article

Free access

Characteristics of application software maintenance

Authors:

G. E. TompkinsAuthors Info & Claims

Communications of the ACM, Volume 21, Issue 6

Pages 466 - 471

https://doi.org/10.1145/359511.359522

Published: 01 June 1978 Publication History

Abstract

Maintenance and enhancement of application software consume a major portion of the total life cycle cost of a system. Rough estimates of the total systems and programming resources consumed range as high as 75-80 percent in each category. However, the area has been given little attention in the literature. To analyze the problems in this area a questionnaire was developed and pretested. It was then submitted to 120 organizations. Respondents totaled 69. Responses were analyzed with the SPSS statistical package. The results of the analysis indicate that: (1) maintenance and enhancement do consume much of the total resources of systems and programming groups; (2) maintenance and enhancement tend to be viewed by management as at least somewhat more important than new application software development; (3) in maintenance and enhancement, problems of a management orientation tend to be more significant than those of a technical orientation; and (4) user demands for enhancements and extension constitute the most important management problem area.

References

[1]

Belady, L.A., and Lehman, M.M. A model of large program development. IBM Syst. J. 3 (1976),

[2]

Boehm, B.W. The high cost of software. Proc Symp on High Cost of Software, Monterey, Calif., 1973, pp. 27--40.

[3]

Boehm, B.W., Brown, J.R., and Lipow, M. Quantitative evaluation of software quality. Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Software Eng., Oct. 1976, pp. 592-605.

Digital Library

[4]

Boehm, B.W. Software engineering. IEEE Trans. Comptrs. C-25 (Dec. 1976), 1226-1241.

Digital Library

[5]

Brantley, C.L., and Osajima, Y.R. Continuing development of centrally developed and maintained software systems. IEEE Comptr. Soc. Proc. 45 (Spring 1975), 285-288.

[6]

Brooks, F.P. Jr. The Mythical Man-Month. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1975.

Digital Library

[7]

Bucher, D.E.W. Maintenance of the computer sciences teleprocessing system. Proc. 1975 Int. Conf. on Reliable Software, April 1975, pp. 260--266.

Digital Library

[8]

Ditri, A.E., Shaw, J.C., and Atkins, W. Managing the EDP Function. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1971.

[9]

Elshoff, J.L. An analysis of some commercial PL/I programs. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. SE-2 (June 1976, 113-120.

Digital Library

[10]

Gildersleeve, T.R. Data Processing Project Management. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1974.

Digital Library

[11]

Gunderman, R.E. A glimpse into program maintenance. Datamation 19 (June 1973), 99-101.

[12]

Implications of Using Modular Programming. Guide No. 1, Hoskyns Syst. Res., J. Hoskyns and Co., London, 1973.

[13]

Khan, Z. How to tackle the systems maintenance dilemma. Canadian Data Syst. (March 1975), 30-32.

[14]

Kosy, D.W. Air Force command and control information processing in the 1980's: Trends in software technology. U.S. Air Force Proj. RAND, RAND Corp., Santa Monica, Calif., June 1974, p. 70.

[15]

Lientz, B.P., Swanson, E.B., and Tompkins, G.E. Maintenance questionnaire and list of respondents. Tech. Rep., 1976; available from authors, U. of California at Los Angeles.

[16]

Lindhorst, W.M. Scheduled maintenance of applications software. Datamation 19 (May 1973), 87-89.

[17]

lClooney, J.W. Organization program maintenance. Datamation 21 (Feb. 1975), 63-66.

[18]

Nie, N.H., et al. SPSS McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975.

[19]

Program maintenance: User's view. Data Processing 7 (Sept.-Oct. 1973), I-4.

[20]

Riggs, R. Computer system maintenance. Datamation 15 (Nov. 1969), 227-235.

[21]

Sterns, S. Experience with centralized maintenance of a large application system. IEEE Comptr. Society Proc. 45 (Spring, 1975), 297-302.

[22]

Swanson, E.B. The Dimension of Maintenance. Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Software Eng., Oct. 1976, pp. 492-497.

Digital Library

[23]

Canning, R. That maintenance iceberg. In EDP Analyzer, Vol. 10, No. 10 Canning Pub., Vista, Calif., Oct. 1972.

Cited By

Heričko TŠumak BKarakatič S(2024)Commit-Level Software Change Intent Classification Using a Pre-Trained Transformer-Based Code ModelMathematics10.3390/math1207101212:7(1012)Online publication date: 28-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/math12071012
Huo H(2024)Optimal Corrective Maintenance Policies via an Availability-Cost Hybrid Factor for Software Aging SystemsMathematics10.3390/math1205069412:5(694)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/math12050694
Marabesi MGarcía-Holgado AGarcía-Peñalvo F(2024)Exploring the Connection between the TDD Practice and Test Smells—A Systematic Literature ReviewComputers10.3390/computers1303007913:3(79)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/computers13030079
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Characteristics of application software maintenance
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Management of computing and information systems
      1. Software management
        Software maintenance
2. Software and its engineering
  1. Software notations and tools
    1. General programming languages
      1. Language types
        Functional languages

Recommendations

A controlled experiment in assessing and estimating software maintenance tasks

Context: Software maintenance is an important software engineering activity that has been reported to account for the majority of the software total cost. Thus, understanding the factors that influence the cost of software maintenance tasks helps ...
Modeling software maintenance requests: a case study
ICSM '97: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance

Software maintenance costs often total twice the original development cost in the lifetime of application software. Modeling the changes of software maintenance activities might improve software maintenance planning. Current studies model software ...
Governance practices and software maintenance: A study of open source projects

We have proposed a two-dimensional taxonomy of open source project governance, namely participation management and responsibility management. We have then formulated four hypotheses by linking the two dimensions to software maintenance time. These ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Communications of the ACM

Communications of the ACM Volume 21, Issue 6

June 1978

75 pages

ISSN:0001-0782

EISSN:1557-7317

DOI:10.1145/359511

Editor:
Robert L. Ashenhurst
The Univ. of Chicago, Chicago, IL

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 1978 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 June 1978

Published in CACM Volume 21, Issue 6

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

315
Total Citations
View Citations
5,116
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)596
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)74

Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Heričko TŠumak BKarakatič S(2024)Commit-Level Software Change Intent Classification Using a Pre-Trained Transformer-Based Code ModelMathematics10.3390/math1207101212:7(1012)Online publication date: 28-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/math12071012
Huo H(2024)Optimal Corrective Maintenance Policies via an Availability-Cost Hybrid Factor for Software Aging SystemsMathematics10.3390/math1205069412:5(694)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/math12050694
Marabesi MGarcía-Holgado AGarcía-Peñalvo F(2024)Exploring the Connection between the TDD Practice and Test Smells—A Systematic Literature ReviewComputers10.3390/computers1303007913:3(79)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/computers13030079
Krüger JLi YLossev KZhu CChechik MBerger TRubin J(2024)A Meta-Study of Software-Change IntentionsACM Computing Surveys10.1145/3661484Online publication date: 25-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1145/3661484
Soria ALopez TSeero EMashhadi NEvans EBurge JVan der Hoek ARoychoudhury APaiva AAbreu RStorey M(2024)Characterizing Software Maintenance Meetings: Information Shared, Discussion Outcomes, and Information CapturedProceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering10.1145/3597503.3623330(1-13)Online publication date: 20-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3597503.3623330
Krüger JLi YZhu CChechik MBerger TRubin JChandra SBlincoe KTonella P(2023)A Vision on Intentions in Software EngineeringProceedings of the 31st ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering10.1145/3611643.3613087(2117-2121)Online publication date: 30-Nov-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3611643.3613087
Sjøberg DBergersen G(2023)Construct Validity in Software EngineeringIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2022.317672549:3(1374-1396)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TSE.2022.3176725
Rahman HAlzayed AMohmand MAlbarrak AQasem S(2023)Application Maintenance Offshoring Using HCI Based Framework and Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique (SMART)IEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.332094111(107068-107084)Online publication date: 2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3320941
Li HLiu YQi XYu XGuo S(2023)Structuring meaningful bug‐fixing patches to fix software defectIET Software10.1049/sfw2.1214017:4(566-581)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1049/sfw2.12140
Ribeiro Tdos Santos PTravassos G(2023)On the Investigation of Empirical Contradictions - Aggregated Results of Local Studies on Readability and Comprehensibility of Source CodeEmpirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-023-10360-528:6Online publication date: 9-Nov-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10664-023-10360-5
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents