Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3406324.3410719acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Understanding Decline in Medical Video Consultation: A User-Centred Approach

Published: 25 February 2021 Publication History

Abstract

The world’s population is growing and ageing. Consequently, the demand for health care services increases, which leads to the need for health care providers to find new ways to provide services. Video consultations (VCs) are a cost-efficient way to address this problem. However, they can only work if both health professionals and patients trust and make use of VC systems. We describe our work on determining the reasons behind why the use of VC declined after an initial period of intensive use at a local Dutch medical centre. Questioning patients why they no longer contact their doctors via video was not possible as it would violate privacy law. We propose an alternative method that combines interviews with medical professionals and vignette studies, which can be used to follow up with patients potentially using VCs. We provide a set of lessons learned, which can support future inquiries in the medical domain.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (3406324.3410719.mp4)
Supplementary video

References

[1]
Rikke Aarhus, Stinne Aaløkke Ballegaard, and Thomas Riisgaard Hansen. 2009. The eDiary: Bridging home and hospital through healthcare technology. In ECSCW 2009. Springer, 63–83.
[2]
Deepti Aggarwal. 2016. Supporting Bodily Communication in Video-based Clinical Consultations. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(San Jose, California, USA) (CHI EA ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 188–192. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2859019
[3]
Deepti Aggarwal, Bernd Ploderer, Frank Vetere, Mark Bradford, and Thuong Hoang. 2016. Doctor, Can You See My Squats? Understanding Bodily Communication in Video Consultations for Physiotherapy. In Proceedings of DIS ’16 (Brisbane, QLD, Australia). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1197–1208. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901871
[4]
Deepti Aggarwal, Weiyi Zhang, Thuong Hoang, Bernd Ploderer, Frank Vetere, and Mark Bradford. 2017. SoPhy: A Wearable Technology for Lower Limb Assessment in Video Consultations of Physiotherapy. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3916–3928. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025489
[5]
Herman Aguinis and Kyle J Bradley. 2014. Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organizational Research Methods 17, 4 (2014), 351–371.
[6]
Christiane Atzmüller and Peter M Steiner. 2010. Experimental vignette studies in survey research. Methodology (2010).
[7]
Ann Blandford, Dominic Furniss, and Stephann Makri. 2016. Qualitative HCI research: Going behind the scenes. Vol. 9. Morgan & Claypool Publishers. 1–115 pages.
[8]
Ann E. Blandford. 2013. Semi-structured qualitative studies. Interaction Design Foundation.
[9]
Fred D Davis. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly (1989), 319–340.
[10]
Heather A. Faucett, Matthew L. Lee, and Scott Carter. 2017. I Should Listen More: Real-Time Sensing and Feedback of Non-Verbal Communication in Video Telehealth. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, CSCW, Article 44 (Dec. 2017), 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134679
[11]
David Gefen. 2000. E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust. Omega 28, 6 (2000), 725–737.
[12]
Stephanie M Merritt, Heather Heimbaugh, Jennifer LaChapell, and Deborah Lee. 2013. I trust it, but I don’t know why: Effects of implicit attitudes toward automation on trust in an automated system. Human factors 55, 3 (2013), 520–534.
[13]
Francisco Nunes, Nervo Verdezoto, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, Morten Kyng, Erik Grönvall, and Cristiano Storni. 2015. Self-Care Technologies in HCI: Trends, Tensions, and Opportunities. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 22, 6, Article 33 (Dec. 2015), 45 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2803173

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
MobileHCI '20: 22nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services
October 2020
248 pages
ISBN:9781450380522
DOI:10.1145/3406324
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 February 2021

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. computer-mediated communication
  2. medical centre
  3. video consultation

Qualifiers

  • Extended-abstract
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

MobileHCI '20

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 202 of 906 submissions, 22%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 95
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 08 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media