Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2814940.2814948acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Women and Men Collaborating with Robots on Assembly Lines: Designing a Novel Evaluation Scenario for Collocated Human-Robot Teamwork

Published: 21 October 2015 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents an original scenario design specifically created for exploring gender-related issues surrounding collaborative human-robot teams on assembly lines. Our methodology is grounded squarely in the need for increased gender work in human-robot interaction. As with most research in social human-robot interaction, investigating and exploring gender issues relies heavily on an evaluation methodology and scenario that aims to maximize ecological validity, so that the lab results can generalize to a real-world social scenario. In this paper, we present our discussion on study elements required for ecological validity in our context, present an original study design that meets these criteria, and present initial pilot results that reflect on our approach and study design.

References

[1]
Augustsson, S., Olsson, J., Christiernin, L.G., and Bolmsjö, G. How to transfer information between collaborating human operators and industrial robots in an assembly. Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, (2014), 286--294.
[2]
Berg, A. and Adam, A. A gendered socio-technical construction: the smart house. In D. Mackenzie and J. Wajcman, eds., The Social Shaping of Tecnology. 1999, 301--313.
[3]
Bradley, A. and Hancock, M. Gendered or neutral? Considering the language of HCI. Graphics Interface, (2015).
[4]
Burnett, M.M., Beckwith, L., Wiedenbeck, S., et al. Gender pluralism in problem-solving software. Interacting with Computers 23, 5 (2011), 450--460.
[5]
Czerwinski, M., Tan, D.S., and Robertson, G.G. Women take a wider view. The SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2002), 195--202.
[6]
Dautenhahn, K., Walters, M., Woods, S., et al. How may I serve you? A robot companion approaching a seated person in a helping context. Human-Robot Interaction, (2006), 172.
[7]
Eyssel, F. and Hegel, F. (S)he's got the look: Gender stereotyping of robots. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 42, 9 (2012), 2213--2230.
[8]
Gleeson, B., Maclean, K., Croft, E.A., and Alcazar, J. Human-robot communication for collaborative assembly. GRAND Symposium, (2013).
[9]
Greeff, J. De and Neerincx, M.A. Human-robot teamwork in USAR environments: the TRADR project. Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts, (2015), 151--152.
[10]
Lee, M.K., Forlizzi, J., Kiesler, S., Cakmak, M., and Srinivasa, S. Predictability or adaptivity?: designing robot handoffs modeled from trained dogs and people. Human-robot interaction, (2011), 179--180.
[11]
Lohse, M. and Evers, V. Useful and motivating robots -- the influence of task structure on human-robot teamwork. Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts, (2014), 232--233.
[12]
Moon, Aj., Troniak, D.M., Gleeson, B., et al. Meet me where i'm gazing: how shared attention gaze affects human-robot handover timing. Human-Robot Interaction, (2014), 334--34
[13]
Morris, M.G., Venkatesh, V., and Ackerman, P.L. Gender and age differences in employee decisions about new technology: an extension to the theory of planned behavior. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 52, 1 (2005), 69--84.
[14]
Müller, R., Vette, M., and Scholer, M. Inspector robot -- a new collaborative testing system designed for the automotive final assembly line. Assembly Automation 34, 4 (2014), 370--378.
[15]
Ormrod, S. "Let's nuke the dinner": discursive practices of gender in the creation of a new cooking process. In C. Cockburn and R. First-Dilić, eds., Bringing Technology Home: Gender and Technology in a Changing Europe. Open University Press, Buckingham {England}, Philadelphia, 1994, 42--58.
[16]
Rode, J.A. A theoretical agenda for feminist HCI. Interacting with Computers 23, 5 (2011), 393--400.
[17]
Schiebinger, L. Gender studies of STS: A look toward the future. Science Technology & Society 4, 1 (1999), 95--106.
[18]
Taylor, P., Liu, C., Agrawal, P., Sarkar, N., and Chen, S. International Journal of Human- Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment in Computer Games Through Real-Time Anxiety-Based Affective Feedback Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment in Computer Games Through Real-Time Anxiety-Based. February 2012, 37--41.
[19]
Unhelkar, V. V. and Shah, J.A. Challenges in developing a collaborative robotic assistant for automotive assembly lines. Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts, (2015), 239--240.
[20]
Vogel, C., Walter, C., and Elkmann, N. A projection-based sensor system for safe physical human-robot collaboration. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, (2013), 5359--5364.
[21]
Wang, Y. and Young, J.E. Beyond "pink" and "blue": gendered attitudes towards robots in society. Proceedings of Gender and IT Appropriation. Science and Practice on Dialogue - Forum for Interdisciplinary Exchange, European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (2014), 49--59.
[22]
Young, J.E., Sung, J., Voida, A., et al. Evaluating human-robot interaction: Focusing on the holistic interaction experience. International Journal of Social Robotics 3, 1 (2011), 53--67.
[23]
National Science Board. Bachelor's Degrees, by Sex and Field 2001-09. Indicators, Science and Engineering, 2012, National Science Foundation P61.
[24]
Case study: Exploring markets for assistive technologies for the elderly. 2012.
[25]
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Women in the Labor Force: A Databook, 2013.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)A survey on the design and evolution of social robots — Past, present and futureRobotics and Autonomous Systems10.1016/j.robot.2022.104193156:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2022

Index Terms

  1. Women and Men Collaborating with Robots on Assembly Lines: Designing a Novel Evaluation Scenario for Collocated Human-Robot Teamwork

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      HAI '15: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction
      October 2015
      254 pages
      ISBN:9781450335270
      DOI:10.1145/2814940
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      • BESK: Brain Engineering Society of Korea

      In-Cooperation

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 21 October 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. evaluation methodology
      2. gender studies
      3. human-robot interaction

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      • University of Manitoba

      Conference

      HAI 2015
      Sponsor:
      • BESK
      HAI 2015: The Third International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction
      October 21 - 24, 2015
      Kyungpook, Daegu, Republic of Korea

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 121 of 404 submissions, 30%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
      Reflects downloads up to 14 Dec 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2022)A survey on the design and evolution of social robots — Past, present and futureRobotics and Autonomous Systems10.1016/j.robot.2022.104193156:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2022

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media