Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3616961.3617803acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmindtrekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Sustainable, inclusive city-making through smart, playable environments: developing and testing the CO2rdinates pervasive mobile game

Published: 02 November 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Human activity, economic and non-economic, is a core driver of global climate change. With urban areas as the epicentre of human activity, cities are simultaneously the greatest contributors and the best opportunities for addressing global climate change and sustaining – even enhancing – planetary wellbeing. Therefore, city-based, stakeholder-inclusive, and evidence-informed solutions could constitute a meaningful inquiry for sustainable development. Enduring, evolving, and emerging concepts of civic engagement, smart urbanism, and urban play demonstrate such promise, albeit with several caveats. This study investigates the use of gamified, digital tools in supporting the co-creation of more sustainable cities, through a systematic review, a structured precedent analysis, as well as a small group app trial and playtest of a mobile pervasive game called CO2rdinates. CO2rdinates is developed as a hybrid tool combining climate action, citizen participation, smart city technology, and playability, and proposed as a part of a holistic response to urban sustainability challenges. Participants of the app trial were generally supportive of the development of gamified tools for co-creating sustainable cities, and most felt that the CO2rdinates app could motivate and facilitate them in doing so. Several participants further expressed that the app could integrate into a wider campaign to promote sustainability awareness and action. However, the study also highlighted key challenges in the use of the CO2rdinates app, and, more broadly, the deployment of gamified digital tools for sustainability-informed, playful, and participatory city-making processes. These include a better integration of the three challenges in the CO2rdinates gameplay, and concerns about potential disputes among stakeholders. This study demonstrates that gamified digital participatory tools can constitute an empathetic, effective response to urban sustainability challenges through stimulating curiosity and learning, as well as facilitating action. There is scope for future work to integrate a wider range of stakeholders in the app trial and development, and to create more cohesively integrated yet inclusively varied game architectures and narratives. Strategies to mitigate, or even facilitate mutual learning from, conflicting views and interests, are also important future considerations.

Supplementary Material

Poster (A0 printout) Walkthrough of the early prototype (pretotype) of the CO2rdinates mobile application, with user interface (UI) notes (A3 PowerPoint slide deck) Screenshots of the CO2rdinates mobile application prototype used in the app trial (A3 PowerPoint slide deck) User journey map for the CO2rdinates mobile application (A3 sheet) Participant responses during the app trial, with and without the app (A4 handout) Participant questionnaire responses (A4 handout) (CO2rdinates app trial user journey.pdf)
Poster (A0 printout) Walkthrough of the early prototype (pretotype) of the CO2rdinates mobile application, with user interface (UI) notes (A3 PowerPoint slide deck) Screenshots of the CO2rdinates mobile application prototype used in the app trial (A3 PowerPoint slide deck) User journey map for the CO2rdinates mobile application (A3 sheet) Participant responses during the app trial, with and without the app (A4 handout) Participant questionnaire responses (A4 handout) (CO2rdinates app trial_comparison of responses with and without app.pdf)
Poster (A0 printout) Walkthrough of the early prototype (pretotype) of the CO2rdinates mobile application, with user interface (UI) notes (A3 PowerPoint slide deck) Screenshots of the CO2rdinates mobile application prototype used in the app trial (A3 PowerPoint slide deck) User journey map for the CO2rdinates mobile application (A3 sheet) Participant responses during the app trial, with and without the app (A4 handout) Participant questionnaire responses (A4 handout) (CO2rdinates app trial questionnaire_responses overview.pdf)
