Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3519935.3519960acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Optimizing strongly interacting fermionic Hamiltonians

Published: 10 June 2022 Publication History

Abstract

The fundamental problem in much of physics and quantum chemistry is to optimize a low-degree polynomial in certain anticommuting variables. Being a quantum mechanical problem, in many cases we do not know an efficient classical witness to the optimum, or even to an approximation of the optimum. One prominent exception is when the optimum is described by a so-called “Gaussian state”, also called a free fermion state. In this work we are interested in the complexity of this optimization problem when no good Gaussian state exists. Our primary testbed is the Sachdev–Ye–Kitaev (SYK) model of random degree-q polynomials, a model of great current interest in condensed matter physics and string theory, and one which has remarkable properties from a computational complexity standpoint. Among other results, we give an efficient classical certification algorithm for upper-bounding the largest eigenvalue in the q=4 SYK model, and an efficient quantum certification algorithm for lower-bounding this largest eigenvalue; both algorithms achieve constant-factor approximations with high probability.

References

[1]
Dorit Aharonov, Itai Arad, and Thomas Vidick. 2013. The quantum PCP conjecture. ACM SIGACT News, 44, 2 (2013), 47–79.
[2]
Rudolf Ahlswede and Andreas Winter. 2002. Strong converse for identification via quantum channels. Transactions on Information Theory, 48, 3 (2002), 569–579. issn:0018-9448 https://doi.org/10.1109/18.985947
[3]
Oriol Bohigas and Jorge Flores. 1971. Two-body random Hamiltonian and level density. Physics Letters B, 34, 4 (1971), 261–263.
[4]
Marek Bożejko, Burkhard Kümmerer, and Roland Speicher. 1997. q-Gaussian processes: non-commutative and classical aspects. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 185, 1 (1997), 129–154. issn:0010-3616 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002200050084
[5]
Fernando Brandão and Aram Harrow. 2013. Product-state approximations to quantum ground states. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC). 871–880.
[6]
Sergey Bravyi. 2005. Lagrangian representation for fermionic linear optics. Quantum Information & Computation, 5, 3 (2005), 216–238.
[7]
Sergey Bravyi, David Gosset, Robert König, and Kristan Temme. 2019. Approximation algorithms for quantum many-body problems. J. Math. Phys., 60, 3 (2019), 032203.
[8]
Moses Charikar and Anthony Wirth. 2004. Maximizing quadratic programs: extending Grothendieck’s inequality. In Proceedings of the 45th annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS). 54–60.
[9]
A. John Coleman. 1963. Structure of fermion density matrices. Reviews of Modern Physics, 35, 3 (1963), 668–686.
[10]
Kenneth Davidson. 1996. C*-algebras by example. American Mathematical Society.
[11]
Philippe Delsarte. 1973. An algebraic approach to the association schemes of coding theory. Philips Research Reports. Supplements, vi+97.
[12]
Michel Deza, Paul Erdős, and Peter Frankl. 1978. Intersection properties of systems of finite sets. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society. Third Series, 36, 2 (1978), 369–384. issn:0024-6115 https://doi.org/10.1112/plms/s3-36.2.369
[13]
Andrew Doherty, Yeong-Cherng Liang, Ben Toner, and Stephanie Wehner. 2008. The quantum moment problem and bounds on entangled multi-prover games. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC). 199–210.
[14]
Robert Erdahl. 1978. Representability. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 13, 6 (1978), 697–718.
[15]
László Erdős and Dominik Schröder. 2014. Phase transition in the density of states of quantum spin glasses. Mathematical Physics, Analysis and Geometry. An International Journal Devoted to the Theory and Applications of Analysis and Geometry to Physics, 17, 3-4 (2014), 441–464.
[16]
Renjie Feng, Gang Tian, and Dongyi Wei. 2018. Spectrum of SYK model II: Central limit theorem. arXiv.
[17]
Renjie Feng, Gang Tian, and Dongyi Wei. 2019. Spectrum of SYK model. Peking Mathematical Journal, 2, 1 (2019), 41–70. issn:2096-6075 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42543-018-0007-1
[18]
Renjie Feng, Gang Tian, and Dongyi Wei. 2020. Spectrum of SYK model III: large deviations and concentration of measures. Random Matrices. Theory and Applications, 9, 2 (2020), 2050001, 24. issn:2010-3263
[19]
Michael Freedman and Matthew Hastings. 2014. Quantum systems on non-k-hyperfinite complexes: a generalization of classical statistical mechanics on expander graphs. Quantum Information & Computation, 14, 1-2 (2014), 144–180.
[20]
James French and Samuel Wong. 1970. Validity of random matrix theories for many-particle systems. Physics Letters B, 33, 7 (1970), 449–452.
[21]
Antonio García-García, Yiyang Jia, Dario Rosa, and Jacobus Verbaarschot. 2021. Sparse Sachdev–Ye–Kitaev model, quantum chaos, and gravity duals. Physical Review D, 103, 10 (2021), 106002.
[22]
Antonio García-García, Yiyang Jia, and Jacobus Verbaarschot. 2018. Exact moments of the Sachdev–Ye–Kitaev model up to order 1/N^2. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2018, 4 (2018), 1–43.
[23]
Antonio García-García and Jacobus Verbaarschot. 2016. Spectral and thermodynamic properties of the Sachdev–Ye–Kitaev model. Physical Review D, 94, 12 (2016), 126010.
[24]
Humphrey Gastineau-Hills. 1980. Systems of orthogonal designs and quasi Clifford algebras. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Sydney.
[25]
Humphrey Gastineau-Hills. 1982. Quasi Clifford algebras and systems of orthogonal designs. Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society, 32, 1 (1982), 1–23.
[26]
Michel Goemans and David Williamson. 1995. Improved approximation algorithms for maximum cut and satisfiability problems using semidefinite programming. J. ACM, 42 (1995), 1115–1145.
[27]
Dima Grigoriev. 2001. Linear lower bound on degrees of Positivstellensatz calculus proofs for the parity. Theoretical Computer Science, 259, 1-2 (2001), 613–622.
[28]
David Gross and Vladimir Rosenhaus. 2017. A generalization of Sachdev–Ye–Kitaev. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2017, 2 (2017), 1–38.
[29]
Johan Håstad. 2001. Some optimal inapproximability results. J. ACM, 48, 4 (2001), 798–859.
[30]
J. William Helton and Scott McCullough. 2004. A Positivstellensatz for non-commutative polynomials. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 356, 9 (2004), 3721–3737. issn:0002-9947 https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-04-03433-6
[31]
Mourad Ismail, Dennis Stanton, and Gérard Viennot. 1987. The combinatorics of q-Hermite polynomials and the Askey-Wilson integral. European Journal of Combinatorics, 8, 4 (1987), 379–392. issn:0195-6698 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6698(87)80046-X
[32]
Cédric Josz and Didier Henrion. 2016. Strong duality in Lasserre’s hierarchy for polynomial optimization. Optimization Letters, 10, 1 (2016), 3–10.
[33]
Julia Kempe, Alexei Kitaev, and Oded Regev. 2006. The complexity of the local Hamiltonian problem. SIAM J. Comput., 35, 5 (2006), 1070–1097.
[34]
Tanya Khovanova. 2008. Clifford Algebras and Graphs. arXiv.
[35]
Alexei Kitaev. 2015. A simple model of quantum holography. In KITP Strings Seminar and Entanglement. 12, 26. https://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev/
[36]
Igor Klebanov, Alexey Milekhin, Fedor Popov, and Grigory Tarnopolsky. 2018. Spectra of eigenstates in fermionic tensor quantum mechanics. Physical Review D, 97, 10 (2018), 106023.
[37]
Alexander Klyachko. 2006. Quantum marginal problem and N-representability. 36, 1 (2006), 72–86.
[38]
Pravesh Kothari, Ryuhei Mori, Ryan O’Donnell, and David Witmer. 2017. Sum of squares lower bounds for refuting any CSP. In Proceedings of the 49th annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC). 132–145.
[39]
Rafał Latał a. 2006. Estimates of moments and tails of Gaussian chaoses. The Annals of Probability, 34, 6 (2006), 2315–2331. issn:0091-1798
[40]
Joseph Lehec. 2011. Moments of the Gaussian chaos. In Séminaire de Probabilités XLIII (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 2006). Springer, Berlin, 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15217-7_13
[41]
Yi-Kai Liu, Matthias Christandl, and Frank Verstraete. 2007. Quantum computational complexity of the N-representability problem: QMA complete. Physical review letters, 98, 11 (2007), 110503.
[42]
László Lovász. 1979. On the Shannon capacity of a graph. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 25, 1 (1979), 1–7. issn:0018-9448 https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1979.1055985
[43]
David Mazziotti. 2012. Structure of fermionic density matrices: Complete N-representability conditions. Physical Review Letters, 108, 26 (2012), 263002.
[44]
David Mazziotti and Robert Erdahl. 2001. Uncertainty relations and reduced density matrices: Mapping many-body quantum mechanics onto four particles. Physical Review A, 63, 4 (2001), 042113.
[45]
Andrea Montanari. 2021. Optimization of the Sherrington–Kirkpatrick Hamiltonian. SIAM J. Comput., FOCS19–1.
[46]
Dana Moshkovitz and Ran Raz. 2010. Two-query PCP with subconstant error. J. ACM, 57, 5 (2010), 29.
[47]
Miguel Navascués, Stefano Pironio, and Antonio Acín. 2008. A convergent hierarchy of semidefinite programs characterizing the set of quantum correlations. New Journal of Physics, 10, 7 (2008), 073013.
[48]
Roberto Imbuzeiro Oliveira. 2010. Sums of random Hermitian matrices and an inequality by Rudelson. Electronic Communications in Probability, 15 (2010), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1214/ECP.v15-1544
[49]
Jerome Percus. 1978. The role of model systems in the few-body reduction of the N-fermion problem. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 13, 1 (1978), 89–124.
[50]
Stefano Pironio, Miguel Navascués, and Antonio Acín. 2010. Convergent relaxations of polynomial optimization problems with noncommuting variables. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 20, 5 (2010), 2157–2180. issn:1052-6234 https://doi.org/10.1137/090760155
[51]
Prasad Raghavendra. 2009. Approximating NP-hard problems: efficient algorithms and their limits. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Washington.
[52]
Prasad Raghavendra and David Steurer. 2009. How to round any CSP. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS). 586–594.
[53]
Vladimir Rosenhaus. 2019. An introduction to the SYK model. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 52, 32 (2019), 323001.
[54]
Subir Sachdev and Jinwu Ye. 1993. Gapless spin-fluid ground state in a random quantum Heisenberg magnet. Physical Review Letters, 70, 21 (1993), 3339–342.
[55]
Barbara Terhal and David DiVincenzo. 2002. Classical simulation of noninteracting-fermion quantum circuits. Physical Review A, 65, 3 (2002), 032325.
[56]
Joel Tropp. 2012. User-friendly tail bounds for sums of random matrices. Foundations of Computational Mathematics, 12, 4 (2012), 389–434. issn:1615-3375 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10208-011-9099-z
[57]
Shenglong Xu, Leonard Susskind, Yuan Su, and Brian Swingle. 2020. A sparse model of quantum holography. arXiv.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
STOC 2022: Proceedings of the 54th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing
June 2022
1698 pages
ISBN:9781450392648
DOI:10.1145/3519935
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 10 June 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. SYK model
  2. fermions
  3. optimization
  4. quantum computing
  5. sum of squares

