research-article

HYPERSONIC: A Hybrid Parallelization Approach for Scalable Complex Event Processing

Authors:

Maor Yankovitch,

Ilya Kolchinsky,

Assaf SchusterAuthors Info & Claims

SIGMOD '22: Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Management of Data

Pages 1093 - 1107

https://doi.org/10.1145/3514221.3517829

Published: 11 June 2022 Publication History

Abstract

The ability to promptly and efficiently detect arbitrarily complex patterns in massive real-time data streams is a crucial requirement in many modern applications. The ever-growing scale of these applications and the sophistication of the patterns involved make it imperative to employ advanced solutions that can optimize pattern detection. One of the most prominent and well-established ways to achieve the above goal is to apply complex event processing (CEP) in a parallel manner, using a multi-core machine and/or a distributed environment. However, the inherent tightly coupled nature of CEP severely limits the scalability of the parallelization methods currently available. In this paper, we introduce a novel parallelization mechanism for efficient complex event processing over data streams. This mechanism is based on a hybrid two-tier model combining multiple layers of parallelism. By employing a fine-grained load balancing model, this multi-layered approach leads to a substantial increase in event detection throughput, while at the same time reducing the latency and the memory consumption. An extensive experimental evaluation on multiple real-life datasets shows that our approach consistently outperforms state-of-the-art CEP parallelization methods by a factor of two to three orders of magnitude.

References

[1]

[n.d.]. http://flink.apache.org.

[2]

[n.d.]. http://www.eoddata.com.

[3]

[n.d.]. http://www.espertech.com.

[4]

D. J. Abadi, Y. Ahmad, M. Balazinska, M. Cherniack, J. Hwang, W. Lindner, A. S. Maskey, E. Rasin, E. Ryvkina, N. Tatbul, Y. Xing, and S. Zdonik. 2005. The design of the Borealis stream processing engine. In CIDR. 277--289.

[5]

A. Adi and O. Etzion. 2004. Amit - the Situation Manager. The VLDB Journal 13, 2 (2004), 177--203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00778-003-0108-y

Digital Library

[6]

J. Agrawal, Y. Diao, D. Gyllstrom, and N. Immerman. 2008. Efficient Pattern Matching over Event Streams. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (Vancouver, Canada) (SIGMOD '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 147--160. https://doi.org/10.1145/1376616.1376634

Digital Library

[7]

M. Akdere, U. Çetintemel, and N. Tatbul. 2008. Plan-based Complex Event Detection Across Distributed Sources. Proc. VLDB Endow. 1, 1 (2008), 66--77.

Digital Library

[8]

Alaa Aljanaby, Emad Abuelrub, and Mohammed Odeh. 2005. A Survey of Distributed Query Optimization. Int. Arab J. Inf. Technol. 2, 1 (2005), 48--57.

[9]

L. Amini, H. Andrade, R. Bhagwan, F. Eskesen, R. King, P. Selo, Y. Park, and C. Venkatramani. 2006. SPC: A Distributed, Scalable Platform for Data Mining. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Data Mining Standards, Services and Platforms (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 27--37. https://doi.org/10.1145/1289612.1289615

Digital Library

[10]

A. Arasu, B. Babcock, S. Babu, J. Cieslewicz, M. Datar, K. Ito, R. Motwani, U. Srivastava, and J. Widom. 2016. STREAM: The Stanford Data Stream Management System. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 317--336. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--540--28608-0_16

[11]

A. Arasu, S. Babu, and J. Widom. 2006. The CQL Continuous Query Language: Semantic Foundations and Query Execution. The VLDB Journal 15, 2 (2006), 121--142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00778-004-0147-z

Digital Library

[12]

C. Balkesen, N. Dindar, M. Wetter, and N. Tatbul. 2013. RIP: Run-based Intraquery Parallelism for Scalable Complex Event Processing. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Conference on Distributed Event-based Systems (Arlington, Texas, USA) (DEBS '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/2488222.2488257

Digital Library

[13]

R. S. Barga, J. Goldstein, M. H. Ali, and M. Hong. 2007. Consistent Streaming Through Time: A Vision for Event Stream Processing. In CIDR. 363--374.

[14]

Paul Beame, Paraschos Koutris, and Dan Suciu. 2017. Communication steps for parallel query processing. Journal of the ACM (JACM) 64, 6 (2017), 1--58.

Digital Library

[15]

M. Blount, M. Ebling, J. Eklund, A. James, C. Mcgregor, N. Percival, K. Smith, and D. Sow. 2010. Real-Time Analysis for Intensive Care: Development and Deployment of the Artemis Analytic System. 29 (05 2010), 110--8.

