Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2380718.2380732acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebsciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Look who I found: understanding the effects of sharing curated friend groups

Published: 22 June 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Online social networks like Google+, Twitter, and Facebook allow users to build, organize, and manage their social connections for the purposes of information sharing and consumption. Nonetheless, most social network users still report that building and curating contact groups is a time consuming burden. To help users overcome the burdens of contact discovery and grouping, Google+ recently launched a new feature known as "circle sharing." The feature makes it easy for users to share the benefits of their own contact curation by sharing entire "circles" (contact groups) with others. Recipients of a shared circle can adopt the circle as a whole, merge the circle into one of their own circles, or select specific members of the circle to add.
In this paper, we investigate the impact that circle-sharing has had on the growth and structure of the Google+ social network. Using a cluster analysis, we identify two natural categories of shared circles, which represent two qualitatively different use cases: circles comprised primarily of celebrities (celebrity circles), and circles comprised of members of a community (community circles). We observe that exposure to circle-sharing accelerates the rate at which a user adds others to his or her circles. More specifically, we notice that circle-sharing has accelerated the "densification" rate of community circles, and also that it has disproportionately affected users with few connections, allowing them to find new contacts at a faster rate than would be expected based on accepted models of network growth. Finally, we identify features that can be used to predict which of a user's circles (s)he is most likely to share, thus demonstrating that it is feasible to suggest to a user which circles to share with friends.

References

[1]
Facebook smart list. http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=10150278932602131.
[2]
Facebook statistics. http://newsroom.fb.com/content/default.aspx?NewsAreaId=22.
[3]
Google circle-sharing feature release news. http://plusheadlines.com/google-circle-sharing-is-here/2378/.
[4]
Katango. http://www.katango.com/.
[5]
Listorious. http://listorious.com/.
[6]
Social networking site coverage. http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/2011/social-networking-sites.aspx.
[7]
P. Adams. Grouped: How small groups of friends are the key to influence on the social web. New Riders Press, 2011.
[8]
R. Z. Albert and A.-L. Barabasi. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics, 2002.
[9]
L. Backstrom, D. Huttenlocher, and J. Kleinberg. Group formation in large social networks: Membership, growth, and evolution. In SIGKDD, 2006.
[10]
K. Bacon and P. Dewan. Towards automatic recommendation of friend lists. In CollaborateCom, 2009.
[11]
B. Everitt and T. Hothorn. A Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using R. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2006.
[12]
S. Farnham and E. Churchill. Faceted identity, faceted lives: social and technical issues with being yourself online. In CSCW, 2011.
[13]
S. Fortunato. Community detection in graphs. Physics Reports, 2010.
[14]
L. Getoor and C. P. Diehl. Link mining: A survey. SigKDD Explorations Special Issue on Link Mining, 2005.
[15]
H. Kwak, C. Lee, H. Park, and S. Moon. What is twitter, a soial network or a news media? In WWW, 2010.
[16]
J. Leskovec, K. Lang, and M. Mahoney. Empirical comparison of algorithms for network community detection. In WWW, 2010.
[17]
D. Liben-Nowell and J. Kleinberg. The link prediction problem for social networks. In CIKM, 2003.
[18]
A. Mislove, H. S. Koppula, K. P. Gummadi, P. Druschel, and B. Bhattacharjee. Growth of the flickr social network. In WOSN, 2008.
[19]
M. Newman. Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks. Physics Review E, 2001.
[20]
F. Ozenc and S. Farnham. Life modes in social media. In CHI, 2011.
[21]
M. Skeels and J. Grudin. When social networks cross boundaries: a case study of workplace use of facebook and linkedin. In Group, 2009.

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)Assessing the evolution of Google+ in its first two yearsIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2015.243379224:3(1813-1826)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2016
  • (2015)Google+ Communities as Plazas and Topic BoardsProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2702123.2702600(3779-3788)Online publication date: 18-Apr-2015
  • (2014)Sharing real-time biometric data across social networksProceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems10.1145/2598510.2598515(657-666)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2014
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Look who I found: understanding the effects of sharing curated friend groups

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    WebSci '12: Proceedings of the 4th Annual ACM Web Science Conference
    June 2012
    531 pages
    ISBN:9781450312288
    DOI:10.1145/2380718
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 22 June 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Google+
    2. circle sharing
    3. social network

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    WebSci '12
    Sponsor:
    WebSci '12: Web Science 2012
    June 22 - 24, 2012
    Illinois, Evanston

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 245 of 933 submissions, 26%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2016)Assessing the evolution of Google+ in its first two yearsIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2015.243379224:3(1813-1826)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2016
    • (2015)Google+ Communities as Plazas and Topic BoardsProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2702123.2702600(3779-3788)Online publication date: 18-Apr-2015
    • (2014)Sharing real-time biometric data across social networksProceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems10.1145/2598510.2598515(657-666)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2014
    • (2014)Are Circles Communities? A Comparative Analysis of Selective Sharing in Google+Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 34th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops10.1109/ICDCSW.2014.34(8-15)Online publication date: 30-Jun-2014
    • (2013)Google+ or Google-?Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web10.1145/2488388.2488431(483-494)Online publication date: 13-May-2013
    • (2013)A personalized recommender system based on users' information in folksonomiesProceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web10.1145/2487788.2488151(1215-1224)Online publication date: 13-May-2013

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media