Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2078856.2078858acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Motivating all our students?

Published: 27 June 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Academics expend a large amount of time and effort to sustain and enhance the motivation of undergraduate students. Typically based on a desire to ensure that all students achieve their full potential, approaches are based on an understanding that students who are highly motivated will learn more. Furthermore, institutional rewards accrue from effective use of academics' time, along with financial benefits associated with high levels of retention and progression. This working group report, based on practice in Europe, Australasia and North America, builds on previous work. It provides an updated and revised literature review, analyses a larger collection of survey data and has sought to triangulate earlier findings with qualitative data from practitioner interviews. The report covers established approaches in teaching, support and extra-curricular activities. It tracks emerging practice such as streamed and differentiated teaching, and research based and authentic learning. It also considers contemporary innovations in student activities. Finally it reports on a repository of tips and techniques which has been established to support faculty wishing to change or review current methods.

References

[1]
ACM international collegiate programming contest, http://www.csse.uwa.edu.au/icpc/UWATrainingSessions
[2]
ACS-W Board, ACS Survey of Women in IT Report, Australian Computer Society, 20 September 2010
[3]
Anderson N, Why aren't Australian girls getting into IT?, http://www.schools.ash.org.au/litweb/gender.html, 2000
[4]
Anderson R, Anderson R, Davis P, Linnell N, Prince C, Razmov V and Videon F, Classroom Presenter: Enhancing Interactive Education with Digital Ink, IEEE Computer, September 2007
[5]
Angelo TA, A teacher's dozen: Fourteen general, research-based principles for improving higher learning in our classrooms, AAHE Bulletin 45(8), 1993
[6]
Baldwin J, Crupi E and Estrellado T, WeBWorK for programming fundamentals, SIGCSE Bulletin 38(3), June 2006
[7]
Barnes D, Public Forum Help Seeking: the impact of providing anonymity on student help seeking behavior, proceedings of Computer Based Learning in Science (CBLIS '99), Czech Republic, 1999
[8]
Barnes T, Richter H, Powell E, Chaffin A and Godwin A, Game2Learn: building CS1 learning games for retention, SIGCSE Bulletin 39(3), June 2007
[9]
Barker L, Student and Faculty Perceptions of Undergraduate Research Experiences in Computing, Transactions on Computing Education 9(1), March 2009
[10]
Baxter-Magolda MD, Knowing and Reasoning in College: Gender-Related Patterns in Students, Intellectual Development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1992
[11]
Bayliss J and Strout S, Games as a "flavor" of CS1, SIGCSE Bulletin 38(1), March 2006
[12]
Beck J, Buckner B and Nikolova O, Using interdisciplinary bioinformatics undergraduate research to recruit and retain computer science students, proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '07), Covington, 2007
[13]
Belenky MF, Clinchy BM, Goldberger N and Tarule JM, Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind, New York: Basic Books, 1986
[14]
Biggers M, Yilmaz T and Sweat M, Using collaborative, modified peer led team learning to improve student success and retention in intro cs, proceedings of the 40th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Chattanooga, 2009
[15]
Birch M, McCormick F and Haddow J, Improving Student Progression by a combination of Streaming, Close Attendance and Target Setting, proceedings of 6th Annual HEA-ICS conference, York, August 2005
[16]
Bornat R, Programming from First Principles, Prentice Hall International, 1987
[17]
Bower M, A Taxonomy of Task Types in Computing, proceedings of ITiCSE'08, Madrid, 2008
[18]
Bowring JF, A new paradigm for programming competitions, proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Portland, 2008
[19]
Boyer KE, Thomas EN, Rorrer AS, Cooper D and Vouk MA, Increasing technical excellence, leadership and commitment of computing students through identity-based mentoring, proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Milwaukee, 2010
[20]
Bransgrove E, Teachers understanding of gender implications for learning with computers, Australian Educational Computing, May 1994
[21]
Buckley M, Nordlinger J and Subramanian D, Socially relevant computing, proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '08), Portland, 2008