[16]

L. Brenna, A. Demers, J. Gehrke, M. Hong, J. Ossher, B. Panda, M. Riedewald, M. Thatte, and W. White. [n.d.]. Cayuga: A High-performance Event Processing Engine. In Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (Beijing, China). ACM, 1100--1102. https://doi.org/10.1145/1247480.1247620

Digital Library

[17]

L. Brenna, J. Gehrke, M. Hong, and D. Johansen. 2009. Distributed event stream processing with non-deterministic finite automata. In DEBS, A. S. Gokhale and D. C. Schmidt (Eds.). ACM.

[18]

P. Brown. 2013. Architecting Complex-Event Processing Solutions with TIBCO (1st ed.). Addison-Wesley Professional.

[19]

S. Chandrasekaran, O. Cooper, A. Deshpande, M. J. Franklin, J. M. Hellerstein, W. Hong, S. Krishnamurthy, S. Madden, V. Raman, F. Reiss, and M. A. Shah. 2003. TelegraphCQ: Continuous Dataflow Processing for an Uncertain World. In CIDR.

[20]

J. Chen, D. J. DeWitt, F. Tian, and Y. Wang. 2000. NiagaraCQ: A Scalable Continuous Query System for Internet Databases. SIGMOD Rec. 29, 2 (2000), 379--390. https://doi.org/10.1145/335191.335432

Digital Library

[21]

Shumo Chu, Magdalena Balazinska, and Dan Suciu. 2015. From theory to practice: Efficient join query evaluation in a parallel database system. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 63--78.

Digital Library

[22]

Diane J Cook. 2010. Learning setting-generalized activity models for smart spaces. IEEE intelligent systems 2010, 99 (2010), 1.

[23]

G. Cugola and A. Margara. 2010. TESLA: a formally defined event specification language. In DEBS. ACM, 50--61.

[24]

G. Cugola and A. Margara. 2012. Complex Event Processing with T-REX. J. Syst. Softw. 85, 8 (2012), 1709--1728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2012.03.056

Digital Library

[25]

G. Cugola and A. Margara. 2012. Low latency complex event processing on parallel hardware. J. Parallel and Distrib. Comput. 72, 2 (2012), 205--218.

Digital Library

[26]

G. Cugola and A. Margara. 2012. Processing Flows of Information: From Data Stream to Complex Event Processing. ACM Comput. Surv. 44, 3, Article 15 (2012), 62 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2187671.2187677

Digital Library

[27]

M. Dayarathna and S. Perera. 2018. Recent Advancements in Event Processing. ACM Comput. Surv. 51, 2, Article 33 (Feb. 2018), 36 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170432

Digital Library

[28]

Jeffrey Dean and Sanjay Ghemawat. 2004. MapReduce: Simplified data processing on large clusters. (2004).

[29]

A. Demers, J. Gehrke, M. Hong, M. Riedewald, and W. White. [n.d.]. Towards Expressive Publish/Subscribe Systems. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Advances in Database Technology. Springer-Verlag, 627--644. https://doi.org/10.1007/11687238_38

Digital Library

[30]

Christos Doulkeridis and Kjetil Nørvåg. 2014. A survey of large-scale analytical query processing in MapReduce. The VLDB journal 23, 3 (2014), 355--380.

Digital Library

[31]

O. Etzion and P. Niblett. 2010. Event Processing in Action. Manning Publications Co.

[32]

I. Flouris, N. Giatrakos, A. Deligiannakis, M. Garofalakis, M. Kamp, and M. Mock. 2017. Issues in complex event processing: Status and prospects in the Big Data era. Journal of Systems and Software 127 (2017), 217 -- 236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.011

Digital Library

[33]

Bugra Gedik, Habibe G Özsema, and Özcan Öztürk. 2016. Pipelined fission for stream programs with dynamic selectivity and partitioned state. J. Parallel and Distrib. Comput. 96 (2016), 106--120.

Digital Library

[34]

D. Gyllstrom, J. Agrawal, Y. Diao, and N. Immerman. 2008. On Supporting Kleene Closure over Event Streams. In ICDE. IEEE, 1391--1393.

[35]

Yeye He, Siddharth Barman, Di Wang, and Jeffrey F Naughton. 2011. On the complexity of privacy-preserving complex event processing. In Proceedings of the thirtieth ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems. 165--174.

Digital Library

[36]

M. Hill, M. Campbell, Y. C. Chang, and V. Iyengar. 2008. Event detection in sensor networks for modern oil fields. In DEBS (ACM International Conference Proceeding Series), Vol. 332. ACM, 95--102.

