Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3581754.3584176acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

DIPA : An Image Dataset with Cross-cultural Privacy Concern Annotations

Published: 27 March 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Image privacy protection is an important topic in Human-Computer Interaction and usable security. Researchers have examined different aspects of image privacy by collecting samples by themselves. However, there does not exist a publicly-available dataset on image privacy, which prevents these efforts from sharing common technical foundations. We introduce DIPA, an open source dataset that provides content-level annotations that specifically focus on image privacy. We include 1,495 images from two existing datasets in DIPA, and augment them with 5,671 annotations. Each annotation includes reasons why the associated visual content can be privacy-threatening, a rating of how informative annotators thought the associated content is to threaten privacy, and another rating of how broadly the image could be shared. We also collected annotations from people living in Japan and UK to enable researchers and developers to perform analysis from the perspective of cultural differences. In this paper, we present the construction procedure of DIPA and report high-level statistics of the data we obtained. We hope that DIPA would accelerate various future research, including quantitative understandings of cultural differences on perceptions of image privacy and the development of robust recognition models for image privacy protection.

Supplementary Material

ZIP File (dataset.zip)
DIPA dataset for downloading.

References

[1]
Shane Ahern, Dean Eckles, Nathaniel S Good, Simon King, Mor Naaman, and Rahul Nair. 2007. Over-exposed? Privacy patterns and considerations in online and mobile photo sharing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 357–366.
[2]
Rawan Alharbi, Mariam Tolba, Lucia C Petito, Josiah Hester, and Nabil Alshurafa. 2019. To mask or not to mask? balancing privacy with visual confirmation utility in activity-oriented wearable cameras. Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies (IMWUT ’19) 3, 3 (2019), 1–29.
[3]
Mary Jean Amon, Rakibul Hasan, Kurt Hugenberg, Bennett I Bertenthal, and Apu Kapadia. 2020. Influencing photo sharing decisions on social media: A case of paradoxical findings. In 2020 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP). IEEE, 1350–1366.
[4]
K Caine. 2008. Linking Studies of HCI to Psychological Theories of Privacy. Georgia Institute of Technology(2008).
[5]
Daniel Castro, Steven Hickson, Vinay Bettadapura, Edison Thomaz, Gregory Abowd, Henrik Christensen, and Irfan Essa. 2015. Predicting daily activities from egocentric images using deep learning. In proceedings of the 2015 ACM International symposium on Wearable Computers. 75–82.
[6]
Hichang Cho, Milagros Rivera-Sánchez, and Sun Sun Lim. 2009. A multinational study on online privacy: global concerns and local responses. New media & society 11, 3 (2009), 395–416.
[7]
Sunny Consolvo, Ian E Smith, Tara Matthews, Anthony LaMarca, Jason Tabert, and Pauline Powledge. 2005. Location disclosure to social relations: why, when, & what people want to share. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 81–90.
[8]
[8] CrowdWorks.2022. https://crowdworks.jp. Accessed: 2022-10-31.
[9]
Agrim Gupta, Piotr Dollar, and Ross Girshick. 2019. Lvis: A dataset for large vocabulary instance segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 5356–5364.
[10]
Hana Habib, Neil Shah, and Rajan Vaish. 2019. Impact of contextual factors on snapchat public sharing. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.
[11]
Mohammed Korayem, Robert Templeman, Dennis Chen, David Crandall, and Apu Kapadia. 2016. Enhancing lifelogging privacy by detecting screens. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’16). 4309–4314.
[12]
Alina Kuznetsova, Hassan Rom, Neil Alldrin, Jasper Uijlings, Ivan Krasin, Jordi Pont-Tuset, Shahab Kamali, Stefan Popov, Matteo Malloci, Alexander Kolesnikov, 2020. The open images dataset v4. International Journal of Computer Vision 128, 7 (2020), 1956–1981.
[13]
Yifang Li, Nishant Vishwamitra, Hongxin Hu, and Kelly Caine. 2020. Towards a taxonomy of content sensitivity and sharing preferences for photos. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20). 1–14.
[14]
Tribhuvanesh Orekondy, Bernt Schiele, and Mario Fritz. 2017. Towards a visual privacy advisor: Understanding and predicting privacy risks in images. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. 3686–3695.
[15]
[15] Prolific.2022. https://www.prolific.co/. Accessed: 2022-10-31.
[16]
Beatrice Rammstedt and Oliver P John. 2007. Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of research in Personality 41, 1 (2007), 203–212.
[17]
Julian Steil, Marion Koelle, Wilko Heuten, Susanne Boll, and Andreas Bulling. 2018. Privaceye: Privacy-preserving first-person vision using image features and eye movement analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.04457(2018).
[18]
Jose M Such, Joel Porter, Sören Preibusch, and Adam Joinson. 2017. Photo privacy conflicts in social media: A large-scale empirical study. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 3821–3832.
[19]
Ashwini Tonge and Cornelia Caragea. 2020. Image privacy prediction using deep neural networks. ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB ’20) 14, 2 (2020), 1–32.
[20]
Lam Tran, Deguang Kong, Hongxia Jin, and Ji Liu. 2016. Privacy-cnh: A framework to detect photo privacy with convolutional neural network using hierarchical features. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 30.
[21]
Ho Keung Tsoi and Li Chen. 2011. From privacy concern to uses of social network sites: A cultural comparison via user survey. In 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing. IEEE, 457–464.
[22]
Nishant Vishwamitra, Yifang Li, Hongxin Hu, Kelly Caine, Long Cheng, Ziming Zhao, and Gail-Joon Ahn. 2022. Towards Automated Content-based Photo Privacy Control in User-Centered Social Networks. In Proceedings of the Twelveth ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy. 65–76.
[23]
Sergej Zerr, Stefan Siersdorfer, Jonathon Hare, and Elena Demidova. 2012. Privacy-aware image classification and search. In Proceedings of the 35th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. 35–44.
[24]
Haoti Zhong, Anna Cinzia Squicciarini, David J Miller, and Cornelia Caragea. 2017. A Group-Based Personalized Model for Image Privacy Classification and Labeling. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI ’17), Vol. 17. 3952–3958.

Index Terms

  1. DIPA : An Image Dataset with Cross-cultural Privacy Concern Annotations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    IUI '23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces
    March 2023
    266 pages
    ISBN:9798400701078
    DOI:10.1145/3581754
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 27 March 2023

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Image privacy
    2. usable security

    Qualifiers

    • Extended-abstract
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    IUI '23
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 746 of 2,811 submissions, 27%

    Upcoming Conference

    IUI '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 149
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)71
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
    Reflects downloads up to 18 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media