Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2750858.2807533acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mobile activity recognition for a whole day: recognizing real nursing activities with big dataset

Published: 07 September 2015 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper, we provide a real nursing data set for mobile activity recognition that can be used for supervised machine learning, and big data combined the patient medical records and sensors attempted for 2 years, and also propose a method for recognizing activities for a whole day utilizing prior knowledge about the activity segments in a day. Furthermore, we demonstrate data mining by applying our method to the bigger data with additional hospital data. In the proposed method, we 1) convert a set of segment timestamps into a prior probability of the activity segment by exploiting the concept of importance sampling, 2) obtain the likelihood of traditional recognition methods for each local time window within the segment range, and, 3) apply Bayesian estimation by marginalizing the conditional probability of estimating the activities for the segment samples. By evaluating with the dataset, the proposed method outperformed the traditional method without using the prior knowledge by 25.81% at maximum by balanced classification rate. Moreover, the proposed method significantly reduces duration errors of activity segments from 324.2 seconds of the traditional method to 74.6 seconds at maximum. We also demonstrate the data mining by applying our method to bigger data in a hospital.

References

[1]
Bao, L., and Intille, S. S. Pervasive Computing, vol. 3001 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004.
[2]
Chavarriaga, R., Sagha, H., Calatroni, A., Digumarti, S. T., Troster, G., Millan, J. D. R., and Roggen, D. The Opportunity challenge: A benchmark database for on-body sensor-based activity recognition. Pattern Recognition Letters 34 (2013), 2033--2042.
[3]
Chen, L., Hoey, J., Nugent, C. D., Cook, D. J., and Yu, Z. Sensor-based activity recognition, 2012.
[4]
Collobert, R., Weston, J., Bottou, L., Karlen, M., Kavukcuoglu, K., and Kuksa, P. Natural Language Processing (almost) from Scratch. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12 (2011), 2493--2537.
[5]
Damas, M., Rojas, I., Amft, O., Toth, A. M., Baños, O., Pomares, H., and Tóth, M. A. A benchmark dataset to evaluate sensor displacement in activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing - UbiComp '12 (2012), 1026.
[6]
Demuynck, K., and Laureys, T. A comparison of different approaches to automatic speech segmentation. In Text, Speech and Dialogue (2002), 277--284.
[7]
Dietterich, T. Machine learning for sequential data: A review. Structural, syntactic, and statistical pattern recognition (2002), 1--15.
[8]
Farringdon, J., Moore, A., Tilbury, N., Church, J., and Biemond, P. Wearable sensor badge and sensor jacket for context awareness. Digest of Papers. Third International Symposium on Wearable Computers (1999).
[9]
Fawcett, T. ROC Graphs: Notes and Practical Considerations for Researchers. ReCALL 31 (2004), 1--38.
[10]
Fawcett, T. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters 27 (2006), 861--874.
[11]
Franco, A., and Destrebecqz, A. Chunking or not chunking? How do we find words in artificial language learning? Advances in Cognitive Psychology 8 (2012), 144--154.
[12]
Gooch, P., and Roudsari, A. Computerization of workflows, guidelines, and care pathways: a review of implementation challenges for process-oriented health information systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA 18 (2011), 738--48.
[13]
Guyon, I., and Elisseeff, A. An introduction to variable and feature selection. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3 (2003), 1157--1182.
[14]
Hand, D., and Till, R. A simple generalisation of the area under the ROC curve for multiple class classification problems. Machine Learning (2001), 171--186.
[15]
Hattori, Y., Inoue, S., and Hirakawa, G. A Large Scale Gathering System for Activity Data with Mobile Sensors. 2011 15th Annual International Symposium on Wearable Computers (2011), 97--100.
[16]
He, H., and Garcia, E. A. Learning from imbalanced data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 21 (2009), 1263--1284.
[17]
He, X. H. X., Zemel, R., and Carreira-Perpinan, M. Multiscale conditional random fields for image labeling. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004. 2 (2004).
[18]
Hido, S., Kashima, H., and Takahashi, Y. Roughly balanced Bagging for Imbalanced data. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining 2 (2009), 412--426.
[19]
Kasteren, T. V., Noulas, A., Englebienne, G., and Kr, B. Accurate Activity Recognition in a Home Setting. In UbiComp '08 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous computing (2008), 1--9.
[20]
Kawaguchi, N., Ogawa, N., and Iwasaki, Y. Hasc challenge: gathering large scale human activity corpus for the real-world activity understandings. In Proceedings of the 2nd Augmented Human International Conference (2011), 27.
[21]
Kelder, T., Conklin, B. R., Evelo, C. T., and Pico, A. R. Finding the right questions: Exploratory pathway analysis to enhance biological discovery in large datasets. PLoS Biology 8 (2010), 11--12.
[22]
Khoshgoftaar, T. M., Golawala, M., and Hulse, J. V. An Empirical Study of Learning from Imbalanced Data Using Random Forest. 19th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence(ICTAI 2007) (Oct. 2007), 310--317.
[23]
Khoshgoftaar, T. M., Van Hulse, J., and Napolitano, A. Comparing boosting and bagging techniques with noisy and imbalanced data. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans 41 (2011), 552--568.
[24]
Kim, E., Helal, S., and Cook, D. Human Activity Recognition and Pattern Discovery. Pervasive Computing, IEEE 9 (2010), 48--53.
[25]
Klinger, R. Classical Probabilistic Models and Conditional Random Fields. Entropy 51 (2007), 282--289.
[26]
Kwapisz, J. R., Weiss, G. M., and Moore, S. A. Activity Recognition using Cell Phone Accelerometers. Human Factors 12 (2010), 74--82.
[27]
Lafferty, J., McCallum, A., and Pereira, F. C. N. Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. ICML '01 Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (2001), 282--289.
[28]
Lane, N. D., Miluzzo, E., Lu, H., Peebles, D., Choudhury, T., and Campbell, A. T. A survey of mobile phone sensing. IEEE Communications Magazine 48 (2010), 140--150.
[29]
Lemmens, L., Van Zelm, R., Vanhaecht, K., and Kerkkamp, H. Systematic review: Indicators to evaluate effectiveness of clinical pathways for gastrointestinal surgery, 2008.
[30]
Lymberopoulos, D., Bamis, A., and Savvides, A. Extracting spatiotemporal human activity patterns in assisted living using a home sensor network, 2011.
[31]
Mannini, A., and Sabatini, A. M. Machine learning methods for classifying human physical activity from on-body accelerometers. Sensors 10 (2010), 1154--1175.
[32]
McQueen, J. M. Segmentation of continuous speech using phonotactics. Journal of Memory and Language 39 (1998), 21--46.
[33]
Mohri, M., Moreno, P., and Weinstein, E. Discriminative Topic Segmentation of Text and Speech. Artificial Intelligence 9 (2010), 533--540.
[34]
Naya, F., Ohmura, R., Takayanagi, F., Noma, H., and Kogure, K. Workers' Routine Activity Recognition using Body Movements and Location Information. 2006 10th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers (2006), 105--108.
[35]
Nohara, Y., Sozo, I., Nakashima, N., Naonori, U., and Kitsuregawa, M. Large-scale Sensor Dataset in a Hospital. In International Workshop on Pattern Recognition for Healthcare Analytics (Tsukuba, Japan, 2012), 4 pages.
[36]
Osmani, V., Balasubramaniam, S., and Botvich, D. Human activity recognition in pervasive health-care: Supporting efficient remote collaboration. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 31, 4 (Nov. 2008), 628--655.
[37]
Panella, M., Marchisio, S., and Di Stanislao, F. Reducing clinical variations with clinical pathways: Do pathways work? International Journal for Quality in Health Care 15 (2003), 509--521.
[38]
Roggen, D., Calatroni, A., Rossi, M., Holleczek, T., Forster, K., Troster, G., Lukowicz, P., Bannach, D., Pirkl, G., Ferscha, A., Doppler, J., Holzmann, C., Kurz, M., Holl, G., Chavarriaga, R., Sagha, H., Bayati, H., Creatura, M., and Millan, J. d. R. Collecting complex activity datasets in highly rich networked sensor environments. Networked Sensing Systems (INSS), 2010 Seventh International Conference on (2010).
[39]
Roggen, D., Troster, G., Lukowicz, P., Ferscha, a., Millan, J. D. R., and Chavarriaga, R. Opportunistic human activity and context recognition. Computer 46 (2013), 36--45.
[40]
Rotter, T., Kinsman, L., James, E., Machotta, A., Gothe, H., Willis, J., Snow, P., and Kugler, J. Clinical pathways: effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay and hospital costs. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2010), CD006632.
[41]
Saraiya, P., North, C., and Duca, K. Visualizing biological pathways: requirements analysis, systems evaluation and research agenda. Information Visualization 4 (2005), 191--205.
[42]
Sun, X., Kashima, H., Tomioka, R., and Ueda, N. Large scale real-life action recognition using conditional random fields with stochastic training. Advances in Knowledge ... (2011), 222--233.
[43]
Tang, K., Wang, R., and Chen, T. Towards Maximizing the Area Under the ROC Curve for Multi-Class Classification Problems. AAAI, Elkan 2001 (2011), 483--488.
[44]
Tapia, E. M., Intille, S. S., Haskell, W., Larson, K., Wright, J., King, A., and Friedman, R. Real-time recognition of physical activities and their intensities using wireless accelerometers and a heart rate monitor. In Proceedings - International Symposium on Wearable Computers, ISWC (2007), 37--40.
[45]
Tentori, M., and Favela, J. Monitoring behavioral patterns in hospitals through activity-aware computing. In 2008 Second International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, IEEE (Jan. 2008), 173--176.
[46]
Vail, D., Veloso, M., and Lafferty, J. Conditional random fields for activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, vol. 5 (2007), 1--8.
[47]
Vail, D. L., Lafferty, J. D., and Veloso, M. M. Feature selection in conditional random fields for activity recognition. In 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (2007), 3379--3384.
[48]
Vinh, L. T., Lee, S., Le, H. X., Ngo, H. Q., Kim, H. I., Han, M., and Lee, Y. K. Semi-Markov conditional random fields for accelerometer-based activity recognition. Applied Intelligence 35 (2011), 226--241.
[49]
Wang, D., Lu, L., and Zhang, H.-J. Speech segmentation without speech recognition. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '03)., vol. 1 (2003), 468--471.
[50]
Ward, J. A., Lukowicz, P., Tröster, G., and Starner, T. E. Activity recognition of assembly tasks using body-worn microphones and accelerometers. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 28 (2006), 1553--1566.
[51]
Zhan, K., Faux, S., and Ramos, F. Multi-scale Conditional Random Fields for first-person activity recognition. Pervasive Computing and ... (2014).
[52]
Zhang, M., and Sawchuk, A. Motion primitive-based human activity recognition using a bag-of-features approach. Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGHIT ..., 1 (2012), 631.
[53]
Zhang, M., and Sawchuk, A. A. A feature selection-based framework for human activity recognition using wearable multimodal sensors. In Int. Conf. Body Area Networks (2011), 92--98.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Deep Learning Models for NEAT Activity Detection on Smartwatch2023 IEEE Smart World Congress (SWC)10.1109/SWC57546.2023.10449263(1-6)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2023
  • (2022)Cost Efficient Sensor Positions Determination For Human Activity RecognitionIEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing10.1109/TSUSC.2021.31014947:1(125-134)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
  • (2022)Wearable activity recognition for robust human-robot teaming in safety-critical environments via hybrid neural networks2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)10.1109/IROS40897.2019.8968615(449-454)Online publication date: 28-Dec-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Mobile activity recognition for a whole day: recognizing real nursing activities with big dataset

