research-article

Open access

Understanding the Security and Privacy Advice Given to Black Lives Matter Protesters

Authors:

Jamar L. Sullivan Jr.,

Marshini Chetty,

Blase UrAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Article No.: 549, Pages 1 - 18

https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445061

Published: 07 May 2021 Publication History

All formats PDF

Abstract

In 2020, there were widespread Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests in the U.S. Because many attendees were novice protesters, organizations distributed guides for staying safe at a protest, often including security and privacy advice. To understand what advice novice protesters are given, we collected 41 safety guides distributed during BLM protests in spring 2020. We identified 13 classes of digital security and privacy advice in these guides. To understand whether this advice influences protesters, we surveyed 167 BLM protesters. Respondents reported an array of security and privacy concerns, and their concerns were magnified when considering fellow protesters. While most respondents reported being aware of, and following, certain advice (e.g., choosing a strong phone passcode), many were unaware of key advice like using end-to-end encrypted messengers and disabling biometric phone unlocking. Our results can guide future advice and technologies to help novice protesters protect their security and privacy.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Materials (3411764.3445061_supplementalmaterials.zip)

Download
85.37 MB

References

[1]

Monica Anderson, Skye Toor, Lee Rainie, and Aaron Smith. 2018. An analysis of #BlackLivesMatter and other Twitter hashtags related to political or social issues. Pew Research Center (2018).

[2]

Ahmer Arif, Leo Graiden Stewart, and Kate Starbird. 2018. Acting the part: Examining information operations within #BlackLivesMatter discourse. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2 (2018).

Digital Library

[3]

Ingolf Becker, Simon Parkin, and M. Angela Sasse. 2017. Finding security champions in blends of organisational culture. In Proc. USEC.

[4]

Odette Beris, Adam Beautement, and M. Angela Sasse. 2015. Employee rule breakers, excuse makers and security champions: Mapping the risk perceptions and emotions that drive security behaviors. In Proc. NSPW.

Digital Library

[5]

Black Lives Matter. 2020. About. https://blacklivesmatter.com/about/

[6]

Black Lives Matter. 2020. Homepage. https://blacklivesmatter.com/

[7]

Black Lives Matter Belfast. 2020. Safety guide. Twitter image. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EZ1Onp7XkAACfFN.png.

[8]

Black Lives Matter Seattle-King County. 2020. Safety while protesting: Protesting & supporting protests safely. Posted on Seattle Central College’s Library. https://libguides.seattlecentral.edu/Staying_Safer_While_Rising_Up.

[9]

Maia J. Boyd, Jamar L. Sullivan Jr., Marshini Chetty, and Blase Ur. 2021. Supplementary Materials for Understanding the Security and Privacy Advice Given to Black Lives Matter Protesters. https://www.blaseur.com/papers/chi21-blm-appendix.pdf

[10]

Larry Buchanan, Quoctrung Bui, and Jugal K. Patel. 2020. Black Lives Matter may be the largest movement in U.S. history. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/07/03/us/george-floyd-protests-crowd-size.html

[11]

Karoline Busse, Julia Schäfer, and Matthew Smith. 2019. Replication: No one can hack my mind. Revisiting a study on expert and non-expert security practices and advice. In Proc. SOUPS.

[12]

Frank Cain. 1983. The Origins of Political Surveillance in Australia. Angus & Robertson Sydney.

[13]

Victoria Carty and Francisco G. Reynoso Barron. 2019. Social movements and new technology: The dynamics of cyber activism in the digital age. In The Palgrave Handbook of Social Movements, Revolution, and Social Transformation. Springer, 373–397.

[14]

Garrett Chase. 2017. The Early History of the Black Lives Matter Movement, and the Implications Thereof. Nevada Law Journal 18(2017), 1091.

[15]

Ivan Cherapau, Ildar Muslukhov, Nalin Asanka, and Konstantin Beznosov. 2015. On the impact of Touch ID on iPhone passcodes. In Proc. SOUPS.

[16]

Ward Churchill. 2001. To disrupt, discredit and destroy. Liberation, Imagination, and the Black Panther Party (2001), 93.

[17]

Ward Churchill and Jim Vander Wall. 1990. The COINTELPRO papers. Boston: South End (1990).

[18]

Sunny Consolvo, Jaeyeon Jung, Ben Greenstein, Pauline Powledge, Gabriel Maganis, and Daniel Avrahami. 2010. The Wi-Fi Privacy Ticker: Improving awareness & control of personal information exposure on Wi-Fi. In Proc. UbiComp.

Digital Library

[19]

Joseph Cox. 2017. Matt Mitchell is arming underserved communities with anti-surveillance tools. Vice. https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/ezaane/matt-mitchell-is-arming-underserved-communities-with-anti-surveillance-tools

[20]

David Cunningham and John A. Noakes. 2008. What if she’s from the FBI? The effects of covert forms of social control on social movements. In Surveillance and Governance: Crime Control and Beyond (Sociology of Crime Law and Deviance). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 175–197.

[21]

Duy Dang-Pham, Siddhi Pittayachawan, and Vince Bruno. 2017. Why employees share information security advice? Exploring the contributing factors and structural patterns of security advice sharing in the workplace. Computers in Human Behavior 67 (2017), 196–206.

Digital Library

[22]

Sauvik Das, Laura A. Dabbish, and Jason I. Hong. 2019. A typology of perceived triggers for end-user security and privacy behaviors. In Proc. SOUPS.

[23]

Susie Day and Laura Whitehorn. 2001. Human rights in the United States: The unfinished story of political prisoners and COINTELPRO. New Political Science 23, 2 (2001), 285–297.

[24]

Munmun De Choudhury, Shagun Jhaver, Benjamin Sugar, and Ingmar Weber. 2016. Social media participation in an activist movement for racial equality. In Proc. ICWSM.

[25]

Lina Dencik and Jonathan Cable. 2017. The advent of surveillance realism: Public opinion and activist responses to the Snowden leaks. International Journal of Communication 11 (2017), 763–781.

[26]

Mallika Dutt and Nadia Rasul. 2014. Raising digital consciousness: An analysis of the opportunities and risks facing human rights activists in a digital age. Sur - International Journal on Human Rights 20 (2014), 427.

[27]

Ugo Etudo, Victoria Y. Yoon, and Niam Yaraghi. 2019. From Facebook to the streets: Russian troll ads and Black Lives Matter protests. In Proc. HICSS.

[28]

Michael Fagan and Mohammad Maifi Hasan Khan. 2016. Why do they do what they do?: A study of what motivates users to (not) follow computer security advice. In Proc. SOUPS.

[29]

Deen Freelon, Charlton D. McIlwain, and Meredith D. Clark. 2016. Beyond the hashtags: #Ferguson, #Blacklivesmatter, and the online struggle for offline justice. https://cmsimpact.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/beyond_the_hashtags_2016.pdf

[30]

Trevor Gabriel and Steven Furnell. 2011. Selecting security champions. Computer Fraud & Security 2011, 8 (2011), 8–12.

[31]

Oscar H. Gandy. 2007. Data mining and surveillance in the post 9/11 environment. The Surveillance Studies Reader(2007), 147–157.

[32]

Max Gedig. 2018. “Woke up with death every morning.” Surveillance experiences of Black Panther Party activists. In Surveillance, Race, Culture. Springer, 267–281.

[33]

Gunnar Harboe and Elaine M. Huang. 2015. Real-world affinity diagramming practices: Bridging the paper-digital gap. In Proc. CHI.

Digital Library

[34]

Cormac Herley. 2009. So long, and no thanks for the externalities: The rational rejection of security advice by users. In Proc. NSPW.

Digital Library

[35]

Alberto Hermida and Víctor Hernández-Santaolalla. 2018. Twitter and video activism as tools for counter-surveillance: The case of social protests in Spain. Information, Communication & Society 21, 3 (2018), 416–433.

