Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3428757.3429123acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiiwasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Extracting Rhetorical Question from Twitter

Published: 27 January 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Many types of content exist on SNSs. Sometimes authors' opinions are not properly communicated to the reader. The content might be inflammatory, known as flaming. We infer the importance of extracting passages in which the author's opinion is not communicated correctly when it is presented to the reader. This study particularly examines tweets, a popular message system of the Twitter SNS, and also specifically examines "rhetorical questions." Rhetorical questions are sometimes known as mandarin sentences. People might misunderstand them and might flame the author. We consider it important to extract rhetorical question tweets automatically and present them.
This paper proposes a method to extract rhetorical question tweets. First, we propose two definitions of rhetorical question tweets by our preliminary experiment. Next we propose a method extracting rhetorical question tweets based on two definitions. Definition 1 is Including the author's opinion in a question. Definition 2 is Including an author's opinion sentence, commentary sentence, or sentiment reversal in a sentence. Specifically, we proposed a method of opinion sentence extraction, commentary sentence extraction, and sentiment reversal extraction. Furthermore, we conducted two experiments and measured the benefits of our proposed methods.

References

[1]
Suhas Ranganath, Xia Hu, Jiliang Tang, Suhang Wang, and Huan Liu. 2018. "Understanding and Identifying Rhetorical Questions in Social Media." ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 9, 2, Article 17 (January 2018), 22 pages.
[2]
Takizawa Osamu, Ito Akira, "A Method for Detecting an Ironic Expression". Journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, 9, 6, 875--881, 1994-11-01.
[3]
Fumiya Isono, Suguru Matsuyoshi, and Fumiyo Fukumoto, "Automatic Detection of Sarcasm in BBS Posts Based on Sarcasm Classification". IPSJ Natural Language Processing, 2013-NL-213, 7, 1-8, 2013-09-05.
[4]
Yulli Dias Tavares Alves, Ana Luiza Sanches, Daniel H. Dalip, and Ismael S. Silva. 2019. "Automatic identification of irony: a case study on Twitter." In Proceedings of the 25th Brazillian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web (WebMedia '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 253--256.
[5]
Larissa A. de Freitas, Aline A. Vanin, Denise N. Hogetop, Marco N. Bochernitsan, and Renata Vieira. 2014. Pathways for irony detection in tweets. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 628--633.
[6]
Mondher Bouazizi and Tomoaki Ohtsuki. 2015. "Opinion Mining in Twitter How to Make Use of Sarcasm to Enhance Sentiment Analysis." In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining 2015 (ASONAM '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1594--1597.
[7]
Lipika Dey and S K Mirajul Haque. 2008. "Opinion mining from noisy text data." In Proceedings of the second workshop on Analytics for noisy unstructured text data (AND '08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 83--90.
[8]
Lu Lin, Jianxin Li, Richong Zhang, Weiren Yu, and Chenggen Sun. 2014. "Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis in Social Networks: A Retweeting Structure-Aware Approach." In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE/ACM 7th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC '14). IEEE Computer Society, USA, 890--895.
[9]
Ali Harb, Michel Plantié, Gerard Dray, Mathieu Roche, François Trousset, and Pascal Poncelet. 2008. "Web opinion mining: how to extract opinions from blogs?" In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Soft computing as transdisciplinary science and technology (CSTST '08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 211--217.
[10]
Iida Ryu, Kobayashi Nozomi, Inui Kentaro, Matsumoto Yuji, Tateishi Kenji, and Fukushima Toshikazu, "A Machine Learning-Based Method to Extract Attribute-Value Pairs for Opinion Mining". IPSJ Natural Language Processing, 2005, 1(2004-NL-165), 21--28, 2005-01-11.
[11]
Shigeru FUJIMURA, Masashi TOYODA, and Masaru KITURE-GAWA, "A Reputation Extracting Method Considering Structure of Sentence". DEWS2005, 2005, 2005, 2005.
[12]
T. Nakagawa, "Opinion extraction tool", 2011, https://alaginrc.nict.go.jp/opinion/index.html
[13]
MATSUYOSHI SUGURU, SATO SATOSHI, UTSURO TAKE-HIRO, (2007). "A Dictionary of Japanese Functional Expressions with Hierarchical Organization". Journal of natural language processing, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp123--146.
[14]
MATSUYOSHI SUGURU, SATO SATOSHI (2008). "Automatic Paraphrasing of Japanese Functional Expressions under Style and Readability Specifications". Journal of natural language processing, Vol. 15, Nol. 2, pp. 75--99.
[15]
Yuki Yamamoto, Tadahiko Kumamoto, Akiyo Nadamoto, "Followee Recommendation Based on Topic Extraction and Sentiment Analysis from Tweets", International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services(iiWAS2015), pp. 215--225, 2015.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
iiWAS '20: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services
November 2020
492 pages
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

  • Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 January 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Opinion mining
  2. Rhetorical question
  3. SNS
  4. Sentiment analysis
  5. Web mining

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

iiWAS '20

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 32
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media