research-article

Open access

Contrasts and similarities between two audio research communities in evaluating auditory artefacts

Authors:

Mariana Seiça,

Licínio Roque,

F. Amílcar CardosoAuthors Info & Claims

AM '20: Proceedings of the 15th International Audio Mostly Conference

Pages 183 - 190

https://doi.org/10.1145/3411109.3411146

Published: 16 September 2020 Publication History

Abstract

The design of auditory artefacts has been establishing its practice as a scientific area for more than 20 years, with a crucial element in this process being how to properly evaluate acoustic outputs. In this paper, we sought to map the evaluation methods applied in a general search inside two main audio-focused conferences: Audio Mostly and the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD). Revisiting last year's editions, as well as a keyword-based search in the last ten years, we attempted to gather and classify each evaluation method according to the level of user involvement, their role, and the authors intentions in using each method. We propose an initial mapping for this gathering, in a framework of evaluation approaches which can reinforce and expand current practices in the creation of auditory artefacts.

Supplementary Material

ZIP File (p183-seica.zip)

Supplemental material.

Download
800.48 KB

References

[1]

Robert L Alexander, Sile O'Modhrain, Jason A Gilbert, and Thomas H Zurbuchen. 2014. Auditory and Visual Evaluation of Fixed-Frequency Events in Time-Varying Signals. In In Prooceedings of the 20th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2014). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[2]

Areti Andreopoulou and Brian FG Katz. 2015. On the use of subjective htrf evaluations for creating global perceptual similarity metrics of assessors and assessees. In In Prooceedings of the 21st International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2015). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[3]

Jack Armitage and Andrew McPherson. 2019. Bricolage in a Hybrid Digital Lutherie Context: A Workshop Study. In Proceedings of the 14th International Audio Mostly Conference: A Journey in Sound (Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AM'19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 82--89.

Digital Library

[4]

Eliott Audry and Jérémie Garcia. 2019. Congruent audio-visual alarms for supervision tasks. In In Prooceedings of the 25th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2019). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[5]

Juan Pablo Martinez Avila, Adrian Hazzard, Chris Greenhalgh, and Steve Benford. 2019. Augmenting Guitars for Performance Preparation. In Proceedings of the 14th International Audio Mostly Conference: A Journey in Sound (Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AM'19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 69--75.

Digital Library

[6]

Nida Aziz, Tony Stockman, and Rebecca Stewart. 2019. An investigation into customisable automatically generated auditory route overviews for pre-navigation. In In Prooceedings of the 25th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2019). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[7]

Brandon Biggs, James M Coughlan, and Peter Coppin. 2019. Design and evaluation of an audio game-inspired auditory map interface. In In Prooceedings of the 25th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2019). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[8]

Derek Brock, S Camille Peres, and Brian McClimens. 2012. Evaluating listeners' attention to and comprehension of serialy interleaved, rate-accelerated speech. In In Prooceedings of the 18th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2012). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[9]

Gary Bromham, David Moffat, Mathieu Barthet, Anne Danielsen, and György Fazekas. 2019. The Impact of Audio Effects Processing on the Perception of Brightness and Warmth. In Proceedings of the 14th International Audio Mostly Conference: A Journey in Sound (Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AM'19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 183--190.

Digital Library

[10]

Fred Bruford, Mathieu Barthet, SKoT McDonald, and Mark Sandler. 2019. Modelling Musical Similarity for Drum Patterns: A Perceptual Evaluation. In Proceedings of the 14th International Audio Mostly Conference: A Journey in Sound (Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AM'19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 131--138.

Digital Library

[11]

Ivica Ico Bukvic, Gregory Earle, Disha Sardana, and Woohun Joo. 2019. Studies in spatial aural perception: establishing foundations for immersive sonification. In In Prooceedings of the 25th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2019). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[12]

Linda Candy, Shigeki Amitani, and Zafer Bilda. 2006. Practice-led strategies for interactive art research. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts 2, 4 (2006), 209--223.

[13]

Filippo Carnovalini and Antonio Rodà. 2019. A Real-Time Tempo and Meter Tracking System for Rhythmic Improvisation. In Proceedings of the 14th International Audio Mostly Conference: A Journey in Sound (Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AM'19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 24--31.

Digital Library

[14]

Juliet M Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 1990. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative sociology 13, 1 (1990), 3--21.

[15]

Stuart Cunningham, Harrison Ridley, Jonathan Weinel, and Richard Picking. 2019. Audio Emotion Recognition Using Machine Learning to Support Sound Design. In Proceedings of the 14th International Audio Mostly Conference: A Journey in Sound (Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AM'19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 116--123.

Digital Library

[16]

Stuart Cunningham, Jonathan Weinel, Shaun Roberts, Vic Grout, and Darryl Griffiths. 2013. Initial Objective Subjective Evaluation of a Similarity-Based Audio Compression Technique. In Proceedings of the 8th Audio Mostly Conference (Piteå, Sweden) (AM '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 1, 6 pages.

Digital Library

[17]

Palle Dahlstedt and Ami Skånberg Dahlstedt. 2019. OtoKin: Mapping for Sound Space Exploration through Dance Improvisation. In International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression - NIME2019. Porto Alegre, Brazil.

[18]

Alejandro Delgado, SKoT McDonald, Ning Xu, and Mark Sandler. 2019. A New Dataset for Amateur Vocal Percussion Analysis. In Proceedings of the 14th International Audio Mostly Conference: A Journey in Sound (Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AM'19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 17--23.

Digital Library

[19]

David Dewhurst. 2019. The design and exploration of auditory display effects for blind drivers in autonomous vehicles. In In Prooceedings of the 25th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2019). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[20]

Milena Droumeva and Iain McGregor. 2014. A Method for Comparative Evaluation of Listening to Auditory Displays by Designers and Users. In In Prooceedings of the 20th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2014). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[21]

Lars Engeln and Rainer Groh. 2019. CoHEARence: A Qualitive User-(Pre-)Test on Resynthesized Shapes for Coherent Visual Sound Design. In Proceedings of the 14th International Audio Mostly Conference: A Journey in Sound (Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AM'19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 98--102.

Digital Library

[22]

Jamie Ferguson and Stephen Brewster. 2019. Evaluating the magnitude estimation approach for designing sonification mapping topologies. In In Prooceedings of the 25th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2019). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[23]

Thomas J. Graham, Thor Magnusson, Chinmay Rajguru, Arash Pour Yazdan, Alex Jacobs, and Gianluca Memoli. 2019. Composing Spatial Soundscapes Using Acoustic Metasurfaces. In Proceedings of the 14th International Audio Mostly Conference: A Journey in Sound (Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AM'19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 103--110.

Digital Library

[24]

Annaliese Micallef Grimaud, Tuomas Eerola, and Nick Collins. 2019. EmoteControl: A System for Live-Manipulation of Emotional Cues in Music. In Proceedings of the 14th International Audio Mostly Conference: A Journey in Sound (Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AM'19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 111--115.

Digital Library

[25]

Brian Hansen, Leya Breanna Baltaxe-Admony, Sri Kurniawan, and Angus G Forbes. 2019. Exploring sonic parameter mapping for network data structures. In In Prooceedings of the 25th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2019). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[26]

Yliess Hati, Francis Rousseaux, and Clément Duhart. 2019. Text-driven mouth animation for human computer interaction with personal assistant. In In Prooceedings of the 25th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2019). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[27]

Laurie M Heller, Arley Schenker, Pulkit Grover, Madeline Gardner, and Felix Liu. 2017. Evaluating Two Ways to Train Sensitivity to Echoes to Improve Echolocation. In In Prooceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2017). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[28]

Thomas Hermann. 2008. Taxonomy and definitions for sonification and auditory display. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Auditory Display.

[29]

Thomas Hermann, Andy Hunt, and John Neuhoff. 2011. The Sonification Handbook. Logos Verlag, Berlin, Germany.

[30]

Thomas Hermann and Marian Weger. 2019. Data-driven Auditory Contrast Enhancement for everyday sounds and sonifications. In In Prooceedings of the 25th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2019). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[31]

Daniel Hug. 2010. Performativity in Design and Evaluation of Sounding Interactive Commodities. In Proceedings of the 5th Audio Mostly Conference: A Conference on Interaction with Sound (Piteå, Sweden) (AM '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 7, 8 pages.

Digital Library

[32]

D. Idhe. 1977. Experimental Phenomenology. State University of New York Press, New York, USA, Chapter Phenomena and the Phenomenological Reductions, 29--54.

[33]

Rébecca Kleinberger, Stefanakis George, and Sebastian Franjou. 2019. Speech companions: Evaluating the effects of musically modulated auditory feedback on the voice. In In Prooceedings of the 25th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2019). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[34]

Takanori Komatsu and Eiji Hayashi. 2019. A design guide-line of auditory display for electric appliance. In In Prooceedings of the 25th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2019). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[35]

Gregory Kramer, BN Walker, Terri Bonebright, Perry Cook, J Flowers, Nadine Miner, John Neuhoff, R Bargar, S Barrass, J Berger, et al. 1999. The sonification report: Status of the field and research agenda. report prepared for the national science foundation by members of the international community for auditory display. International Community for Auditory Display (ICAD), Santa Fe, NM (1999).

[36]

Thimmaiah Kuppanda, Norberto Degara, David Worrall, Balaji Thoshkahna, and Meinard Müller. 2015. Virtual reality platform for sonification evaluation. In In Prooceedings of the 21st International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2015). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[37]

Adam Lefaivre and John Z. Zhang. 2018. Music Genre Classification: Genre-Specific Characterization and Pairwise Evaluation. In Proceedings of the Audio Mostly 2018 on Sound in Immersion and Emotion (Wrexham, United Kingdom) (AM'18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 22, 4 pages.

Digital Library

[38]

Sara Lenzi, Ginevra Terenghi, Riccardo Taormina, Stefano Galelli, and Paolo Ciuccarelli. 2019. Disclosing cyber attacks on water distribution systems: an experimental approach to the sonification of threats and anomalous data. In In Prooceedings of the 25th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2019). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[39]

Stan Lester. 1999. An introduction to phenomenological research.

[40]

Grace Li and Bruce N Walker. 2019. Mixed speech and non-speech auditory displays: impacts of design, learning, and individual differences in musical engagement. In In Prooceedings of the 25th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2019). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[41]

Peter Lundén, Marja Gustin, Mats E. Nilsson, Jens Forssén, and Björn Hellström. 2010. Psychoacoustic Evaluation as a Tool for Optimization in the Development of an Urban Soundscape Simulator. In Proceedings of the 5th Audio Mostly Conference: A Conference on Interaction with Sound (Piteå, Sweden) (AM '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 3, 6 pages.

Digital Library

[42]

Keenan R May, Briana Sobel, Jeff Wilson, and Bruce N Walker. [n.d.]. Auditory displays to facilitate object targeting in 3D space. In In Prooceedings of the 25th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2019). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[43]

Iain McGregor, Gregory Leplâtre, Phil Turner, and Tom Flint. 2010. Soundscape Mapping: a tool for evaluating sounds and auditory environments. (2010).

[44]

Neil McGuiness and Chris Nash. 2019. The Pulse: Embedded Beat Sensing Using Physical Data. In Proceedings of the 14th International Audio Mostly Conference: A Journey in Sound (Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AM'19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 207--214.

Digital Library

[45]

Yuki Nakayama, Yuji Takano, Masaki Matsubara, Kenji Suzuki, and Hiroko Terasawa. 2015. Real-time smile sonification using surface EMG signal and the evaluation of its usability. In In Prooceedings of the 21st International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2015). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[46]

Timothy Neate, Norberto Degara, Andy Hunt, and Frederik Nagel. 2014. A Generic Evaluation Model for Auditory Feedback in Complex Visual Searches. In In Prooceedings of the 20th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2014). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[47]

John G Neuhoff. 2019. Is sonification doomed to fail?. In In Prooceedings of the 25th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2019). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[48]

Richard Pinsenschaum and Flaithri Neff. 2016. Evaluating Gesture Characteristics When Using a Bluetooth Handheld Music Controller. In Proceedings of the Audio Mostly 2016 (Norrköping, Sweden) (AM '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 209--214.

Digital Library

[49]

Durval Pires, Bárbara Furtado, Tiago Carregã, Luís Reis, Luís Lucas Pereira, Rui Craveirinha, and Licínio Roque. 2013. The blindfold soundscape game: a case for participation-centered gameplay experience design and evaluation. In Proceedings of the 8th Audio Mostly Conference. 1--7.

Digital Library

[50]

Zuzanna Podwinska, Bruno M Fazenda, and William J Davies. 2019. Testing spatial aspects of auditory salience. In In Prooceedings of the 25th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2019). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[51]

Cornelius Poepel. 2014. Evaluating Computer-Based Musical Instruments from the Perspective of Listening. In Proceedings of the 9th Audio Mostly: A Conference on Interaction With Sound (Aalborg, Denmark) (AM '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 19, 8 pages.

Digital Library

[52]

Winters R Michael, Ankur Kalra, and Bruce N Walker. [n.d.]. Hearing artificial intelligence: Sonification guidelines & results from a case-study in melanoma diagnosis. In In Prooceedings of the 25th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2019). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[53]

Richard Ramchurn, Juan Martinez-Avila, Sarah Martindale, Alan Chamberlain, Max L Wilson, and Steve Benford. 2019. Improvising a Live Score to an Interactive Brain-Controlled Film. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. Porto Alegre, Brazil: Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul.

[54]

Katja Rogers and Michael Weber. 2019. Audio Habits and Motivations in Video Game Players. In Proceedings of the 14th International Audio Mostly Conference: A Journey in Sound (Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AM'19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 45--52.

Digital Library

[55]

Niklas Rönnberg and Jonas Lowgren. 2019. Traces of modal synergy: studying interactive musical sonification of images in general-audience use. In In Prooceedings of the 25th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2019). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[56]

Richard Savery, Madhukesh Ayyagari, Keenan May, and Bruce N Walker. 2019. Soccer sonification: Enhancing viewer experience. In In Prooceedings of the 25th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2019). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[57]

Sebastian Schwarz and Tim Ziemer. 2019. A psychoacoustic sound design for pulse oximetry. In In Prooceedings of the 25th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2019). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[58]

Marco Scirea, Yun-Gyung Cheong, Mark J. Nelson, and Byung-Chull Bae. 2014. Evaluating Musical Foreshadowing of Videogame Narrative Experiences. In Proceedings of the 9th Audio Mostly: A Conference on Interaction With Sound (Aalborg, Denmark) (AM '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 8, 7 pages.

Digital Library

[59]

Gabriela Seibert and Daniel Hug. 2013. Bringing Musicality to Movement Sonification: Design and Evaluation of an Auditory Swimming Coach. In Proceedings of the 8th Audio Mostly Conference (Piteå, Sweden) (AM '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 17, 6 pages.

Digital Library

[60]

Mariana Seiça, Pedro Martins, Licínio Roque, and F Amílcar Cardoso. 2019. A sonification experience to portray the sounds of portuguese consumption habits. In In Prooceedings of the 25th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2019). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[61]

Phoebe Sengers and Bill Gaver. 2006. Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation. In Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems. 99--108.

Digital Library

[62]

Tony Stockman and Dena Al-Thanki. 2010. Development and Evaluation of a Cross-Modal XML Schema Browser. In In Prooceedings of the 16th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2010). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[63]

Elio Toppano, Sveva Toppano, and Alessandro Basiaco. 2019. Moving across Sonic Atmospheres. In Proceedings of the 14th International Audio Mostly Conference: A Journey in Sound (Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AM'19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 139--146.

Digital Library

[64]

Luca Turchet, Travis West, and Marcelo M. Wanderley. 2019. Smart Mandolin and Musical Haptic Gilet: Effects of Vibro-Tactile Stimuli during Live Music Performance. In Proceedings of the 14th International Audio Mostly Conference: A Journey in Sound (Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AM'19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 168--175.

Digital Library

[65]

P. Vickers and B. Hogg. 2006. Sonification Abstraite / Sonification Concr'ete: An "Aesthetic Perspective Space" for Classifying Auditory Displays in the Ars Musica Domain. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Auditory Display. London, UK, 210--216.

[66]

Paul Vickers and Robert Höldrich. 2019. Direct Segmented Sonification of Characteristic Features of the Data Domain. In In Prooceedings of the 25th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2019). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[67]

K. Vogt. 2014. A Quantitative Evaluation Approach to Sonifications. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2014). Budapest, Hungary.

[68]

K. Vogt, V. Goudarzi, and R. Parncutt. 2013. Empirical Aesthetic Evaluation of Sonifications. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2013). Lodz, Poland, 175--179.

[69]

Bartlomiej P Walus, Sandra Pauletto, and Amanda Mason-Jones. 2015. Evaluating the use of sonification and music to support the communication of alcohol health risk to young people: initial results. In In Prooceedings of the 21st International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2015). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[70]

Marian Weger, Thomas Hermann, and Robert Höldrich. 2019. Real-time auditory contrast enhancement. In In Prooceedings of the 25th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2019). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[71]

Marian Weger and Robert Höldrich. 2019. A Hear-through System for Plausible Auditory Contrast Enhancement. In Proceedings of the 14th International Audio Mostly Conference: A Journey in Sound (Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AM'19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--8.

Digital Library

[72]

György Wersényi, Hunor Nagy, and Ádám Csapó. 2015. Evaluation of reaction times to sound stimuli on mobile devices. In In Prooceedings of the 21st International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2015). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[73]

Dirk Vander Wilt and Morwaread Mary Farbood. 2019. Automating Audio Description for Live Theater: Using Reference Recordings to Trigger Descriptive Tracks in Real Time. In Proceedings of the 14th International Audio Mostly Conference: A Journey in Sound (Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AM'19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 75--81.

Digital Library

[74]

KatieAnna Wolf and Rebecca Fiebrink. 2019. Toward Supporting End-User Design of Soundscape Sonifications. In In Prooceedings of the 25th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD 2019). Georgia Institute of Technology.

[75]

Emma Young, Alan Marsden, and Paul Coulton. 2019. Making the Invisible Audible: Sonifying Qualitative Data. In Proceedings of the 14th International Audio Mostly Conference: A Journey in Sound. 124--130.

Digital Library

Cited By

Esau-Held MMarsh AKrauß VStevens G(2023)“Foggy sounds like nothing” — enriching the experience of voice assistants with sonic overlaysPersonal and Ubiquitous Computing10.1007/s00779-023-01722-327:5(1927-1947)Online publication date: 6-Jun-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-023-01722-3
Ziemer TSchultheis H(2022)PAMPAS: A PsychoAcoustical Method for the Perceptual Analysis of multidimensional SonificationFrontiers in Neuroscience10.3389/fnins.2022.93094416Online publication date: 6-Oct-2022
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.930944
Ziemer TSchultheis H(2022)Both Rudimentary Visualization and Prototypical Sonification can Serve as a Benchmark to Evaluate New Sonification DesignsProceedings of the 17th International Audio Mostly Conference10.1145/3561212.3561228(24-31)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3561212.3561228
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Contrasts and similarities between two audio research communities in evaluating auditory artefacts
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. HCI design and evaluation methods
    2. Interaction techniques
      1. Auditory feedback

Recommendations

Lyricon Lyrics + Earcons Improves Identification of Auditory Cues
Proceedings, Part II, of the 4th International Conference on Design, User Experience, and Usability: Users and Interactions - Volume 9187

Auditory researchers have developed various non-speech cues in designing auditory user interfaces. A preliminary study of "lyricons" lyricsï ź+ï źearcons [1] has provided a novel approach to devising auditory cues in electronic products, by combining ...
Evaluating a vehicle auditory display: comparing a designer's expectations with listeners' experiences
ECCE '11: Proceedings of the 29th Annual European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics

This paper illustrates a method for the early evaluation of auditory displays in context. A designer was questioned about his expectations of an auditory display for Heavy Goods Vehicles, and the results were compared to the experiences of 10 listeners. ...
Spatial auditory display: Comments on Shinn-Cunningham et al., ICAD 2001

Spatial auditory displays have received a great deal of attention in the community investigating how to present information through sound. This short commentary discusses our 2001 ICAD paper (Shinn-Cunningham, Streeter, and Gyss), which explored whether ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

AM '20: Proceedings of the 15th International Audio Mostly Conference

September 2020

281 pages

ISBN:9781450375634

DOI:10.1145/3411109

Conference Chairs:
Katharina Groß-Vogt,
Robert Höldrich

Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 September 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia

Conference

AM'20

AM'20: Audio Mostly 2020

September 15 - 17, 2020

Graz, Austria

Acceptance Rates

AM '20 Paper Acceptance Rate 29 of 47 submissions, 62%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 177 of 275 submissions, 64%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

5
Total Citations
View Citations
311
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)121
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)17

Reflects downloads up to 13 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Esau-Held MMarsh AKrauß VStevens G(2023)“Foggy sounds like nothing” — enriching the experience of voice assistants with sonic overlaysPersonal and Ubiquitous Computing10.1007/s00779-023-01722-327:5(1927-1947)Online publication date: 6-Jun-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-023-01722-3
Ziemer TSchultheis H(2022)PAMPAS: A PsychoAcoustical Method for the Perceptual Analysis of multidimensional SonificationFrontiers in Neuroscience10.3389/fnins.2022.93094416Online publication date: 6-Oct-2022
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.930944
Ziemer TSchultheis H(2022)Both Rudimentary Visualization and Prototypical Sonification can Serve as a Benchmark to Evaluate New Sonification DesignsProceedings of the 17th International Audio Mostly Conference10.1145/3561212.3561228(24-31)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3561212.3561228
Seiça MRoque LMartins PCardoso F(2022)An Illustrative Design Case of Systemic SonificationProceedings of the 17th International Audio Mostly Conference10.1145/3561212.3561224(171-178)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3561212.3561224
Seiça MRoque LMartins PCardoso F(2022)Playing With Sound Beings: A Sonic PlayfieldExtended Abstracts of the 2022 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play10.1145/3505270.3558384(339-344)Online publication date: 2-Nov-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3505270.3558384

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents