research-article

Automatically Detecting Incompatible Android APIs

Authors:

Mattia Fazzini,

Li LiAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, Volume 33, Issue 1

Article No.: 15, Pages 1 - 33

https://doi.org/10.1145/3624737

Published: 23 November 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Fragmentation is a serious problem in the Android ecosystem, which is mainly caused by the fast evolution of the system itself and the various system customizations. Many efforts have attempted to mitigate its impact via approaches to automatically pinpointing compatibility issues in Android apps. We conducted a literature review to identify all the currently available approaches to addressing this issue. Within the nine identified approaches, the four issue detection tools and one incompatible API harvesting tool could be successfully executed. We tried to reproduce them based on their original datasets and then empirically compared those approaches against common datasets. Our experimental results show that existing tool capabilities are quite distinct with only a small overlap in the compatibility issues being identified. Moreover, these detection tools commonly detect compatibility issues via two separate steps including incompatible APIs gathering and compatibility issues (induced by the incorrect invocations of the identified incompatible APIs) determination. To help developers better identify compatibility issues in Android apps, we developed a new approach, AndroMevol, to systematically spot incompatible APIs as they play a crucial role in issue detection. AndroMevol was able to pinpoint 397,678 incompatible APIs against the full history of the official Android framework and 52 customized Android frameworks spanning five popular device manufacturers. Our approach could enhance the ability of the state-of-the-art detection tools by identifying many more incompatible APIs that may cause compatibility issues in Android apps and foster more advanced approaches to pinpointing all types of compatibility issues.

References

[1]

2021. ACID. Retrieved from https://github.com/TSUMahmud/acid

[2]

2021. ACRyL. Retrieved from https://github.com/intersimone999/acryl

[3]

2021. CiD. Retrieved from https://github.com/lilicoding/CiD

[4]

2021. CIDER. Retrieved from https://github.com/cideranalyzer/cideranalyzer.github.io

[5]

2021. Download Pivot. Retrieved from https://ficissuepivot.github.io/Pivot/

[6]

2021. FicFinder Project Homepage. Retrieved from http://sccpu2.cse.ust.hk/ficfinder/

[7]

2021. IctApiFinder. Retrieved from https://github.com/DongjieHe/IctApiFinder

[8]

2021. OPPO’s Share of Smartphone Shipments Worldwide. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/628545/global-market-share-held-by-oppo-smartphones/

[9]

2022. AnkiDroid. Retrieved from https://github.com/ankidroid/Anki-Android

[10]

2022. Gadgetbridge. Retrieved from https://github.com/Freeyourgadget/Gadgetbridge

[11]

2022. LibreTorrent. Retrieved from https://github.com/proninyaroslav/libretorrent

[12]

2022. Monkey. Retrieved from http://developer.android.com/tools/help/monkey.html

[13]

2022. MozStumbler. Retrieved from https://github.com/mozilla/MozStumbler

[14]

2022. Official Android API Reference. Retrieved from https://developer.android.com/reference

[15]

2022. Oppo firmware update site. Retrieved from https://support.oppo.com/au/software-update/

[16]

2022. Sample Size Calculator. Retrieved from https://www.surveysystem.com/sscalc.htm

[17]

2022. Soot Framework. Retrieved from http://soot-oss.github.io/soot/

[18]

2022. Various firmware hosting site. Retrieved from https://firmwarefile.com/

[19]

2022. Xiaomi firmware update site. Retrieved from https://c.mi.com/global/miuidownload/index

[20]

Serge Abiteboul, Richard Hull, and Victor Vianu. 1995. Foundations of Databases. Vol. 8. Addison-Wesley Reading.

Digital Library

[21]

Steven Arzt, Siegfried Rasthofer, Christian Fritz, Eric Bodden, Alexandre Bartel, Jacques Klein, Yves Le Traon, Damien Octeau, and Patrick McDaniel. 2014. Flowdroid: Precise context, flow, field, object-sensitive and lifecycle-aware taint analysis for android apps. ACM SIGPLAN Not. 49, 6 (2014), 259–269.