[36]

Kris Holt. 2020. 11 Ways To Protect Your Privacy While Protesting. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/krisholt/2020/06/07/privacy-black-lives-matter-protest-george-floyd/#70d382ce1801.

[37]

Karen Holtzblatt and Hugh Beyer. 1997. Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Elsevier.

Digital Library

[38]

Jelani Ince, Fabio Rojas, and Clayton Davis. 2017. The social media response to Black Lives Matter: How Twitter users interact with Black Lives Matter through hashtag use. Ethnic and Racial Studies 40 (2017), 1814–1830.

[39]

Iulia Ion, Rob Reeder, and Sunny Consolvo. 2015. “... no one can hack my mind”: Comparing expert and non-expert security practices. In Proc. SOUPS.

[40]

Sarah J. Jackson, Moya Bailey, and Brooke Foucault Welles. 2020. # HashtagActivism: Networks of Race and Gender Justice. MIT Press.

[41]

Charles E. Jones. 1988. The political repression of the Black Panther Party 1966-1971: The case of the Oakland Bay Area. Journal of Black Studies 18, 4 (1988), 415–434.

[42]

Esther Kim. 2020. Protesting tips for being safe and strong + #blacklivesmatter. Instagram post. https://www.instagram.com/p/CA6XErjhp2c/.

[43]

Ken Klippenstein. 2019. FBI strategy guide FY2018-20 and threat guidance for racial extremists. https://www.scribd.com/document/421166393/FBI-Strategy-Guide-FY2018-20-and-Threat-Guidance-for-Racial-Extremists

[44]

Kirk Kristofferson, Katherine White, and John Peloza. 2014. The nature of slacktivism: How the social observability of an initial act of token support affects subsequent prosocial action. Journal of Consumer Research 40, 6 (2014), 1149–1166.

[45]

Yu-Hao Lee and Gary Hsieh. 2013. Does slacktivism hurt activism? The effects of moral balancing and consistency in online activism. In Proc. CHI.

[46]

David Lyon. 2006. Airport screening, surveillance, and social sorting: Canadian responses to 9/11 in context. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 48, 3 (2006), 397–411.

[47]

David Lyon. 2007. Surveillance, security and social sorting: Emerging research priorities. International Criminal Justice Review 17, 3 (2007), 161–170.

[48]

Gary Marx. 1974. Thoughts on a neglected category of social movement participant: The agent provocateur and the informant. Amer. J. Sociology 80(1974).

[49]

Alexandra Mateescu, Douglas Brunton, Alex Rosenblat, Desmond Patton, Zachary Gold, and danah boyd. 2015. Social media surveillance and law enforcement. Data & Civil Rights 27(2015), 2015–2027.

[50]

Dennis McCafferty. 2011. Activism vs. slacktivism. Commun. ACM 54, 12 (2011), 17–19.

Digital Library

[51]

John G McNutt. 2018. Technology, Activism, and Social Justice in a Digital Age. Oxford University Press.

[52]

Torin Monahan. 2006. Counter-surveillance as political intervention?Social Semiotics 16, 4 (2006), 515–534.

[53]

Marcia Mundt, Karen Ross, and Charla M. Burnett. 2018. Scaling social movements through social media: The case of Black Lives Matter. Social Media + Society 4, 4 (2018).

[54]

Deborah Netburn. 2012. YouTube’s new face-blurring tool designed to protect activists. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/business/la-xpm-2012-jul-18-la-fi-tn-youtube-face-blurring-20120718-story.html

[55]

Huey P. Newton. 1980. War Against the Panthers: A Study of Repression in America. Vol. 1980. University of California, Santa Cruz.

[56]

James Nicholson, Lynne Coventry, and Pamela Briggs. 2019. “If it’s important it will be a headline” Cybersecurity information seeking in older adults. In Proc. CHI.

[57]

Ihudiya Finda Ogbonnaya-Ogburu, Angela D.R. Smith, Alexandra To, and Kentaro Toyama. 2020. Critical race theory for HCI. In Proc. CHI.

