Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3568444.3568470acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmumConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open access

Frankie: Exploring how Self-Tracking Technologies can go from Data-Centred to Human-Centred

Published: 29 December 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Self-tracking technologies have long promised to enhance our well-being. However, our initial work and that of others show that most of these technologies focus on data, not the user. Based on interviews, development of mood boards, and the creation of a research product, we propose an alternative approach to self-tracking: re-humanising self-tracking technologies. Our work shows that feelings play an important role with data, that data are temporal, and associated with work and utility. We interpret four design criteria, which are applied in the creation of Frankie: a human-centred tracking device which records both quantitative (number of activities) and qualitative (perceived weight of the activity and spoken reflections) data to foster self-reflection. Through this design case we add to the discussion on re-imagining self-tracking technologies to go beyond data-centric artefacts.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (Frankie_Interaction Video.mp4)
Video showing the interaction with Frankie.

References

[1]
Eric P.S. Baumer, Vera Khovanskaya, Mark Matthews, Lindsay Reynolds, Victoria Schwanda Sosik, and Geri Gay. 2014. Reviewing Reflection: On the Use of Reflection in Interactive System Design. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (DIS ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598598
[2]
Andréa Belliger and David J Krieger. 2016. From Quantified to Qualified Self. A Fictional Dialogue at the Mall. Digital Culture & Society 2, 1 (2016), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/822
[3]
Marit Bentvelzen, Paweł W. Woźniak, Pia S.F. Herbes, Evropi Stefanidi, and Jasmin Niess. 2022. Revisiting Reflection in HCI: Four Design Resources for Technologies That Support Reflection. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 6, 1, Article 2 (mar 2022), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3517233
[4]
Marit Bentvelzen, Paweł W. Woźniak, Pia S.F. Herbes, Evropi Stefanidi, and Jasmin Niess. 2022. Revisiting Reflection in HCI: Four Design Resources for Technologies That Support Reflection. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 6, 1, Article 2 (mar 2022), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3517233
[5]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2019. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 11, 4 (2019), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
[6]
Tracy Cassidy. 2011. The Mood Board Process Modeled and Understood as a Qualitative Design Research Tool. Fashion Practice 3, 2 (2011), 225–251. https://doi.org/10.2752/175693811X13080607764854 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.2752/175693811X13080607764854
[7]
Barbara L. Chalfonte, Robert S. Fish, and Robert E. Kraut. 1991. Expressive Richness: A Comparison of Speech and Text as Media for Revision. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, Louisiana, USA) (CHI ’91). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/108844.108848
[8]
Eugene Cho. 2019. Hey Google, Can I Ask You Something in Private?. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300488
[9]
Eun Kyoung Choe, Saeed Abdullah, Mashfiqui Rabbi, Edison Thomaz, Daniel A Epstein, Felicia Cordeiro, Matthew Kay, Gregory D Abowd, Tanzeem Choudhury, James Fogarty, 2017. Semi-automated tracking: a balanced approach for self-monitoring applications. IEEE Pervasive Computing 16, 1 (2017), 74–84.
[10]
Eun Kyoung Choe, Bongshin Lee, Haining Zhu, Nathalie Henry Riche, and Dominikus Baur. 2017. Understanding Self-Reflection: How People Reflect on Personal Data through Visual Data Exploration. In Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (Barcelona, Spain) (PervasiveHealth ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1145/3154862.3154881
[11]
Chia-Fang Chung, Elena Agapie, Jessica Schroeder, Sonali Mishra, James Fogarty, and Sean A. Munson. 2017. When Personal Tracking Becomes Social: Examining the Use of Instagram for Healthy Eating. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1674–1687. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025747
[12]
Kate Crawford, Jessa Lingel, and Tero Karppi. 2015. Our metrics, ourselves: A hundred years of self-tracking from the weight scale to the wrist wearable device. European Journal of Cultural Studies 18, 4-5 (2015), 479–496.
[13]
Linda de Valk, Tilde Bekker, and Berry Eggen. 2013. Leaving Room for Improvisation: Towards a Design Approach for Open-Ended Play. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (New York, New York, USA) (IDC ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1145/2485760.2485771
[14]
Lina Dib, Daniela Petrelli, and Steve Whittaker. 2010. Sonic Souvenirs: Exploring the Paradoxes of Recorded Sound for Family Remembering. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Savannah, Georgia, USA) (CSCW ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718985