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

STOC '22
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,469 of 4,586 submissions, 32%

Upcoming Conference

STOC '25
57th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2025)
June 23 - 27, 2025
Prague , Czech Republic

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)275
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)35
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Expanding the reach of quantum optimization with fermionic embeddingsQuantum10.22331/q-2024-08-28-14518(1451)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Relaxations and Exact Solutions to Quantum Max Cut via the Algebraic Structure of Swap OperatorsQuantum10.22331/q-2024-05-22-13528(1352)Online publication date: 22-May-2024
  • (2024)Fermionic quantum computation with Cooper pair splittersSciPost Physics10.21468/SciPostPhys.16.5.13516:5Online publication date: 27-May-2024
  • (2024)Sparse Random Hamiltonians Are Quantumly EasyPhysical Review X10.1103/PhysRevX.14.01101414:1Online publication date: 9-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Uncertainty Relations from State Polynomial OptimizationPhysical Review Letters10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.200202132:20Online publication date: 16-May-2024
  • (2023)Discovering optimal fermion-qubit mappings through algorithmic enumerationQuantum10.22331/q-2023-10-18-11457(1145)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Optimizing sparse fermionic HamiltoniansQuantum10.22331/q-2023-08-10-10817(1081)Online publication date: 10-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Precise low-temperature expansions for the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev modelPhysical Review B10.1103/PhysRevB.108.035103108:3Online publication date: 5-Jul-2023

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media