Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3503516.3503533acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesadcsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Analysis of the Australian Political Discourse in Sponsored Social Media Content

Published: 31 January 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Disinformation is deliberately designed to spread false information over internet. Recent concerns about the use of disinformation to manipulate political voting campaigns have attracted researchers’ attention. In this paper, we conduct our first study towards the understanding of how sponsored social media content is used in Australian voting campaigns. To this end, we collect the ad posts sponsored by Australian organizations on Facebook from 1 Feb, 2020 to 17 May, 2021. We also retain the screenshot of each collected ad that originally appeared on Facebook and download the images and videos that were presented in these ad posts. To obtain annotations of these ads, we generate labels that describe general objects, locations, activities presented in the images or videos by algorithms, as well as human created annotations over crowdsourcing platforms. Based on the collected human annotations, we then design a second-round crowdsourcing task to ask workers to provide more detailed annotations for the collected ads, ranging from truthfulness evaluation of the content to various political aspects (e.g., topics and sentiment). The multi-modal dataset created in our work enables future research, for example, to train supervised learning algorithms for further analysis on the use of disinformation on social media that may affect political campaigns.

References

[1]
Maribel Acosta, Amrapali Zaveri, Elena Simperl, Dimitris Kontokostas, Sören Auer, and Jens Lehmann. 2013. Crowdsourcing linked data quality assessment. In International Semantic Web Conference. Springer, 260–276.
[2]
W Lance Bennett and Steven Livingston. 2020. The Disinformation Age: Politics, Technology, and Disruptive Communication in the United States. Cambridge University Press.
[3]
Gianluca Demartini, Stefano Mizzaro, and Damiano Spina. 2020. Human-in-the-loop Artificial Intelligence for Fighting Online Misinformation: Challenges and Opportunities. The Bulletin of the Technical Committee on Data Engineering 43, 3(2020).
[4]
Robin M Hogarth and Hillel J Einhorn. 1992. Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. Cognitive psychology 24, 1 (1992), 1–55.
[5]
Pei-Yun Hsueh, Prem Melville, and Vikas Sindhwani. 2009. Data quality from crowdsourcing: a study of annotation selection criteria. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2009 workshop on active learning for natural language processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, 27–35.
[6]
Edda Humprecht, Frank Esser, and Peter Van Aelst. 2020. Resilience to online disinformation: A framework for cross-national comparative research. The International Journal of Press/Politics 25, 3 (2020), 493–516.
[7]
Andreas Jungherr, Gonzalo Rivero, and Daniel Gayo-Avello. 2020. Retooling politics: How digital media are shaping democracy. Cambridge University Press.
[8]
David Karpf. 2019. On digital disinformation and democratic myths. Social Science Research Council MediaWell(2019).
[9]
Glenn Kefford. 2021. Political Parties and Campaigning in Australia: Data, Digital and Field. Springer Nature.
[10]
Yang Liu and Yi-Fang Brook Wu. 2018. Early detection of fake news on social media through propagation path classification with recurrent and convolutional networks. In Thirty-second AAAI conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI).
[11]
Michael L Miller and Cristian Vaccari. 2020. Digital threats to democracy: comparative lessons and possible remedies. The International Journal of Press/Politics 25, 3 (2020), 333–356.
[12]
Sora Park, Caroline Fisher, Kieran McGuinness, Jee Young Lee, and Kerry McCallum. 2021. Digital news report: Australia 2021. (2021).
[13]
Kevin Roitero, Michael Soprano, Shaoyang Fan, Damiano Spina, Stefano Mizzaro, and Gianluca Demartini. 2020. Can The Crowd Identify Misinformation Objectively? The Effects of Judgment Scale and Assessor’s Background. In Proceedings of SIGIR. 439–448.
[14]
Chris Tenove. 2020. Protecting democracy from disinformation: Normative threats and policy responses. The International Journal of Press/Politics 25, 3 (2020), 517–537.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The State of Pilot Study Reporting in Crowdsourcing: A Reflection on Best Practices and GuidelinesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36410238:CSCW1(1-45)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024

Index Terms

  1. An Analysis of the Australian Political Discourse in Sponsored Social Media Content
              Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

              Information & Contributors

              Information

              Published In

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              ADCS '21: Proceedings of the 25th Australasian Document Computing Symposium
              December 2021
              61 pages
              ISBN:9781450395991
              DOI:10.1145/3503516
              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              Published: 31 January 2022

              Permissions

              Request permissions for this article.

              Check for updates

              Author Tags

              1. Crowdsourcing
              2. Disinformation
              3. Political Campaign
              4. Social Media

              Qualifiers

              • Research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed limited

              Funding Sources

              Conference

              ADCS '21
              ADCS '21: Australasian Document Computing Symposium
              December 9, 2021
              Virtual Event, Australia

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate 30 of 57 submissions, 53%

              Contributors

              Other Metrics

              Bibliometrics & Citations

              Bibliometrics

              Article Metrics

              • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
              • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
              Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

              Other Metrics

              Citations

              Cited By

              View all
              • (2024)The State of Pilot Study Reporting in Crowdsourcing: A Reflection on Best Practices and GuidelinesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36410238:CSCW1(1-45)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024

              View Options

              Login options

              View options

              PDF

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader

              HTML Format

              View this article in HTML Format.

              HTML Format

              Media

              Figures

              Other

              Tables

              Share

              Share

              Share this Publication link

              Share on social media