Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

One Ring to Rule Them All: An Empirical Understanding of Day-to-Day Smartring Usage Through In-Situ Diary Study

Published: 07 September 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Smartrings have potential to extend our ubiquitous control through their always available and finger-worn location, as well as their quick and subtle interactions. As such, smartrings have gained popularity in research and in commercial usage; however, they often concentrate on a singular or novel aspect of a smartring's potential. While with any emerging technology the focus on these individual components is important, there is a lack of broader empirical understanding regarding a user's intentions for smartring usage. Thus in this work, we investigate concrete and reported smartring usage scenarios throughout the daily lives of participants. During a two-week in-situ diary study (N = 14), utilizing a mock smartring, we provide an initial understanding of the potential tasks, daily activities, connected devices, and interactions for which augmentation with a smartring was desired. We further highlight patterns of imagined smartring use found by our participants. Finally, we provide and discuss guidelines, grounded through our found knowledge, to inform research and development towards the design of future smartrings.

Supplementary Material

bardot (bardot.zip)
Supplemental movie, appendix, image and software files for, One Ring to Rule Them All: An Empirical Understanding of Day-to-Day Smartring Usage Through In-Situ Diary Study

References

[1]
Daniel Ashbrook, Patrick Baudisch, and Sean White. 2011. Nenya: subtle and eyes-free mobile input with a magnetically-tracked finger ring. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2043--2046. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979238
[2]
Sandra Bardot, Surya Rawat, Duy Thai Nguyen, Sawyer Rempel, Huizhe Zheng, Bradley Rey, Jun Li, Kevin Fan, Da-Yuan Huang, Wei Li, et al. 2021. ARO: Exploring the Design of Smart-Ring Interactions for Encumbered Hands. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction. 1--11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3447526.3472037
[3]
Patrick Baudisch and Gerry Chu. 2009. Back-of-device interaction allows creating very small touch devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1923--1932. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518995
[4]
Roger Boldu, Alexandru Dancu, Denys JC Matthies, Thisum Buddhika, Shamane Siriwardhana, and Suranga Nanayakkara. 2018. Fingerreader2. 0: Designing and evaluating a wearable finger-worn camera to assist people with visual impairments while shopping. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 2, 3 (2018), 1--19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3264904
[5]
Roger Boldu, Alexandru Dancu, Denys JC Matthies, Pablo Gallego Cascón, Shanaka Ransir, and Suranga Nanayakkara. 2018. Thumb-In-Motion: Evaluating Thumb-to-Ring Microgestures for Athletic Activity. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Spatial User Interaction. 150--157. https://doi.org/10.1145/3267782.3267796
[6]
Scott Carter and Jennifer Mankoff. 2005. When participants do the capturing: the role of media in diary studies. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 899--908. https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055098
[7]
Karen Church and Barry Smyth. 2009. Understanding the intent behind mobile information needs. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. 247--256. https://doi.org/10.1145/1502650.1502686
[8]
Sunny Consolvo and Miriam Walker. 2003. Using the experience sampling method to evaluate ubicomp applications. IEEE pervasive computing 2, 2 (2003), 24--31. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2003.1203750
[9]
Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and Reed Larson. 2014. Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. In Flow and the foundations of positive psychology. Springer, 35--54. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_3
[10]
David Dearman, Melanie Kellar, and Khai N Truong. 2008. An examination of daily information needs and sharing opportunities. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 679--688. https://doi.org/10.1145/1460563.1460668
[11]
Barrett Ens, Ahmad Byagowi, Teng Han, Juan David Hincapié-Ramos, and Pourang Irani. 2016. Combining ring input with hand tracking for precise, natural interaction with spatial analytic interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2016 Symposium on Spatial User Interaction. 99--102. https://doi.org/10.1145/2983310.2985757
[12]
Bogdan-Florin Gheran, Jean Vanderdonckt, and Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2018. Gestures for smart rings: empirical results, insights, and design implications. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 623--635. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196741
[13]
Bogdan-Florin Gheran and Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2020. From controls on the steering wheel to controls on the finger: using smart rings for in-vehicle interactions. In Companion Publication of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 299--304. https://doi.org/10.1145/3393914.3395851
[14]
Sarthak Ghosh, Hyeong Cheol Kim, Yang Cao, Arne Wessels, Simon T Perrault, and Shengdong Zhao. 2016. Ringteraction: coordinated thumb-index interaction using a ring. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2640--2647. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892371
[15]
Aakar Gupta, Cheng Ji, Hui-Shyong Yeo, Aaron Quigley, and Daniel Vogel. 2019. Rotoswype: Word-gesture typing using a ring. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300244
[16]
Kyohei Hakka, Toshiya Isomoto, and Buntarou Shizuki. 2019. One-Handed Interaction Technique for Single-Touch Gesture Input on Large Smartphones. In Symposium on Spatial User Interaction. 1--2. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357251.3358750
[17]
Jonna Häkkilä, Farnaz Vahabpour, Ashley Colley, Jani Väyrynen, and Timo Koskela. 2015. Design probes study on user perceptions of a smart glasses concept. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. 223--233. https://doi.org/10.1145/2836041.2836064
[18]
Teng Han, Qian Han, Michelle Annett, Fraser Anderson, Da-Yuan Huang, and Xing-Dong Yang. 2017. Frictio: Passive kinesthetic force feedback for smart ring output. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 131--142. https://doi.org/10.1145/3126594.3126622
[19]
Gabriella M Harari, Nicholas D Lane, Rui Wang, Benjamin S Crosier, Andrew T Campbell, and Samuel D Gosling. 2016. Using smartphones to collect behavioral data in psychological science: Opportunities, practical considerations, and challenges. Perspectives on Psychological Science 11, 6 (2016), 838--854. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616650285
[20]
Anuradha Herath, Bradley Rey, Sandra Bardot, Sawyer Rempel, Lucas Audette, Huizhe Zheng, Jun Li, Kevin Fan, Da-Yuan Huang, Wei Li, et al. 2022. Expanding Touch Interaction Capabilities for Smart-rings: An Exploration of Continual Slide and Microroll Gestures. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. 1--7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519714
[21]
Javier Hernandez, Daniel McDuff, Christian Infante, Pattie Maes, Karen Quigley, and Rosalind Picard. 2016. Wearable ESM: differences in the experience sampling method across wearable devices. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services. 195--205. https://doi.org/10.1145/2935334.2935340
[22]
Stephen Intille, Caitlin Haynes, Dharam Maniar, Aditya Ponnada, and Justin Manjourides. 2016. μEMA: Microinteraction-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) using a smartwatch. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. 1124--1128. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971648.2971717
[23]
Lei Jing, Zixue Cheng, Yinghui Zhou, Junbo Wang, and Tongjun Huang. 2013. Magic ring: A self-contained gesture input device on finger. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. 1--4. https://doi.org/10.1145/2541831.2541875
[24]
Tero Jokela, Jarno Ojala, and Thomas Olsson. 2015. A diary study on combining multiple information devices in everyday activities and tasks. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. 3903--3912. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702211
[25]
Jingun Jung, Sangyoon Lee, Jiwoo Hong, Eunhye Youn, and Geehyuk Lee. 2020. Voice+ Tactile: Augmenting In-vehicle Voice User Interface with Tactile Touchpad Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376863
[26]
Junhyeok Kim, William Delamare, and Pourang Irani. 2018. Thumbtext: Text entry for wearable devices using a miniature ring. In Graphics Interface. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03030524
[27]
Marc Kurz, Robert Gstoettner, and Erik Sonnleitner. 2021. Smart Rings vs. Smartwatches: Utilizing Motion Sensors for Gesture Recognition. Applied Sciences 11, 5 (2021), 2015. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/5/2015
[28]
Chen Liang, Chun Yu, Yue Qin, Yuntao Wang, and Yuanchun Shi. 2021. DualRing: Enabling Subtle and Expressive Hand Interaction with Dual IMU Rings. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 5, 3, Article 115 (sep 2021), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3478114
[29]
Julia M Mayer, Starr Roxanne Hiltz, Louise Barkhuus, Kaisa Väänänen, and Quentin Jones. 2016. Supporting opportunities for context-aware social matching: An experience sampling study. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2430--2441. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858175
[30]
Milad Asgari Mehrabadi, Iman Azimi, Fatemeh Sarhaddi, Anna Axelin, Hannakaisa Niela-Vilén, Saana Myllyntausta, Sari Stenholm, Nikil Dutt, Pasi Liljeberg, Amir M Rahmani, et al. 2020. Sleep tracking of a commercially available smart ring and smartwatch against medical-grade actigraphy in everyday settings: instrument validation study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 8, 11 (2020), e20465. https://doi.org/10.2196/20465