Digital Library

[58]

Eyal Peer, Laura Brandimarte, Sonam Somat, and Alessandro Acquisti. 2017. Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. In Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

[59]

Hao Peng, Ceren Budak, and Daniel M. Romero. 2019. Event-driven analysis of crowd dynamics in the Black Lives Matter online social movement. In Proc. WWW.

Digital Library

[60]

James Pierce, Sarah Fox, Nick Merrill, and Richmond Wong. 2018. Differential vulnerabilities and a diversity of tactics: What toolkits teach us about cybersecurity. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2 (Nov. 2018).

Digital Library

[61]

Prolific. 2020. Quickly find research participants you can trust. https://www.prolific.co/

[62]

Emilee Rader, Rick Wash, and Brandon Brooks. 2012. Stories as informal lessons about security. In Proc. SOUPS.

Digital Library

[63]

Elissa M. Redmiles, Sean Kross, and Michelle L. Mazurek. 2016. How I learned to be secure: A census-representative survey of security advice sources and behavior. In Proc. CCS.

Digital Library

[64]

Elissa M. Redmiles, Sean Kross, and Michelle L. Mazurek. 2019. How Well Do My Results Generalize? Comparing Security and Privacy Survey Results from MTurk, Web, and Telephone Samples. In Proc. IEEE S&P.

[65]

Elissa M. Redmiles, Amelia R. Malone, and Michelle L. Mazurek. 2016. I think they’re trying to tell me something: Advice sources and selection for digital security. In Proc. IEEE S&P.

[66]

Elissa M. Redmiles, Miraida Morales, Lisa Maszkiewicz, Rock Stevens, Everest Liu, Dhruv Kuchhal, and Michelle L. Mazurek. 2018. First steps toward measuring the readability of security advice. In Proc. ConPro.

[67]

Elissa M. Redmiles, Noel Warford, Amritha Jayanti, Aravind Koneru, Sean Kross, Miraida Morales, Rock Stevens, and Michelle L. Mazurek. 2020. A comprehensive quality evaluation of security and privacy advice on the web. In Proc. USENIX Security.

[68]

Robert W. Reeder, Iulia Ion, and Sunny Consolvo. 2017. 152 simple steps to stay safe online: Security advice for non-tech-savvy users. IEEE Security & Privacy 15, 5 (2017), 55–64.

Digital Library

[69]

Katelyn Ringrose and Divya Ramjee. 2020. Watch where you walk: Law enforcement surveillance and protester privacy. California Law Review 11, 349 (2020).

[70]

Ellen Schrecker. 2004. Threatening Anthropology: McCarthyism and the FBI’s Surveillance of Activist Anthropologists. Duke University Press.

[71]

Steve Sheng, Bryant Magnien, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru, Alessandro Acquisti, Lorrie Faith Cranor, Jason Hong, and Elizabeth Nunge. 2007. Anti-phishing Phil: The design and evaluation of a game that teaches people not to fall for phish. In Proc. SOUPS.

Digital Library

[72]

Daniel J. Solove. 2007. I’ve got nothing to hide and other misunderstandings of privacy. San Diego L. Rev. 44(2007), 745.

[73]

Alice Speri. 2015. 1 2014 8:14 Silent vigil alert #NMOS14. The Intercept. https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2178934/1-2014-8-14-silent-vigil-alert-nmos14.pdf

[74]

Katta Spiel, Oliver L. Haimson, and Danielle Lottridge. 2019. How to do better with gender on surveys: A guide for HCI researchers. Interactions 26, 4 (2019), 62–65.

Digital Library

[75]

Kate Starbird. 2019. Disinformation’s spread: Bots, trolls and all of us. Nature 571, 7766 (2019), 449–450.

[76]

Leo Graiden Stewart, Ahmer Arif, A. Conrad Nied, Emma S. Spiro, and Kate Starbird. 2017. Drawing the lines of contention: Networked frame contests within# BlackLivesMatter discourse. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact 1 (2017).

Digital Library

[77]

Leo Graiden Stewart, Ahmer Arif, and Kate Starbird. 2018. Examining trolls and polarization with a retweet network. In Proc. MIS2.

[78]

Reem Talhouk, Kellie Morrissey, Sarah Fox, Nadia Pantidi, Emma Simpson, Lydia Emma Michie, and Madeline Balaam. 2018. Human computer interaction & health activism. In Proc. CHI EA.

Digital Library

[79]

Alvin B. Tillery. 2019. What kind of movement is Black Lives Matter? The view from Twitter. Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics 4, 2 (2019), 297–323.

[80]

Twitter. 2020. Protesting safely. Twitter image. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EZZ0-koUEAAazF3.jpg.

[81]

Marlon Twyman, Brian C. Keegan, and Aaron Shaw. 2017. Black Lives Matter in Wikipedia: Collective memory and collaboration around online social movements. In Proc. CSCW.

Digital Library

[82]

Julie Uldam. 2016. Corporate management of visibility and the fantasy of the post-political: Social media and surveillance. New Media & Society 18, 2 (2016), 201–219.

[83]

Julie Uldam. 2018. Social media visibility: challenges to activism. Media, Culture & Society 40, 1 (2018), 41–58.

[84]

Peter Ullrich and Philipp Knopp. 2018. Protesters’ reactions to video surveillance of demonstrations: Counter-moves, security cultures, and the spiral of surveillance and counter-surveillance. Surveillance & Society(2018).

[85]

Elham Vaziripour, Justin Wu, Mark O’Neill, Jordan Whitehead, Scott Heidbrink, Kent Seamons, and Daniel Zappala. 2017. Is that you, Alice? A usability study of the authentication ceremony of secure messaging applications. In Proc. SOUPS.

[86]

Kevin Walby and Jeffrey Monaghan. 2011. Private eyes and public order: Policing and surveillance in the suppression of animal rights activists in Canada. Social Movement Studies 10, 1 (2011), 21–37.

[87]

Rick Wash. 2010. Folk models of home computer security. In Proc. SOUPS.

Digital Library

[88]

Rick Wash and Molly M. Cooper. 2018. Who provides phishing training? Facts, stories, and people like me. In Proc. CHI.

[89]

Denise J. Wilkins, Andrew G. Livingstone, and Mark Levine. 2019. Whose tweets? The rhetorical functions of social media use in developing the Black Lives Matter movement. British Journal of Social Psychology 58, 4 (2019), 786–805.

[90]

Dean Wilson and Tanya Serisier. 2010. Video activism and the ambiguities of counter-surveillance. Surveillance & Society 8, 2 (2010), 166–180.

[91]

William Lafi Youmans and Jillian C. York. 2012. Social media and the activist toolkit: User agreements, corporate interests, and the information infrastructure of modern social movements. Journal of Communication 62, 2 (2012), 315–329.

[92]

Mihir Zaveri. 2020. ‘I need people to hear my voice’: Teens protest racism. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/23/us/teens-protest-black-lives-matter.html

[93]

Weiyu Zhang. 2013. Redefining youth activism through digital technology in Singapore. International Communication Gazette(2013).

Cited By

Wong PSingh ABrumby D(2024)I Just Don't Quite Fit In: How People of Colour Participate in Online and Offline Climate ActivismProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373478:CSCW1(1-35)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637347
Schmüser JSri Ramulu HWöhler NStransky CBensmann FDimitrov DSchellhammer SWermke DDietze SAcar YFahl S(2024)Analyzing Security and Privacy Advice During the 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine on TwitterProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642826(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642826
Oak RShafiq Z(2024)Understanding Underground Incentivized Review ServicesProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642342(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642342
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Understanding the Security and Privacy Advice Given to Black Lives Matter Protesters

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

Protest Privacy Recommendations: An Analysis of Digital Surveillance Circumvention Advice During Black Lives Matter Protests
CHI EA '21: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

