Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3639631.3639642acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesacaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Multi-source information comprehensive malicious domain name detection based on convolutional neural network

Published: 16 February 2024 Publication History

Abstract

As the communication carrier of malware, viruses and malicious servers, malicious domain names pose a threat to social public information security. Aiming at the problem that the characteristics of malicious domain names change all the time, which leads to a low accuracy of traditional malicious domain name detection models, this paper proposes a multi-source information comprehensive malicious domain name detection model based on convolutional neural network. Firstly, different types of features in Domain Name System are divided into five categories, and a convolutional neural network framework is designed for each category to reduce the mutual influence between different types of features. Secondly, perform feature extraction is carried out and corresponding weights are trained, and multiple classification results are fused by decision pool to capture information among various features. Finally, the experimental results show that our scheme has higher prediction accuracy than other machine learning algorithms.

References

[1]
China Internet Network Information Center. 49 times China Internet network development state statistic report [EB/OL]. http://www.cnnic.cn/gywm/xwzx/rdxw/20172017_7086/202202/t20220225_71724.htm, 2022-02-25.
[2]
Network Security Information and trends weekly report. The 13th Internet Security Threat Report [EB/OL]. [2018-04-01]. http: / /www. cert. org. cn /publish /main / 44/2018/20180404150414268888501/20180404150414268888501_201html.
[3]
Guangxi YU, Yan ZHANG, Huajun CUI, Xinghua YANG, Yang LI, Chang LIU. Design and Implementation of A DGA Domain Name Detection System by Machine Learning[J].Journal of Cyber Security,2020,5(3):35-47.
[4]
Bo Hong, Guanggang Geng, Liming Wang, Wei Wang, Wei Mao. System to discover phishing attacks actively based on DNS[J]. Computer Application Research, 2013,30(12):3771-3774.
[5]
Congxian Yin. Research and implementation of malicious domain name detection technology based on big Data analysis [D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications,2018.
[6]
Zhao H, Chang Z B, Wang W J, Malicious domain names detection algorithm based on lexical analysis and feature quantification[J].IEEE Access, 2019, 7:128990- 128999.
[7]
Changling ZHOU, Kai CHEN, Xuxiao GONG, Ping CHEN, Hao MA. Detection of Fast-Flux Domains Based on Passive DNS Analysis[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2016, 52(3): 396-402.
[8]
Marques C, Malta S, Magalhães JP. DNS dataset for malicious domains detection. Data Brief. 2021 Sep 4;38:107342. 34541265; PMCID: PMC8437788.
[9]
Weiwei Zhang. Malicious service detection and threat assessment based on DNS activities[D]. Southeast University, 2017.
[10]
Yuzhu Wang. Network traffic anomaly detection method based on combination learning [D]. Yanshan University, 2021. Emily. 2018.
[11]
Ya LIU, Mingjie LIN, Bo QU. Survey on Graph Representation Learning in Cybersecurity Domain. Journal of Chinese Computer Systems. 2023, 44(3): 616-628.
[12]
Xiao Ma; Manchun Cai; Tianliang Lu;. Detection Method of Malicious Domain by DNS Graph Mining Based on Improved BP Algorithm [J]. Journal of People's Public Security University of China (Natural Science Edition), 2021,04:68-73.
[13]
Xiaobao Wu. Research on a mining method on illegal domain names and organizations based on association relationships [D]. Harbin Institute of Technology, 2019.
[14]
Zhenwei Sheng, Guotian Xu. DGA malicious domain name detection method based on fusion of CNN and GRU [J]. Network Security Technology & Application, 2022(12):29-32.
[15]
Haidong Sun. Research on Malicious Domain NameDetection Method based on Deep Learningand Similarity [D]. Chongqing University of Technology, 2022.
[16]
Li V, Dunn M, Pearce P, Reading the tea leaves: a comparative analysis of threat intelligence[C]// USENIX Security Symposium. USENIX Association, 2019.
[17]
Guo M H, Xu T X, Liu J J, Attention mechanisms in computer vision: A survey[J]. Computational visual media, 2022, 8(3): 331-368.
[18]
Luo J H, Wu J. Neural network pruning with residual-connections and limited-data[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2020: 1458-1467.
[19]
Liting Liu. Research on malicious domain name detection based on domain name text features [D]. Guangdong University of Technology, 2022.
[20]
Yi Zhang, Futai Zou. Detection Method of Malicious Domain Name based on Knowledge Map [J]. Communication Technology, 2020,53(01):168-173.
[21]
Yifan Xi, Yang Wang, Yu Zhang. An approach for detecting malicious domain names generated by dictionary-based DGA [J]. Information Security Research, 2022, 8(02): 129-134.

Index Terms

  1. Multi-source information comprehensive malicious domain name detection based on convolutional neural network
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ACAI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 6th International Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Artificial Intelligence
      December 2023
      371 pages
      ISBN:9798400709203
      DOI:10.1145/3639631
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 16 February 2024

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Malicious domain name, Machine learning, Convolutional neural network, Multiple source information
      2. Total threat

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      ACAI 2023

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 173 of 395 submissions, 44%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 208
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)208
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)30
      Reflects downloads up to 14 Dec 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Login options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media