Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article
Free access

An experimental study of people creating spreadsheets

Published: 01 July 1987 Publication History

Abstract

Nine experienced users of electronic spreadsheets each created three spreadsheets. Although participants were quite confident that their spreadsheets were accurate, 44 percent of the spreadsheets contained user-generated programming errors. With regard to the spreadsheet creation process, we found that experienced spreadsheet users spend a large percentage of their time using the cursor keys, primarily for the purpose of moving the cursor around the spreadsheet. Users did not spend a lot of time planning before launching into spreadsheet creation, nor did they spend much time in a separate, systematic debugging stage. Participants spent 21 percent of their time pausing, presumably reading and/or thinking, prior to the initial keystrokes of spreadsheet creation episodes.

References

[1]
CARD, S., MORAN, T., AND NEWELL, A. The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., 1983.
[2]
CREETH, R. Micro-computer spreadsheets: Their uses and abuses. J. Account. {June 1985), 90-93.
[3]
DOHERTY, W. J., AND POPE, W. Computing as a tool for human augmentation. IBM Tech. Rep. RC- 11622, June 1986.
[4]
GOULD, J.D. Experiments on composing letters: Some facts, some myths, and some observations. In Cognitive Processes in Writing, L. Gregg and E. R. Steinberg, Eds. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., 1980, 97-118.
[5]
GOULD, J. D. Composing letters with computer-based text editors. Hum. Factors 23 (1981), 593-606.
[6]
GOULD, J. D., LEWIS, C., AND BARNES, V. Cursor movement during text editing. ACM Trans. Off. Inf. Syst. 3, 1 (Jan. 1985), 22-34.
[7]
GRUSHCOW, J. Avoid these common spreadsheet errors. Lotus (July 1984), 59-62.
[8]
LEVY, S. A spreadsheet way of knowledge. Harpers (Nov. 1984), 58-64.
[9]
OLSON, J., AND NILSEN, E. Analysis of the cognition involved in spreadsheet software interaction. Paper presented at the twenty-sixth annual meeting of the Psychonomics society, 1985.
[10]
WHITESIDE, j., ARCHER, N., WIXON, D., AND GOOD, M. How do people really use text editors? SIGOA Newsl. 3 (June 1982), 29-40.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Auto-Formula: Recommend Formulas in Spreadsheets using Contrastive Learning for Table RepresentationsProceedings of the ACM on Management of Data10.1145/36549252:3(1-27)Online publication date: 30-May-2024
  • (2024)To Abstract or Not to Abstract? A Comparative Study Evaluating the User Experience of Spreadsheet Programming with Sheet-Defined Functional AbstractionsInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2024.2361209(1-17)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Advances in building data management for building performance standards using the SEED platformDevelopments in the Built Environment10.1016/j.dibe.2024.10053020(100530)Online publication date: Dec-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Reviews

Robert M. Lynch

.abstract Nine experienced users of electronic spreadsheets each created three spreadsheets. Although participants were quite confident that their spreadsheets were accurate, 44 percent of the spreadsheets contained user-generated programming errors. With regard to the spreadsheet creation process, we found that experienced spreadsheet users spend a large percentage of their time using the cursor keys, primarily for the purpose of moving the cursor around the spreadsheet. Users did not spend a lot of time planning before launching into spreadsheet creation, nor did they spend much time im a separate, systematic debugging stage. Participants spent 21 percent of their time pausing, presumably reading and/or thinking, prior to the inital keystrokes of spreadsheet creation episodes. — Authors' Abstract Two important findings have resulted from this research. The first is the large percentage of spreadsheets with errors. From the analysis, the errors are largely a result of errors in cell formulas. The second is the lack of time spent by developers in planning spreadsheets. Though none of the spreadsheet exercises are large (the longest average time to develop a spreadsheet is 63 minutes), the overall lack of planning is a surprise. These findings focus attention on the need for improved user interfaces and support utilities. Debugging assistance would be of particular interest. Specifically, interfaces that permit views of the spreadsheet formulas, values, and cell addresses across a number of cells and across different areas of the sheet might reduce the error rate. Organizing and displaying formulas, values, and cell addresses that are related to or arise from one another could also help.

Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Information Systems
ACM Transactions on Information Systems  Volume 5, Issue 3
July 1987
77 pages
ISSN:1046-8188
EISSN:1558-2868
DOI:10.1145/27641
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 July 1987
Published in TOIS Volume 5, Issue 3

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)146
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)15
Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Auto-Formula: Recommend Formulas in Spreadsheets using Contrastive Learning for Table RepresentationsProceedings of the ACM on Management of Data10.1145/36549252:3(1-27)Online publication date: 30-May-2024
  • (2024)To Abstract or Not to Abstract? A Comparative Study Evaluating the User Experience of Spreadsheet Programming with Sheet-Defined Functional AbstractionsInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2024.2361209(1-17)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Advances in building data management for building performance standards using the SEED platformDevelopments in the Built Environment10.1016/j.dibe.2024.10053020(100530)Online publication date: Dec-2024
  • (2024)Spreadsheet quality assurance: a literature reviewFrontiers of Computer Science10.1007/s11704-023-2384-618:2Online publication date: 22-Jan-2024
  • (2023)FxD: a functional debugger for dysfunctional spreadsheets2023 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)10.1109/VL-HCC57772.2023.00012(31-40)Online publication date: 3-Oct-2023
  • (2022)Investigating Trends and Costs Associated with Designing Concrete Mixes Using Different Methods by Computer ProgramsAdvances in Civil Engineering10.1155/2022/25268332022:1Online publication date: 6-Feb-2022
  • (2018)Can beyond-CMOS devices illuminate dark silicon?Communications of the ACM10.1145/323062861:9(60-69)Online publication date: 22-Aug-2018
  • (2018)A domain-specific architecture for deep neural networksCommunications of the ACM10.1145/315448461:9(50-59)Online publication date: 22-Aug-2018
  • (2018)Key Attributes of a Modern Statistical Computing ToolThe American Statistician10.1080/00031305.2018.1482784(1-10)Online publication date: Jun-2018
  • (2018)Preparing Teachers to Use Excelets: Developing Creative Modeling Experiences for Secondary Mathematics StudentsCreativity and Technology in Mathematics Education10.1007/978-3-319-72381-5_8(203-231)Online publication date: 4-Sep-2018
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media