Digital Library

[22]

Gabriele Bavota, Mario Linares-Vasquez, Carlos Eduardo Bernal-Cardenas, Massimiliano Di Penta, Rocco Oliveto, and Denys Poshyvanyk. 2014. The impact of api change-and fault-proneness on the user ratings of android apps. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 41, 4 (2014), 384–407.

Digital Library

[23]

Eric Bodden. 2012. Inter-procedural data-flow analysis with ifds/ide and soot. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN International Workshop on State of the Art in Java Program Analysis. 3–8.

Digital Library

[24]

Pearl Brereton, Barbara A. Kitchenham, David Budgen, Mark Turner, and Mohamed Khalil. 2007. Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. J. Syst. Softw. 80, 4 (2007), 571–583.

Digital Library

[25]

Gleison Brito, Andre Hora, Marco Tulio Valente, and Romain Robbes. 2016. Do developers deprecate apis with replacement messages? a large-scale analysis on java systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE 23rd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER’16), Vol. 1. IEEE, 360–369.

[26]

Haipeng Cai, Ziyi Zhang, Li Li, and Xiaoqin Fu. 2019. A large-scale study of application incompatibilities in android. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis. 216–227.

Digital Library

[27]

Lingchao Chen, Foyzul Hassan, Xiaoyin Wang, and Lingming Zhang. 2020. Taming behavioral backward incompatibilities via cross-project testing and analysis. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering. 112–124.

Digital Library

[28]

Mattia Fazzini, Qi Xin, and Alessandro Orso. 2019. Automated API-usage update for android Apps. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 204–215.

Digital Library

[29]

Jeanne Ferrante, Karl J Ottenstein, and Joe D. Warren. 1987. The program dependence graph and its use in optimization. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 9, 3 (1987), 319–349.

Digital Library

[30]

Michael I. Gordon, Deokhwan Kim, Jeff H. Perkins, Limei Gilham, Nguyen Nguyen, and Martin C. Rinard. 2015. Information flow analysis of android applications in droidsafe. In Proceedings of the Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS’15), Vol. 15. 110.

[31]

Todd J. Green, Molham Aref, and Grigoris Karvounarakis. 2012. Logicblox, platform and language: A tutorial. In Datalog in Academia and Industry: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop. Springer, 1–8.

Digital Library

[32]

Dongjie He, Lian Li, Lei Wang, Hengjie Zheng, Guangwei Li, and Jingling Xue. 2018. Understanding and detecting evolution-induced compatibility issues in Android apps. In Proceedings of the 33rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE’18). IEEE, 167–177.

Digital Library

[33]

André Hora, Romain Robbes, Nicolas Anquetil, Anne Etien, Stéphane Ducasse, and Marco Tulio Valente. 2015. How do developers react to API evolution? The Pharo ecosystem case. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME’15). IEEE, 251–260.

Digital Library

[34]

Huaxun Huang, Lili Wei, Yepang Liu, and Shing-Chi Cheung. 2018. Understanding and detecting callback compatibility issues for android applications. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering. 532–542.

Digital Library

[35]

Hong Jin Kang, Ferdian Thung, Julia Lawall, Gilles Muller, Lingxiao Jiang, and David Lo. 2019. Semantic patches for Java program transformation (experience report). In Proceedings of the 33rd European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP’19). Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik.

[36]

Staffs Keele et al. 2007. Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Technical Report. Citeseer.

[37]

Taeyeon Ki, Chang Min Park, Karthik Dantu, Steven Y. Ko, and Lukasz Ziarek. 2019. Mimic: UI compatibility testing system for Android apps. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’19). IEEE, 246–256.

Digital Library

[38]

Pingfan Kong, Li Li, Jun Gao, Kui Liu, Tegawendé F Bissyandé, and Jacques Klein. 2018. Automated testing of android apps: A systematic literature review. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 68, 1 (2018), 45–66.

[39]

Julia Lawall and Gilles Muller. 2018. Coccinelle: 10 years of automated evolution in the Linux kernel. In Proceedings of the USENIX Annual Technical Conference (USENIX ATC’18). 601–614.

[40]

Li Li, Alexandre Bartel, Tegawendé F. Bissyandé, Jacques Klein, Yves Le Traon, Steven Arzt, Siegfried Rasthofer, Eric Bodden, Damien Octeau, and Patrick McDaniel. 2015. Iccta: Detecting inter-component privacy leaks in android apps. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, Vol. 1. IEEE, 280–291.

