research-article

Public Access

Data Integration as Coordination: The Articulation of Data Work in an Ocean Science Collaboration

Authors:

Andrew B. Neang,

Will Sutherland,

Michael W. Beach,

Charlotte P. LeeAuthors Info & Claims

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 4, Issue CSCW3

Article No.: 256, Pages 1 - 25

https://doi.org/10.1145/3432955

Published: 05 January 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Recent CSCW research on the collaborative design and development of research infrastructures for the natural sciences has increasingly focused on the challenges of open data sharing. This qualitative study describes and analyzes how multidisciplinary, geographically distributed ocean scientists are integrating highly diverse data as part of an effort to develop a new research infrastructure to advance science. This paper identifies different kinds of coordination that are necessary to align processes of data collection, production, and analysis. Some of the hard work to integrate data is undertaken before data integration can even become a technical problem. After data integration becomes a technical problem, social and organizational means continue to be critical for resolving differences in assumptions, methods, practices, and priorities. This work calls attention to the diversity of coordinative, social, and organizational practices and concerns that are needed to integrate data and also how, in highly innovative work, the process of integrating data also helps to define scientific problem spaces themselves.

References

[1]

Matthew Bietz, Eric Baumer, and Charlotte P. Lee. 2010. Synergizing in Cyberinfrastructure Development. The Journal of Collaborative Computing, Vol. 19, 3 (2010), 245--281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-010-9114-y

Digital Library

[2]

Matthew J Bietz and Charlotte P Lee. 2009. Collaboration in metagenomics: Sequence databases and the organization of scientific work. In ECSCW 2009. Springer, 243--262.

[3]

Christine L Borgman. 2008. Data, disciplines, and scholarly publishing. Learned publishing, Vol. 21, 1 (2008), 29--38.

[4]

Christine L. Borgman. 2012. The conundrum of sharing research data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 63, 6 (2012), 1059--1078. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22634

Digital Library

[5]

Kathy Charmaz. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London; Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications, London; Thousand Oaks, Calif.

[6]

Su Yun Chung and Limsoon Wong. 1999. Kleisli: a new tool for data integration in biology. Trends in Biotechnology, Vol. 17, 9 (1999), 351--355. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7799(99)01342-6

[7]

Juliet M Corbin and Anselm L Strauss. 1993. The articulation of work through interaction. The sociological quarterly, Vol. 34, 1 (1993), 71--83.

[8]

Kevin Crowston, Alison Specht, Carol Hoover, Katherine M. Chudoba, and Mary Beth Watson-Manheim. 2015. Perceived discontinuities and continuities in transdisciplinary scientific working groups. Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 534, C (2015), 159--172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.121

[9]

Andrew K. Dow, Eli M. Dow, Thomas D. Fitzsimmons, and Maurice M. Materise. 2015. Harnessing the environmental data flood: a comparative analysis of hydrologic, oceanographic, and meteorological informatics platforms.(ESSAY). Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 96, 5 (2015), 725. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00178.1

[10]

Paul N. Edwards, Steven J. Jackson, Geoffrey C. Bowker, and Cory P. Knobel. 2007. Understanding infrastructure: Dynamics, tensions, and design. (2007).

[11]

Paul N. Edwards, Matthew S. Mayernik, Archer L. Batcheller, Geoffrey C. Bowker, and Christine L. Borgman. 2011. Science friction: Data, metadata, and collaboration. Social Studies of Science, Vol. 41, 5 (2011), 667--690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312711413314

[12]

Robert M. Emerson, Rachel I. Fretz, and Linda L. Shaw. 1995. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press.

[13]

Ixchel M. Faniel and Trond Jacobsen. 2010. Reusing Scientific Data: How Earthquake Engineering Researchers Assess the Reusability of Colleagues? Data. The Journal of Collaborative Computing, Vol. 19, 3 (2010), 355--375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-010-9117-8

Digital Library

[14]

Ixchel M. Faniel and Elizabeth Yakel. 2017. Practices do not make perfect: Disciplinary data sharing and reuse practices and their implications for repository data curation. Curating research data, volume one: Practical strategies for your digital repository (2017), 103--126.

[15]

Benedikt Fecher, Sascha Friesike, and Marcel Hebing. 2015. What drives academic data sharing? PloS one, Vol. 10, 2 (2015).

[16]

Sebastian S Feger, Sünje Dallmeier-Tiessen, Paweł W Wo'zniak, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2019. The Role of HCI in Reproducible Science: Understanding, Supporting and Motivating Core Practices. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--6.

[17]

Thomas A Finholt. 2002. Collaboratories. Annual review of information science and technology, Vol. 36, 1 (2002), 73--107.

[18]

Joan H. Fujimura. 1987. Constructing `Do-able' Problems in Cancer Research: Articulating Alignment. Social Studies of Science, Vol. 17, 2 (1987), 257--293. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631287017002003

[19]

Joan H. Fujimura. 1996. Crafting science: a sociohistory of the quest for the genetics of cancer. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

[20]

Mike J. Gallivan. 1997. Value in triangulation: a comparison of two approaches for combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Springer, 417--443.

[21]

Elihu M. Gerson. 2008. Reach, bracket, and the limits of rationalized coordination: Some challenges for CSCW. Springer, 193--220. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-901-9_8

[22]

Vidar Hepsø et almbox. 2006. Intelligent energy in E&P: When are we going to address organizational robustness and collaboration as something else than a residual factor?. In Intelligent Energy Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

[23]

Tony Hey and Anne Trefethen. 2003. e-Science and its implications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 361, 1809 (2003), 1809--1825. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2003.1224

[24]

Steven J Jackson, David Ribes, Ayse Buyuktur, and Geoffrey C Bowker. 2011. Collaborative rhythm: temporal dissonance and alignment in collaborative scientific work. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 245--254.

Digital Library

[25]

Marina Jirotka, Charlotte Lee, and Gary Olson. 2013. Supporting Scientific Collaboration: Methods, Tools and Concepts. The Journal of Collaborative Computing and Work Practices, Vol. 22, 4 (2013), 667--715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-012-9184-0

Digital Library

[26]

Cutcher-Gershenfeld Joel, S. Baker Karen, Berente Nicholas, R. Carter Dorothy, A. Dechurch Leslie, C. Flint Courtney, Gershenfeld Gabriel, Haberman Michael, King John Leslie, Kirkpatrick Christine, Knight Eric, Lawrence Barbara, Lewis Spenser, W. Christopher Lenhardt, Lopez Pablo, S. Mayernik Matthew, Mcelroy Charles, Mittleman Barbara, Nichol Victor, and Nolan Mark. 2016. Build It, But Will They Come? A Geoscience Cyberinfrastructure Baseline Analysis. Data Science Journal, Vol. 15, 0 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2016-008

[27]

Helena Karasti, Karen Baker, and Florence Millerand. 2010. Infrastructure Time: Long-term Matters in Collaborative Development. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Vol. 19, 3 (2010), 377--415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-010-9113-z

Digital Library

[28]

Youngseek Kim and Ayoung Yoon. 2017. Scientists' data reuse behaviors: A multilevel analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 68, 12 (2017), 2709--2719. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23892

Digital Library

[29]

Kateryna Kuksenok, Cecilia Aragon, James Fogarty, Charlotte Lee, and Gina Neff. 2017. Deliberate Individual Change Framework for Understanding Programming Practices in four Oceanography Groups. The Journal of Collaborative Computing and Work Practices, Vol. 26, 4 (2017), 663--691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-017-9285-x

Digital Library

[30]

Bruno Latour. 1987. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard university press.

[31]

Bruno Latour and Steve Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

[32]

Charlotte P Lee, Paul Dourish, and Gloria Mark. 2006. The human infrastructure of cyberinfrastructure. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 483--492.

Digital Library

[33]

Charlotte P Lee and Drew Paine. 2015. From The Matrix to a Model of Coordinated Action (MoCA) A Conceptual Framework of and for CSCW. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 179--194.

