Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3478431.3499296acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

POGIL in CS1: Evidence for Student Learning and Belonging

Published: 22 February 2022 Publication History

Abstract

For the past ten years, computer science instructors have adopted Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL). Other STEM disciplines have shown conclusively that POGIL impacts student learning and knowledge retention. However, most research about POGIL in computer science has focused on perceptions and experiences, not learning outcomes. In this study, we examined the influence of POGIL on student learning in CS1. We collected data from all sections of CS1 at the same institution. Four of the faculty implemented POGIL, and three taught with other active methods. The learning data included pre and post assessments, midterm and final exams, and a retention test at the beginning of the next course. Students also completed three surveys about their prior programming experience, sense of belonging, and perceptions of teamwork. We used multiple regression to analyze the relationship between the survey data and learning outcomes. Our results show that students in the POGIL sections outperformed students in the other sections. POGIL students scored higher on the post-test, and a higher proportion of them met the grade requirement to progress to the next course. After the five-week winter break, POGIL students had higher and more consistent scores on the retention test. These results provide evidence that POGIL can be very effective as an instructional technique in computer science.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (SIGCSE22-V1fp128v.mp4)
Presentation video for the paper at SIGCSE 2022 titled "POGIL in CS1: Evidence for Student Learning and Belonging" by Chris Mayfield, Sukanya Kannan Moudgalya, Aman Yadav, Clif Kussmaul, and Helen H. Hu

References

[1]
Leland Beck and Alexander Chizhik. 2013. Cooperative learning instructional methods for CS1: Design, implementation, and evaluation. Transactions on Computing Education, Vol. 13, 3 (2013), 10:1--10:21. https://doi.org/10.1145/2492686
[2]
S. Jeff Cold. 2013. Partially Flipped: Experiences Using POGIL. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM SIGITE Conference on Information Technology Education. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 133--134. https://doi.org/10.1145/2512276.2512314
[3]
Andrea De Palma. 2005. Engaging students through the guided-inquiry cycle. In Proceedings of Redesigning Pedagogy: Research, Policy, Practice. National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
[4]
John J. Farrell, Richard S. Moog, and James N. Spencer. 1999. A Guided-Inquiry General Chemistry Course. Journal of Chemical Education, Vol. 76, 4 (1999), 570--574.
[5]
Helen Hu and Brian Avery. 2015. CS Principles with POGIL activities as a learning community. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, Vol. 31, 2 (2015), 79--86.
[6]
Helen H. Hu, Clifton Kussmaul, Brian Knaeble, Chris Mayfield, and Aman Yadav. 2016. Results from a survey on faculty adoption of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) in Computer Science. In Proc. of the Conf. on Innov. and Tech. in CS Edu. (ITiCSE). ACM, 186--191.
[7]
Helen H. Hu and Tricia D. Shepherd. 2013. Using POGIL to Help Students Learn to Program. Trans. on Comp. Edu. (ToCE), Vol. 13, 3, Article 13 (Aug. 2013), bibinfonumpages23 pages.
[8]
R. Karplus and Herbert D. Thier. 1967. A New Look at Elementary School Science; Science Curriculum Improvement Study .Rand McNally & Co.
[9]
Shreya Kumar and Charles Wallace. 2014. Instruction in software project communication through guided inquiry and reflection. In Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference. Madrid, Spain.
[10]
Clifton Kussmaul. 2011. Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning for Soft Computing. In Advances in Computing and Communications, Ajith Abraham, Jaime Lloret Mauri, John F. Buford, Junichi Suzuki, and Sabu M. Thampi (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 533--542. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--642--22720--2_56
[11]
Stanley M. Lo and Jonathan I. Mendez. 2019. L: Learning - The Evidence .Stylus Publishing, LLC, 85--110.
[12]
Richard S. Moog. 2014. Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning. In Integrating Cognitive Science with Innovative Teaching in STEM Disciplines, Mark A. McDaniel, Regina F. Frey, Susan M. Fitzpatrick, and Henry L. Roediger III (Eds.). Washington University, Saint Louis, MO, USA, Chapter 8, 147--166.
[13]
Sukanya Kannan Moudgalya, Chris Mayfield, Aman Yadav, Helen H. Hu, and Clif Kussmaul. 2021. Measuring Students' Sense of Belonging in Introductory CS Courses. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 445--451. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432425
[14]
Miranda C. Parker, Mark Guzdial, and Shelly Engleman. 2016. Replication, Validation, and Use of a Language Independent CS1 Knowledge Assessment. In ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 93--101.
[15]
Suzanne M. Ruder and Sally S. Hunnicutt. 2008. POGIL in Chemistry Courses at a Large Urban University: A Case Study .American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, Chapter 12, 133--147.
[16]
Shawn R. Simonson (Ed.). 2019. POGIL: An Introduction to Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning for Those Who Wish to Empower Learners .Stylus Publishing, LLC, Sterling, Virginia. Google-Books-ID: NL2SDwAAQBAJ.
[17]
Tammy VanDeGrift. 2017. POGIL activities in data structures: What do students value?. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education . ACM, New York, NY, USA, 597--602. https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017697
[18]
Lindsey Walker and Abdi-Rizak M. Warfa. 2017. Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) Marginally Effects Student Achievement Measures but Substantially Increases the Odds of Passing a Course. PLOS ONE, Vol. 12, 10 (2017), 1--17.
[19]
Aman Yadav, Clif Kussmaul, Chris Mayfield, and Helen H. Hu. 2019. POGIL in Computer Science: Faculty Motivation and Challenges. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Minneapolis, MN, USA) (SIGCSE '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 280--285. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287360
[20]
Aman Yadav, Chris Mayfield, Sukanya Kannan Moudgalya, Clif Kussmaul, and Helen H. Hu. 2021. Collaborative Learning, Self-Efficacy, and Student Performance in CS1 POGIL. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 775--781. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432373

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Aplicação do POGIL no ensino de ComputaçãoAnais do IV Simpósio Brasileiro de Educação em Computação (EDUCOMP 2024)10.5753/educomp.2024.237541(224-233)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2024
  • (2024)The CS1 Python Bakery: A Modern "Batteries Included" Open-Source Curriculum with All the FixingsProceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3649217.3653630(667-673)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2024
  • (2024)A synthesized teaching model that promotes both procedural and conceptual knowledge dimensions in CS1Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Computing Education Practice10.1145/3633053.3633064(9-12)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGCSE 2022: Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education - Volume 1
February 2022
1049 pages
ISBN:9781450390705
DOI:10.1145/3478431
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 February 2022

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. active learning
  2. collaborative learning
  3. comparative study

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • National Science Foundation (NSF)

Conference

SIGCSE 2022
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

Upcoming Conference

SIGCSE Virtual 2024
1st ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference
December 5 - 8, 2024
Virtual Event , NC , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)224
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)29
Reflects downloads up to 23 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Aplicação do POGIL no ensino de ComputaçãoAnais do IV Simpósio Brasileiro de Educação em Computação (EDUCOMP 2024)10.5753/educomp.2024.237541(224-233)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2024
  • (2024)The CS1 Python Bakery: A Modern "Batteries Included" Open-Source Curriculum with All the FixingsProceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3649217.3653630(667-673)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2024
  • (2024)A synthesized teaching model that promotes both procedural and conceptual knowledge dimensions in CS1Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Computing Education Practice10.1145/3633053.3633064(9-12)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Exploring the Effects of a Collaborative Guided Inquiry Learning Approach on Performance and Retention of Underrepresented Minority Students across Multiple Sections in an Introductory Programming CourseProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630853(554-561)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Guiding Students to Think Critically about Reproductive Development and Public Conversations on Sex and GenderDevelopmental Biology10.1016/j.ydbio.2024.09.012Online publication date: Oct-2024
  • (2023)Effectiveness of Using Game Development in CS1: Faculty-Led or Peer Created Video-Based?Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges10.5555/3637068.363708239:5(150-159)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023
  • (2023)Experiences Introducing the POGIL Methodology for Teaching Computer Organization & ArchitectureJournal of Computing Sciences in Colleges10.5555/3636971.363697939:2(85-97)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Board 297: Foundational Strategies to Support Students with Diverse Backgrounds and Interests in Early Programming2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings10.18260/1-2--42806Online publication date: Jun-2023
  • (2023)Exploring Barriers in Productive FailureProceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3568813.3600111(284-297)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023
  • (2022)Conversation with a prominent propagatorACM Inroads10.1145/354954613:3(6-9)Online publication date: 23-Aug-2022

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media