Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3410886.3410911acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An instantiation of a process model towards health interoperability

Published: 11 September 2020 Publication History

Abstract

In response to the critical problem of fragmentation of health information, a process model towards health interoperability is articulated. In conceptualizing and instantiating the research artifact, the DSR method was operationalized through the Mullarkey and Hevner elaborated Action Design Research (ADR) process model. The ADR process model was considered an appropriate choice as it caters for an immersive exploration as part of an in-situ context. This study articulated in this paper is considered to have a problem-centered entry point, as it is driven by the researcher-practitioner's desire to understand what a “better artefact would look like”. The ADR process model is adopted, since it's iterative and in-situ nature is in line with the overreaching organizational research aim to develop a process model that can describe and guide the process of testing conformance of health information systems to the eHealth interoperability standards prescribed by the Health Normative Standards Framework in South Africa.

References

[1]
Adebesin, F., Barriers & challenges to the adoption of E-Health standards in Africa.2013.
[2]
Terry, N., Pit Crews with Computers: Can Health Information Technology Fix Fragmented Care?2014.
[3]
Dixon, B., Health Information Exchange: Navigating and Managing a Network of Health Information Systems. 2016: Academic Press.
[4]
National Department of Health and Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Health Normative Standards Framework for eHealth Interoperability. 2014.
[5]
Nilsen, P., Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implementation Science, 2015. 10 (1): p. 53.
[6]
Kindrick, J.D., J.A. Sauter, and R.S. Matthews, Improving conformance and interoperability testing.StandardView, 1996. 4 (1): p. 61-68.
[7]
Moseley, S., S. Randall, and A. Wiles. Experience within ETSI of the combined roles of conformance testing and interoperability testing. in Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology, 2003. The 3rd Conference on. 2003. IEEE.
[8]
Gebase, L., R. Snelick, and M. Skall. Conformance Testing and Interoperability: A Case Study in Healthcare Data Exchange. in Software Engineering Research and Practice. 2008.
[9]
Oemig, F. and R. Snelick, Healthcare interoperability standards compliance handbook.Cham, The Netherlands: Springer International Publishing, 2016.
[10]
Sokol, A.W. and M.D. Hogan, NIST Cloud Computing Standards Roadmap. 2013.
[11]
Monkewich, O., Tutorial on Conformance and Interoperability Testing.International Telecommunication Union (ITU), December, 2006.8.
[12]
Hevner, A.R., Design science in information systems research.Management Information Systems Quarterly, 2004. 28 (1): p. 75-105.
[13]
Gregor, S. and A.R. Hevner, The Front End of Innovation: Perspectives on Creativity, Knowledge and Design, in New Horizons in Design Science: Broadening the Research Agenda. 2015, Springer. p. 249-263.
[14]
Hevner, A.R. and N. Wickramasinghe, Design Science Research Opportunities in Health Care, in Theories to Inform Superior Health Informatics Research and Practice. 2018, Springer. p. 3-18.
[15]
Gregor, S., The Nature of Theory in Information Systems.Management Information Systems Quarterly, 2006. 30 (3): p. 611 - 642.
[16]
Gill, A.Q. and E. Chew, Configuration information system architecture: Insights from applied action design research.Information & Management, 2019. 56 (4): p. 507-525.
[17]
Haj-Bolouri, A., Action design research in practice: lessons and concerns.2018.
[18]
Sein, M.K., Action design research MIS Quarterly, 2011. 35 (1): p. 37 - 56.
[19]
Venable, J.R., A framework for design science research activities, in Emerging trends and challenges in information technology management, M. Khosrow-Pour, Editor. 2006, IDEA Group Publishing: Hersey PA. p. 21-24.
[20]
Hevner, A.R., A three cycle view of design science research.Scandinavian journal of information systems, 2007. 19 (2): p. 4.
[21]
