Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3501712.3529723acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesidcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

MoDa: Designing a Tool to Interweave Computational Modeling with Real-world Data Analysis for Science Learning in Middle School

Published: 27 June 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Coordinating modeling and real-world data is central to building scientific theories. This paper examines how a complementary focus on modeling and data contributed to 8th grade students’ learning of mechanisms underlying wildfire smoke spread in MoDa, a web-based environment that integrates computational modeling side-by-side with real-world data for comparison and validation. Epistemic network analysis of student responses in pre-post tests revealed a shift from primarily macro-level explanations to explanations that integrated macro and micro-level explanations of the phenomenon. Video data analysis revealed three design elements that contributed to student learning: Naming of the blocks, match between data and model visualization, and collective reflections on models. We reflect on implications for the design of environments that integrate computational modeling with real-world data analysis.

References

[1]
2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290
[2]
Umit Aslan, Nicholas LaGrassa, MS Horn, and Uri Wilensky. 2020. Code-first learning environments for science education: a design experiment on kinetic molecular theory. Constructionism 2020(2020).
[3]
Tom Bielik, Lynn Stephens, Dan Damelin, and Joseph S Krajcik. 2019. Designing Technology Environments to Support System Modeling Competence. In Towards a Competence-Based View on Models and Modeling in Science Education. Springer, 275–290.
[4]
Engin Bumbacher, Zahid Hossain, Ingmar Riedel-Kruse, and Paulo Blikstein. 2018. Design Matters: The Impact of Technology Design on Students’ Inquiry Behaviors.International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.[ISLS].
[5]
Amanda Catherine Dickes, Pratim Sengupta, Amy Voss Farris, and Satabdi Basu. 2016. Development of mechanistic reasoning and multilevel explanations of ecology in third grade using agent-based models. Science Education 100, 4 (2016), 734–776.
[6]
Tamar Fuhrmann, Bertrand Schneider, and Paulo Blikstein. 2018. Should students design or interact with models? Using the Bifocal Modelling Framework to investigate model construction in high school science. International Journal of Science Education 40, 8 (2018), 867–893.
[7]
Julia Svoboda Gouvea and Aditi Wagh. 2018. Exploring the unknown: Supporting students’ navigation of scientific uncertainty with coupled methodologies. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.[ISLS].
[8]
Brigitte Jordan and Austin Henderson. 1995. Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The journal of the learning sciences 4, 1 (1995), 39–103.
[9]
Ken Kahn. 2007. Building computer models from small pieces. In SCSC. 931–936.
[10]
Victor Lee and Michelle Wilkerson. 2018. Data use by middle and secondary students in the digital age: A status report and future prospects. (2018).
[11]
Brian J Reiser, Iris Tabak, William A Sandoval, Brian K Smith, Franci Steinmuller, and Anthony J Leone. 2001. BGuILE: Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms. Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (2001), 263–305.
[12]
Alexander Repenning and James Ambach. 1997. The agentsheets behavior exchange: Supporting social behavior processing. In CHI’97 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 26–27.
[13]
Rosemary S Russ, Rachel E Scherr, David Hammer, and Jamie Mikeska. 2008. Recognizing mechanistic reasoning in student scientific inquiry: A framework for discourse analysis developed from philosophy of science. Science education 92, 3 (2008), 499–525.
[14]
David Williamson Shaffer. 2018. Epistemic network analysis: Understanding learning by using big data for thick description. International handbook of the learning sciences (2018), 520–531.
[15]
Robert Tinker and Joseph Krajcik. 2012. Portable technologies: Science learning in context. Vol. 13. Springer Science & Business Media.
[16]
Aditi Wagh and Uri Wilensky. 2018. EvoBuild: A quickstart toolkit for programming agent-based models of evolutionary processes. Journal of Science Education and Technology 27, 2 (2018), 131–146.
[17]
Uri Wilensky. 1999. NetLogo. Evanston, IL: Center for connected learning and computer-based modeling, Northwestern University.
[18]
Michelle Wilkerson-Jerde, Aditi Wagh, and Uri Wilensky. 2015. Balancing curricular and pedagogical needs in computational construction kits: Lessons from the DeltaTick project. Science Education 99, 3 (2015), 465–499.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The role of CCI in supporting children’s engagement with environmental sustainability at a time of climate crisisInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction10.1016/j.ijcci.2023.10060538:COnline publication date: 27-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Towards Convergence: Characterizing Students’ Design Moves in Computational Modeling Through Log Data with Video and Cluster AnalysisArtificial Intelligence in Education10.1007/978-3-031-64299-9_38(413-421)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Right but wrong: How students' mechanistic reasoning and conceptual understandings shift when designing agent‐based models using dataScience Education10.1002/sce.21890Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
IDC '22: Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference
June 2022
718 pages
ISBN:9781450391979
DOI:10.1145/3501712
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 June 2022

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. agent-based modeling
  2. computational modeling
  3. data practices
  4. design
  5. science education

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

  • NSF

Conference

IDC '22
Sponsor:
IDC '22: Interaction Design and Children
June 27 - 30, 2022
Braga, Portugal

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 172 of 578 submissions, 30%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)350
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)48
Reflects downloads up to 29 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The role of CCI in supporting children’s engagement with environmental sustainability at a time of climate crisisInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction10.1016/j.ijcci.2023.10060538:COnline publication date: 27-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Towards Convergence: Characterizing Students’ Design Moves in Computational Modeling Through Log Data with Video and Cluster AnalysisArtificial Intelligence in Education10.1007/978-3-031-64299-9_38(413-421)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Right but wrong: How students' mechanistic reasoning and conceptual understandings shift when designing agent‐based models using dataScience Education10.1002/sce.21890Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media