Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3596225.3596228acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Lock-Free Buffer Managers Do Not Require Delayed Memory Reclamation

Published: 17 July 2023 Publication History

Abstract

High-performance data systems running on modern many-core CPUs should not require readers to acquire physical locks. There exist multiple synchronization schemes that allow this, but they all require a solution for concurrent memory reclamation. In this paper, we show that one can eschew such a scheme when a few basic requirements are fulfilled. We exploit this insight in our high-performance buffer manager implementation in LeanStore, which as a consequence got simpler, more robust, and more performant.

References

[1]
Adnan Alhomssi, Michael Haubenschild, and Viktor Leis. 2023. The Evolution of LeanStore. In BTW(LNI, Vol. P-331). 259–281.
[2]
Adnan Alhomssi and Viktor Leis. 2021. Contention and Space Management in B-Trees. In CIDR. www.cidrdb.org.
[3]
Adnan Alhomssi and Viktor Leis. 2023. Scalable and Robust Snapshot Isolation for High-Performance Storage Engines. Proc. VLDB Endow. 16, 6 (2023), 1426–1438.
[4]
Jan Böttcher, Viktor Leis, Jana Giceva, Thomas Neumann, and Alfons Kemper. 2020. Scalable and robust latches for database systems. In DaMoN.
[5]
Nathan Grasso Bronson, Jared Casper, Hassan Chafi, and Kunle Olukotun. 2010. A practical concurrent binary search tree. In PPoPP. 257–268.
[6]
Sang Kyun Cha, Sangyong Hwang, Kihong Kim, and Keunjoo Kwon. 2001. Cache-Conscious Concurrency Control of Main-Memory Indexes on Shared-Memory Multiprocessor Systems. In VLDB. 181–190.
[7]
Gabriel Haas and Viktor Leis. 2023. What Modern NVMe Storage Can Do, And How To Exploit It: High-Performance I/O for High-Performance Storage. Proc. VLDB Endow. 16, 9 (2023).
[8]
Alex Kogan and Erez Petrank. 2011. Wait-free queues with multiple enqueuers and dequeuers. In PPoPP. 223–234.
[9]
Viktor Leis, Michael Haubenschild, Alfons Kemper, and Thomas Neumann. 2018. LeanStore: In-Memory Data Management beyond Main Memory. In ICDE.
[10]
Viktor Leis, Michael Haubenschild, and Thomas Neumann. 2019. Optimistic Lock Coupling: A Scalable and Efficient General-Purpose Synchronization Method. IEEE Data Eng. Bull. 42, 1 (2019), 73–84.
[11]
Viktor Leis, Florian Scheibner, Alfons Kemper, and Thomas Neumann. 2016. The ART of practical synchronization. In DaMoN.
[12]
Yandong Mao, Eddie Kohler, and Robert Tappan Morris. 2012. Cache craftiness for fast multicore key-value storage. In EuroSys. 183–196.
[13]
Maged M. Michael. 2002. High performance dynamic lock-free hash tables and list-based sets. In SPAA. 73–82.
[14]
Maged M. Michael. 2004. Hazard Pointers: Safe Memory Reclamation for Lock-Free Objects. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 15, 6 (2004), 491–504.
[15]
Maged M. Michael and Michael L. Scott. 1996. Simple, Fast, and Practical Non-Blocking and Blocking Concurrent Queue Algorithms. In PODC. 267–275.
[16]
Ori Shalev and Nir Shavit. 2006. Split-ordered lists: Lock-free extensible hash tables. J. ACM 53, 3 (2006), 379–405.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
SiMoD '23: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Simplicity in Management of Data
June 2023
28 pages
ISBN:9798400707834
DOI:10.1145/3596225
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 17 July 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Badges

  • Best Paper

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

SiMoD '23

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 2 of 8 submissions, 25%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)52
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10
Reflects downloads up to 24 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media