[31]
Meredith Ringel Morris, Andreea Danielescu, Steven Drucker, Danyel Fisher, Bongshin Lee, and Jacob O Wobbrock. 2014. Reducing Legacy Bias in Gesture Elicitation Studies. interactions 21, 3: 40-45. Google Scholar Google Scholar Digital Library Digital Library (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2591689
[32]
Miguel A Nacenta, Dzmitry Aliakseyeu, Sriram Subramanian, and Carl Gutwin. 2005. A comparison of techniques for multi-display reaching. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 371--380. https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055024
[33]
Ali Neshati, Bradley Rey, Ahmed Shariff Mohommed Faleel, Sandra Bardot, Celine Latulipe, and Pourang Irani. 2021. BezelGlide: Interacting with Graphs on Smartwatches with Minimal Screen Occlusion. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445201
[34]
Masa Ogata, Yuta Sugiura, Hirotaka Osawa, and Michita Imai. 2012. iRing: intelligent ring using infrared reflection. In Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. 131--136. https://doi.org/10.1145/2380116.2380135
[35]
Farshid Salemi Parizi, Eric Whitmire, and Shwetak Patel. 2019. AuraRing: Precise Electromagnetic Finger Tracking. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 3, 4, Article 150 (dec 2019), 28 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3369831
[36]
Gunhyuk Park, Hojun Cha, and Seungmoon Choi. 2018. Haptic enchanters: Attachable and detachable vibrotactile modules and their advantages. IEEE transactions on haptics 12, 1 (2018), 43--55. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2018.2859955
[37]
Sameer Patil, Roberto Hoyle, Roman Schlegel, Apu Kapadia, and Adam J Lee. 2015. Interrupt now or inform later? Comparing immediate and delayed privacy feedback. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1415--1418. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702165
[38]
Sebastien Pelurson and Laurence Nigay. 2016. Bimanual input for multiscale navigation with pressure and touch gestures. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. 145--152. https://doi.org/10.1145/2993148.2993152
[39]
Daniel E Rivera and Holly B Jimison. 2013. Systems modeling of behavior change: Two illustrations from optimized interventions for improved health outcomes. IEEE pulse 4, 6 (2013), 41--47. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPUL.2013.2279621
[40]
Yvonne Rogers, Kay Connelly, Lenore Tedesco, William Hazlewood, Andrew Kurtz, Robert E Hall, Josh Hursey, and Tammy Toscos. 2007. Why it's worth the hassle: The value of in-situ studies when designing ubicomp. In International conference on ubiquitous computing. Springer, 336--353. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74853-3_20
[41]
Anne Roudaut, Eric Lecolinet, and Yves Guiard. 2009. MicroRolls: expanding touch-screen input vocabulary by distinguishing rolls vs. slides of the thumb. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 927--936. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518843
[42]
Thijs Roumen, Simon T Perrault, and Shengdong Zhao. 2015. Notiring: A comparative study of notification channels for wearable interactive rings. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2497--2500. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702350
[43]
Houssem Saidi, Marcos Serrano, Pourang Irani, and Emmanuel Dubois. 2017. TDome: a touch-enabled 6DOF interactive device for multi-display environments. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 5892--5904. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025661
[44]
Niilo Saranummi, Donna Spruijt-Metz, Stephen S Intille, Ilkka Korhone, Wendy J Nilsen, and Misha Pavel. 2013. Moving the science of behavior change into the 21st century: novel solutions to prevent disease and promote health. IEEE pulse 4, 5 (2013), 22--24. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPUL.2013.2271680
[45]
Alberto Savoia. 2019. The right it: Why so many ideas fail and how to make sure yours succeed. Harper One.
[46]
Hasti Seifi and Kent Lyons. 2016. Exploring the design space of touch-based vibrotactile interactions for smartwatches. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 156--165. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971763.2971783
[47]
Marcos Serrano, Barrett Ens, Xing-Dong Yang, and Pourang Irani. 2015. Gluey: Developing a head-worn display interface to unify the interaction experience in distributed display environments. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. 161--171. https://doi.org/10.1145/2785830.2785838
[48]
Marcos Serrano, Eric Lecolinet, and Yves Guiard. 2013. Bezel-Tap gestures: quick activation of commands from sleep mode on tablets. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 3027--3036. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481421
[49]
Roy Shilkrot, Jochen Huber, Jürgen Steimle, Suranga Nanayakkara, and Pattie Maes. 2015. Digital digits: A comprehensive survey of finger augmentation devices. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 48, 2 (2015), 1--29. https://doi.org/10.1145/2828993
[50]
Gaganpreet Singh, William Delamare, and Pourang Irani. 2018. D-SWIME: A design space for smartwatch interaction techniques supporting mobility and encumbrance. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174208
[51]
Timothy Sohn, Kevin A Li, William G Griswold, and James D Hollan. 2008. A diary study of mobile information needs. In Proceedings of the sigchi conference on human factors in computing systems. 433--442. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357125
[52]
Arthur A Stone, Ronald C Kessler, and Jennifer A Haythomthwatte. 1991. Measuring daily events and experiences: Decisions for the researcher. Journal of personality 59, 3 (1991), 575--607. https://doi.org/10.llll/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00260.x
[53]
Hsin-Ruey Tsai, Min-Chieh Hsiu, Jui-Chun Hsiao, Lee-Ting Huang, Mike Chen, and Yi-Ping Hung. 2016. TouchRing: subtle and always-available input using a multi-touch ring. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct. 891--898. https://doi.org/10.1145/2957265.2961860
[54]
Niels Van Berkel, Denzil Ferreira, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2017. The experience sampling method on mobile devices. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 50, 6 (2017), 1--40. https://doi.org/10.1145/3123988
[55]
Niels van Berkel, Jorge Goncalves, Peter Koval, Simo Hosio, Tilman Dingler, Denzil Ferreira, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2019. Context-informed scheduling and analysis: improving accuracy of mobile self-reports. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300281
[56]
Radu-Daniel Vatavu and Laura-Bianca Bilius. 2021. GestuRING: A Web-based Tool for Designing Gesture Input with Rings, Ring-Like, and Ring-Ready Devices. In The 34th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 710--723. https://doi.org/10.1145/3472749.3474780
[57]
Bryan Wang and Tovi Grossman. 2020. BlyncSync: Enabling Multimodal Smartwatch Gestures with Synchronous Touch and Blink. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376132
[58]
Martin Weigel and Jürgen Steimle. 2017. Deformwear: Deformation input on tiny wearable devices. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 2 (2017), 1--23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3090093
[59]
Pui Chung Wong, Kening Zhu, Xing-Dong Yang, and Hongbo Fu. 2020. Exploring Eyes-free Bezel-initiated Swipe on Round Smartwatches. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376393
[60]
Xinghui Yan, Shriti Raj, Bingjian Huang, Sun Young Park, and Mark W Newman. 2020. Toward Lightweight In-situ Self-reporting: An Exploratory Study of Alternative Smartwatch Interface Designs in Context. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 4, 4 (2020), 1--22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3432212
[61]
Yui-Pan Yau, Lik Hang Lee, Zheng Li, Tristan Braud, Yi-Hsuan Ho, and Pan Hui. 2020. How Subtle Can It Get? A Trimodal Study of Ring-Sized Interfaces for One-Handed Drone Control. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 4, 2, Article 63 (jun 2020), 29 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3397319
[62]
Vibol Yem, Ryuta Okazaki, and Hiroyuki Kajimoto. 2016. FinGAR: combination of electrical and mechanical stimulation for high-fidelity tactile presentation. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2016 Emerging Technologies. 1--2. https://doi.org/10.1145/2929464.2929474
[63]
Eman MG Younis, Eiman Kanjo, and Alan Chamberlain. 2019. Designing and evaluating mobile self-reporting techniques: crowdsourcing for citizen science. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 23, 2 (2019), 329--338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-019-01207-2
[64]
Zhen Yue, Eden Litt, Carrie J Cai, Jeff Stern, Kathy K Baxter, Zhiwei Guan, Nikhil Sharma, and Guangqiang Zhang. 2014. Photographing information needs: the role of photos in experience sampling method-style research. In Proceedings of the sigchi conference on human factors in Computing Systems. 1545--1554. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557192
[65]
Tengxiang Zhang, Xin Zeng, Yinshuai Zhang, Ke Sun, Yuntao Wang, and Yiqiang Chen. 2020. ThermalRing: Gesture and Tag Inputs Enabled by a Thermal Imaging Smart Ring. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376323
[66]
Kening Zhu, Simon Perrault, Taizhou Chen, Shaoyu Cai, and Roshan Lalintha Peiris. 2019. A sense of ice and fire: Exploring thermal feedback with multiple thermoelectric-cooling elements on a smart ring. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 130 (2019), 234--247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.07.003

