Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2839509.2844578acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Online CS1: Who Enrols, Why, and How Do They Do?

Published: 17 February 2016 Publication History

Abstract

When students can choose to take a course online or face-to-face, who chooses each format? Why do students select one format instead of the other? We compare an online section of CS1 to a concurrent face-to-face section and find that the populations in the two sections are very different. In particular, students in the online section have less prior programming experience and are less likely to intend to major in computer science. We also examine the reasons why students choose their section, many of which relate to convenience, desire for interaction with others, and degree of familiarity with the course material. Finally, we compare course outcomes for the two sections. We find significant differences in drop rates, but not in final exam scores. We investigate whether the differences we find can be explained by differences in the populations who choose to take the course online vs face-to-face.

References

[1]
J. Campbell, D. Horton, M. Craig, and P. Gries. Evaluating an inverted CS1. In Proceeding of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '14, pages 307--312, 2014.
[2]
P. Carter. An experience report: On the use of multimedia pre-instruction and just-in-time teaching in a cs1 course. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '12, pages 361--366, 2012.
[3]
D. Hagan and S. Markham. Does it help to have some programming experience before beginning a computing degree program? SIGCSE Bulletin, 32:25--28, 2000.
[4]
D. Horton and M. Craig. Drop, fail, pass, continue: Persistence in cs1 and beyond in traditional and inverted delivery. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '15, pages 235--240, 2015.
[5]
D. Horton, M. Craig, J. Campbell, P. Gries, and D. Zingaro. Comparing outcomes in inverted and traditional cs1. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE '14, pages 261--266, 2014.
[6]
A. Korhonen, L. Malmi, P. Myllyselkä, and P. Scheinin. Does it make a difference if students exercise on the web or in the classroom? In Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE '02, pages 121--124, 2002.
[7]
M. J. Lee and A. J. Ko. Comparing the effectiveness of online learning approaches on cs1 learning outcomes. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research, ICER '15, pages 237--246, 2015.
[8]
M. McDonald, B. Dorn, and G. McDonald. A statistical analysis of student performance in online computer science courses. In Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '04, pages 71--74, 2004.
[9]
D. Olson. A comparison of online and lecture methods for delivering the cs 1 course. J. Comput. Sci. Coll., 18(2):57--63, Dec. 2002.
[10]
J. A. Preston and L. Wilson. Offering cs1 on-line reducing campus resource demand while improving the learning environment. In Proceedings of the Thirty-second SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '01, pages 342--346, 2001.
[11]
D. Zingaro, Y. Cherenkova, O. Karpova, and A. Petersen. Facilitating code-writing in PI classes. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '13, pages 585--590, 2013.

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Introductory programming: a systematic literature reviewProceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education10.1145/3293881.3295779(55-106)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2018
  • (2016)Factors for Success in Online CS1Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education10.1145/2899415.2899457(320-325)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2016

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGCSE '16: Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education
February 2016
768 pages
ISBN:9781450336857
DOI:10.1145/2839509
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 17 February 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. cs1
  2. drop rate
  3. flipped
  4. novice programming
  5. online
  6. outcomes

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

SIGCSE '16
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

SIGCSE '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 105 of 297 submissions, 35%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

Upcoming Conference

SIGCSE TS 2025
The 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
February 26 - March 1, 2025
Pittsburgh , PA , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 14 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Introductory programming: a systematic literature reviewProceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education10.1145/3293881.3295779(55-106)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2018
  • (2016)Factors for Success in Online CS1Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education10.1145/2899415.2899457(320-325)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2016

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media