Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2783258.2788566acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Interpreting Advertiser Intent in Sponsored Search

Published: 10 August 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Search engines derive revenue by displaying sponsored results along with organic results in response to user queries. In general, search engines run a per-query, on-line auction amongst interested advertisers to select sponsored results to display. In doing so, they must carefully balance the revenue derived from sponsored results against potential degradation in user experience due to less-relevant results. Hence, major search engines attempt to analyze the relevance of potential sponsored results to the user's query using supervised learning algorithms. Past work has employed a bag-of-words approach using features extracted from both the query and potential sponsored result to train the ranker.
We show that using features that capture the advertiser's intent can significantly improve the performance of relevance ranking. In particular, we consider the ad keyword the advertiser submits as part of the auction process as a direct expression of intent. We leverage the search engine itself to interpret the ad keyword by submitting the ad keyword as an independent query and incorporating the results as features when determining the relevance of the advertiser's sponsored result to the user's original query. We achieve 43.2% improvement in precision-recall AUC over the best previously published baseline and 2.7% improvement in the production system of a large search engine.

References

[1]
Click Modeling in Search Advertising: Challenges & Solutions. http://advertise.bingads.microsoft.com/en-us/editorial-relevance-quality-guidelines.
[2]
DMOZ - the Open Directory Project. http://www.dmoz.org.
[3]
English Stop Words (CSV). http://www.textfixer.com/resources/common-english-words.txt.
[4]
Personal communications with Bing Ads Relevance Team.
[5]
Relevance and quality guidelines - Bing Ads. http://advertise.bingads.microsoft.com/en-us/editorial-relevance-quality-guidelines.
[6]
E. Agichtein, E. Brill, and S. Dumais. Improving Web Search Ranking by Incorporating User Behavior Information. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR '06, pages 19--26, 2006.
[7]
L. Ballesteros and W. B. Croft. Phrasal Translation and Query Expansion Techniques for Cross-language Information Retrieval. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR '97, pages 84--91, 1997.
[8]
P. N. Bennett, K. Svore, and S. T. Dumais. Classification-Enhanced Ranking. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW '10, pages 111--120, 2010.
[9]
A. Broder, M. Ciaramita, M. Fontoura, E. Gabrilovich, V. Josifovski, D. Metzler, V. Murdock, and V. Plachouras. To Swing or Not to Swing: Learning when (Not) to Advertise. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM '08, pages 1003--1012, 2008.
[10]
A. Z. Broder, P. Ciccolo, M. Fontoura, E. Gabrilovich, V. Josifovski, and L. Riedel. Search Advertising Using Web Relevance Feedback. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM '08, pages 1013--1022, 2008.
[11]
A. Z. Broder, M. Fontoura, E. Gabrilovich, A. Joshi, V. Josifovski, and T. Zhang. Robust Classification of Rare Queries Using Web Knowledge. In Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, SIGIR '07, pages 231--238, 2007.
[12]
C. Burges, R. Ragno, and Q. Le. Learning to Rank with Non-Smooth Cost Functions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, January 2007.
[13]
C. J. Burges. From RankNet to LambdaRank to LambdaMART: An Overview. Technical Report MSR-TR-2010--82, June 2010.
[14]
Y. Choi, M. Fontoura, E. Gabrilovich, V. Josifovski, M. Mediano, and B. Pang. Using Landing Pages for Sponsored Search Ad Selection. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW '10, pages 251--260, 2010.
[15]
M. Ciaramita, V. Murdock, and V. Plachouras. Online Learning from Click Data for Sponsored Search. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW '08, pages 227--236, 2008.
[16]
K. S. Dave and V. Varma. Learning the Click-through Rate for Rare/New Ads from Similar Ads. In Proceedings of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR '10, pages 897--898, 2010.
[17]
C. B. Do and A. Y. Ng. Transfer learning for text classification. In Y. Weiss, B. Schölkopf, and J. Platt, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 18, pages 299--306. MIT Press, 2006.
[18]
E. N. Efthimiadis and P. V. Biron. UCLA-Okapi at TREC-2: Query Expansion Experiments. In In Proceedings of the Second Text Retrieval Conference, pages 500--215, 1994.
[19]
X. He, J. Pan, O. Jin, T. Xu, B. Liu, T. Xu, Y. Shi, A. Atallah, R. Herbrich, S. Bowers, and J. Q. n. Candela. Practical Lessons from Predicting Clicks on Ads at Facebook. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Data Mining for Online Advertising, ADKDD'14, pages 5:1--5:9, 2014.
[20]
D. Hillard, S. Schroedl, E. Manavoglu, H. Raghavan, and C. Leggetter. Improving Ad Relevance in Sponsored Search. In Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM '10, pages 361--370, 2010.
[21]
K. Hui, B. Gao, B. He, and T.-J. Luo. Sponsored Search Ad Selection by Keyword Structure Analysis. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Retrieval, ECIR '13, pages 230--241, 2013.
[22]
B. J. Jansen and T. Mullen. Sponsored search: an overview of the concept, history, and technology. International Journal of Electronic Business, 6(2):114--131, 2008.
[23]