[22]
Carter J and Boyle R, Teaching Delivery issues: Lessons from Computer Science, Journal of Information Technology Education, Volume 1, pp77--90, 2002
[23]
Carter J, Efford N, Jameison S, Jenkins T and White S, The TOPS Project -- Teaching our Over-Performing Students, proceedings of 8th Annual HEA-ICS conference, Southampton, August 2007
[24]
Carter J, Efford N, Jamieson S, Jenkins T, and White S, Taxing our best students, ITALICS, 7(1):120--127, June 2008
[25]
Carter J and Jenkins T, The Problems of Teaching Programming: Do They Change with Time?, proceedings of 11th annual HEA ICS conference, Durham, 2010
[26]
Carter J, White S, Fraser K, Kurkovsky S, McCreesh C and Wieck M, ITiCSE 2010 Working Group Report: Motivating our Top Students, proceedings of the 2010 ITiCSE working group reports, ACM digital library, 2010
[27]
Chan CK and Lee EY, Fostering knowledge building using concurrent, embedded and transformative assessment for high-and low-achieving students, proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, New Brunswick, 2007
[28]
Chao C, An Investigation of Learning Style Differences and Attitudes toward Digital Game-based Learning among Mobile Users, proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Workshop on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technology in Education, Washington, 2006
[29]
Clua E, Feijó B, Rocca J, Schwartz J, das Graças M, Perlin K, Tori R and Barnes T, Game and interactivity in computer science education, ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Educators Program SIGGRAPH '06, Boston, 2006
[30]
Codelab, http://turingscraft.com/
[31]
Denny P, Luxton-Reilly A and Hamer J, Student use of the PeerWise system, SIGCSE Bulletin 40(3), June 2008
[32]
Die Initiative Bundesweit Informatiknachwuchs fördern, http://www.bwinf.de/competition-workshop/Submissions/11_Cormack.pdf
[33]
D'Souza D, Hamilton M and Harris M, Software Development Marketplaces - Implications for Plagiarism, Computing Education 2007, CRPIT (66), pp27--33, 2007
[34]
D'Souza D, Hamilton M, Harland J, Muir P, Thevathayan C and Walker C, Transforming Learning of Programming: A Mentoring Project, Tenth Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE2008), Wollongong, Australia, January 2008
[35]
Edwards S, Using software testing to move students from trial-and-error to reflection-in-action, proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '04), Norfolk, VA, 2004
[36]
Farrell JJ, Moog RS and Spencer JN, A Guided Inquiry Chemistry Course, Journal of Chemistry Education 76(4), 1997
[37]
Forte A and Guzdial M, Computers for Communication, Not Calculation: Media as a Motivation and Context for Learning, proceedings of 37th Hawaiian International Conference of Systems Sciences, Big Island, HI, 2004
[38]
Fu X, Peltsverger B, Qian K, Tao L and Liu J, APOGEE: automated project grading and instant feedback system for web based computing, SIGCSE Bulletin 40(1), March 2008
[39]
Google Docs, http://preview.tinyurl.com/5t4wvcg
[40]
Guerreiro P and Georgouli K, Combating Annonymousness in Populous CS1 and CS2 Courses, proceedings of ITiCSE'06, Bologna, 2006
[41]
Guzdial M, Teaching computing to everyone, Communications of the ACM 52(5), May 2009
[42]
Guzdial M, Technology for Teaching the Rest of Us, Keynote talk ITiCSE '11, Darmstadt, June 2011
[43]
Hadfields and Schweitzer D, Building an undergraduate computer science research experience, proceedings of the 39th IEEE international conference on Frontiers in education conference (FIE'09), San Antonio, Texas, 2009
[44]
Hamer J, Purchase H, Luxton-Reilly A and Sheard J, Tools for "contributing student learning", proceedings of the 2010 ITiCSE working group reports, ACM Digital Library, 2010
[45]
Hamer J, Kell C and Spence F, Peer Assessment Using Arop a, proceedings of Ninth Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE2007), Ballarat, Australia, 2007
[46]
Hamilton M, Tahaghoghi S and Walker C, Educating Students About Plagiarism Avoidance - A Computer Science Perspective, proceedings of ICCE2004: International Conference on Computers in Education, Lisobon, 2004
[47]
HEA, A Study of Progression in Irish Higher Education, Higher Education Authority, 2010
[48]
Healey M and Jenkins A, Developing undergraduate research and inquiry, HE Academy, York, 2009
[49]
Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) United Kingdom, Student Introduction and Population reports 2009/10, http://www.hesa.ac.uk/, 2010
[50]