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Zero-Configuration Alarms: Towards Reducing Distracting Smartphone Interactions while DrivingACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies10.1145/36751592:3(1-30)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
  • (2024)GestureMark: Shortcut Input Technique using Smartwatch Touch Gestures for XR GlassesProceedings of the Augmented Humans International Conference 202410.1145/3652920.3652941(63-71)Online publication date: 4-Apr-2024
  • (2024)MouseRing: Always-available Touchpad Interaction with IMU RingsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642225(1-19)Online publication date: 11-May-2024

Index Terms

  1. One Ring to Rule Them All: An Empirical Understanding of Day-to-Day Smartring Usage Through In-Situ Diary Study

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
    Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 6, Issue 3
    September 2022
    1612 pages
    EISSN:2474-9567
    DOI:10.1145/3563014
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 07 September 2022
    Published in IMWUT Volume 6, Issue 3

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. diary study
    2. in-situ study
    3. smartring
    4. usage scenario

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)138
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)13
    Reflects downloads up to 27 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Zero-Configuration Alarms: Towards Reducing Distracting Smartphone Interactions while DrivingACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies10.1145/36751592:3(1-30)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
    • (2024)GestureMark: Shortcut Input Technique using Smartwatch Touch Gestures for XR GlassesProceedings of the Augmented Humans International Conference 202410.1145/3652920.3652941(63-71)Online publication date: 4-Apr-2024
    • (2024)MouseRing: Always-available Touchpad Interaction with IMU RingsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642225(1-19)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2022)Wearable Devices Combined with Artificial Intelligence—A Future Technology for Atrial Fibrillation Detection?Sensors10.3390/s2222858822:22(8588)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2022

    View Options

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media