Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Comparative Analysis Between the Main 3D Scanning Techniques: Photogrammetry, Terrestrial Laser Scanner, and Structured Light Scanner in Religious Imagery: The Case of The Holy Christ of the Blood

Published: 14 December 2021 Publication History

Abstract

In recent years, three-dimensional (3D) scanning has become the main tool for recording, documenting, and preserving cultural heritage in the long term. It has become the “document” most in demand today by historians, curators, and art restorers to carry out their work based on a “digital twin,” that is, a totally reliable and accurate model of the object in question. Thanks to 3D scanning, we can preserve reliable models in digital format of the real state of our heritage, some of which are currently destroyed. The first step is to digitize our heritage with the highest possible quality and precision. To do this, it will be necessary to identify the most appropriate technique. In this article, we will show some of the main digitization techniques currently used in sculpture heritage and the workflows associated with them to obtain high-quality models. Finally, a complete comparative analysis will be made to show their main advantages and disadvantages.

References

[1]
Fabio Remondino, Maria Grazia Spera, et al. 2014. State of the art in high density image matching. Photogram. Record 29 (2014), 144−166.
[2]
Mohammad Nabil and Fathi Saleh. 2014. 3D Reconstruction from images for museum artefacts: A comparative study. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Virtual Systems & Multimedia (VSMM). Hong Kong, China, 257–260.
[3]
V. Evgenikou and Andreas Georgopoulos. 2015. Investigating 3D reconstruction methods for small artifacts. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XL-5/W4, 101–108. DOI:
[4]
Sara Morena, Salvatore Barba, and Antonio Álvaro-Tordesillas. 2019. Shining 3D einscan-pro, application and validation in the field of cultural heritage, from the Chillida-Leku museum to the Archaeological Museum of Sarno. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLII-2/W18, 135–142. DOI:
[5]
David Katz and Martin Friess. 2014. Technical Note: 3D from standard digital photography of human crania—a preliminary assessment. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 154, (2014), 152–158. DOI:
[6]
Allowen Evin et al. 2016. The use of close-range photogrammetry in zooarchaeology: Creating accurate 3D models of wolf crania to study dog domestication. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 9, 87–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.06.028
[7]
Valentina Alena Girelli et al. 2020. 3D digitisation in cultural heritage knowledge and preservation: the case of the neptune statue in bologna and its archetype. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences Volume XLIII-B2-2020, 2020 XXIV ISPRS Congress. 1403–1408. DOI:
[8]
Ana María Buchón. 2000. Escultores extranjeros maestros del gremio de carpinteros de Valencia: Nicolás de Bussy, Julio Capuz y Francisco Stolf. Boletín de la Sociedad Castellonense de Cultura 76, (1–4) (2000), 161–168.
[9]
María José López Azorín and María del Carmen Sánchez-Rojas. 2004. Notas para una biografía del escultor D. Nicolás de Bussy. Boletín del Museo Nacional de ESCULTURA 8 (2004), 29–36.
[10]
María del Carmen Sánchez-Rojas. 2005. Nuevas Aportaciones al Estudio del Escultor Barroco Nicolás de Bussy. Murcia: Archicofradía de la Preciosísima Sangre de Nuestro Señor Jesucristo.
[11]
Roberto Alonso Moral. 2006. Nicolás de Bussy, escultor del rey. Su etapa en el Palacio de Aranjuez. In Nicolás de Bussy: un Escultor Europeo en España. Tercer Centenario de su Muerte (1706–2006). Montojo, V. (Ed.), Murcia: Real Academia de Bellas Artes de la Arrixaca. 33–53.
[12]
José Iniesta Magán. 2006. Nicolás de Bussy y la archicofradía del rosario. Las Claves de un Pleito. Murcia: Academia Alfonso X el Sabio.
[13]
Javier Bernal Casanova and Francisco López Soldevilla. 2004. Cristo de la Sangre Nicolás de Bussy. La Imagen Restaurada. Murcia: Ayuntamiento de Murcia.
[14]
Juan Antonio Fernández Labaña. 2017. San Francisco de Borja, una obra de Nicolás Salzillo. In Estudios de Escultura en Europa. A. Cañestro Donoso (Ed.), Alicante: Instituto de Cultura Juan Gil-Albert. 639–674.
[15]
Inmaculada Alcántara. 2010. El Cristo de la Sangre, de Nicolás de Bussy. Iconografía e historia. In Vid salvífica. Calasparra: Antigua y Venerable Cofradía de la Sangre de Cristo y la Vera Cruz de Calasparra. J. J. Moya y Martínez (Ed.), 181–199.
[16]
Francisco López Soldevila and Javier Bernal Casanova. 2008. Cristo de la Sangre. In Catálogo de Obras Restauradas: 1998 a 2007. F. López Soldevila (Ed.), Murcia: Comunidad Autónoma de la Región de Murcia. 68–74.
[17]
Kaja Antlej, Miran Eric, Mojca Savnik, and Bernarda Zupanek. 2011. Combining 3D technologies in the field of cultural heritage: Three case studies. In Proceedings of the Conference VAST: 12th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage---Short and Project Papers. The Eurographics Association, 1--4.
[18]
Gabriele Guidi, Sara Gonizzi Barsanti, and Laura Loredana Micoli. 2014. Image pre-processing for optimizing automated photogrammetry performances. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, II (5). In ISPRS Technical Commission V Symposium, 23–25 June 2014, Riva del Garda, Italy. Copernicus Publications, 145--152.
[19]
Rafael Melendreras Ruiz, María Teresa Marín Torres, and Paloma Sánchez Allegue. 2020. Flujo de trabajo para la digitalización 3D mediante fotogrametría de las tallas de madera policromada del Santísimo Cristo de la sangre y su ángel. E-rph. 27 (2020), 52–83. https://revistadepatrimonio.es/index.php/erph/article/view/424.
[20]
Concepción de la Peña, Josefina García–León, and Paloma Sánchez-Allegue. 2017. Documentación, conservación y difusión de un retablo a través de la Geomática: El retablo barroco de la Iglesia de San Miguel en Murcia. E-rph 21 (2017), 67–90. https://revistadepatrimonio.es/index.php/erph/article/view/239/263.
[21]
Carlos León Robles, Juan Francisco Reinoso Gordo, and Jesús Mataix Sanjuán. 2018. Luz estructurada en la reconstrucción digital de detalles arquitectónicos. EGA Expresión Gráfica Arquitectónica 23, 32 (2018), 198–207. https://polipapers.upv.es/index.php/EGA/article/view/9810.
[22]
Marek Milosz, Jacek Kęsik, and Jerzy Montusiewicz. 2020. 3D scanning and visualization of large monuments of Timurid architecture in central Asia—a methodical approach. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 14, 1 (2020), 8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3425796
[23]
Pedro Ortiz Coder and Beatriz del Pino Espinosa. 2013. Digitalización 3D automática con láser escáner, fotogrametría y videogrametría. El caso práctico del Templo de Diana (Mérida). Virtual Archaeology Review 4, 8 (2013), 90–94. https://polipapers.upv.es/index.php/var/article/view/4325.
[24]
Salsabil Ahmed, Raisa Islam, Sadman Shawmik Himalay, and Jia Uddin. 2019. Preserving heritage sites using 3D modeling and virtual reality technology. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Cryptography, Security and Privacy, Kuala Lumpur, Malasya (ICCSP'19). ACM Press, 267--272. https://doi.org/10.1145/3309074.3309116
[25]
Josefina García–León and Paloma Sánchez–Allegue, Concepción de la Peña–Velasco, Luca Cipriani, and Filippo Fantini. 2018. Interactive dissemination of the 3D model of a baroque altarpiece: A pipeline from digital survey to game engines. SCIRES-IT 8, 2 (2018), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.2423/i22394303v8n2p59
[26]
Pablo Rodríguez Navarro. 2012. La fotogrametría digital automatizada frente a los sistemas basados en sensores 3D activos. EGA. Revista de Expresión Gráfica Arquitectónica 17, 20 (2012), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.4995/ega.2012.1408
[27]
Elvira Isora García Vacas. 2018. Análisis comparativo de diferentes sistemas de digitalización tridimensional aplicados al patrimonio escultórico. Grado en Conservación y Restauración de Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de la Laguna. 44–53. https://riull.ull.es/xmlui/handle/915/12132.
[28]
Luca Cipriani, Filippo Fantini, and Silvia Bertacchi. 2015. El color en las piedras y en los mosaicos de Rávena: Nuevas imágenes de los monumentos antiguos a través de la fotogrametría no convencional de última generación. EGA Expresión Gráfica Arquitectónica 26 (2015), 190–201. https://polipapers.upv.es/index.php/EGA/article/view/4052.
[29]
Borja Molero Alonso, Salvatore Barba, and Antonio Álvaro Tordesillas. 2016. Documentación del patrimonio cultural. Método Basado en la Fusión de Técnicas Fotogramétricas y de Escaneado Óptico de Triangulación. EGA. Revista de Expresión Gráfica Arquitectónica 21, 28 (2016), 236–245. https://doi.org/10.4995/ega.2016.6308
[30]
Marco Giana, Fabrizio Apollonio, and Filippo Fantini. 2019. Evaluating smartphones color fidelity and metric accuracy for the 3D documentation of small artifact. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XLII-2/W11. GEORES 2019---2nd International Conference of Geomatics and Restoration. Milan. 8--10. ISPRS and ICOMOS-CIPA Heritage Documentation. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W11-539%E2%80%932019
[31]
Bárbara Tobijaszewska, Richard Mills, and Jakob Jons. 2018. El uso de la espectrometría para la medición simultánea del color y la composición en muestras de alimentos. Analytics Beyond Measure. Foss.es.
[32]
Francisco Javier Manera Bassa. 2004. Evolución Del Color Externo e Interno en Diferentes Variedades de Pomelo y Limonero. Tesis doctoral. Universidad Miguel Hernández.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)An Improved Approach for Generating Digital Twins of Cultural Spaces through the Integration of Photogrammetry and Laser Scanning TechnologiesDigital10.3390/digital40100114:1(215-231)Online publication date: 16-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Digitalizing cultural heritage through metaverse applications: challenges, opportunities, and strategiesHeritage Science10.1186/s40494-024-01403-112:1Online publication date: 13-Aug-2024
  • (2024)3D Recording of Palaeolithic Rock Art through Different Techniques: a Critical Comparison and EvaluationJournal of Field Archaeology10.1080/00934690.2024.239297249:7(508-526)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Comparative Analysis Between the Main 3D Scanning Techniques: Photogrammetry, Terrestrial Laser Scanner, and Structured Light Scanner in Religious Imagery: The Case of The Holy Christ of the Blood