This paper describes a qualitative study of media and advocacy publications about digital surveillance in the context of Black Lives Matter protests, including recommendations for techniques on how to circumvent such surveillance. We conducted a content ...
The Affiliative Use of Emoji and Hashtags in the Black Lives Matter Movement in Twitter

Protests and counter-protests seek to draw and direct attention and concern with confronting images and slogans. In recent years, as protests and counter-protests have partially migrated to the digital space, such images and slogans have also gone ...
Systematic analysis and comparison of security advice as datasets
Abstract
A long list of documents have been offered as security advice, codes of practice, and security guidelines for building and using security products, including Internet of Things (IoT) devices. To date, little or no systematic analysis ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 2021

10862 pages

ISBN:9781450380966

DOI:10.1145/3411764

General Chairs:
Yoshifumi Kitamura
Tohoku University, Japan
,
Aaron Quigley
University of New South Wales, Australia
,
Program Chairs:
Katherine Isbister
University of California Santa Cruz, USA
,
Takeo Igarashi
The University of Tokyo, Japan
,
Publications Chairs:
Pernille Bjørn
University of Copenhagen, Denmark
,
Steven Drucker
Microsoft Research, USA

Copyright © 2021 Owner/Author.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 May 2021

Check for updates

Badges

Honorable Mention

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

CHI '21

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '21: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 8 - 13, 2021

Yokohama, Japan

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI '25

Sponsor:
sigchi

CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

16
Total Citations
View Citations
2,886
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)976
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)141

Reflects downloads up to 20 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Wong PSingh ABrumby D(2024)I Just Don't Quite Fit In: How People of Colour Participate in Online and Offline Climate ActivismProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373478:CSCW1(1-35)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637347
Schmüser JSri Ramulu HWöhler NStransky CBensmann FDimitrov DSchellhammer SWermke DDietze SAcar YFahl S(2024)Analyzing Security and Privacy Advice During the 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine on TwitterProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642826(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642826
Oak RShafiq Z(2024)Understanding Underground Incentivized Review ServicesProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642342(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642342
Guntrum L(2024)Keyboard Fighters: The Use of ICTs by Activists in Times of Military Coup in MyanmarProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642279(1-19)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642279
SCHMIT CLARSON BTANABE TRAMEZANI MZHENG QKUM H(2024)Changing US Support for Public Health Data Use Through Pandemic and Political TurmoilThe Milbank Quarterly10.1111/1468-0009.12700102:2(463-502)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12700
Bellini RTseng EWarford NDaffalla AMatthews TConsolvo SWoelfer JGage Kelley PMazurek MCuomo DDell NRistenpart T(2024)SoK: Safer Digital-Safety Research Involving At-Risk Users2024 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)10.1109/SP54263.2024.00071(635-654)Online publication date: 19-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/SP54263.2024.00071
Tran MMunyendo CSri Ramulu HRodriguez RBall Schnell LSula CSimko LAcar Y(2024)Security, Privacy, and Data-sharing Trade-offs When Moving to the United States: Insights from a Qualitative Study2024 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)10.1109/SP54263.2024.00004(617-634)Online publication date: 19-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/SP54263.2024.00004
McClearn JJensen RTalhouk RCalandrino JTroncoso C(2023)Othered, silenced and scapegoatedProceedings of the 32nd USENIX Conference on Security Symposium10.5555/3620237.3620496(4625-4642)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3620237.3620496
Fassl MPonticello ADabrowski AKrombholz K(2023)Investigating Security Folklore: A Case Study on the Tor over VPN PhenomenonProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36101937:CSCW2(1-26)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610193
Munyendo CAcar YAviv A(2023)"In Eighty Percent of the Cases, I Select the Password for Them": Security and Privacy Challenges, Advice, and Opportunities at Cybercafes in Kenya2023 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)10.1109/SP46215.2023.10179410(570-587)Online publication date: May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/SP46215.2023.10179410
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents