Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2187980.2188174acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

User community reconstruction using sampled microblogging data

Published: 16 April 2012 Publication History

Abstract

User community recognition in social media services is important to identify hot topics or users' interests and concerns in a timely way when a disaster has occurred. In microblogging services, many short messages are posted every day and some of them represent replies or forwarded messages between users. We extract such conversational messages to link the users as a user network and regard the strongly-connected components in the network as indicators of user communities. However, using all of the microblog data for user community extraction is too costly and requires too much storage space when decomposing strongly-connected components. In contrast, using sampled data may miss some user connections and thus divide one user community into pieces. In this paper, we propose a method for user community reconstruction using the lexical similarity of the messages and the user's link information between separate communities.

References

[1]
http://twitter.com/
[2]
https://dev.twitter.com/
[3]
A. Java, X. Song, T. Finin, and B. Tseng. Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In Proc. of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis. ACM,2007.
[4]
D. Gibson, R. Kumar and A. Tomkins. Discovering Large Dense Subgraphs in Massive Graphs, VLDB, pp. 721--732, 2005.
[5]
E. Nuutila and E. Soisalon-Soininen. On finding the strongly connected components in a directed graph, Information Processing Letters, Vol.49, No.1, pp. 9--14, 1994.
[6]
F. Benevenuto, T. Rodrigues, M. Cha, and V. Almeida. Characterizing user behavior in online social networks. In Proc. of IMC '09, pages 49--62, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
[7]
F. Schneider, A. Feldmann, B. Krishnamurthy, and W. Willinger. Understanding online social network usage from a network perspective. In IMC '09.
[8]
Garrett, Sean. "Big Goals, Big Game, Big Records".http://blog.twitter.com/2010/06/big-goals-big-game-big-records.html. Retrieved February 7, 2011.
[9]
G. W. Flake, S. Lawrence and C. L. Giles. Efficient Identification of Web Communities, In Proc. KDD, 2000.
[10]
"Japan's phone networks remain severely disrupted", Computerworld. 12 March 2011. Archived from the original on 18 April 2011. http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9214261/Japan_s_phone_networks_remain_severely_disrupted.
[11]
M. Haraguchi, Y. Okubo. A Method for Clustering of Web Pages with Pseudo-Clique Search, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 3847, pp. 59--78, 2006.
[12]
M. Mathioudakis and N. Koudas. TwitterMonitor: trend detection over the twitter stream, Proc. of ACM SIGMOD, pp. 1155--1158,2010.
[13]
Newman, M. E. J. Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks, Physical Review E, Vol. 69, No. 066133,2004.
[14]
Pear Analytics (2009) Twitter Study -- August, 2009. http://www.pearanalytics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Twitter-Study-August-2009.pdf
[15]
R. E. Tarjan. Depth-first search and linear graph algorithms, SIAM Journal on Computing 1 (2): 146--160, 1972.
[16]
S. R. Kumar, P. Raphavan, S. Rajagopalan and A. Tomkins. Trawling the Web for emerging cyber communities, In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on World Wide Web (WWW), pp. 1481--1493, 1999.
[17]
T. Sakaki, M. Okazaki, and Y. Matsuo. Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors, In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World Wide Web (WWW), pp.851--860,2010.
[18]
T. Uno. An efficient algorithm for solving pseudo clique enumeration problem, Algorithmica (56--1): 3 - 16, 2010.
[19]
Yuto Yamaguchi, Toshiyuki Amagasa, and Hiroyuki Kitagawa. Tag-based User Topic Discovery using Twitter Lists, pp. 13--20, The International Conference on Advances in Social Network Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), July 25--27, 2011.
[20]
Z.Guan, J. Wu, Q. Zhang, A. Singh, and X. Yan. Assessing and Ranking Structural Correlations in Graphs, Proc. of ACM SIGMOD, pp. 937--948, 2011.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. User community reconstruction using sampled microblogging data

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WWW '12 Companion: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web
      April 2012
      1250 pages
      ISBN:9781450312301
      DOI:10.1145/2187980
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      • Univ. de Lyon: Universite de Lyon

      In-Cooperation

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 16 April 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. community reconstruction
      2. microblogging
      3. social media
      4. twitter

      Qualifiers

      • Tutorial

      Conference

      WWW 2012
      Sponsor:
      • Univ. de Lyon
      WWW 2012: 21st World Wide Web Conference 2012
      April 16 - 20, 2012
      Lyon, France

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 26 Sep 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2020)MicroblogsSIGSPATIAL Special10.1145/3404820.340482712:1(41-52)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2020
      • (2019)Microblogs data management: a surveyThe VLDB Journal10.1007/s00778-019-00569-6Online publication date: 18-Sep-2019
      • (2016)Detecting and tagging users' social circles in social mediaMultimedia Systems10.1007/s00530-014-0435-422:4(423-431)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2016
      • (2014)Challenging social media analyticsProceedings of the 2014 ACM conference on Web science10.1145/2615569.2615690(177-181)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2014
      • (2013)Graph-Based Hierarchical Categorization of Microblog UsersProceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Congress on Big Data10.1109/BigData.Congress.2013.28(149-156)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2013
      • (2013)Detecting Community Structures in Microblogs from Behavioral InteractionsWeb Technologies and Applications10.1007/978-3-642-37401-2_71(734-745)Online publication date: 2013

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media