Drechsler, A., TOWARDS A UNIFYING FRAMEWORK FOR DESIGN AND ACTION-ORIENTED IS RESEARCH.2019.
[22]
Mullarkey, M.T. and A.R. Hevner, An elaborated action design research process model.European Journal of Information Systems, 2019. 28 (1): p. 6-20.
[23]
Peffers, K., A Design Science Research methodology for information systems research.Journal of Management Information Systems, 2008. 24 (3): p. 45 - 77.
[24]
Peffers, K., A design science research methodology for information systems research.Journal of Management Information Systems, 2007. 24 (3): p. 45 - 77.
[25]
HIMSS, HIMSS Dictionary of Healthcare Information Technology Terms, Acronyms and Organisations. 2013, Chicago: Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society.
[26]
Geraci, A., IEEE standard computer dictionary: Compilation of IEEE standard computer glossaries. 1991: IEEE Press.
[27]
Iroju, O., Interoperability in healthcare: benefits, challenges and resolutions.International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 2013. 3 (1): p. 262-270.
[28]
HIQA, Health Information and Quality Authority: Overview of Healthcare Interoperability Standards. 2013, Health Information and Quality Authority
[29]
Rezaei, R., T.K. Chiew, and S.P. Lee, An interoperability model for ultra large scale systems.Advances in Engineering Software, 2014.67: p. 22-46.
[30]
ISO, Guide 2–Standardization and related activities-General vocabulary. Geneva: ISO. 2004: International Standards Organisation.
[31]
Benson, T. and G. Grieve, Principles of Health Interoperability. 2016: Springer.
[32]
Union, I.T., E-Health Standards and Interoperability. 2012.
[33]
Hawn, C., Take two aspirin and tweet me in the morning: how Twitter, Facebook, and other social media are reshaping health care.Health affairs, 2009. 28 (2): p. 361-368.
[34]
Wager, K.A., F.W. Lee, and J.P. Glaser, Health care information systems: a practical approach for health care management. 2017: John Wiley & Sons.
[35]
Kotze, P., A review of interoperability standards in e-Health and imperatives for their adoption in Africa.South African Computer Journal, 2013. 50 (1): p. 55-72.
[36]
National Planning Commission, National Development Plan 2030: Our future–make it work. Presidency of South Africa, Pretoria, 2012.1.
[37]
National Department of Health, eHealth Strategy South Africa 2012-2016. 2012.
[38]
Chetty, eHealth Summary for Presidential Health Summit 2018, CSIR.
[39]
Raj, A., Data network protocol conformance test system. 2002, Google Patents.
[40]
Caruso, F. and A. Umar, Architectures to survive technological and business turbulences.Information Systems Frontiers, 2004. 6 (1): p. 9-21.
[41]
Woo, J., N. Ivezic, and H. Cho, Agile test framework for business-to-business interoperability.Information Systems Frontiers, 2012. 14 (3): p. 789-808.
[42]
IHE International, IHE Changing the way in which healthcare connects. 2012.
[43]
IHE International, IHE Profiles. 2013.
[44]
Health Level Seven International, HL7 Reference Information Model. 2011.
[45]
IHE. IHE-XDS infrastructuur verbetert medische behandeling van CVA-patiënten in Noord-Nederland. 2016 [cited 2018 August]; Available from: https://www.ihe-nl.org/nieuws/ihe-xds-infrastructuur-verbetert-medische-behandeling-van-cva-patienten-in-.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Systems Interoperability Types: A Tertiary StudyACM Computing Surveys10.1145/365909856:10(1-37)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
SAICSIT '20: Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists 2020
September 2020
258 pages
ISBN:9781450388474
DOI:10.1145/3410886
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 September 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Action Design Research
  2. Conformance Testing
  3. Interoperability
  4. eHealth

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

SAICSIT '20

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 187 of 439 submissions, 43%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 09 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Systems Interoperability Types: A Tertiary StudyACM Computing Surveys10.1145/365909856:10(1-37)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2024

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media