Horwitz S, Rodger SH, Biggers M, Binkley D, Frantz CK, Gundermann D, Hambrusch S, Huss-Lederman S, Munson E, Ryder B and Sweat M, Using peer-led team learning to increase participation and success of under-represented groups in introductory computer science, proceedings of the 40th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Chattanooga, 2009
[51]
Huang T and Briggs A, A Unified Approach to Introductory Computer Science: Can One Size Fit All?, proceedings of ITiCSE'09, Paris, 2009
[52]
Hughes J, Gregor P, Chaplain M, Coleman G and McIver L, Research-Teaching Linkages: enhancing graduate attributes Information and Mathematical Sciences, The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, http://www.enhancementThemes.ac.uk/documents/ResearchTeaching/Info_Math_Science.pdf, 2009
[53]
IEEEExtreme, http://www.ieee.org/xtreme
[54]
Ihantola P, Ahoniemi T, Karavirta V and Sepp O, Review of recent systems for automatic assessment of programming assignments, proceedings of the 10th Koli Calling, International Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli Calling '10), Berlin, 2010
[55]
Institute for personal robots in education http://www.roboteducation.org/
[56]
International Contest on Informatics and Computer Fluency http://www.bebras.org/en/welcome
[57]
Jenkins T and Helmore S, Coursework for Cash: The Threat from On-Line Plagiarism, proceedings of 7th Annual HEA ICS conference, Dublin, 2006
[58]
Johnson, Johnson, & Smith, Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom, Interaction Book Company, 1991
[59]
Jplag, https://www.ipd.uni-karlsruhe.de/jplag/
[60]
Kearse IB and Hardnett CR, Computer science olympiad: exploring computer science through competition, proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Portland, 2008
[61]
Kölling M, and Barnes DJ, Enhancing Apprentice-Based Learning of Java, presented at 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on computer science education, 2004
[62]
Knox DL, DePasquale PJ and Pulimood SM, A model for summer undergraduate research experiences in emerging technologies, proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Houston, 2006
[63]
Lahtinen E, Ala-Mutka K and Jarvinen HM, A Study of the Difficulties of Novice Programmers, proceedings of ITiCSE'05, Lisbon, 2005
[64]
Liu N and Carless D, Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment, Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279--290, 2006
[65]
Lundeberg MA and Diemert S, Influence of Social Interaction on Cognition: Connected Learning in Science, Journal of Higher Education, 66(3), pp312--335, 1995
[66]
Luxton-Reilly A, Plimmer B and Sheehan R, StudySieve: a tool that supports constructive evaluation for free-response questions, proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the NZ Chapter of the ACM Special Interest Group on Human-Computer Interaction (CHINZ '10), Massy, NZ, 2010
[67]
Machado R, Guerreiro P, Johnston E, Delimar M and Brito M, IEEEXtreme: From a student competition to the promotion of real-world programming education, proceedings of 39th Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, 2009
[68]
Mahmoud Q and Dyer A, Mobile Devices in an Introductory Programming Course, Computer 41(6), June 2008
[69]
Margolis J and Fisher A, Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing, MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 2002
[70]
Markham S, Georgia State University Department of Computer Science: a Positive Place for Women and Minorities, The Young Scientist: A Career Guide for Underrepresented Science Graduates, Spectrum Publishers, 2011
[71]
Markham S and King K, Using personal robots in CS1: experiences, outcomes, and attitudinal influences, proceedings of the fifteenth annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education (ITiCSE '10), Ankara, 2010
[72]
Matthiasdottir A, What Student find Difficult in learning Programming, proceedings of 5th Annual HEA-ICS conference, Ulster, August 2004
[73]
Mazur E, Peer Instruction: A User's Manual, Prentice Hall, 1997
[74]
McWhorter W and O'Connor B, Do LEGO® Mindstorms® motivate students in CS1?, proceedings of the 40th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '09), Chattanooga, 2009
[75]
Media computation resources, http://www.mediacomputation.org
[76]
Mendes E, Al-Fakhri LB and Luxton-Reilly A, Investigating pair-programming in a 2nd-year software development and design computer science course, proceedings of ITiCSE'05, Lisbon, 2005
[77]
Microsoft Imagine Cup, http://www.imaginecup.com/
[78]
Mobile games, https://sites.google.com/site/csmobilegames/
[79]
Moritz S, Wei F, Parvez S and Blank G, From objects-first to design-first with multimedia and intelligent tutoring, SIGCSE Bulletin 37(3), June 2005
[80]
Morrison B and Preston J, Engagement: gaming throughout the curriculum, proceedings of 40th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '09), Chattanooga, 2009
[81]
Nicol, D, http://www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/documents/G21C/Assessment_230210.pdf, 2001
[82]
NSF, Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2011, http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/pdf/nsf11309.pdf
[83]
OECD, Higher Education: Quality, Equity and Efficiency, 2008
[84]
O'Leary E, Fancy A Prize? Motivating Students Using Competitions in Formative Assessment, proceedings of the 3rd annual ICEP conference, NUI Maynooth, 2010
[85]
Parlante N, Murtagh T, Sahami M, Astrachan O, Reed D, Stone C, Heeringa B and Reid K, Nifty Assignments, proceedings of the 40th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '09), Chattanooga, 2009
[86]
Pastor J, Gonzalez I and Rodrigues FJ, Participating in an International Robot Contest as a Way to Develop Professional Skills In Engineering Students, proceedings of the 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, New York, 2008
[87]
Peckham J, Stephenson P, Hervé J, Hutt R and Encarnação M, Increasing student retention in computer science through research programs for undergraduates, proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Covington, 2007
[88]
Programming challenges, http://www.programming-challenges.com/pg.php?page=index
[89]
Project Euler, http://projecteuler.net/
[90]
Raikes program http://raikes.unl.edu/
[91]
Renaissance Program http://cse.unl.edu/~riedesel/pub/Advise/CSbull11.pdf
[92]
Rentacoder, http://www.rent-acoder.com/
[93]
Riedesel C, http://cse.unl.edu/~riedesel/pub/cse155N/HW1.docx
[94]
RMIT programming club https://sites.google.com/site/rmitprogrammingclub
[95]
Rocktest, http://cs.sru.edu/~contest/rocktest
[96]
Rosenbloom A, Running a Programming Contest in an Introductory Computer Science Course, proceedings of ITiCSE'09, Paris, 2009
[97]
Schneider GM, A new model for a required senior research experience, SIGCSE Bulletin 34(4), December 2002
[98]
Skiena S and Revilla M, Programming Challenges, Springer-Verlag, USA, 2003
[99]
Skupas B, Dagiene V and Revilla M, Developing classification criteria for programming tasks, SIGCSE Bulletin 41(3), July 2009
[100]
Starr C, Bergman D and Zaubi P, The development and implementation of a context-based curricular framework for computer science education in high schools, proceedings of the 14th annual ITiCSE conference, Paris 2009
[101]
Tew A, Fowler C and Guzdial M, Tracking an innovation in introductory CS education from a research university to a two-year college, SIGCSE Bulletin 37(1) February 2005
[102]
TopCoder, http://www.topcoder.com/
[103]
TOPS http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/~jec/TOPS
[104]
Tremblay G, Laforest L and Salah A, Extending a marking tool with simple support for testing, proceedings of the 12th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education (ITiCSE '07), Dundee 2007
[105]
TurnItIn http://turnitin.com/static/index.php
[106]
Universidad de Valladolid, http://acm.uva.es/
[107]
University of Nebraska-Lincoln CSE day, http://www.cse.unl.edu/cseday/
[108]
Van den Berg I, Admiraal W and Pilot A, Peer assessment in university teaching: evaluating seven course designs, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(1), 19--36, 2006
[109]
Vincent Chu, Programming contest management project overview, http://www.sfu.ca/~vwchu/projects/programmingcontestenvironment.pdf
[110]
Weinberg J, Pettibone J, Thomas S, Stephen M and Stein C, The impact of robot projects on girls' attitudes toward science and engineering, Robotics science and systems (RSS) workshop on research in robots for education, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 2009
[111]
Werner L, Hanks B and McDowell C, Pair-programming helps female computer science students, Journal of Educational Resources in Computing 4(1), March 2004
[112]
Wilkerson M, Griswold W and Simon B, Ubiquitous presenter: increasing student access and control in a digital lecturing environment, proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '05), St Loius, 2005
[113]
Williams L, Lessons learned from seven years of pair programming at North Carolina State University, SIGCSE Bulletin 39(4), December 2007
[114]