[34]

Sabina Leonelli. 2013. Integrating data to acquire new knowledge: Three modes of integration in plant science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biol & Biomed Sci, Vol. 44, 4 (2013), 503--514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.03.020

[35]

Sabina Leonelli. 2016. Data-Centric Biology: A Philosophical Study. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226416502.001.0001

[36]

David Maier, Vernonika M. Megler, and Kristin Tufte. [n.d.]. Challenges for dataset search. In International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications. Springer, 1--15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05810-8_1

[37]

Helena M Mentis, Madhu Reddy, and Mary Beth Rosson. 2010. Invisible emotion: information and interaction in an emergency room. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 311--320.

Digital Library

[38]

Florence Millerand, David Ribes, Karen S. Baker, and Geoffrey C. Bowker. 2013. Making an Issue out of a Standard: Storytelling Practices in a Scientific Community. Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 38, 1 (2013), 7--43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243912437221

[39]

Gerard Oleksik, Natasa Milic-Frayling, and Rachel Jones. 2012. Beyond data sharing: artifact ecology of a collaborative nanophotonics research centre. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 1165--1174.

Digital Library

[40]

Gary M Olson and Judith S Olson. 2000. Distance matters. Human-computer interaction, Vol. 15, 2--3 (2000), 139--178.

[41]

Gary M. Olson, Ann Zimmerman, and Nathan Bos. 2008. Scientific Collaboration on the Internet. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262151207.001.0001

[42]

Maureen A. O'malley and Orkun S. Soyer. 2012. The roles of integration in molecular systems biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biol & Biomed Sci, Vol. 43, 1 (2012), 58--68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.10.006

[43]

Trine Pallesen and Peter H. Jacobsen. 2018. Articulation work from the middle'a study of how technicians mediate users and technology. New Technology, Work and Employment, Vol. 33, 2 (2018), 171--186. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12113

[44]

Ted Palys. 2008. Basic research. The sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods, Vol. 2 (2008), 58--60.

[45]

Chrysanthi Papoutsi and Ian Brown. 2015. Privacy as articulation work in HIV health services. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 339--348.

Digital Library

[46]

Irene V Pasquetto, Ashley E Sands, Peter T Darch, and Christine L Borgman. 2016. Open data in scientific settings: From policy to practice. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1585--1596.

Digital Library

[47]

Michael Quinn Patton. 2015. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: integrating theory and practice fourth edition. ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, California.

[48]

Heather A. Piwowar, Roger S. Day, and Douglas B. Fridsma. 2007. Sharing Detailed Research Data Is Associated with Increased Citation Rate (Sharing Data Citation Rate). PLoS ONE, Vol. 2, 3 (2007), e308. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000308

[49]

Neil Pollock. 2005. When Is a Work-Around? Conflict and Negotiation in Computer Systems Development. Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 30, 4 (2005), 496--514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243905276501

[50]

David P Randall, E Ilana Diamant, and Charlotte P Lee. 2015. Creating sustainable cyberinfrastructures. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1759--1768.

Digital Library

[51]

David Ribes. 2017. Notes on the concept of data interoperability: Cases from an ecology of AIDS research infrastructures. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 1514--1526.

Digital Library

[52]

Betsy Rolland and Charlotte P Lee. 2013. Beyond trust and reliability: reusing data in collaborative cancer epidemiology research. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 435--444.

Digital Library

[53]

Steve Sawyer and Andrea Tapia. 2006. Always Articulating: Theorizing on Mobile and Wireless Technologies. The Information Society, Vol. 22, 5 (2006), 311--323. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240600904258

[54]

Kjeld Schmidt and Liam Bannon. 1992. Taking CSCW seriously. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Vol. 1, 1--2 (1992), 7--40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00752449

[55]

Kjeld Schmidt and Carla Simone. 1996. Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Vol. 5, 2 (1996), 155--200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133655

Digital Library

[56]

Dan Sholler, Sara Stoudt, Chris Kennedy, Fernando Hoces de la Guardia, Francois Lanusse, Karthik Ram, Kellie Ottoboni, Marla Stuart, Maryam Vareth, and Nelle Varoquaux. 2019. Resistance to Adoption of Best Practices. (2019).