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
        Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage   Volume 15, Issue 1
        February 2022
        348 pages
        ISSN:1556-4673
        EISSN:1556-4711
        DOI:10.1145/3505194
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 14 December 2021
        Accepted: 01 June 2021
        Revised: 01 May 2021
        Received: 01 January 2021
        Published in JOCCH Volume 15, Issue 1

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. Digital photogrammetry
        2. terrestrial laser scanner
        3. structured light scanner
        4. cultural heritage
        5. 3D scanning
        6. 3D models
        7. workflow
        8. dimensional control
        9. spectrophotometer
        10. colorimetry

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article
        • Refereed

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)475
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)41
        Reflects downloads up to 13 Nov 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)An Improved Approach for Generating Digital Twins of Cultural Spaces through the Integration of Photogrammetry and Laser Scanning TechnologiesDigital10.3390/digital40100114:1(215-231)Online publication date: 16-Feb-2024
        • (2024)Digitalizing cultural heritage through metaverse applications: challenges, opportunities, and strategiesHeritage Science10.1186/s40494-024-01403-112:1Online publication date: 13-Aug-2024
        • (2024)3D Recording of Palaeolithic Rock Art through Different Techniques: a Critical Comparison and EvaluationJournal of Field Archaeology10.1080/00934690.2024.239297249:7(508-526)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2024
        • (2024)Saving temporary exhibitions in virtual environments: The Digital Renaissance of Ulisse Aldrovandi – Acquisition and digitisation of cultural heritage objectsDigital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage10.1016/j.daach.2023.e0030932(e00309)Online publication date: Mar-2024
        • (2024)Analysis of the user experience (On site vs. Virtual Reality) through biological markers and cognitive tests in museums: the case of Museo Cristo de la Sangre (Murcia, Spain)Virtual Reality10.1007/s10055-023-00928-328:1Online publication date: 26-Feb-2024
        • (2023)Three-Dimensional Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation for Cultural Heritage: A Comprehensive ReviewRemote Sensing10.3390/rs1503054815:3(548)Online publication date: 17-Jan-2023
        • (2023)The Framework of Culture Heritage Digital Twin System Based on Semantic Network2023 IEEE Smart World Congress (SWC)10.1109/SWC57546.2023.10449294(1-6)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2023
        • (2023)Digital modes of interpretation of Pictish sculptureEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-12151-329:8(10009-10042)Online publication date: 23-Sep-2023
        • (2022)Desarrollo de una Réplica Táctil Para Experiencias Inclusivas de Artefactos ReligiososCurator: The Museum Journal10.1111/cura.1247265:2(333-353)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2022
        • (2022)Development of a Touchable Replica for Inclusive Experiences of Religious ArtifactsCurator: The Museum Journal10.1111/cura.1246965:2(305-331)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2022

        View Options

        Get Access

        Login options

        Full Access

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Full Text

        View this article in Full Text.

        Full Text

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format.

        HTML Format

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media