[37]

M. Hirzel. 2012. Partition and Compose: Parallel Complex Event Processing. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Distributed Event- Based Systems (Berlin, Germany) (DEBS '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 191--200. https://doi.org/10.1145/2335484.2335506

Digital Library

[38]

M. Hirzel, R. Soulé, S. Schneider, B. Gedik, and R. Grimm. 2014. A Catalog of Stream Processing Optimizations. ACM Comput. Surv. 46, 4, Article 46 (March 2014), 34 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2528412

Digital Library

[39]

M. Hirzel, R. Soulé, S. Schneider, B. Gedik, and R. Grimm. 2014. A catalog of stream processing optimizations. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 46, 4 (2014), 46.

Digital Library

[40]

K.Chapnik, I. Kolchinsky, and A. Schuster. 2022. DARLING: Data-Aware Load Shedding in Complex Event Processing Systems. PVLDB 15, 15 (2022).

[41]

I. Kolchinsky and A. Schuster. 2018. Efficient Adaptive Detection of Complex Event Patterns. PVLDB 11, 11 (2018), 1346--1359.

Digital Library

[42]

I. Kolchinsky and A. Schuster. 2018. Join Query Optimization Techniques for Complex Event Processing Applications. PVLDB 11, 11 (2018), 1332--1345.

Digital Library

[43]

Ilya Kolchinsky and Assaf Schuster. 2019. Real-Time Multi-Pattern Detection over Event Streams. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Management of Data, SIGMOD Conference 2019, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, June 30 - July 5, 2019, Peter A. Boncz, Stefan Manegold, Anastasia Ailamaki, Amol Deshpande, and Tim Kraska (Eds.). ACM, 589--606. https://doi.org/10.1145/3299869.3319869

Digital Library

[44]

I. Kolchinsky, A. Schuster, and D. Keren. 2016. Efficient Detection of Complex Event Patterns Using Lazy Chain Automata. CoRR abs/1612.05110 (2016). arXiv:1612.05110 http://arxiv.org/abs/1612.05110

[45]

I. Kolchinsky, I. Sharfman, and A. Schuster. 2015. Lazy Evaluation Methods for Detecting Complex Events. In DEBS (Oslo, Norway). ACM, 34--45. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675743.2771832

Digital Library

[46]

Donald Kossmann. 2000. The state of the art in distributed query processing. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 32, 4 (2000), 422--469.

Digital Library

[47]

Kyong-Ha Lee, Yoon-Joon Lee, Hyunsik Choi, Yon Dohn Chung, and Bongki Moon. 2012. Parallel data processing with MapReduce: a survey. AcM sIGMoD Record 40, 4 (2012), 11--20.

[48]

Qian Lin, Beng Chin Ooi, Zhengkui Wang, and Cui Yu. 2015. Scalable distributed stream join processing. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 811--825.

Digital Library

[49]

Mo Liu, Elke Rundensteiner, Dan Dougherty, Chetan Gupta, Song Wang, Ismail Ari, and Abhay Mehta. 2011. High-performance nested CEP query processing over event streams. In 2011 IEEE 27th International Conference on Data Engineering. IEEE, 123--134.

Digital Library

[50]

M. Liu, E. Rundensteiner, K. Greenfield, C. Gupta, S. Wang, I. Ari, and A. Mehta. 2011. E-Cube: Multi-dimensional Event Sequence Analysis Using Hierarchical Pattern Query Sharing. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (Athens, Greece) (SIGMOD '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 889--900. https://doi.org/10.1145/1989323.1989416

Digital Library

[51]

R. Mayer, B. Koldehofe, and K. Rothermel. 2015. Predictable Low-Latency Event Detection With Parallel Complex Event Processing. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 2, 4 (Aug 2015), 274--286. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2015.2397316

[52]

Ruben Mayer, Ahmad Slo, Muhammad Adnan Tariq, Kurt Rothermel, Manuel Gräber, and Umakishore Ramachandran. 2017. SPECTRE: supporting consumption policies in window-based parallel complex event processing. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM/IFIP/USENIX Middleware Conference. 161--173.

Digital Library

[53]

Ruben Mayer, Muhammad Adnan Tariq, and Kurt Rothermel. 2017. Minimizing communication overhead in window-based parallel complex event processing. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM International Conference on Distributed and Event-based Systems. 54--65. 14

Digital Library

[54]

Y. Mei and S. Madden. 2009. ZStream: a cost-based query processor for adaptively detecting composite events. In SIGMOD Conference. ACM, 193--206.