[57]

Susan Leigh Star and Karen Ruhleder. 1996. Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information systems research, Vol. 7, 1 (1996), 111--134.

Digital Library

[58]

Stephanie B Steinhardt. 2016. Breaking down while building up: design and decline in emerging infrastructures. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2198--2208.

Digital Library

[59]

Stephanie B Steinhardt and Steven J Jackson. 2015. Anticipation work: Cultivating vision in collective practice. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 443--453.

Digital Library

[60]

Allan Stisen, Nervo Verdezoto, Henrik Blunck, Mikkel Baun Kjærgaard, and Kaj Grønbæk. 2016. Accounting for the invisible work of hospital orderlies: Designing for local and global coordination. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 980--992.

Digital Library

[61]

Anselm L. Strauss. 1985. Work and the Division of Labor. The Sociological Quarterly, Vol. 26, 1 (1985), 1--19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533--8525.1985.tb00212.x

[62]

Anselm L. Strauss. 1988. The Articulation of Project Work: An Organizational Process. Sociological Quarterly, Vol. 29, 2 (1988), 163--178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1988.tb01249.x

[63]

Lucy Suchman. 1996. Supporting articulation work. Computerization and controversy: Value conflicts and social choices, Vol. 2 (1996), 407--423.

[64]

Katie G Tanaka and Amy Voida. 2016. Legitimacy work: Invisible work in philanthropic crowdfunding. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 4550--4561.

Digital Library

[65]

Carol Tenopir, Suzie Allard, Kimberly Douglass, Arsev Umur Aydinoglu, Lei Wu, Eleanor Read, Maribeth Manoff, and Mike Frame. 2011. Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions. PloS one, Vol. 6, 6 (2011), e21101.

[66]

Theresa Velden, Matthew J Bietz, E Ilana Diamant, James D Herbsleb, James Howison, David Ribes, and Stephanie B Steinhardt. 2014. Sharing, re-use and circulation of resources in cooperative scientific work. In Proceedings of the companion publication of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 347--350.

Digital Library

[67]

Janet Vertesi and Paul Dourish. 2011. The value of data: considering the context of production in data economies. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 533--542.

Digital Library

[68]

Jillian C Wallis, Elizabeth Rolando, and Christine L Borgman. 2013. If we share data, will anyone use them? Data sharing and reuse in the long tail of science and technology. PloS one, Vol. 8, 7 (2013).

[69]

Robert Stuart Weiss. 1994. Learning from strangers: the art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: Free Press; Toronto: Maxwell Macmillan Canada; New York: Maxwell Macmillan International, New York: Toronto: New York.

[70]

Michael C Whitlock, Mark A McPeek, Mark D Rausher, Loren Rieseberg, and Allen J Moore. 2010. Data Archiving. The American Naturalist, Vol. 175, 2 (2010), 145--146. https://doi.org/10.1086/650340

[71]

R Williams, G Pryor, A Bruce, S Macdonald, W Marsden, J Calvert, and C Neilson. 2009. Patterns of information use and exchange: Case studies of researchers in the life sciences Research Information Network Report. University of Edinburgh Digital Curation Centre.

[72]

William A. Wulf. 1993. The collaboratory opportunity. (National Research Council report 'National Collaboratories: Applying Information Technology for Scientific Research') (Computing in Science) (Cover Story). Science, Vol. 261, 5123 (1993), 854. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8346438

[73]

Alyson L Young and Wayne G Lutters. 2015. (Re) defining Land Change Science through Synthetic Research Practices. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 431--442.

Digital Library

[74]

Ann Zimmerman. 2007. Not by metadata alone: the use of diverse forms of knowledge to locate data for reuse. International Journal on Digital Libraries, Vol. 7, 1 (2007), 5--16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-007-0015-8

Cited By

Yang TMiceli M(2024)"Guilds" as Worker Empowerment and Control in a Chinese Data Work PlatformProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869048:CSCW2(1-27)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686904
Yoo DWoo HPendse SLu NBirnbaum MAbowd GDe Choudhury M(2024)Missed Opportunities for Human-Centered AI Research: Understanding Stakeholder Collaboration in Mental Health AI ResearchProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373728:CSCW1(1-24)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637372
Sutherland WPaine DLee C(2024)‘The Cloud is Not Not IT’: Ecological Change in Research Computing in the CloudComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)10.1007/s10606-024-09490-1Online publication date: 14-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-024-09490-1
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Data Integration as Coordination: The Articulation of Data Work in an Ocean Science Collaboration
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Collaborative and social computing

Recommendations

Bridging the data integration gap: from theory to implementation

The integration of multiple autonomous and heterogeneous data sources (both across the web and via a company intranet) has received much attention throughout the years, particularly due to its many applications in the fields of Artificial Intelligence ...
On-demand big data integration

Scientific research requires access, analysis, and sharing of data that is distributed across various heterogeneous data sources at the scale of the Internet. An eager extract, transform, and load (ETL) process constructs an integrated data repository ...
Bridging the data integration gap: from theory to implementation

The integration of multiple autonomous and heterogeneous data sources (both across the web and via a company intranet) has received much attention throughout the years, particularly due to its many applications in the fields of Artificial Intelligence ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Volume 4, Issue CSCW3

CSCW

December 2020

1825 pages

EISSN:2573-0142

DOI:10.1145/3446568

Editor:
Jeff Nichols
Apple Inc., United States

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2021 Owner/Author.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 05 January 2021

Published in PACMHCI Volume 4, Issue CSCW3

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

National Science Foundation
Simons Collaboration on Computational Biogeochemical Modeling of Marine Ecosystems

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

13
Total Citations
View Citations
865
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)292
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)51

Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Yang TMiceli M(2024)"Guilds" as Worker Empowerment and Control in a Chinese Data Work PlatformProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869048:CSCW2(1-27)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686904
Yoo DWoo HPendse SLu NBirnbaum MAbowd GDe Choudhury M(2024)Missed Opportunities for Human-Centered AI Research: Understanding Stakeholder Collaboration in Mental Health AI ResearchProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373728:CSCW1(1-24)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637372
Sutherland WPaine DLee C(2024)‘The Cloud is Not Not IT’: Ecological Change in Research Computing in the CloudComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)10.1007/s10606-024-09490-1Online publication date: 14-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-024-09490-1
Jones RSeidelin CNeang ALee C(2023)Lessons Learned from a Comparative Study of Long-Term Action Research with Community Design of Infrastructural SystemsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35795027:CSCW1(1-35)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3579502
Sun YMa XLindtner SHe L(2023)Data Work of Frontline Care Workers: Practices, Problems, and Opportunities in the Context of Data-Driven Long-Term CareProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35794757:CSCW1(1-28)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3579475
Mosconi Gde Carvalho ASyed HRandall DKarasti HPipek V(2023)Fostering Research Data Management in Collaborative Research Contexts: Lessons learnt from an ‘Embedded’ Evaluation of ‘Data Story’Computer Supported Cooperative Work10.1007/s10606-023-09467-632:4(911-949)Online publication date: 15-May-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10606-023-09467-6
Heger AMarquis LVorvoreanu MWallach HWortman Vaughan J(2022)Understanding Machine Learning Practitioners' Data Documentation Perceptions, Needs, Challenges, and DesiderataProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35557606:CSCW2(1-29)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3555760
Su ZHe LJariwala SZheng KChen Y(2022)"What is Your Envisioned Future?": Toward Human-AI Enrichment in Data Work of Asthma CareProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35551576:CSCW2(1-28)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3555157
Thomer AAkmon DYork JTyler APolasek FLafia SHemphill LYakel E(2022)The Craft and Coordination of Data Curation: Complicating Workflow Views of Data ScienceProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35551396:CSCW2(1-29)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3555139
Ko MMa X(2022)Mobilizing Instrumental Childcare Support for Postpartum Mothers: Needs for and Barriers to Infant-centric Family Informatics Practices in Hong KongProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35550846:CSCW2(1-40)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3555084
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents