Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3448891.3448918acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobiquitousConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

IAM – Interpolation and Aggregation on the Move: Collaborative Crowdsensing for Spatio-temporal Phenomena

Published: 09 August 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Crowdsensing allows citizens to contribute to the monitoring of their living environment using the sensors embedded in their mobile devices, e.g., smartphones. However, crowdsensing at scale involves significant communication, computation, and financial costs due to the dependence on cloud infrastructures for the analysis (e.g., interpolation and aggregation) of spatio-temporal data. This limits the adoption of crowdsensing by activists although sorely needed to inform our knowledge of the environment. As an alternative to the centralized analysis of crowdsensed observations, this paper introduces a fully distributed interpolation-mediated aggregation approach running on smartphones. To achieve so efficiently, we model the interpolation as a distributed tensor completion problem, and we introduce a lightweight aggregation strategy that anticipates the likelihood of future encounters according to the quality of the interpolation. Our approach thus shifts the centralized post-processing of crowdsensed data to distributed pre-processing on the move, based on opportunistic encounters of crowdsensors through state-of-the-art D2D networking. The evaluation using a dataset of quantitative environmental measurements collected from 550 crowdsensors over 1 year shows that our solution significantly reduces –and may even eliminate– the dependence on the cloud infrastructure, while it incurs a limited resource cost on end devices. Meanwhile, the overall data accuracy remains comparable to that of the centralized approach.

References

[1]
Yanshuai Cao and David J Fleet. 2014. Generalized product of experts for automatic and principled fusion of Gaussian process predictions. In Modern Nonparametrics 3: Automating the Learning Pipeline workshop at NIPS.
[2]
Xu Chen, Lingjun Pu, Lin Gao, 2017. Exploiting massive D2D collaboration for energy-efficient mobile edge computing. IEEE Wireless Communications 24, 4 (2017).
[3]
Yun Cheng, Xiaoxi He, Zimu Zhou, 2020. MapTransfer: Urban Air Quality Map Generation for Downscaled Sensor Deployments. In ACM International Conference on Internet of Things Design and Implementation.
[4]
Marc Peter Deisenroth and Jun Wei Ng. 2015. Distributed Gaussian processes. In International Conference on Machine Learning.
[5]
Ngoc Do, Ye Zhao, Cheng-Hsin Hsu, 2016. Crowdsourced mobile data transfer with delay bound. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology 16, 4 (2016).
[6]
Yifan Du, Francoise Sailhan, and Valerie Issarny. 2020. Let opportunistic crowdsensors work together for resource-efficient, quality-aware observations. In IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications.
[7]
Khalid Eldrandaly and Ahmed Abdelmouty. 2017. Spatio-temporal Interpolation: Current Practices and Future Prospects. International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its Applications 11 (06 2017).
[8]
Michele Girolami, Stefano Chessa, Gaia Adami, 2017. Sensing interpolation strategies for a mobile crowdsensing platform. In IEEE International Conference on Mobile Cloud Computing, Services, and Engineering.
[9]
Paul Harris, AS Fotheringham, R Crespo, 2010. The use of geographically weighted regression for spatial prediction: an evaluation of models using simulated data sets. Mathematical Geosciences 42, 6 (2010).
[10]
Takamasa Higuchi, Hirozumi Yamaguchi, Teruo Higashino, 2014. A neighbor collaboration mechanism for mobile crowd sensing in opportunistic networks. In IEEE International Conference on Communications.
[11]
Valerie Issarny, Vivien Mallet, Kinh Nguyen, 2016. Dos and don’ts in mobile phone sensing middleware: Learning from a large-scale experiment. In ACM/IFIP International Middleware Conference.
[12]
Paulo Jesus, Carlos Baquero, and Paulo Sérgio Almeida. 2014. A survey of distributed data aggregation algorithms. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 17, 1 (2014).
[13]
Haiming Jin, Lu Su, Houping Xiao, 2018. Incentive mechanism for privacy-aware data aggregation in mobile crowd sensing systems. IEEE Transactions on Networking 26, 5 (2018).
[14]
Oskar Juhlin and Mattias Östergren. 2006. Time to meet face-to-face and device-to-device. In ACM Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services.
[15]
Goran Kalic, Iva Bojic, and Mario Kusek. 2012. Energy consumption in android phones when using wireless communication technologies. In IEEE International Convention MIPRO.
[16]
Xu Kang, Liang Liu, and Huadong Ma. 2016. Data correlation based crowdsensing enhancement for environment monitoring. In IEEE International Conference on Communications.
[17]
Xu Kang, Liang Liu, and Huadong Ma. 2017. Enhance the quality of crowdsensing for fine-grained urban environment monitoring via data correlation. MDPI Sensors 17, 1 (2017).
[18]
Linghe Kong, Mingyuan Xia, Xiao-Yang Liu, 2013. Data loss and reconstruction in sensor networks. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.
[19]
Ioannis Koukoutsidis. 2017. Estimating spatial averages of environmental parameters based on mobile crowdsensing. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks 14, 1 (2017).
[20]
Youngki Lee, Younghyun Ju, Chulhong Min, 2012. Comon: Cooperative ambience monitoring platform with continuity and benefit awareness. In ACM International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services.
[21]
Chenguang Liu, Jie Hua, and Christine Julien. 2019. Scents: Collaborative sensing in proximity iot networks. In IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops.
[22]
Haitao Liu, Yew-Soon Ong, Xiaobo Shen, 2020. When Gaussian process meets big data: A review of scalable GPs. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (2020).
[23]
Diego Mendez, Miguel Labrador, and Kandethody Ramachandran. 2013. Data interpolation for participatory sensing systems. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 9, 1 (2013).
[24]
Budiman Minasny and Alex B McBratney. 2005. The Matérn function as a general model for soil variograms. Geoderma 128, 3-4 (2005).
[25]
Orlando Ohashi and Luis Torgo. 2012. Spatial interpolation using multiple regression. In IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.
[26]
Zhaokun Qin and Yanmin Zhu. 2016. NoiseSense: A crowd sensing system for urban noise mapping service. In IEEE International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems.
[27]
Carl Edward Rasmussen. 2003. Gaussian processes in machine learning. In Springer Summer School on Machine Learning.
[28]
Francoise Sailhan, Valérie Issarny, and Otto Tavares-Nascimiento. 2017. Opportunistic multiparty calibration for robust participatory sensing. In IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems.
[29]
Jing Shi, Rui Zhang, Yunzhong Liu, 2010. Prisense: privacy-preserving data aggregation in people-centric urban sensing systems. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.
[30]
Muhammad Umer, Lars Kulik, and Egemen Tanin. 2010. Spatial interpolation in wireless sensor networks: localized algorithms for variogram modeling and Kriging. Geoinformatica 14, 1 (2010).
[31]
Raphaël Ventura, Vivien Mallet, and Valérie Issarny. 2018. Assimilation of mobile phone measurements for noise mapping of a neighborhood. The journal of the acoustical society of America 144, 3 (2018).
[32]
Jiangtao Wang, Yasha Wang, Daqing Zhang, 2018. Learning-assisted optimization in mobile crowd sensing: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 15, 1 (2018).
[33]
Leye Wang, Daqing Zhang, Yasha Wang, 2016. Sparse mobile crowdsensing: challenges and opportunities. IEEE Communications Magazine 54, 7 (2016).
[34]
Leye Wang, Daqing Zhang, Haoyi Xiong, 2016. ecoSense: Minimize participants’ total 3G data cost in mobile crowdsensing using opportunistic relays. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems 47, 6(2016).
[35]
Yu Xiao, Pieter Simoens, Padmanabhan Pillai, 2013. Lowering the barriers to large-scale mobile crowdsensing. In ACM International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications.
[36]
Liwen Xu, Xiaohong Hao, Nicholas D Lane, 2015. More with less: Lowering user burden in mobile crowdsourcing through compressive sensing. In ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing.
[37]
Xi Xu, Rashid Ansari, Ashfaq Khokhar, 2015. Hierarchical data aggregation using compressive sensing (HDACS) in WSNs. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks 11, 3 (2015).
[38]
Yanan Xu, Yanmin Zhu, and Zhaokun Qin. 2019. Urban noise mapping with a crowd sensing system. Wireless Networks 25, 5 (2019).
[39]
Sijia Yang, Jiang Bian, Licheng Wang, 2018. EdgeSense: Edge-mediated spatial-temporal crowdsensing. IEEE Access 7(2018).
[40]
Yu Zheng, Tong Liu, Yilun Wang, 2014. Diagnosing New York city’s noises with ubiquitous data. In ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)A Data Processing Architecture for Intelligent Hierarchical Air Quality Monitoring Networks in Urban Innovation and Citizen Science ApplicationsAir Quality Networks10.1007/978-3-031-08476-8_2(19-46)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023
  • (2022)Consent-driven Data Reuse in Multi-tasking Crowdsensing SystemsPervasive and Mobile Computing10.1016/j.pmcj.2022.10161483:COnline publication date: 1-Jul-2022

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
MobiQuitous '20: MobiQuitous 2020 - 17th EAI International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services
December 2020
493 pages
ISBN:9781450388405
DOI:10.1145/3448891
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 August 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Aggregation
  2. Crowdsensing
  3. Interpolation
  4. Opportunistic Relay
  5. Pervasive Computing
  6. Ubiquitous Sensing

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

MobiQuitous '20
MobiQuitous '20: Computing, Networking and Services
December 7 - 9, 2020
Darmstadt, Germany

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 26 of 87 submissions, 30%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 18 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)A Data Processing Architecture for Intelligent Hierarchical Air Quality Monitoring Networks in Urban Innovation and Citizen Science ApplicationsAir Quality Networks10.1007/978-3-031-08476-8_2(19-46)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023
  • (2022)Consent-driven Data Reuse in Multi-tasking Crowdsensing SystemsPervasive and Mobile Computing10.1016/j.pmcj.2022.10161483:COnline publication date: 1-Jul-2022

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media