[41]

Li Li, Tegawendé F Bissyandé, and Jacques Klein. 2018. MoonlightBox: Mining android api histories for uncovering release-time inconsistencies. In Proceedings of the 29th IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE’18).

[42]

Li Li, Tegawendé F Bissyandé, Yves Le Traon, and Jacques Klein. 2016. Accessing inaccessible android APIs: An empirical study. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME’16).

[43]

Li Li, Tegawendé F Bissyandé, Damien Octeau, and Jacques Klein. 2016. DroidRA: Taming reflection to support whole-program analysis of android Apps. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA’16).

Digital Library

[44]

Li Li, Tegawendé F Bissyandé, Mike Papadakis, Siegfried Rasthofer, Alexandre Bartel, Damien Octeau, Jacques Klein, and Yves Le Traon. 2017. Static analysis of android Apps: A systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. (2017).

Digital Library

[45]

Li Li, Tegawendé F Bissyandé, Haoyu Wang, and Jacques Klein. 2018. Cid: Automating the detection of api-related compatibility issues in android apps. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis. 153–163.

Digital Library

[46]

Li Li, Jun Gao, Tegawendé F. Bissyandé, Lei Ma, Xin Xia, and Jacques Klein. 2018. Characterising deprecated android apis. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories. 254–264.

Digital Library

[47]

Li Li, Jun Gao, Tegawendé F. Bissyandé, Lei Ma, Xin Xia, and Jacques Klein. 2020. Cda: Characterising deprecated android apis. Empir. Softw. Eng. (2020), 1–41.

[48]

Mario Linares-Vásquez, Gabriele Bavota, Carlos Bernal-Cárdenas, Massimiliano Di Penta, Rocco Oliveto, and Denys Poshyvanyk. 2013. API change and fault proneness: A threat to the success of android Apps. In Proceedings of the 9th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering. ACM, 477–487.

Digital Library

[49]

Pei Liu, Mattia Fazzini, John Grundy, and Li Li. 2022. Do customized android frameworks keep pace with android? In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR’22).

Digital Library

[50]

Pei Liu, Li Li, Yichun Yan, Mattia Fazzini, and John Grundy. 2021. Identifying and characterizing silently-evolved methods in the android API. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, SEIP Track (ICSE-SEIP’21).

Digital Library

[51]

Pei Liu, Yanjie Zhao, Haipeng Cai, Mattia Fazzini, John Grundy, and Li Li. 2022. Automatically detecting api-induced compatibility issues in android Apps: A comparative analysis (replicability studies). In Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA’22).

Digital Library

[52]

Yue Liu, Chakkrit Tantithamthavorn, Li Li, and Yepang Liu. 2021. Deep learning for android malware defenses: A systematic literature review. arXiv:2103.05292. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.05292

[53]

Tarek Mahmud, Meiru Che, and Guowei Yang. 2021. Android compatibility issue detection using API differences. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER’21). IEEE, 480–490.

[54]

Tyler McDonnell, Baishakhi Ray, and Miryung Kim. 2013. An empirical study of api stability and adoption in the android ecosystem. In Proceedings of the 29th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance. IEEE, 70–79.

Digital Library

[55]

Marco Mobilio, Oliviero Riganelli, Daniela Micucci, and Leonardo Mariani. 2020. FILO: FIx-LOcus localization for backward incompatibilities caused by Android framework upgrades. In Proceedings of the 35th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering. 1292–1296.

Digital Library

[56]

Sebastian Nielebock, Paul Blockhaus, Jacob Krüger, and Frank Ortmeier. 2021. AndroidCompass: A dataset of android compatibility checks in code repositories. arXiv:2103.09620. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.09620

[57]

Lina Qiu, Yingying Wang, and Julia Rubin. 2018. Analyzing the analyzers: Flowdroid/iccta, amandroid, and droidsafe. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis. 176–186.

Digital Library

[58]

Romain Robbes, Mircea Lungu, and David Röthlisberger. 2012. How do developers react to API deprecation? The case of a Smalltalk ecosystem. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT 20th International Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering. 1–11.

Digital Library

[59]

Reudismam Rolim, Gustavo Soares, Loris D’Antoni, Oleksandr Polozov, Sumit Gulwani, Rohit Gheyi, Ryo Suzuki, and Björn Hartmann. 2017. Learning syntactic program transformations from examples. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’17). IEEE, 404–415.

Digital Library

[60]

Anand Ashok Sawant, Romain Robbes, and Alberto Bacchelli. 2018. On the reaction to deprecation of clients of 4+ 1 popular Java APIs and the JDK. Empir. Softw. Eng. 23, 4 (2018), 2158–2197.

Digital Library

[61]

Simone Scalabrino, Gabriele Bavota, Mario Linares-Vásquez, Michele Lanza, and Rocco Oliveto. 2019. Data-driven solutions to detect api compatibility issues in android: An empirical study. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 16th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR’19). IEEE, 288–298.

Digital Library

[62]

Simone Scalabrino, Gabriele Bavota, Mario Linares-Vásquez, Valentina Piantadosi, Michele Lanza, and Rocco Oliveto. 2020. API compatibility issues in Android: Causes and effectiveness of data-driven detection techniques. Empir. Softw. Eng. 25, 6 (2020), 5006–5046.

Digital Library

[63]

Md. Shamsujjoha, John Grundy, Li Li, Hourieh Khalajzadeh, and Qinghua Lu. 2021. Developing mobile applications via model driven development: A systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. (2021).

Digital Library

[64]

Yannis Smaragdakis and Martin Bravenboer. 2011. Using Datalog for fast and easy program analysis. In Datalog Reloaded: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop (Datalog’10). Springer, 245–251.

Digital Library

[65]

Ting Su, Jue Wang, and Zhendong Su. 2021. Benchmarking automated GUI testing for Android against real-world bugs. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering. 119–130.

Digital Library

[66]

Xiaoyu Sun, Li Li, Tegawendé F. Bissyandé, Jacques Klein, Damien Octeau, and John Grundy. 2020. Taming reflection: An essential step towards whole-program analysis of android Apps. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. (2020).

[67]

Raja Vallée-Rai, Phong Co, Etienne Gagnon, Laurie Hendren, Patrick Lam, and Vijay Sundaresan. 2010. Soot: A Java bytecode optimization framework. In CASCON First Decade High Impact Papers. 214–224.

Digital Library

[68]

Haoyu Wang, Hongxuan Liu, Xusheng Xiao, Guozhu Meng, and Yao Guo. 2019. Characterizing Android app signing issues. In Proceedings of the 34th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE’19). IEEE, 280–292.

Digital Library

[69]

Fengguo Wei, Sankardas Roy, and Xinming Ou. 2014. Amandroid: A precise and general inter-component data flow analysis framework for security vetting of android apps. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. 1329–1341.

Digital Library

[70]

Fengguo Wei, Sankardas Roy, and Xinming Ou. 2018. Amandroid: A precise and general inter-component data flow analysis framework for security vetting of android apps. ACM Trans. Priv. Secur. 21, 3 (2018), 1–32.

Digital Library

[71]

Lili Wei, Yepang Liu, and Shing-Chi Cheung. 2016. Taming Android fragmentation: Characterizing and detecting compatibility issues for Android apps. In Proceedings of the 31st IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering. 226–237.

Digital Library

[72]

Lili Wei, Yepang Liu, and Shing-Chi Cheung. 2019. Pivot: Learning api-device correlations to facilitate android compatibility issue detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’19). IEEE, 878–888.

Digital Library

[73]

Lili Wei, Yepang Liu, Shing-Chi Cheung, Huaxun Huang, Xuan Lu, and Xuanzhe Liu. 2018. Understanding and detecting fragmentation-induced compatibility issues for android apps. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 46, 11 (2018), 1176–1199.

[74]

Hao Xia, Yuan Zhang, Yingtian Zhou, Xiaoting Chen, Yang Wang, Xiangyu Zhang, Shuaishuai Cui, Geng Hong, Xiaohan Zhang, Min Yang, et al. 2020. How Android developers handle evolution-induced API compatibility issues: A large-scale study. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’20). IEEE, 886–898.

Digital Library

[75]

Guowei Yang, Jeffrey Jones, Austin Moninger, and Meiru Che. 2018. How do android operating system updates impact Apps?. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 10th International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and Systems (MobileSoft’18). ACM, New York, NY, 156–160.

Digital Library

[76]

Shishuai Yang, Rui Li, Jiongyi Chen, Wenrui Diao, and Shanqing Guo. 2022. Demystifying android non-SDK APls: Measurement and understanding. In 2022 IEEE/ACM 44th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’22), IEEE Computer Society, 647–658.

[77]

Shengqian Yang, Dacong Yan, Haowei Wu, Yan Wang, and Atanas Rountev. 2015. Static control-flow analysis of user-driven callbacks in Android applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, Vol. 1. IEEE, 89–99.

[78]

Xian Zhan, Tianming Liu, Lingling Fan, Li Li, Sen Chen, Xiapu Luo, and Yang Liu. 2021. Research on third-party libraries in Android Apps: A taxonomy and systematic literature review. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. (2021).

[79]

Yanjie Zhao, Li Li, Kui Liu, and John Grundy. 2022. Towards automatically repairing compatibility issues in published android Apps. In Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’22).

Digital Library

[80]

Jing Zhou and Robert J. Walker. 2016. API deprecation: A retrospective analysis and detection method for code examples on the web. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering. 266–277.

Digital Library

Cited By

Kuroishi PPaiva AMaldonado JVincenzi A(2025)Testing infrastructures to support mobile application testing: A systematic mapping studyInformation and Software Technology10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107573177(107573)Online publication date: Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107573
Zhao YZhang YWang HLin ZLiao X(2023)Potential Risks Arising from the Absence of Signature Verification in Miniapp PluginsProceedings of the 2023 ACM Workshop on Secure and Trustworthy Superapps10.1145/3605762.3624433(59-64)Online publication date: 26-Nov-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3605762.3624433

Index Terms

Automatically Detecting Incompatible Android APIs
1. Software and its engineering
  1. Software creation and management
    1. Software verification and validation
      1. Software defect analysis
        Software testing and debugging

Recommendations

Towards automatically repairing compatibility issues in published Android apps
ICSE '22: Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering

The heavy fragmentation of the Android ecosystem has led to severe compatibility issues with apps, including those that crash at runtime or cannot be installed on certain devices but work well on other devices. To address this problem, various approaches ...
Automatically detecting API-induced compatibility issues in Android apps: a comparative analysis (replicability study)
ISSTA 2022: Proceedings of the 31st ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis

Fragmentation is a serious problem in the Android ecosystem. This problem is mainly caused by the fast evolution of the system itself and the various customizations independently maintained by different smartphone manufacturers. Many efforts have ...
CiD4HMOS: A Solution to HarmonyOS Compatibility Issues
ASE '23: Proceedings of the 38th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering

HarmonyOS is an operating system boasting a substantial global user base and provides multiple versions of its SDK. Various open-source applications continue to utilize older versions, leading to compatibility issues arising from system constraints. ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology

ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology Volume 33, Issue 1

January 2024

933 pages

EISSN:1557-7392

DOI:10.1145/3613536

Editor:
Mauro Pezzè
USI Universitá della Svizzera italiana and SIT Schaffhausen Institute of Technology, Switzerland

Issue’s Table of Contents

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 November 2023

Online AM: 18 September 2023

Accepted: 10 July 2023

Revised: 27 June 2023

Received: 06 August 2022

Published in TOSEM Volume 33, Issue 1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

Australian Research Council (ARC) under a Laureate Fellowship project
Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (DECRA) project
Discovery project

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
433
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)328
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)42

Reflects downloads up to 16 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Kuroishi PPaiva AMaldonado JVincenzi A(2025)Testing infrastructures to support mobile application testing: A systematic mapping studyInformation and Software Technology10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107573177(107573)Online publication date: Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107573
Zhao YZhang YWang HLin ZLiao X(2023)Potential Risks Arising from the Absence of Signature Verification in Miniapp PluginsProceedings of the 2023 ACM Workshop on Secure and Trustworthy Superapps10.1145/3605762.3624433(59-64)Online publication date: 26-Nov-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3605762.3624433

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View full text|Download PDF

View Issue’s Table of Contents