[15]
Chris Elsden, David Kirk, Mark Selby, and Chris Speed. 2015. Beyond Personal Informatics: Designing for Experiences with Data. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI EA ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2341–2344. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2702632
[16]
Daniel A. Epstein, An Ping, James Fogarty, and Sean A. Munson. 2015. A Lived Informatics Model of Personal Informatics. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (Osaka, Japan) (UbiComp ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 731–742. https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2804250
[17]
Steven Faerm. 2010. Fashion design course : principles, practice and techniques : the ultimate guide for aspiring fashion designers. B.E.S. Publishing. 144 pages.
[18]
Daniel Fallman. 2010. A different way of seeing: Albert Borgmann’s philosophy of technology and human–computer interaction. Ai & Society 25, 1 (2010), 53–60.
[19]
Shan Feng, Matti Mäntymäki, Amandeep Dhir, and Hannu Salmela. 2021. How Self-tracking and the Quantified Self Promote Health and Well-being: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 23, 9 (sep 2021), e25171. https://doi.org/10.2196/25171
[20]
Erik Grönvall and Nervo Verdezoto. 2013. Beyond self-monitoring: Understanding non-functional aspects of home-based healthcare technology. In UbiComp 2013 - Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. 587–596. https://doi.org/10.1145/2493432.2493495
[21]
Jenny Hislop, Sara Arber, Rob Meadows, and Sue Venn. 2005. Narratives of the Night: The Use of Audio Diaries in Researching Sleep. Sociological Research Online 10, 4 (2005), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1194 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1194
[22]
Trevor Hogan and Eva Hornecker. 2012. How Does Representation Modality Affect User-Experience of Data Artifacts?. In Haptic and Audio Interaction Design(Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Charlotte Magnusson, Delphine Szymczak, and Stephen Brewster (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32796-4_15
[23]
Sarah Homewood and Anna Vallgårda. 2020. Putting Phenomenological Theories to Work in the Design of Self-Tracking Technologies. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (DIS ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1833–1846. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395550
[24]
Sun-ha Hong. 2020. Technologies of Speculation -The Limits of Knowledge in a Data-Driven Society. NYU Press, New York.
[25]
Kristina Höök. 2009. Affective loop experiences: designing for interactional embodiment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364(2009), 3585 – 3595.
[26]
Yvonne Jansen, Pierre Dragicevic, Petra Isenberg, Jason Alexander, Abhijit Karnik, Johan Kildal, Sriram Subramanian, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2015. Opportunities and Challenges for Data Physicalization. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3227–3236. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702180
[27]
Rikke Hagensby Jensen, Enrique Encinas, and Dimitrios Raptis. 2022. Spicing It Up: From Ubiquitous Devices to Tangible Things Through Provocation. In Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(Daejeon, Republic of Korea) (TEI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 33, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490149.3502257
[28]
Jakob Karolus, Eva Brass, Thomas Kosch, Albrecht Schmidt, and Pawel Wozniak. 2021. Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: Exploring Ubiquitous Artifacts for Health Tracking. In 20th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (Leuven, Belgium) (MUM 2021). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490632.3490671
[29]
Vera Khovanskaya, Eric P.S. Baumer, Dan Cosley, Stephen Voida, and Geri Gay. 2013. "Everybody Knows What You’re Doing": A Critical Design Approach to Personal Informatics. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3403–3412. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466467
[30]
Lenneke Kuijer. 2020. Democratising and Anticipating Everyday Futures Through Critical Design: A Review of Exemplars. Temes de Disseny36 (sep 2020), 150–177. https://doi.org/10.46467/TDD36.2020.150-177
[31]
Kwangyoung Lee and Hwajung Hong. 2017. Designing for Self-Tracking of Emotion and Experience with Tangible Modality. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Edinburgh, United Kingdom) (DIS ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064697
[32]
Ian Li, Anind Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2009. Grafitter: Leveraging Social Media for Self Reflection. XRDS 16, 2 (Dec. 2009), 12–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/1665997.1666001
[33]
Ian Li, Jodi Forlizzi, and Anind Dey. 2010. Know Thyself: Monitoring and Reflecting on Facets of One’s Life. In CHI ’10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI EA ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4489–4492. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753846.1754181
[34]
Andrés Lucero. 2012. Framing, aligning, paradoxing, abstracting, and directing: How design mood boards work. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, DIS ’12. 438–447. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318021
[35]
A A (andrés) Lucero. 2009. Co-designing interactive spaces for and with designers:supporting mood-board making.
[36]
Yuhan Luo. 2021. Designing Multimodal Self-Tracking Technologies to Promote Data Capture and Self-Reflection. In Companion Publication of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Virtual Event, USA) (DIS ’21 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3468002.3468232
[37]
Deborah Lupton. 2016. The quantified self. John Wiley & Sons.
[38]
Daphne Menheere, Evianne van Hartingsveldt, Mads Birkebæk, Steven Vos, and Carine Lallemand. 2021. Laina: Dynamic Data Physicalization for Slow Exercising Feedback. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021 (Virtual Event, USA) (DIS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1015–1030. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462041
[39]
Ine Mols, Elise van den Hoven, and Berry Eggen. 2020. Everyday Life Reflection: Exploring Media Interaction with Balance, Cogito & Dott. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Sydney NSW, Australia) (TEI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1145/3374920.3374928
[40]
William Odom, Ron Wakkary, Youn-kyung Lim, Audrey Desjardins, Bart Hengeveld, and Richard Banks. 2016. From Research Prototype to Research Product. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2549–2561. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858447
[41]
Fredrik Ohlin and Carl Magnus Olsson. 2015. Beyond a Utility View of Personal Informatics: A Postphenomenological Framework. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (Osaka, Japan) (UbiComp/ISWC’15 Adjunct). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1087–1092. https://doi.org/10.1145/2800835.2800965
[42]
Amon Rapp and Federica Cena. 2016. Personal informatics for everyday life: How users without prior self-tracking experience engage with personal data. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 94 (2016), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.05.006
[43]
Amon Rapp and Lia Tirabeni. 2018. Personal Informatics for Sport: Meaning, Body, and Social Relations in Amateur and Elite Athletes. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 25, 3, Article 16 (jun 2018), 30 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196829
[44]
Amon Rapp and Lia Tirabeni. 2020. Self-tracking while doing sport: Comfort, motivation, attention and lifestyle of athletes using personal informatics tools. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 140, 102434 (Aug. 2020), 102434.
[45]
Amon Rapp and Maurizio Tirassa. 2017. Know Thyself: A Theory of the Self for Personal Informatics. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 32, 5–6 (Nov. 2017), 335–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2017.1285704
[46]
John Rooksby, Mattias Rost, Alistair Morrison, and Matthew Chalmers. 2014. Personal Tracking as Lived Informatics. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1163–1172. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557039
[47]
John Rooksby, Mattias Rost, Alistair Morrison, and Matthew Chalmers. 2014. Personal tracking as lived informatics. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1163–1172.
[48]
Sherry Ruan, Jacob O. Wobbrock, Kenny Liou, Andrew Ng, and James A. Landay. 2018. Comparing Speech and Keyboard Text Entry for Short Messages in Two Languages on Touchscreen Phones. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 4, Article 159 (Jan. 2018), 23 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3161187
[49]
Kim Sauvé, Saskia Bakker, Nicolai Marquardt, and Steven Houben. 2020. LOOP: Exploring Physicalization of Activity Tracking Data. In Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society (Tallinn, Estonia) (NordiCHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 52, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420109
[50]
Nitin Sawhney, Cleve Graver, and Emily Breitkopf. 2018. Audio Journaling for Self-Reflection and Assessment among Teens in Participatory Media Programs. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Trondheim, Norway) (IDC ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1145/3202185.3202752
[51]
Nitin Sawhney, Cleve Graver, and Emily Breitkopf. 2018. Audio Journaling for Self-Reflection and Assessment among Teens in Participatory Media Programs. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Trondheim, Norway) (IDC ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1145/3202185.3202752
[52]
Phoebe Sengers and Bill Gaver. 2006. Staying Open to Interpretation: Engaging Multiple Meanings in Design and Evaluation. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (University Park, PA, USA) (DIS ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1145/1142405.1142422
[53]
Sujay Shalawadi, Anas Alnayef, Niels van Berkel, Jesper Kjeldskov, and Florian Echtler. 2021. Rainmaker: A Tangible Work-Companion for the Personal Office Space. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction (Toulouse &; Virtual, France) (MobileHCI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 39, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3447526.3472032
[54]
Tamar Sharon and Dorien Zandbergen. 2017. From data fetishism to quantifying selves: Self-tracking practices and the other values of data. New Media & Society 19, 11 (2017), 1695–1709. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816636090 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816636090
[55]
Katta Spiel, Fares Kayali, Louise Horvath, Michael Penkler, Sabine Harrer, Miguel Sicart, and Jessica Hammer. 2018. Fitter, Happier, More Productive? The Normative Ontology of Fitness Trackers. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI EA ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3188401
[56]
Melanie Swan. 2013. The Quantified Self:Fundamental Disruption in Big Data Science and Biological Discovery. Big Data 1, 2 (2013), 1–15.
[57]
Neille-Ann H. Tan, Han Sha, Eda Celen, Phucanh Tran, Kelly Wang, Gifford Cheung, Philip Hinch, and Jeff Huang. 2018. Rewind: Automatically Reconstructing Everyday Memories with First-Person Perspectives. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2, 4, Article 191 (dec 2018), 20 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287069
[58]
Alex S. Taylor, Richard Harper, Laurel Swan, Shahram Izadi, Abigail Sellen, and Mark Perry. 2007. Homes that make us smart. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 11, 5 (jul 2007), 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-006-0076-5
[59]
Niels van Berkel, Chu Luo, Denzil Ferreira, Jorge Goncalves, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2015. The Curse of Quantified-Self: An Endless Quest for Answers. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers(Osaka, Japan) (UbiComp/ISWC’15 Adjunct). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 973–978. https://doi.org/10.1145/2800835.2800946
[60]
Rosa van Koningsbruggen, Hannes Waldschütz, and Eva Hornecker. 2022. What is Data? - Exploring the Meaning of Data in Data Physicalisation Teaching. In Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(Daejeon, Republic of Korea) (TEI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 13, 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490149.3501319
[61]
Yun Wang, Adrien Segal, Roberta Klatzky, Daniel F. Keefe, Petra Isenberg, Jorn Hurtienne, Eva Hornecker, Tim Dwyer, Stephen Barrass, and Theresa-Marie Rhyne. 2019. An Emotional Response to the Value of Visualization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 39, 5 (Sept. 2019), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2019.2923483
[62]
John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through Design as a Method for Interaction Design Research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Dr. Convenience Love or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love my Voice Assistant✱Proceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685364(1-14)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Manual, Hybrid, and Automatic Privacy Covers for Smart Home CamerasProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661569(3453-3470)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)From Metrics to Experiences: Investigating How Sport Data Shapes the Social Context, Self-Determination and Motivation of AthletesInteracting with Computers10.1093/iwc/iwae012Online publication date: 14-May-2024

Index Terms

  1. Frankie: Exploring how Self-Tracking Technologies can go from Data-Centred to Human-Centred

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    MUM '22: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia
    November 2022
    315 pages
    ISBN:9781450398206
    DOI:10.1145/3568444
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 29 December 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Humanising Self-Tracking Technologies
    2. Qualified Self
    3. Self-Reflection
    4. Self-Tracking

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    MUM 2022

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 190 of 465 submissions, 41%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)218
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)30
    Reflects downloads up to 22 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Dr. Convenience Love or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love my Voice Assistant✱Proceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685364(1-14)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Manual, Hybrid, and Automatic Privacy Covers for Smart Home CamerasProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661569(3453-3470)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)From Metrics to Experiences: Investigating How Sport Data Shapes the Social Context, Self-Determination and Motivation of AthletesInteracting with Computers10.1093/iwc/iwae012Online publication date: 14-May-2024

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media