Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2016039.2016089acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesacm-seConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An empirical analysis of communication links in embedded wireless networks

Published: 24 March 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Embedded wireless networks have been widely used, from social networking to disaster response. Despite their increasing application, developers still face many challenges. One of the most significant is ensuring reliable communication between communicating devices. In this paper, we present an empirical examination of some of the key factors that affect the quality of wireless links in outdoor environments. Specifically, we study the effects of height differences between devices, device orientation, and data transmission rate on communication quality.

References

[1]
A. Ahmed and N. Fisal. Experiment measurements for packet reception rate in wireless underground sensor networks. International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering, 2(2):71--75, 2009.
[2]
N. Alsharabi et al. Wireless sensor networks of battlefields hotspot: Challenges and solutions. In Proceedings of the 6 th International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks, pages 192--196, Washington DC, USA, March--April 2008. IEEE Computer Society.
[3]
A. Arora et al. A line in the sand: A wireless sensor network for target detection, classification, and tracking. Computer Networks, 46(5):605--634, 2004.
[4]
D. Gay et al. The nesC language: A holistic approach to networked embedded systems. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pages 1--11, New York NY, USA, June 2003. ACM Press.
[5]
J. H. Hauer et al. Experimental study of the impact of WLAN interference on IEEE 802.15.4 body area networks. In Proceedings of the 6 th European Conference on Wireless Sensor Networks, pages 1--16, Berlin, Germany, February 2009. Springer.
[6]
R. Jafari et al. Wireless sensor networks for health monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2 nd Annual International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services, pages 479--481, Washington DC, USA, July 2005. IEEE Computer Society.
[7]
A. Mainwaring et al. Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring. In Proceedings of the 1 st ACM International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications, pages 88--97, New York NY, USA, September 2002. ACM Press.
[8]
MEMSIC. TelosB mote platform. http://www.memsic.com/products/wireless-sensor-networks/wireless-modules.html, December 2010. (last access).
[9]
E. Miluzzo et al. Sensing meets mobile social networks: the design, implementation and evaluation of the cenceme application. In Proceedings of the 6 th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems, pages 337--350, New York NY, USA, November 2008. ACM.
[10]
H. Ren et al. Experimental evaluations of on-body transmission characteristics for wireless biosensors. In IEEE International Conference on Integration Technology, pages 745--750, Washington DC, USA, March 2007. IEEE.
[11]
D. Son et al. Experimental study of the effects of transmission power control and blacklisting in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1 st IEEE Conference on Sensor and Adhoc Communication and Networks, pages 289--298, Washington DC, USA, October 2004. IEEE.
[12]
K. Srinivasan et al. Understanding the causes of packet delivery success and failure in dense wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 4 th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pages 419--421, New York NY, USA, October--November 2006. ACM.
[13]
Texas Instruments. CC2420 2.4 GHZ IEEE 802.15.4 zigbee-ready RF transceiver data sheet (rev. 1.3). http://www-s.ti.com/sc/ds/cc2420.pdf, December. 2010. (last access).
[14]
TinyOS. Boomerang RSSI readings. http://docs.tinyos.net/index.php/Boomerang_RSSI_Readings, October 2007.
[15]
UC Berkeley. TinyOS community forum -- an open-source OS for the networked sensor regime. http://www.tinyos.net, Sept. 2009. (last access).
[16]
S. K. Wahba et al. An empirical evaluation of embedded link quality. In Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Sensor Technologies and Applications, pages 430--435, Washington DC, USA, October 2007. IEEE Computer Society.
[17]
S. K. Wahba et al. Initiating a design pattern catalog for embedded network systems. In Proceedings of the 10 th ACM International Conference on Embedded Software, pages 249--258, New York, NY, USA, October 2010. ACM.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. An empirical analysis of communication links in embedded wireless networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ACMSE '11: Proceedings of the 49th annual ACM Southeast Conference
      March 2011
      399 pages
      ISBN:9781450306867
      DOI:10.1145/2016039
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 24 March 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. embedded networks
      2. network design
      3. radio link quality
      4. sensor networks
      5. wireless communication

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      ACM SE '11
      Sponsor:
      ACM SE '11: ACM Southeast Regional Conference
      March 24 - 26, 2011
      Georgia, Kennesaw

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 502 of 1,023 submissions, 49%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media