B. J. Jansen and M. Resnick. An examination of searcher's perceptions of nonsponsored and sponsored links during ecommerce Web searching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(14):1949--1961, 2006.
[24]
P. Kowalczyk, I. Zukerman, and M. Niemann. Analyzing the Effect of Query Class on Document Retrieval Performance. In G. Webb and X. Yu, editors, AI 2004: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, volume 3339 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 550--561. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005.
[25]
D. Metzler, S. Dumais, and C. Meek. Similarity Measures for Short Segments of Text. In G. Amati, C. Carpineto, and G. Romano, editors, Advances in Information Retrieval, volume 4425 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 16--27. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007.
[26]
M. Mitra, A. Singhal, and C. Buckley. Improving Automatic Query Expansion. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR '98, pages 206--214, 1998.
[27]
M. F. Porter. An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program, 14(3):130--137, 1980.
[28]
F. Radlinski, A. Broder, P. Ciccolo, E. Gabrilovich, V. Josifovski, and L. Riedel. Optimizing Relevance and Revenue in Ad Search: A Query Substitution Approach. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR '08, pages 403--410, 2008.
[29]
H. Raghavan and D. Hillard. A Relevance Model Based Filter for Improving Ad Quality. In Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, SIGIR '09, pages 762--763, 2009.
[30]
R. Raina, A. Y. Ng, and D. Koller. Constructing Informative Priors Using Transfer Learning. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML '06, pages 713--720, 2006.
[31]
M. Richardson, E. Dominowska, and R. Ragno. Predicting Clicks: Estimating the Click-through Rate for New Ads. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW '07, pages 521--530, 2007.
[32]
D. Sculley, R. G. Malkin, S. Basu, and R. J. Bayardo. Predicting Bounce Rates in Sponsored Search Advertisements. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD '09, pages 1325--1334, 2009.
[33]
Y. Song, H. Ma, H. Wang, and K. Wang. Exploring and Exploiting User Search Behavior on Mobile and Tablet Devices to Improve Search Relevance. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW '13, May 2013.
[34]
E. M. Voorhees. Query Expansion Using Lexical-semantic Relations. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR '94, pages 61--69, 1994.
[35]
Q. Wu, C. Burges, K. Svore, and J. Gao. Adapting boosting for information retrieval measures. Information Retrieval, 13(3):254--270, June 2010.
[36]
J. Xu and W. B. Croft. Improving the Effectiveness of Information Retrieval with Local Context Analysis. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 18(1):79--112, Jan. 2000.
[37]
W. V. Zhang, X. He, B. Rey, and R. Jones. Query Rewriting Using Active Learning for Sponsored Search. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR '07, pages 853--854, 2007.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Social media intention mining for sustainable information systems: categories, taxonomy, datasets and challengesComplex & Intelligent Systems10.1007/s40747-021-00342-99:3(2773-2799)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2021
  • (2017)Exploring the dynamics of search advertiser fraudProceedings of the 2017 Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/3131365.3131393(157-170)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2017
  • (2017)Computational Advertising: A Paradigm Shift for Advertising and Marketing?IEEE Intelligent Systems10.1109/MIS.2017.5832:3(3-6)Online publication date: 1-May-2017
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Interpreting Advertiser Intent in Sponsored Search

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    KDD '15: Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
    August 2015
    2378 pages
    ISBN:9781450336642
    DOI:10.1145/2783258
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 10 August 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. ad relevance
    2. online advertising
    3. sponsored search

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    KDD '15
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    KDD '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 160 of 819 submissions, 20%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,133 of 8,635 submissions, 13%

    Upcoming Conference

    KDD '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 18 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)Social media intention mining for sustainable information systems: categories, taxonomy, datasets and challengesComplex & Intelligent Systems10.1007/s40747-021-00342-99:3(2773-2799)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2021
    • (2017)Exploring the dynamics of search advertiser fraudProceedings of the 2017 Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/3131365.3131393(157-170)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2017
    • (2017)Computational Advertising: A Paradigm Shift for Advertising and Marketing?IEEE Intelligent Systems10.1109/MIS.2017.5832:3(3-6)Online publication date: 1-May-2017
    • (2017)AdScope: Search Campaign Scoping Using Relevance FeedbackIEEE Intelligent Systems10.1109/MIS.2017.4732:3(14-20)Online publication date: 1-May-2017
    • (2016)Where Can I Buy a Boulder?Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web10.1145/2872427.2882998(1225-1235)Online publication date: 11-Apr-2016

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media