Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2808797.2809331acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Utilizing Non-QA Data to Improve Questions Routing for Users with Low QA Activity in CQA

Published: 25 August 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Community Question Answering (CQA) systems, such as Yahoo! Answers and Stack Overflow, represent a well-known example of collective intelligence. The existing CQA systems, despite their overall successfulness and popularity, fail to answer a significant amount of questions in required time. One option for scaffolding collaboration in CQA systems is a recommendation of new questions to users who are suitable candidates for providing correct answers (so called question routing). Various methods have been proposed so far to find appropriate answerers, but almost all approaches heavily depend on previous users' activities in a particular CQA system (i.e. QA-data). In our work, we attempt to involve a whole community including users with no or minimal previous activity (e.g. newcomers or lurkers). We proposed a question routing method which analyses users' non-QA data from a CQA system itself as well as from external services and platforms, such as blogs, microblogs or social networking sites, in order to estimate users' interests and expertise early and more precisely. Consequently, we can recommend new questions to a wider part of a community as well as more accurately. Evaluation on a dataset from Stack Exchange platform showed that considering non-QA data leads not only to better recognition of users with low activity as suitable answerers, but also to higher overall precision of the recommendations. It implies that non-QA data can supplement QA data during expertise estimation in question routing and thus also improve a success rate of a questions answering process.

References

[1]
Q. Liu, E. Agichtein, G. Dror, Y. Maarek, and I. Szpektor, "When web search fails, searchers become askers," in Proc. of the 35th int. ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval - SIGIR '12, 2012, pp. 801--810.
[2]
B. Li and I. King, "Routing questions to appropriate answerers in community question answering services," in Proc. of the 19th ACM Int. Conf. on Inf. and Knowl. Management - CIKM '10, 2010, pp. 1585--1588.
[3]
T. C. Zhou, M. R. Lyu, and I. King, "A classification-based approach to question routing in community question answering," in Proc. of the 21st Int. Conf. Comp. on World Wide Web - WWW '12, 2012, pp. 783--790.
[4]
M. Liu, Y. Liu, and Q. Yang, "Predicting Best Answerers for New Questions in Community Question Answering," in Proc. of the 11th Int. Conf. on Web-age Inf. Management, 2010, pp. 127--138.
[5]
J. Guo, S. Xu, S. Bao, and Y. Yu, "Tapping on the potential of q&a community by recommending answer providers," in Proc. of the 17th Int. Conf. on Inf. and Knowl. Management - CIKM '08, 2008, pp. 921--930.
[6]
G. Zhou, K. Liu, and J. Zhao, "Joint relevance and answer quality learning for question routing in community QA," in Proc. of the 21st ACM Int. Conf. on Inf. and Knowl. Management - CIKM '12, 2012, pp. 1492--1496.
[7]
Z. Ji and B. Wang, "Learning to rank for question routing in community question answering," in Proc. of the 22nd ACM Int. Conf. on Inf. and Knowl. Management - CIKM '13, 2013, pp. 2363--2368.
[8]
F. Riahi, Z. Zolaktaf, M. Shafiei, and E. Milios, "Finding expert users in community question answering," in Proc. of the 21st Int. Conf. Comp. on World Wide Web - WWW '12, 2012, no. i, pp. 791--798.
[9]
Y. Tian, P. S. Kochhar, E.-P. Lim, F. Zhu, and D. Lo, "Predicting Best Answerers for New Questions: An Approach Leveraging Topic Modeling and Collaborative Voting," in Proc. of Social Informatics 2013 Int. Workshops, 2013, pp. 55--68.
[10]
L. Fang, M. Huang, and X. Zhu, "Question routing in community based QA: Incorporating Answer Quality and Answer Content," in Proc. of the ACM SIGKDD WS on Mining Data Semantics - MDS'12, 2012, pp. 1--8.
[11]
B. Li, "A Computational Framework for Question Processing in Community Question Answering Services," Doctoral Thesis, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2014.
[12]
I. Szpektor, Y. Maarek, and D. Pelleg, "When Relevance is not Enough: Promoting Diversity and Freshness in Personalized Question Recommendation," in Proc. of the 22nd Int. Conf. on World Wide Web - WWW'13, 2013, pp. 1249--1259.
[13]
I. Srba and M. Bielikova, "Why Stack Overflow Fails? Preservation of Sustainability in Community Question Answering," IEEE Software, Submitted, 2015.
[14]
Y. Pan, L. Luo, C. Chi, and Q. Liao, "To answer or not: What non-QA Social Activities Can Tell," in Proc. of the 2013 Conf. on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW'13, 2013, pp. 1253--1263.
[15]
L. Luo, F. Wang, M. X. Zhou, Y. Pan, and H. Chen, "Who have got answers?: growing the pool of answerers in a smart enterprise social QA system," in Proc. of the 19th Int. Conf. on Intelligent User Interfaces - IUI '14, 2014, pp. 7--16.
[16]
Z. Liu and B. J. Jansen, "Predicting potential responders in social Q&a based on non-QA features," in Proc. of the 32nd Annual ACM Conf. on Human Factors in Comp. Systems - CHI EA '14, 2014, pp. 2131--2136.
[17]
Z. Zhao, L. Zhang, X. He, and W. Ng, "Expert Finding for Question Answering via Graph Regularized Matrix Completion," IEEE Trans. on Knowledge Data Engineering, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 993--1004, 2015.
[18]
J. Yang, K. Tao, A. Bozzon, and G.-J. Houben, "Sparrows and Owls: Characterisation of Expert Behaviour in StackOverflow," in User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2014, vol. 8538, pp. 37--48.
[19]
D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan, "Latent Dirichlet Allocation," Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 3, no. 4--5, pp. 993--1022, 2012.
[20]
F. Xu, Z. Ji, and B. Wang, "Dual role model for question recommendation in community question answering," in Proc. of the 35th Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Inf. Retrieval - SIGIR '12, 2012, pp. 771--779.
[21]
H. Zhu, E. Chen, and H. Cao, "Finding experts in tag based knowledge sharing communities," in Proc. of 5th Int. Conf. KSEM 2011, 2011, vol. 7091 LNAI, pp. 183--195.
[22]
I. Srba and M. Bielikova, "Askalot: Community Question Answering as a Means for Knowledge Sharing in an Educational Organization," in Proc. of the 18th ACM Conf. Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW'15, 2015, pp. 179--182.
[23]
A. Ahmed, Y. Low, M. Aly, V. Josifovski, and A. J. Smola, "Scalable distributed inference of dynamic user interests for behavioral targeting," in Proc. of the 17th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. on Knowledge discovery and Data Mining - KDD '11, 2011, pp. 114--122.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)CoArgue : Fostering Lurkers’ Contribution to Collective Arguments in Community-based QA PlatformsProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580932(1-17)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2022)Analysis of community question‐answering issues via machine learning and deep learningCAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology10.1049/cit2.120818:1(95-117)Online publication date: 4-May-2022
  • (2021)Time-aware hybrid expertise retrieval system in community question answering servicesApplied Intelligence10.1007/s10489-020-02177-2Online publication date: 17-Feb-2021
  • Show More Cited By
  1. Utilizing Non-QA Data to Improve Questions Routing for Users with Low QA Activity in CQA

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ASONAM '15: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining 2015
      August 2015
      835 pages
      ISBN:9781450338547
      DOI:10.1145/2808797
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 25 August 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. community question answering
      2. expertise estimation
      3. non-qa data
      4. question recommendation
      5. question routing

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      ASONAM '15
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 116 of 549 submissions, 21%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 23 Sep 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)CoArgue : Fostering Lurkers’ Contribution to Collective Arguments in Community-based QA PlatformsProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580932(1-17)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
      • (2022)Analysis of community question‐answering issues via machine learning and deep learningCAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology10.1049/cit2.120818:1(95-117)Online publication date: 4-May-2022
      • (2021)Time-aware hybrid expertise retrieval system in community question answering servicesApplied Intelligence10.1007/s10489-020-02177-2Online publication date: 17-Feb-2021
      • (2019)Activity Archetypes in Question-and-Answer (Q8A) Websites—A Study of 50 Stack Exchange InstancesACM Transactions on Social Computing10.1145/33016122:1(1-23)Online publication date: 21-Feb-2019
      • (2019)Where to PostProceedings of the ACM India Joint International Conference on Data Science and Management of Data10.1145/3297001.3297018(136-142)Online publication date: 3-Jan-2019
      • (2019)Expert recommendation in community question answering: a review and future directionInternational Journal of Crowd Science10.1108/IJCS-03-2019-00113:3(348-372)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2019
      • (2018)Expert Identification Based on Dynamic LDA Topic Model2018 IEEE Third International Conference on Data Science in Cyberspace (DSC)10.1109/DSC.2018.00141(881-888)Online publication date: Jun-2018
      • (2018)A Survey on Expert Recommendation in Community Question AnsweringJournal of Computer Science and Technology10.1007/s11390-018-1845-033:4(625-653)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2018
      • (2018)Retrieving people: Identifying potential answerers in Community Question‐AnsweringJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.2404269:10(1246-1258)Online publication date: 18-Jul-2018
      • (2017)Educational Question Routing in Online Student CommunitiesProceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3109859.3109886(47-55)Online publication date: 27-Aug-2017
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media