[55]

Gabriele Mencagli, Massimo Torquati, Marco Danelutto, and Tiziano De Matteis. 2017. Parallel continuous preference queries over out-of-order and bursty data streams. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 28, 9 (2017), 2608--2624.

Digital Library

[56]

Muhammad Anis Uddin Nasir, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Nicolas Kourtellis, and Marco Serafini. 2016. When two choices are not enough: Balancing at scale in distributed stream processing. In 2016 IEEE 32nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). IEEE, 589--600.

[57]

M Tamer Özsu and Patrick Valduriez. 1996. Distributed and parallel database systems. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 28, 1 (1996), 125--128.

Digital Library

[58]

Karl Pearson. 1895. VII. Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents. proceedings of the royal society of London 58, 347--352 (1895), 240--242.

[59]

O. Poppe, C. Lei, S. Ahmed, and E. Rundensteiner. 2017. Complete Event Trend Detection in High-Rate Event Streams. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Management of Data (Chicago, Illinois, USA) (SIGMOD '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 109--124. https://doi.org/10.1145/3035918.3035947

Digital Library

[60]

E. Rabinovich, O. Etzion, and A. Gal. 2011. Pattern Rewriting Framework for Event Processing Optimization. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on Distributed Event-based Systems (New York, New York, USA). ACM, 101--112. https://doi.org/10.1145/2002259.2002277

Digital Library

[61]

M. Ray, C. Lei, and E. A. Rundensteiner. 2016. Scalable Pattern Sharing on Event Streams. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Management of Data (San Francisco, California, USA) (SIGMOD '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 495--510. https://doi.org/10.1145/2882903.2882947

Digital Library

[62]

Sasko Ristov, Radu Prodan, Marjan Gusev, and Karolj Skala. 2016. Superlinear speedup in HPC systems: Why and when?. In 2016 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS). IEEE, 889--898.

[63]

Nicoló Rivetti, Emmanuelle Anceaume, Yann Busnel, Leonardo Querzoni, and Bruno Sericola. 2016. Online scheduling for shuffle grouping in distributed stream processing systems. In Proceedings of the 17th International Middleware Conference. 1--12.

Digital Library

[64]

Henriette Röger and Ruben Mayer. 2019. A comprehensive survey on parallelization and elasticity in stream processing. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 52, 2 (2019), 1--37.

Digital Library

[65]

Pratanu Roy, Jens Teubner, and Rainer Gemulla. 2014. Low-latency handshake join. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 7, 9 (2014), 709--720.

Digital Library

[66]

Ravindra S. and Dayarathna M. 2015. Distributed Scaling of WSO2 Complex Event Processor. (2015). https://wso2.com/library/articles/2015/12/article-distributed-scaling-of-wso2-complex-event-processor/.

[67]

Omran Saleh, Heiko Betz, and Kai-Uwe Sattler. 2015. Partitioning for scalable complex event processing on data streams. In New Trends in Database and Information Systems II. Springer, 185--197.

[68]

N. P. Schultz-Møller, M. M., and P. R. Pietzuch. 2009. Distributed complex event processing with query rewriting. In DEBS. ACM.

[69]

S. Suhothayan, K. Gajasinghe, I. L. Narangoda, S. Chaturanga, S. Perera, and V. Nanayakkara. 2011. Siddhi: A Second Look at Complex Event Processing Architectures. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Workshop on Gateway Computing Environments (Seattle, Washington, USA) (GCE '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 43--50. https://doi.org/10.1145/2110486.2110493

Digital Library

[70]

Yuzhe Tang and Bugra Gedik. 2012. Autopipelining for data stream processing. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 24, 12 (2012), 2344--2354.

Digital Library

[71]

Jens Teubner and Rene Mueller. 2011. How soccer players would do stream joins. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data. 625--636.

Digital Library

[72]

YH Wang, Kening Cao, and XM Zhang. 2013. Complex event processing over distributed probabilistic event streams. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 66, 10 (2013), 1808--1821.

Digital Library

[73]

L. Woods, J. Teubner, and G. Alonso. 2010. Complex event detection at wire speed with FPGAs. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 3, 1--2 (2010), 660--669.

Digital Library

[74]

E. Wu, Y. Diao, and S. Rizvi. 2006. High-performance complex event processing over streams. In SIGMOD Conference. ACM, 407--418.

[75]

Fuyuan Xiao, Cheng Zhan, Hong Lai, Li Tao, and Zhiguo Qu. 2017. New parallel processing strategies in complex event processing systems with data streams. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks 13, 8 (2017), 1550147717728626. https://doi.org/10.1177/1550147717728626 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1550147717728626

[76]

H. Zhang, Y. Diao, and N. Immerman. 2014. On Complexity and Optimization of Expensive Queries in Complex Event Processing. In SIGMOD. 217--228.

