Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3613904.3642818acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Sharing Frissons among Online Video Viewers: Exploring the Design of Affective Communication for Aesthetic Chills

Published: 11 May 2024 Publication History

Abstract

On online video platforms, viewers often lack a channel to sense others’ and express their affective state on the fly compared to co-located group-viewing. This study explored the design of complementary affective communication specifically for effortless, spontaneous sharing of frissons during video watching. Also known as aesthetic chills, frissons are instant psycho-physiological reactions like goosebumps and shivers to arousing stimuli. We proposed an approach that unobtrusively detects viewers’ frissons using skin electrodermal activity sensors and presents the aggregated data alongside online videos. Following a design process of brainstorming, focus group interview (N=7), and design iterations, we proposed three different designs to encode viewers’ frisson experiences, namely, ambient light, icon, and vibration. A mixed-methods within-subject study (N=48) suggested that our approach offers a non-intrusive and efficient way to share viewers’ frisson moments, increases the social presence of others as if watching together, and can create affective contagion among viewers.

Supplemental Material

MP4 File - Video Preview
Video Preview
Transcript for: Video Preview
MP4 File - Video Presentation
Video Presentation
Transcript for: Video Presentation
MP4 File - A video demo of the implementation
This is a video demonstration of our three designs. The vibration cannot be captures by camera, so we use diagrams instead.
ZIP File - Source Code of the Frisson-Sharing Prototype
The source code is also available at https://github.com/fhfuih/CHI24-Frissons-Online-Videos
PDF File - Additional documentation of the design process
It contains the related works we have surveyed before the brainstorming process, the rationales we choose or deprecate design alternatives according to the interview feedback, and the alternative icon design.

References

[1]
Saba Ahsan, Varun Singh, and Jörg Ott. 2014. Characterizing Internet Video for Large-scale Active Measurements. arxiv:1408.5777 [cs] http://arxiv.org/abs/1408.5777
[2]
Nazanin Andalibi. 2020. Disclosure, Privacy, and Stigma on Social Media: Examining Non-Disclosure of Distressing Experiences. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 27, 3 (May 2020), 18:1–18:43. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3386600
[3]
Arthur Aron, Elaine N. Aron, and Danny Smollan. 1992. Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the Structure of Interpersonal Closeness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63, 4 (Oct. 1992), 596–612. http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
[4]
Ilhan Aslan, Andreas Seiderer, Chi Tai Dang, Simon Rädler, and Elisabeth André. 2020. PiHearts: Resonating Experiences of Self and Others Enabled by a Tangible Somaesthetic Design. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction(ICMI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1145/3382507.3418848
[5]
Jin Yeong Bak, Suin Kim, and Alice Oh. 2012. Self-Disclosure and Relationship Strength in Twitter Conversations. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Short Papers - Volume 2(ACL ’12). Association for Computational Linguistics, USA, 60–64.
[6]
Scott Bannister. 2019. Distinct Varieties of Aesthetic Chills in Response to Multimedia. PLoS ONE 14, 11 (Nov. 2019), e0224974. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6855651/
[7]
Mathias Benedek and Christian Kaernbach. 2011. Physiological Correlates and Emotional Specificity of Human Piloerection. Biological Psychology 86, 3 (March 2011), 320–329. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3061318/
[8]
Mathias Benedek, Barbara Wilfling, Reingard Lukas-Wolfbauer, Björn H. Katzur, and Christian Kaernbach. 2010. Objective and Continuous Measurement of Piloerection. Psychophysiology 47, 5 (Sept. 2010), 989–993. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01003.x
[9]
Alberto Betella, Riccardo Zucca, Ryszard Cetnarski, Alberto Greco, Antonio Lanatà, Daniele Mazzei, Alessandro Tognetti, Xerxes D. Arsiwalla, Pedro Omedas, Danilo De Rossi, and Paul F. M. J. Verschure. 2014. Inference of Human Affective States from Psychophysiological Measurements Extracted under Ecologically Valid Conditions. Frontiers in Neuroscience 8 (2014), 286. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00286
[10]
Yue Chen, Qin Gao, and Pei-Luen Patrick Rau. 2017. Watching a Movie Alone yet Together: Understanding Reasons for Watching Danmaku Videos. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 33, 9 (Sept. 2017), 731–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1282187
[11]
Yu Chen, Xiaojuan Ma, Alfredo Cerezo, and Pearl Pu. 2014. Empatheticons: Designing Emotion Awareness Tools for Group Recommenders. In Proceedings of the XV International Conference on Human Computer Interaction(Interacción ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2662253.2662269
[12]
V.S. Chouhan and S.S. Mehta. 2007. Total Removal of Baseline Drift from ECG Signal. In 2007 International Conference on Computing: Theory and Applications (ICCTA’07). 512–515. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCTA.2007.126
[13]
Mitchell C. Colver and Amani El-Alayli. 2016. Getting Aesthetic Chills from Music: The Connection between Openness to Experience and Frisson. Psychology of Music 44, 3 (May 2016), 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735615572358
[14]
Daniel G. Craig. 2005. An Exploratory Study of Physiological Changes during “Chills” Induced by Music. Musicae Scientiae 9, 2 (July 2005), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/102986490500900207
[15]
Arindam Dey, Hao Chen, Ashkan Hayati, Mark Billinghurst, and Robert W. Lindeman. 2019. Sharing Manipulated Heart Rate Feedback in Collaborative Virtual Environments. In 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). 248–257. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2019.00022
[16]
Arindam Dey, Hao Chen, Chang Zhuang, Mark Billinghurst, and Robert W. Lindeman. 2018. Effects of Sharing Real-Time Multi-Sensory Heart Rate Feedback in Different Immersive Collaborative Virtual Environments. In 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2018.00052
[17]
Aidan D’Souza, Bernd Ploderer, Madison Klarkowski, and Peta Wyeth. 2018. Augmenting Co-Located Social Play with Biofeedback: An Interactional Approach. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play(CHI PLAY ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1145/3242671.3242679
[18]
Abdallah El Ali, Ekaterina R. Stepanova, Shalvi Palande, Angelika Mader, Pablo Cesar, and Kaspar Jansen. 2023. BreatheWithMe: Exploring Visual and Vibrotactile Displays for Social Breath Awareness during Colocated, Collaborative Tasks. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Hamburg Germany, 1–8. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544549.3585589
[19]
Milou A. Feijt, Joyce H.D.M. Westerink, Yvonne A.W. De Kort, and Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn. 2021. Sharing Biosignals: An Analysis of the Experiential and Communication Properties of Interpersonal Psychophysiology. Human–Computer Interaction 0, 0 (July 2021), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2021.1913164
[20]
Fitbit, Inc.[n. d.]. Stress Management | Fitbit Technology. https://www.fitbit.com/global/us/technology/stress
[21]
Jérémy Frey, May Grabli, Ronit Slyper, and Jessica R. Cauchard. 2018. Breeze: Sharing Biofeedback through Wearable Technologies. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174219
[22]
Sandra Garrido and Jennifer Macritchie. 2020. Audience Engagement with Community Music Performances: Emotional Contagion in Audiences of a ‘pro-Am’ Orchestra in Suburban Sydney. Musicae Scientiae 24, 2 (June 2020), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864918783027
[23]
Gerger Gernot, Matthew Pelowski, and Helmut Leder. 2018. Empathy, Einfühlung, and Aesthetic Experience: The Effect of Emotion Contagion on Appreciation of Representational and Abstract Art Using fEMG and SCR. Cognitive Processing 19, 2 (May 2018), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-017-0800-2
[24]
Avram Goldstein. 1980. Thrills in Response to Music and Other Stimuli. Physiological Psychology 8, 1 (March 1980), 126–129. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03326460
[25]
Google LLC. [n. d.]. Human Computer Interaction - Google Scholar Metrics. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=top_venues&hl=en&vq=eng_humancomputerinteraction
[26]
Jiajing Guo and Susan R. Fussell. 2020. A Preliminary Study of Emotional Contagion in Live Streaming. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2020 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing(CSCW ’20 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1145/3406865.3418309
[27]
A. J. H. Haar, A. Jain, F. Schoeller, and P. Maes. 2020. Augmenting Aesthetic Chills Using a Wearable Prosthesis Improves Their Downstream Effects on Reward and Social Cognition. Scientific Reports 10, 1 (Dec. 2020), 21603. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-77951-w
[28]
Oliver L. Haimson, Tianxiao Liu, Ben Zefeng Zhang, and Shanley Corvite. 2021. The Online Authenticity Paradox: What Being "Authentic" on Social Media Means, and Barriers to Achieving It. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2 (Oct. 2021), 423:1–423:18. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3479567
[29]
Luke Harrison and Psyche Loui. 2014. Thrills, Chills, Frissons, and Skin Orgasms: Toward an Integrative Model of Transcendent Psychophysiological Experiences in Music. Frontiers in Psychology 5 (2014). https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00790
[30]
Mariam Hassib, Daniel Buschek, Paweł W. Wozniak, and Florian Alt. 2017. HeartChat: Heart Rate Augmented Mobile Chat to Support Empathy and Awareness. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2239–2251. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025758
[31]
Yan He, George Chernyshov, Jiawen Han, Dingding Zheng, Ragnar Thomsen, Danny Hynds, Muyu Liu, Yuehui Yang, Yulan Ju, Yun Suen Pai, Kouta Minamizawa, Kai Kunze, and Jamie A. Ward. 2022. Frisson Waves: Exploring Automatic Detection, Triggering and Sharing of Aesthetic Chills in Music Performances. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 6, 3 (Sept. 2022), 118:1–118:23. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3550324
[32]
Carolina Herrando and Efthymios Constantinides. 2021. Emotional Contagion: A Brief Overview and Future Directions. Frontiers in Psychology 12 (July 2021), 712606. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8322226/
[33]
Noura Howell, Greg Niemeyer, and Kimiko Ryokai. 2019. Life-Affirming Biosensing in Public: Sounding Heartbeats on a Red Bench. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300910
[34]
Tristen K. Inagaki and Naomi I. Eisenberger. 2013. Shared Neural Mechanisms Underlying Social Warmth and Physical Warmth. Psychological Science 24, 11 (Nov. 2013), 2272–2280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613492773
[35]
Abhinandan Jain, Felix Schoeller, Emilie Zhang, and Pattie Maes. 2022. Frisson: Leveraging Metasomatic Interactions for Generating Aesthetic Chills. In INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION. ACM, Bengaluru India, 148–158. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3536221.3556626
[36]
Jina Kim, Young-Woo Park, and Tek-Jin Nam. 2015. BreathingFrame: An Inflatable Frame for Remote Breath Signal Sharing. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 109–112. https://doi.org/10.1145/2677199.2680606
[37]
Jaemin Kim, Dae Geon Seo, and Young-Ho Cho. 2014. A Flexible Skin Piloerection Monitoring Sensor. In 2014 IEEE SENSORS. 847–850. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSENS.2014.6985132
[38]
Dongho Koo, Tania (Tee) C. O’Neill, Salih Berk Dinçer, Hin Kwan (Billy) Kwok, and Felicia Renelus. 2022. Immersive Emotions: Translating Emotions Into Visualization. In Adjunct Publication of the 24th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, Vancouver BC Canada, 1–4. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3528575.3551430
[39]
Sueyoon Lee, Abdallah El Ali, Maarten Wijntjes, and Pablo Cesar. 2022. Understanding and Designing Avatar Biosignal Visualizations for Social Virtual Reality Entertainment. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517451
[40]
Fannie Liu, Laura Dabbish, and Geoff Kaufman. 2017. Can Biosignals Be Expressive? How Visualizations Affect Impression Formation from Shared Brain Activity. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW (Dec. 2017), 71:1–71:21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134706
[41]
Fannie Liu, Laura Dabbish, and Geoff Kaufman. 2017. Supporting Social Interactions with an Expressive Heart Rate Sharing Application. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 3 (Sept. 2017), 77:1–77:26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3130943
[42]
Fannie Liu, Chunjong Park, Yu Jiang Tham, Tsung-Yu Tsai, Laura Dabbish, Geoff Kaufman, and Andrés Monroy-Hernández. 2021. Significant Otter: Understanding the Role of Biosignals in Communication. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445200
[43]
Zhicong Lu, Haijun Xia, Seongkook Heo, and Daniel Wigdor. 2018. You Watch, You Give, and You Engage: A Study of Live Streaming Practices in China. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174040
[44]
E. Luharuka and R.X. Gao. 2002. A Microcontroller-Based Data Logger for Physiological Sensing. In IMTC/2002. Proceedings of the 19th IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37276), Vol. 1. 175–180 vol.1. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/1006836
[45]
Xiaojuan Ma and Nan Cao. 2017. Video-Based Evanescent, Anonymous, Asynchronous Social Interaction: Motivation and Adaption to Medium. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing(CSCW ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 770–782. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2998181.2998256
[46]
Xiao Ma, Jeff Hancock, and Mor Naaman. 2016. Anonymity, Intimacy and Self-Disclosure in Social Media. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3857–3869. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2858036.2858414
[47]
Jennifer Mankoff, Anind K. Dey, Gary Hsieh, Julie Kientz, Scott Lederer, and Morgan Ames. 2003. Heuristic Evaluation of Ambient Displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’03). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 169–176. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/642611.642642
[48]
Jennifer Marlow and Laura Dabbish. 2011. Photo Sharing in Diverse Distributed Teams. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work(CSCW ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 317–320. https://doi.org/10.1145/1958824.1958872
[49]
Moïra Mikolajczak, Sophie Brasseur, and Carole Fantini-Hauwel. 2014. Measuring Intrapersonal and Interpersonal EQ: The Short Profile of Emotional Competence (S-PEC). Personality and Individual Differences 65 (July 2014), 42–46. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886914000439
[50]
Hyeryung Christine Min and Tek-Jin Nam. 2014. Biosignal Sharing for Affective Connectedness. In CHI ’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2191–2196. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2581345
[51]
Clara Moge, Katherine Wang, and Youngjun Cho. 2022. Shared User Interfaces of Physiological Data: Systematic Review of Social Biofeedback Systems and Contexts in HCI. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517495
[52]
Kristin Neidlinger, Khiet P. Truong, Caty Telfair, Loe Feijs, Edwin Dertien, and Vanessa Evers. 2017. AWElectric: That Gave Me Goosebumps, Did You Feel It Too?. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 315–324. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3024969.3025004
[53]
Julia Omarzu. 2000. A Disclosure Decision Model: Determining How and When Individuals Will Self-Disclose. Personality and Social Psychology Review 4, 2 (May 2000), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_05
[54]
Yun Suen Pai. 2016. Physiological Signal-Driven Virtual Reality in Social Spaces. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology(UIST ’16 Adjunct). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 25–28. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2984751.2984787
[55]
Jaak Panksepp. 1995. The Emotional Sources of "Chills" Induced by Music. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal 13, 2 (1995), 171–207. jstor:40285693https://www.jstor.org/stable/40285693
[56]
James W. Pennebaker, Emmanuelle Zech, and Bernard Rimé. 2001. Disclosing and Sharing Emotion: Psychological, Social, and Health Consequences. In Handbook of Bereavement Research: Consequences, Coping, and Care. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, US, 517–543. https://doi.org/10.1037/10436-022
[57]
Zachary Pousman and John Stasko. 2006. A Taxonomy of Ambient Information Systems: Four Patterns of Design. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces(AVI ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 67–74. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1133265.1133277
[58]
Chao Ying Qin, Jun-Ho Choi, Marios Constantinides, Luca Maria Aiello, and Daniele Quercia. 2021. Having a Heart Time? A Wearable-based Biofeedback System. In 22nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services(MobileHCI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3406324.3410539
[59]
Bernard Rimé. 2009. Emotion Elicits the Social Sharing of Emotion: Theory and Empirical Review. Emotion Review 1, 1 (Jan. 2009), 60–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073908097189
[60]
Jonathan W. Roberti. 2004. A Review of Behavioral and Biological Correlates of Sensation Seeking. Journal of Research in Personality 38, 3 (June 2004), 256–279. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656603000679
[61]
Natalie Roberts, Alissa Beath, and Simon Boag. 2020. A Mixed-Methods Examination of Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response: Comparison to Frisson. Consciousness and Cognition 86 (Nov. 2020), 103046. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810020305134
[62]
Raquel Breejon Robinson, Ricardo Rheeder, Madison Klarkowski, and Regan L Mandryk. 2022. ”Chat Has No Chill”: A Novel Physiological Interaction For Engaging Live Streaming Audiences. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’22). ACM, New Orleans LA USA, 1–18. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3491102.3501934
[63]
Camilo Rojas, Malena Corral, Niels Poulsen, and Pattie Maes. 2020. Project Us: A Wearable for Enhancing Empathy. In Companion Publication of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS’ 20 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1145/3393914.3395882
[64]
Matthew E. Sachs, Robert J. Ellis, Gottfried Schlaug, and Psyche Loui. 2016. Brain Connectivity Reflects Human Aesthetic Responses to Music. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 11, 6 (June 2016), 884–891. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw009
[65]
Valorie N. Salimpoor, Mitchel Benovoy, Gregory Longo, Jeremy R. Cooperstock, and Robert J. Zatorre. 2009. The Rewarding Aspects of Music Listening Are Related to Degree of Emotional Arousal. PLOS ONE 4, 10 (Oct. 2009), e7487. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0007487