Poster (A0 printout) Walkthrough of the early prototype (pretotype) of the CO2rdinates mobile application, with user interface (UI) notes (A3 PowerPoint slide deck) Screenshots of the CO2rdinates mobile application prototype used in the app trial (A3 PowerPoint slide deck) User journey map for the CO2rdinates mobile application (A3 sheet) Participant responses during the app trial, with and without the app (A4 handout) Participant questionnaire responses (A4 handout) (Poster portrait A0.pdf)
Poster (A0 printout) Walkthrough of the early prototype (pretotype) of the CO2rdinates mobile application, with user interface (UI) notes (A3 PowerPoint slide deck) Screenshots of the CO2rdinates mobile application prototype used in the app trial (A3 PowerPoint slide deck) User journey map for the CO2rdinates mobile application (A3 sheet) Participant responses during the app trial, with and without the app (A4 handout) Participant questionnaire responses (A4 handout) (CO2rdinates mobile app walkthrough with UI notes.pdf)
Poster (A0 printout) Walkthrough of the early prototype (pretotype) of the CO2rdinates mobile application, with user interface (UI) notes (A3 PowerPoint slide deck) Screenshots of the CO2rdinates mobile application prototype used in the app trial (A3 PowerPoint slide deck) User journey map for the CO2rdinates mobile application (A3 sheet) Participant responses during the app trial, with and without the app (A4 handout) Participant questionnaire responses (A4 handout) (Prototype screenshots.pdf)

References

[1]
Frank Ackerman and Lisa Heinzerling. 2002. Pricing the Priceless: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Environmental Protection. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 150, 5: 1553. https://doi.org/10.2307/3312947
[2]
W Neil Adger, Katrina Brown, Jenny Fairbrass, Andrew Jordan, Jouni Paavola, Sergio Rosendo, and Gill Seyfang. 2003. Governance for Sustainability: Towards a ‘Thick’ Analysis of Environmental Decisionmaking. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 35, 6: 1095–1110. https://doi.org/10.1068/a35289
[3]
Maria Beatrice Andreucci, Antonino Marvuglia, Milen Baltov, and Preben Hansen (eds.). 2021. Rethinking Sustainability Towards a Regenerative Economy. Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71819-0
[4]
Marvin Andujar, Anton Nijholt, and Juan E. Gilbert. 2017. Mobile Augmented Games in Playable Cities: Humorous Interaction with Pokémon Go. In Distributed, Ambient and Pervasive Interactions, Norbert Streitz and Panos Markopoulos (eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58697-7_43
[5]
Adam P. Balcerzak, Elvira Nica, Elżbieta Rogalska, Miloš Poliak, Tomáš Klieštik, and Oana-Matilda Sabie. 2022. Blockchain Technology and Smart Contracts in Decentralized Governance Systems. Administrative Sciences 12, 3: 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12030096
[6]
Vincent Blok, Bart Gremmen, and Renate Wesselink. 2016. Dealing with the Wicked Problem of Sustainability: The Role of Individual Virtuous Competence. Business and Professional Ethics Journal. https://doi.org/10.5840/bpej201621737
[7]
Inge Blom, Laure Itard, and Arjen Meijer. 2011. Environmental impact of building-related and user-related energy consumption in dwellings. Building and Environment 46, 8: 1657–1669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.02.002
[8]
Peter Blundell-Jones (ed.). 2009. Architecture and participation. Taylor & Francis, London.
[9]
Samuel Bowles. 2012. The New Economics of Inequality and Redistribution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139012980
[10]
Rebekah R. Brown, Ana Deletic, and Tony H. F. Wong. 2015. Interdisciplinarity: How to catalyse collaboration. Nature 525, 7569: 315–317. https://doi.org/10.1038/525315a
[11]
. Gro Harlem Brundtland. 1987. Our Common Future—Call for Action. Environmental Conservation 14, 4: 291–294. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900016805
[12]
Roger Caillois, Meyer Barash, and Roger Caillois. 2001. Man, play, and games. Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana, Ill.
[13]
Larry W. Canter. 2018. Environmental Impact of Agricultural Production Activities. CRC Press.
[14]
Michael X. Delli Carpini, Fay Lomax Cook, and Lawrence R. Jacobs. 2004. Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science 7, 1: 315–344. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630
[15]
Christos G. Cassandras. 2016. Smart Cities as Cyber-Physical Social Systems. Engineering 2, 2: 156–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2016.02.012
[16]
Yu-Kai Chou. 2016. Actionable gamification: beyond points, badges, and leaderboards. Octalysis Media, Fremont, CA.
[17]
Paul Coulton, Jonny Huck, Adrian Gradinar, and Lara Salinas. 2017. Mapping the Beach Beneath the Street: Digital Cartography for the Playable City. In Playable Cities, Anton Nijholt (ed.). Springer Singapore, Singapore, 137–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1962-3_7
[18]
Robert Cowley and Federico Caprotti. 2019. Smart city as anti-planning in the UK. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 37, 3: 428–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775818787506
[19]
Lidija Čuček, Jiří Jaromír Klemeš, and Zdravko Kravanja. 2012. A Review of Footprint analysis tools for monitoring impacts on sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production 34: 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.036
[20]
Michiel De Lange, Kåre Synnes, and Gerald Leindecker. 2019. Smart Citizens in the Hackable City: On the Datafication, Playfulness, and Making of Urban Public Spaces Through Digital Art. In CyberParks – The Interface Between People, Places and Technology, Carlos Smaniotto Costa, Ina Šuklje Erjavec, Therese Kenna, Michiel De Lange, Konstantinos Ioannidis, Gabriela Maksymiuk and Martijn De Waal (eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13417-4_13
[21]
Fabian Dembski, Uwe Wössner, Mike Letzgus, Michael Ruddat, and Claudia Yamu. 2020. Urban Digital Twins for Smart Cities and Citizens: The Case Study of Herrenberg, Germany. Sustainability 12, 6: 2307. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062307
[22]
Simone Des Roches, Kristien I. Brans, Max R. Lambert, L. Ruth Rivkin, Amy Marie Savage, Christopher J. Schell, Cristian Correa, Luc De Meester, Sarah E. Diamond, Nancy B. Grimm, Nyeema C. Harris, Lynn Govaert, Andrew P. Hendry, Marc T. J. Johnson, Jason Munshi‐South, Eric P. Palkovacs, Marta Szulkin, Mark C. Urban, Brian C. Verrelli, and Marina Alberti. 2021. Socio‐eco‐evolutionary dynamics in cities. Evolutionary Applications 14, 1: 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.13065
[23]
Kevin C. Desouza and Akshay Bhagwatwar. 2014. Technology-Enabled Participatory Platforms for Civic Engagement: The Case of U.S. Cities. Journal of Urban Technology 21, 4: 25–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.954898
[24]
Sebastian Deterding, Dan Dixon, Rilla Khaled, and Lennart Nacke. 2011. From game design elements to gamefulness: defining “gamification.” In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
[25]
Rachel Emas. 2015. The concept of sustainable development: definition and defining principles. Brief for GSDR 2015. https://doi.org/10-13140
[26]
Siri H. Eriksen and Katrina Brown. 2011. Sustainable adaptation to climate change: prioritising social equity and environmental integrity. Earthscan, London.
[27]
Francesca Esses. 2023. About. Hello Lamp Post. Retrieved September 26, 2023 from https://www.hlp.city/
[28]
Brian D. Fath, Daniel A. Fiscus, Sally J. Goerner, Anamaria Berea, and Robert E. Ulanowicz. 2019. Measuring regenerative economics: 10 principles and measures undergirding systemic economic health. Global Transitions 1: 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2019.02.002
[29]
Michael Fernandez, Peter G. Boyd, Thomas D. Daff, Mohammad Zein Aghaji, and Tom K. Woo. 2014. Rapid and Accurate Machine Learning Recognition of High Performing Metal Organic Frameworks for CO 2 Capture. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 5, 17: 3056–3060. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz501331m
[30]
Ruth Fincher and Jane M. Jacobs (eds.). 1998. Cities of difference. Guilford Press, New York, NY.
[31]
Joern Fischer, Robert Dyball, Ioan Fazey, Catherine Gross, Stephen Dovers, Paul R Ehrlich, Robert J Brulle, Carleton Christensen, and Richard J Borden. 2012. Human behavior and sustainability. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10, 3: 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1890/110079
[32]
Richard T. T. Forman. 2014. Urban ecology: science of cities. Cambridge University Press, New York.
[33]
Robert Frodeman, Julie Thompson Klein, and Roberto C. S. Pacheco (eds.). 2017. The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
[34]
Masahisa Fujita, Paul Krugman, and Anthony J. Venables. 1999. The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6389.001.0001
[35]
Bernardo Alves (Editor) Furtado, Patrícia Alessandra Morita (Editora) Sakowski, and Marina Haddad (Editora) Tóvolli. 2015. Modeling complex systems for public policies. http://www.ipea.gov.br. Retrieved September 28, 2023 from https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/4051
[36]
Martin Geissdoerfer, Paulo Savaget, Nancy M.P. Bocken, and Erik Jan Hultink. 2017. The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production 143: 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
[37]
Robert Goodland. 1995. The Concept of Environmental Sustainability. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26, 1: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.26.110195.000245
[38]
Kannan Govindan and Hamed Soleimani. 2017. A review of reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chains: a Journal of Cleaner Production focus. Journal of Cleaner Production 142: 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.126
[39]
Nancy B. Grimm, Stanley H. Faeth, Nancy E. Golubiewski, Charles L. Redman, Jianguo Wu, Xuemei Bai, and John M. Briggs. 2008. Global Change and the Ecology of Cities. Science 319, 5864: 756–760. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150195
[40]
M. Grubb. 2004. Technology Innovation and Climate Change Policy: an overview of issues and options. Keio Economic Studies 41, 2: 103–132.
[41]
Lobna Hassan and Mattia Thibault. 2020. Critical Playable Cities. In Making Smart Cities More Playable, Anton Nijholt (ed.). Springer Singapore, Singapore, 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9765-3_4
[42]
J. Huizinga. 2014. Homo Ludens Ils 86. Routledge.
[43]
Lady Allen of Hurtwood. 1971. Planning for Play. Thames & Hudson, London, UK.
[44]
Ronald Inglehart. 1995. Public Support for Environmental Protection: Objective Problems and Subjective Values in 43 Societies. PS: Political Science & Politics 28, 1: 57–72. https://doi.org/10.2307/420583
[45]
Troy Innocent. 2019. Playable Cities Now. DiGRA Conference Proceedings 2019. Retrieved from https://digraa.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/DIGRAA_2019_paper_26.pdf
[46]
. IPCC. 2023. Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. A Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Geneva, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647
[47]
Dale Jamieson. 2020. Ethics and Intentional Climate Change. In The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy (1st ed.), Andrew Maynard and Jack Stilgoe (eds.). Routledge, 247–260. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003075028-16
[48]
Michael C. Jensen. 2009. Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function. In U.S. Corporate Governance, Donald H. Chew and Stuart L. Gillan (eds.). Columbia University Press, 3–25. https://doi.org/10.7312/chew14856-001
[49]
Julian Kirchherr, Denise Reike, and Marko Hekkert. 2017. Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 127: 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
[50]
Pierre Kohler. 2015. Redistributive Policies for Sustainable Development: Looking at the Role of Assets and Equity. https://doi.org/10.18356/787cb9be-en
[51]
Anja Kollmuss and Julian Agyeman. 2002. Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research 8, 3: 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
[52]
Michael E. Kraft. 2001. Environmental policy and politics. Longman, New York.
[53]
Alan Latham and Jack Layton. 2019. Social infrastructure and the public life of cities: Studying urban sociality and public spaces. Geography Compass 13, 7: e12444. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12444
[54]
Julian Laufs, Hervé Borrion, and Ben Bradford. 2020. Security and the smart city: A systematic review. Sustainable Cities and Society 55: 102023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102023
[55]
Markku Lehtonen. 2004. The environmental–social interface of sustainable development: capabilities, social capital, institutions. Ecological Economics 49, 2: 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.03.019
[56]
Anthony M. Levenda, Noel Keough, Melanie Rock, and Byron Miller. 2020. Rethinking public participation in the smart city. Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes 64, 3: 344–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12601
[57]
Mark J. McDonnell and Ian MacGregor-Fors. 2016. The ecological future of cities. Science 352, 6288: 936–938. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf3630
[58]
Justice Mensah. 2019. Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review. Cogent Social Sciences 5, 1: 1653531. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1653531
[59]
John H. Mollenkopf. 1983. The contested city. Princeton Univ. Pr, Princeton, NJ.
[60]
Andres Monzon. 2015. Smart Cities Concept and Challenges: Bases for the Assessment of Smart City Projects. In Smart Cities, Green Technologies, and Intelligent Transport Systems, Markus Helfert, Karl-Heinz Krempels, Cornel Klein, Brian Donellan and Oleg Guiskhin (eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27753-0_2
[61]
Piero Morseletto. 2020. Restorative and regenerative: Exploring the concepts in the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology 24, 4: 763–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12987
[62]
Huong Thu Nguyen, Pilar Marques, and Paul Benneworth. 2022. Living labs: Challenging and changing the smart city power relations? Technological Forecasting and Social Change 183: 121866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121866
[63]
Jakob Nielsen. 1994. Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems celebrating interdependence - CHI ’94, 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1145/191666.191729
[64]
Anton Nijholt (ed.). 2017. Playable Cities: The City as a Digital Playground. Springer Singapore: Imprint: Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1962-3
[65]
Anton Nijholt. 2017. Towards Playful and Playable Cities. In Playable Cities, Anton Nijholt (ed.). Springer Singapore, Singapore, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1962-3_1
[66]
Anton Nijholt. 2017. Mischief Humor in Smart and Playable Cities. In Playable Cities, Anton Nijholt (ed.). Springer Singapore, Singapore, 235–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1962-3_11
[67]
Anton Nijholt. 2017. Humans as Avatars in Smart and Playable Cities. In 2017 International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW), 190–193. https://doi.org/10.1109/CW.2017.23
[68]
Valentina Nisi, Catia Prandi, and Nuno Jardim Nunes. 2020. Towards Eco-Centric Interaction: Urban Playful Interventions in the Anthropocene. In Making Smart Cities More Playable, Anton Nijholt (ed.). Springer Singapore, Singapore, 235–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9765-3_11
[69]
Amparo Novo Vázquez and María Rosalía Vicente. 2019. Exploring the Determinants of e-Participation in Smart Cities. In E-Participation in Smart Cities: Technologies and Models of Governance for Citizen Engagement. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89474-4_8
[70]
Y. Oswald, J.K. Steinberger, D. Ivanova, and J. Millward-Hopkins. 2021. Global redistribution of income and household energy footprints: a computational thought experiment. Global Sustainability 4: e4. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2021.1
[71]
Theodore Panayotou. 2020. 14. Economic Growth and the Environment. In The Environment in Anthropology (Second Edition), Nora Haenn, Allison Harnish and Richard Wilk (eds.). New York University Press, 140–148. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479862689.003.0018
[72]
Peter-Paul Pichler, Ingram S. Jaccard, Ulli Weisz, and Helga Weisz. 2019. International comparison of health care carbon footprints. Environmental Research Letters 14, 6: 064004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab19e1
[73]
S. T. A. Pickett, M. L. Cadenasso, J. M. Grove, C. H. Nilon, R. V. Pouyat, W. C. Zipperer, and R. Costanza. 2001. Urban Ecological Systems: Linking Terrestrial Ecological, Physical, and Socioeconomic Components of Metropolitan Areas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32, 1: 127–157. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114012
[74]
Sofie Pilemalm. 2018. Participatory Design in Emerging Civic Engagement Initiatives in the New Public Sector: Applying PD Concepts in Resource-Scarce Organizations. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 25, 1: 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152420
[75]
J. Poore and T. Nemecek. 2018. Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science 360, 6392: 987–992. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0216
[76]
Jonathan Pryshlakivsky and Cory Searcy. 2013. Sustainable Development as a Wicked Problem. In Managing and Engineering in Complex Situations, Samuel F. Kovacic and Andres Sousa-Poza (eds.). Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5515-4_6
[77]
Antonio Puliafito, Giuseppe Tricomi, Anastasios Zafeiropoulos, and Symeon Papavassiliou. 2021. Smart Cities of the Future as Cyber Physical Systems: Challenges and Enabling Technologies. Sensors 21, 10: 3349. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21103349
[78]
Madeleine E. Pullman, Michael J. Maloni, and Craig R. Carter. 2009. Food for Thought: Social Versus Environmental Sustainability Practices and Performance Outcomes. Journal of Supply Chain Management 45, 4: 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2009.03175.x
[79]
Ben Purvis, Yong Mao, and Darren Robinson. 2019. Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science 14, 3: 681–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5
[80]
Kate Raworth. 2017. Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st century economist. Chelsea Green Publishing, White River Junction, Vermont.
[81]
Sokwoo Rhee. 2016. Catalyzing the Internet of Things and smart cities: Global City Teams Challenge. In 2016 1st International Workshop on Science of Smart City Operations and Platforms Engineering (SCOPE) in partnership with Global City Teams Challenge (GCTC) (SCOPE - GCTC), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/SCOPE.2016.7515058
[82]
Horst W. J. Rittel and Melvin M. Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4, 2: 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
[83]
Taylor Shelton and Thomas Lodato. 2019. Actually existing smart citizens: Expertise and (non)participation in the making of the smart city. City 23, 1: 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2019.1575115
[84]
Bhagya Silva, Murad Khan, Changsu Jung, Jihun Seo, Diyan Muhammad, Jihun Han, Yongtak Yoon, and Kijun Han. 2018. Urban Planning and Smart City Decision Management Empowered by Real-Time Data Processing Using Big Data Analytics. Sensors 18, 9: 2994. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18092994
[85]
Bhagya Nathali Silva, Murad Khan, and Kijun Han. 2018. Towards sustainable smart cities: A review of trends, architectures, components, and open challenges in smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society 38: 697–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.053
[86]
Jung-Eun Son, So-Hyun Lee, Eun-Young Cho, and Hee-Woong Kim. 2016. Examining online citizenship behaviours in social network sites: a social capital perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology 35, 9: 730–747. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1143032
[87]
André Sorensen and Carolin Funck (eds.). 2007. Living cities in Japan: citizens’ movements, machizukuri and local environments. Routledge, London.
[88]
Walter R. Stahel. 2016. The circular economy. Nature 531, 7595: 435–438. https://doi.org/10.1038/531435a
[89]
Kris Steen and Ellen van Bueren. 2017. Urban Living Labs: A living lab way of working. Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Metropolitan Solutions (AMS)Amsterdam. Retrieved September 28, 2023 from http://www.ams-institute.org/solution/urban-living-labs-2/
[90]
Michael Storper. 2013. Keys to the City: How Economics, Institutions, Social Interaction, and Politics Shape Development. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400846269
[91]
Xinlu Sun, Zhifu Mi, Andrew Sudmant, D'Maris Coffman, Pu Yang, and Richard Wood. 2022. Using crowdsourced data to estimate the carbon footprints of global cities. Advances in Applied Energy 8: 100111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adapen.2022.100111
[92]
P. Van Waart, I. J. Mulder, and C. De Bont. 2015. Participatory prototyping for future cities. PIN-C 2015: Proceedings of the 4th Participatory Innovation Conference 2015: Reframing design, The Hague, The Netherlands, 18-20 May, 2015. Eds.: Rianne Valkenburg, Coen Dekkers and Janneke Sluijs. Retrieved September 28, 2023 from https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid%3A20b30d6f-0a58-40f5-9e81-774614c7722e
[93]
Gabriela Viale Pereira, Maria Alexandra Cunha, Thomas J. Lampoltshammer, Peter Parycek, and Maurício Gregianin Testa. 2017. Increasing collaboration and participation in smart city governance: a cross-case analysis of smart city initiatives. Information Technology for Development 23, 3: 526–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1353946
[94]
T. M. Vinod Kumar. 2015. E-Governance for Smart Cities. In E-Governance for Smart Cities, T. M. Vinod Kumar (ed.). Springer Singapore, Singapore, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-287-6_1
[95]
T. M. Vinod Kumar and Bharat Dahiya. 2017. Smart Economy in Smart Cities. In Smart Economy in Smart Cities: International Collaborative Research: Ottawa, St.Louis, Stuttgart, Bologna, Cape Town, Nairobi, Dakar, Lagos, New Delhi, Varanasi, Vijayawada, Kozhikode, Hong Kong, T. M. Vinod Kumar (ed.). Springer, Singapore, 3–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1610-3_1
[96]
Madhu Viswanathan, Kiju Jung, Srinivas Venugopal, Ishva Minefee, and In Woo Jung. 2014. Subsistence and Sustainability: From Micro-Level Behavioral Insights to Macro-Level Implications on Consumption, Conservation, and the Environment. Journal of Macromarketing 34, 1: 8–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146713499351
[97]
Robert O. Vos. 2007. Defining sustainability: a conceptual orientation. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology 82, 4: 334–339. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.1675
[98]
Eetu Wallius, Mattia Thibault, Thomas Apperley, and Juho Hamari. 2022. Gamifying the city: E-scooters and the critical tensions of playful urban mobility. Mobilities 17, 1: 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2021.1985382
[99]
2012. Watershed started Playable City, putting people and play at the heart of the Future City | Watershed. Watershed. Retrieved September 26, 2023 from https://www.watershed.co.uk/support-us/that-the-concept-of-the-playable-city-was-coined-by-watershed-and-grown-right
[100]
2019. Civic Engagement Apps Fall into Seven Categories. Esri. Retrieved September 26, 2023 from https://www.esri.com/news/arcuser/0312/civic-engagement-apps-fall-into-seven-categories.html
[101]
2023. The Origin Story. Park(ing) Day. Retrieved September 26, 2023 from https://www.myparkingday.org/about
[102]
2023. Can You See Me Now? | Location Based Game. Blast Theory. Retrieved September 26, 2023 from https://www.blasttheory.co.uk/projects/can-you-see-me-now/
[103]
The butterfly diagram: visualising the circular economy. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Retrieved September 26, 2023 from https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/circular-economy-diagram
[104]
Zero Emission Bus Guide. Zemo Partnership. Retrieved September 28, 2023 from https://www.zemo.org.uk/work-with-us/buses-coaches/projects/zero-and-ultra-low-emission-bus-guide.htm

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
Mindtrek '23: Proceedings of the 26th International Academic Mindtrek Conference
October 2023
381 pages
ISBN:9798400708749
DOI:10.1145/3616961
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 November 2023

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Poster
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

Mindtrek '23

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 110 of 207 submissions, 53%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 70
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)70
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media