Wirth A and Bertolacci M, New algorithms research for first year students, SIGCSE Bulletin 38(3), June 2006
[115]
Wolz U, Barnes T, Bayliss J and Cromack J, Girls do like playing and creating games, proceedings the 40th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Chattanooga, 2009
[116]
Zhang M, Lundak E, Lin C, Gegg-Harrison T and Francioni J, Interdisciplinary application tracks in an undergraduate computer science curriculum, proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Covington, 2007
[117]
Zobel J, "Uni cheats racket": a case study in plagiarism investigation, proceedings of ACE'04, Dunedin, NZ, 2004
[118]
Zobel J and Hamilton M, Managing Student Plagiarism in Large Academic Departments, Australian Universities Review 45(2), pp23--30, 2002
[119]
Zohar A and Peled B, The effects of explicit teaching of metastrategic knowledge on low- and high-achieving students, Learning and Instruction 18(4), August 2008

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)A Classification Scheme for Gamification in Computer Science Education: Discovery of Foundational Gamification Genres in Data Structures Courses2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637447(1-9)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2021
  • (2021)A cross-curricular approach to fostering innovation such as virtual reality development through student-led projects2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE.2016.7757628(1-9)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2021
  • (2021)Renewables for Fiji – Path for green power generationRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews10.1016/j.rser.2021.111374149(111374)Online publication date: Oct-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ITiCSE-WGR '11: Proceedings of the 16th annual conference reports on Innovation and technology in computer science education - working group reports
June 2011
58 pages
ISBN:9781450311229
DOI:10.1145/2078856
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 June 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. differentiation in the classroom
  2. learning programming
  3. otivation

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ITiCSE '11
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 552 of 1,613 submissions, 34%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)A Classification Scheme for Gamification in Computer Science Education: Discovery of Foundational Gamification Genres in Data Structures Courses2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637447(1-9)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2021
  • (2021)A cross-curricular approach to fostering innovation such as virtual reality development through student-led projects2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE.2016.7757628(1-9)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2021
  • (2021)Renewables for Fiji – Path for green power generationRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews10.1016/j.rser.2021.111374149(111374)Online publication date: Oct-2021
  • (2016)Illusion of Progress is Moar Addictive than Cat PicturesProceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale10.1145/2876034.2893388(133-136)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2016
  • (2015)New Horizons in the Assessment of Computer Science at School and BeyondProceedings of the 2015 ITiCSE on Working Group Reports10.1145/2858796.2858801(117-147)Online publication date: 4-Jul-2015
  • (2015)Teaching Pervasive Computing to CS FreshmenProceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education10.1145/2729094.2742584(195-200)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2015
  • (2015)Handling Heterogeneity in Programming Courses for FreshmenProceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering10.1109/LaTiCE.2015.18(197-203)Online publication date: 9-Apr-2015
  • (2014)Three views on motivation and programmingProceedings of the 2014 conference on Innovation & technology in computer science education10.1145/2591708.2591709(321-322)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2014
  • (2014)Course-embedded research in software development coursesProceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education10.1145/2538862.2538927(45-48)Online publication date: 5-Mar-2014
  • (2014)Simple rules for identifying students on the edge2014 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE)10.1109/TALE.2014.7062559(333-340)Online publication date: Dec-2014
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media