[66]
Stefan Schneegass, Romina Poguntke, and Tonja Machulla. 2019. Understanding the Impact of Information Representation on Willingness to Share Information. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3290605.3300753
[67]
Oliver S. Schneider, Hasti Seifi, Salma Kashani, Matthew Chun, and Karon E. MacLean. 2016. HapTurk: Crowdsourcing Affective Ratings of Vibrotactile Icons. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3248–3260. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2858036.2858279
[68]
Martin Schrepp, Andreas Hinderks, and Jörg Thomaschewski. 2017. Design and Evaluation of a Short Version of the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ-S). International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence 4, 6 (2017), 103. http://www.ijimai.org/journal/node/1838
[69]
Nathan Semertzidis, Michaela Scary, Josh Andres, Brahmi Dwivedi, Yutika Chandrashekhar Kulwe, Fabio Zambetta, and Florian Floyd Mueller. 2020. Neo-Noumena: Augmenting Emotion Communication. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376599
[70]
Paul J. Silvia and Emily C. Nusbaum. 2011. On Personality and Piloerection: Individual Differences in Aesthetic Chills and Other Unusual Aesthetic Experiences.Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 5, 3 (Aug. 2011), 208–214. http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0021914
[71]
Jaime Snyder, Mark Matthews, Jacqueline Chien, Pamara F. Chang, Emily Sun, Saeed Abdullah, and Geri Gay. 2015. MoodLight: Exploring Personal and Social Implications of Ambient Display of Biosensor Data. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing(CSCW ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675191
[72]
Chiew Seng Sean Tan, Johannes Schöning, Kris Luyten, and Karin Coninx. 2014. Investigating the Effects of Using Biofeedback as Visual Stress Indicator during Video-Mediated Collaboration. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557038
[73]
Mike Thelwall, Pardeep Sud, and Farida Vis. 2012. Commenting on YouTube Videos: From Guatemalan Rock to El Big Bang. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63, 3 (2012), 616–629. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/asi.21679
[74]
Wolfgang Tschacher, Steven Greenwood, Hauke Egermann, Melanie Wald-Fuhrmann, Anna Czepiel, Martin Tröndle, and Deborah Meier. 2023. Physiological Synchrony in Audiences of Live Concerts. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 17 (2023), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000431
[75]
Evert A. van Doorn, Gerben A. van Kleef, and Joop van der Pligt. 2015. Deriving Meaning from Others’ Emotions: Attribution, Appraisal, and the Use of Emotions as Social Information. Frontiers in Psychology 6 (2015). https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01077
[76]
Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2015. Audience Silhouettes: Peripheral Awareness of Synchronous Audience Kinesics for Social Television. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video(TVX ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 13–22. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2745197.2745207
[77]
Wouter Walmink, Danielle Wilde, and Florian ’Floyd’ Mueller. 2014. Displaying Heart Rate Data on a Bicycle Helmet to Support Social Exertion Experiences. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1145/2540930.2540970
[78]
Yi-Chia Wang, Moira Burke, and Robert Kraut. 2016. Modeling Self-Disclosure in Social Networking Sites. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing(CSCW ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 74–85. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2818048.2820010
[79]
Eugen Wassiliwizky, Stefan Koelsch, Valentin Wagner, Thomas Jacobsen, and Winfried Menninghaus. 2017. The Emotional Power of Poetry: Neural Circuitry, Psychophysiology and Compositional Principles. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 12, 8 (Aug. 2017), 1229–1240. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx069
[80]
Julia Werner, Reto Wettach, and Eva Hornecker. 2008. United-Pulse: Feeling Your Partner’s Pulse. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services(MobileHCI ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 535–538. http://doi.org/10.1145/1409240.1409338
[81]
Margaret Wetherell. 2012. Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. In Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. SAGE Publications Ltd, London, 140–160. https://sk.sagepub.com/books/affect-and-emotion/n7.xml
[82]
Douiji yasmina, Mousannif Hajar, and Al Moatassime Hassan. 2016. Using YouTube Comments for Text-based Emotion Recognition. Procedia Computer Science 83 (Jan. 2016), 292–299. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187705091630151X

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHI '24: Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
May 2024
18961 pages
ISBN:9798400703300
DOI:10.1145/3613904
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 May 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Badges

Author Tags

  1. affective communication
  2. asynchronous communication
  3. biosignal
  4. frissons
  5. online video platforms

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

  • Seed fund of the Big Data for Bio-Intelligence Laboratory (Z0428) from The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

Conference

CHI '24

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 605
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)605
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)98
Reflects downloads up to 28 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

Full Text

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media