[77]

S. Zhang, H. T. Vo, D. Dahlmeier, and B. He. 2017. Multi-Query Optimization for Complex Event Processing in SAP ESP. In 33rd IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering, ICDE 2017, San Diego, CA, USA, April 19--22, 2017. 1213--1224. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.2017.166

[78]

Shuhao Zhang, Feng Zhang, Yingjun Wu, Bingsheng He, and Paul Johns. 2020. Hardware-conscious stream processing: A survey. ACM SIGMOD Record 48, 4 (2020), 18--29.

Digital Library

[79]

Q. Zhou, Y. Simmhan, and V. K. Prasanna. 2012. Incorporating Semantic Knowledge into Dynamic Data Processing for Smart Power Grids. In International Semantic Web Conference (2) (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Vol. 7650. Springer, 257--273.

[80]

Nikolaos Zygouras, Nikos Zacheilas, Vana Kalogeraki, Dermot Kinane, and Dimitrios Gunopulos. 2015. Insights on a scalable and dynamic traffic management system. In EDBT. 653--664.

Cited By

Akili SPurtzel SWeidlich M(2024)DecoPa: Query Decomposition for Parallel Complex Event ProcessingProceedings of the ACM on Management of Data10.1145/36549352:3(1-26)Online publication date: 30-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3654935
Qiu TJiang SYang XWang BZong CZhu R(2024)An Efficient Algorithm for Continuous Complex Event Matching Using Bit-Parallelism2024 IEEE 40th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE60146.2024.00037(396-408)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE60146.2024.00037
Zhang CZhao MLiang JFan QZhu LGuo S(2023)NANO: Cryptographic Enforcement of Readability and Editability Governance in Blockchain DatabasesIEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing10.1109/TDSC.2023.333017121:4(3439-3452)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TDSC.2023.3330171

Index Terms

HYPERSONIC: A Hybrid Parallelization Approach for Scalable Complex Event Processing
1. Computing methodologies
  1. Distributed computing methodologies
    1. Distributed algorithms
  2. Parallel computing methodologies
    1. Parallel algorithms
2. Information systems
  1. Data management systems
    1. Database management system engines
      1. Database query processing
        Query optimization
      2. Stream management

Recommendations

Towards complex actions for complex event processing
DEBS '13: Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Distributed event-based systems

Complex actions are a natural extension for complex event processing languages needed by many applications like emergency management. In particular interactions with external actuators that are common in those applications pose challenges that need to ...
Event-Driven Approach for Logic-Based Complex Event Processing
CSE '09: Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering - Volume 01

In this paper, we present a powerful logical encoding of complex event patterns into Transaction Logic programs. Complex Event Processing (CEP) deals with finding composed events and has useful applications in areas ranging from agile business and ...
Stream reasoning and complex event processing in ETALIS
On linked spatiotemporal data and geo-ontologies

Addressing dynamics and notifications in the Semantic Web realm has recently become an important area of research. Run time data is continuously generated by multiple social networks, sensor networks, various on-line services and so forth. How to get ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

SIGMOD '22: Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Management of Data

June 2022

2597 pages

ISBN:9781450392495

DOI:10.1145/3514221

General Chair:
Zachary Ives
University of Pennsylvania (USA)
,
Program Chairs:
Angela Bonifati
Lyon 1 University (France)
,
Amr El Abbadi
University of California, Santa Barbara (USA)

Copyright © 2022 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 June 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

SIGMOD/PODS '22

Sponsor:

SIGMOD

SIGMOD/PODS '22: International Conference on Management of Data

June 12 - 17, 2022

PA, Philadelphia, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 785 of 4,003 submissions, 20%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

3
Total Citations
View Citations
372
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)67
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9

Reflects downloads up to 13 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Akili SPurtzel SWeidlich M(2024)DecoPa: Query Decomposition for Parallel Complex Event ProcessingProceedings of the ACM on Management of Data10.1145/36549352:3(1-26)Online publication date: 30-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3654935
Qiu TJiang SYang XWang BZong CZhu R(2024)An Efficient Algorithm for Continuous Complex Event Matching Using Bit-Parallelism2024 IEEE 40th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE60146.2024.00037(396-408)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE60146.2024.00037
Zhang CZhao MLiang JFan QZhu LGuo S(2023)NANO: Cryptographic Enforcement of Readability and Editability Governance in Blockchain DatabasesIEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing10.1109/TDSC.2023.333017121:4(3439-3452)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TDSC.2023.3330171

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents