research-article

Taming Internet of Things Application Development with the IoTvar Middleware

Authors:

Pedro Victor Borges,

Chantal Taconet,

Sophie Chabridon,

Everton Cavalcante,

Thais BatistaAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, Volume 23, Issue 2

Article No.: 29, Pages 1 - 21

https://doi.org/10.1145/3586010

Published: 19 May 2023 Publication History

Abstract

In the last years, Internet of Things (IoT) platforms have been designed to provide IoT applications with various services such as device discovery, context management, and data filtering. The lack of standardization has led each IoT platform to propose its own abstractions, APIs, and data models. As a consequence, programming interactions between an IoT consuming application and an IoT platform is time-consuming, is error prone, and depends on the developers’ level of knowledge about the IoT platform. To address these issues, this article introduces IoTvar, a middleware library deployed on the IoT consumer application that manages all its interactions with IoT platforms. IoTvar relies on declaring variables automatically mapped to sensors whose values are transparently updated with sensor observations through proxies on the client side. This article presents the IoTvar architecture and shows how it has been integrated into the FIWARE, OM2M, and muDEBS platforms. We also report the results of experiments performed to evaluate IoTvar, showing that it reduces the effort required to declare and manage IoT variables and has no considerable impact on CPU, memory, and energy consumption.

References

[1]

M. Ben Alaya, Y. Banouar, T. Monteil, C. Chassot, and K. Drira. 2014. OM2M: Extensible ETSI-compliant M2M service platform with self-configuration capability. Procedia Computer Science 32 (2014), 1079–1086. The 5th International Conference on Ambient Systems, Networks and Technologies (ANT’14), the 4th International Conference on Sustainable Energy Information Technology (SEIT’14).

[2]

Parvaneh Asghari, Amir Rahmani, and Hamid Haj Seyyed Javadi. 2018. Internet of things applications: A systematic review. Computer Networks 148 (Dec.2018), 241–261.

[3]

Djamal Benslimane, Schahram Dustdar, and Amit Sheth. 2008. Services mashups: The new generation of web applications. IEEE Internet Computing 12 (Oct.2008), 13–15.

Digital Library

[4]

Pedro Victor Borges, Chantal Taconet, Sophie Chabridon, Denis Conan, Thais Batista, Everton Cavalcante, and Cesar Batista. 2019. Mastering interactions with internet of things platforms through the IoTVar middleware. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence (UCAmI) 31, 1 (Nov.2019), 78.

[5]

Raja Boujbel, Sam Rottenberg, Sébastien Leriche, Chantal Taconet, Jean-Paul Arcangeli, and Claire Lecocq. 2014. MuScADeL: A deployment DSL based on a multiscale characterization framework. In 2014 IEEE 38th International Computer Software and Applications Conference Workshops. 708–715.

Digital Library

[6]

Rodrigo Canek, Pedro Borges, and Chantal Taconet. 2022. Analysis of the impact of interaction patterns and IoT protocols on energy consumption of IoT consumer applications. In Distributed Applications and Interoperable Systems, David Eyers and Spyros Voulgaris (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 131–147.

Digital Library

[7]

M. A. Chaqfeh and N. Mohamed. 2012. Challenges in middleware solutions for the internet of things. In 2012 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS’12). 21–26.

[8]

Flávia C. Delicato, Paulo F. Pires, and Thais Batista. 2013. The Programming and Execution Module (PEM). Springer London, London, 45–55.

[9]

N. Denis, P. Chaffardon, D. Conan, M. Laurent, S. Chabridon, and J. Leneutre. 2020. Privacy-preserving content-based publish/subscribe with encrypted matching and data splitting. In Proc. of the 17th International Joint Conference on e-Business and Telecommunications. INSTICC, SciTePress, 405–414.

[10]

Paul D. Ellis. 2010. The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes: Statistical Power, Meta-analysis, and the Interpretation of Research Results. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.

[11]

Michael P. Fay and Michael A. Proschan. 2010. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney or t-test? On assumptions for hypothesis tests and multiple interpretations of decision rules. Statistics Surveys 4 (2010), 1–39.

[12]

FIWARE. 2021. FIWARE-NGSI v2 Specification. http://telefonicaid.github.io/fiware-orion/api/v2/stable/.

[13]

FIWARE Consortium. 2022. FIWARE Platform. https://www.fiware.org.

[14]

Andy Georges, Dries Buytaert, and Lieven Eeckhout. 2007. Statistically rigorous Java performance evaluation. SIGPLAN Not. 42, 10 (Oct.2007), 57–76.

Digital Library

[15]

Ross Harmes and Dustin Diaz. 2008. The proxy pattern. In Pro JavaScript Design Patterns. Apress, Berkeley, CA, 197–214.

[16]

Melinda Hess and Jeffrey Kromrey. 2004. Robust confidence intervals for effect sizes: A comparative study of Cohen’s d and Cliff’s delta under non-normality and heterogeneous variances. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

[17]

Soobin Jeon and Inbum Jung. 2017. MinT: Middleware for cooperative interaction of things. Sensors 17, 6 (2017).

[18]

Tomasz Kalbarczyk and Christine Julien. 2018. Omni: An application framework for seamless device-to-device interaction in the wild. In Proceedings of the 19th International Middleware Conference (Middleware’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 161–173.

Digital Library

[19]

Ken Kelley and Kristopher J. Preacher. 2012. On effect size. Psychological Methods 17, 2 (2012), 137–152.

[20]

Gregor Kiczales, Erik Hilsdale, Jim Hugunin, Mik Kersten, Jeffrey Palm, and William G. Griswold. 2001. An overview of AspectJ. In Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP’01). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 327–353.

Digital Library

[21]

Shancang Li, Li Da Xu, and Shanshan Zhao. 2015. The internet of things: A survey. Information Systems Frontiers 17, 2 (April2015), 243–259.

Digital Library

[22]

H. B. Mann and D. R. Whitney. 1947. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 18, 1 (1947), 50–60.

[23]

Pierrick Marie, Léon Lim, Atif Manzoor, Sophie Chabridon, Denis Conan, and Thierry Desprats. 2014. QoC-aware context data distribution in the internet of things. InProceedings of the 1st ACM Workshop on Middleware for Context-Aware Applications in the IoT - M4IOT@middleware: 13–17 (2014).

[24]

Julien Mineraud, Oleksiy Mazhelis, Xiang Su, and Sasu Tarkoma. 2016. A gap analysis of Internet-of-Things platforms. Computer Communications 89–90 (Sept.2016), 5–16.

Digital Library

[25]

Bhumi Nakhuva and Tushar Champaneria. 2015. Study of various internet of things platforms. International Journal of Computer Science & Engineering Survey 6, 6 (2015), 61–74.

[26]

NGSI. 2021. FIWARE-NGSI v2 Specification. https://fiware.github.io/specifications/ngsiv2/stable/.

[27]

Anne H. Ngu, Mario Gutierrez, Vangelis Metsis, Surya Nepal, and Quan Z. Sheng. 2017. IoT middleware: A survey on issues and enabling technologies. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 4, 1 (2017), 1–20.

[28]

NODE-RED. 2021. Node-Red. https://nodered.org/.

[29]

OASIS. 2015. MQTT Version 3.1.1 Plus Errata 01. Retrieved May 21, 2021, from https://docs.oasis-open.org/mqtt/mqtt/v3.1.1/mqtt-v3.1.1.pdf.

[30]

OM2M API. 2021. The oneM2M REST APIs. https://www.onem2m.org/getting-started/onem2m-overview/application-program-interfaces-api.

[31]

oneM2M Partners. 2019. oneM2M Services Platform. Release 3.

[32]

Open mashup alliance. (n. d.). Enterprise Mashup Markup Language. http://www.openmashup.org/.

[33]

Pankesh Patel and Damien Cassou. 2015. Enabling high-level application development for the Internet of Things. Journal of Systems and Software 103 (2015), 62–84.

Digital Library

[34]

Dave Raggett. 2015. The web of things: Challenges and opportunities. Computer 48, 5 (2015), 26–32.

Digital Library

[35]

Partha Pratim Ray. 2016. A survey of IoT cloud platforms. Future Computing and Informatics Journal 1, 1 (2016), 35–46.

[36]

M. A. Razzaque, M. Milojevic-Jevric, A. Palade, and S. Clarke. 2016. Middleware for internet of things: A survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 3, 1 (2016), 70–95.

[37]

April Reeve. 2013. Chapter 12 - Data integration patterns. In Managing Data in Motion, April Reeve (Ed.). Morgan Kaufmann, Boston, 79–85.

[38]

Marc Shapiro. 1986. Structure and encapsulation in distributed systems: The proxy principle. In Int. Conf. on Distr. Comp. Sys. (ICDCS’86). IEEE, Cambridge, MA, 198–204. https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00444651.

[39]

Samuel Sanford Shapiro and Martin Wilk. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52, 3–4 (1965), 591–611.

[40]

K. J. Singh and D. S. Kapoor. 2017. Create your own internet of things: A survey of IoT platforms. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine 6, 2 (2017), 57–68.

[41]

Karthik Soundararajan and Robert Brennan. 2008. Design patterns for real-time distributed control system benchmarking. Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing 24 (Oct.2008), 606–615.

Digital Library

[42]

Pierre Sutra, Etienne Rivière, Cristian Cotes, Marc Sánchez Artigas, Pedro Garcia Lopez, Emmanuel Bernard, William Burns, and Galder Zamarreño. 2017. CRESON: Callable and replicated shared objects over NoSQL. In 2017 IEEE 37th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS’17). 115–128.

[43]

Antero Taivalsaari and Tommi Mikkonen. 2017. A roadmap to the programmable world: Software challenges in the IoT era. IEEE Software 34, 1 (Jan.– Feb.2017), 72–80.

Digital Library

[44]

András Vargha and Harold D. Delaney. 2000. A critique and improvement of the CL common language effect size statistics of McGraw and Wong. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 25, 2 (2000), 101–132.

[45]

WIRECLOUD. 2021. Wirecloud. https://wirecloud.readthedocs.io/en/stable/.

[46]

Franco Zambonelli. 2017. Key abstractions for IoT-oriented software engineering. IEEE Software 34, 1 (Jan.– Feb.2017), 38–45.

Digital Library

Cited By

Bakir FWang SEkaireb TPearson JKrintz CWolski R(2024)Ambience: an operating system for IoT microservicesJournal of Edge Computing10.55056/jec.786Online publication date: 5-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.55056/jec.786
Xu XZang SBilal MXu XDou W(2024)Intelligent architecture and platforms for private edge cloud systems: A reviewFuture Generation Computer Systems10.1016/j.future.2024.06.024160(457-471)Online publication date: Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2024.06.024
Issa MEldosouky AIbnkahla MJaskolka JMatrawy A(2023)Integrating Medical and Wearable Devices with E-Health Systems Using Horizontal IoT Platforms2023 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS)10.1109/SAS58821.2023.10254186(1-6)Online publication date: 18-Jul-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/SAS58821.2023.10254186
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Taming Internet of Things Application Development with the IoTvar Middleware

Recommendations

Middleware for Internet of Things: A Study
DCOSS '15: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems

The significant progress in smart devices has lead to the shifting of actual Internet to the Internet of Things (IoT). Internet of Things is invading our real lives. In this new Internet vision, trillions of smart dynamic objects and areas will be ...
Interoperability in Internet of Things: Taxonomies and Open Challenges

In the last few years, many smart objects found in the physical world are interconnected and communicate through the existing internet infrastructure which creates a global network infrastructure called the Internet of Things (IoT). Research has shown a ...
A Middleware Environment for Developing Internet of Things Applications
M4IoT'18: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Middleware and Applications for the Internet of Things

With the rising popularity of IoT, several platforms have been proposed for supporting the development of IoT applications. KNoT and FIWARE are examples of open-source platforms with a complementary purpose. While KNoT is a gateway-based middleware to ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Internet Technology

ACM Transactions on Internet Technology Volume 23, Issue 2

May 2023

276 pages

ISSN:1533-5399

EISSN:1557-6051

DOI:10.1145/3597634

Editor:
Ling Liu
Georgia Institute of Technology, USA

Issue’s Table of Contents

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 19 May 2023

Online AM: 28 February 2023

Accepted: 16 February 2023

Revised: 19 November 2022

Received: 25 April 2022

Published in TOIT Volume 23, Issue 2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

4
Total Citations
View Citations
197
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)60
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9

Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Bakir FWang SEkaireb TPearson JKrintz CWolski R(2024)Ambience: an operating system for IoT microservicesJournal of Edge Computing10.55056/jec.786Online publication date: 5-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.55056/jec.786
Xu XZang SBilal MXu XDou W(2024)Intelligent architecture and platforms for private edge cloud systems: A reviewFuture Generation Computer Systems10.1016/j.future.2024.06.024160(457-471)Online publication date: Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2024.06.024
Issa MEldosouky AIbnkahla MJaskolka JMatrawy A(2023)Integrating Medical and Wearable Devices with E-Health Systems Using Horizontal IoT Platforms2023 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS)10.1109/SAS58821.2023.10254186(1-6)Online publication date: 18-Jul-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/SAS58821.2023.10254186
Borges PTaconet CChabridon SConan DCavalcante E(2023)A Middleware Architecture for Mastering Energy Consumption in Internet of Things Applications2023 International Conference on ICT for Sustainability (ICT4S)10.1109/ICT4S58814.2023.00016(66-75)Online publication date: 5-Jun-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICT4S58814.2023.00016

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View full text|Download PDF

View Issue’s Table of Contents