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    UbiComp '15: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing
    September 2015
    1302 pages
    ISBN:9781450335744
    DOI:10.1145/2750858
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 07 September 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. dataset
    2. domain-specific activity recognition
    3. mobile activity recognition
    4. nursing activity

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

    Conference

    UbiComp '15
    Sponsor:
    • Yahoo! Japan
    • SIGMOBILE
    • FX Palo Alto Laboratory, Inc.
    • ACM
    • Rakuten Institute of Technology
    • Microsoft
    • Bell Labs
    • SIGCHI
    • Panasonic
    • Telefónica
    • ISTC-PC

    Acceptance Rates

    UbiComp '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 101 of 394 submissions, 26%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 764 of 2,912 submissions, 26%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 23 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Deep Learning Models for NEAT Activity Detection on Smartwatch2023 IEEE Smart World Congress (SWC)10.1109/SWC57546.2023.10449263(1-6)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2023
    • (2022)Cost Efficient Sensor Positions Determination For Human Activity RecognitionIEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing10.1109/TSUSC.2021.31014947:1(125-134)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
    • (2022)Wearable activity recognition for robust human-robot teaming in safety-critical environments via hybrid neural networks2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)10.1109/IROS40897.2019.8968615(449-454)Online publication date: 28-Dec-2022
    • (2022)Attempts Toward Behavior Recognition of the Asian Black Bears Using an AccelerometerSensor- and Video-Based Activity and Behavior Computing10.1007/978-981-19-0361-8_4(57-79)Online publication date: 4-May-2022
    • (2022)Using LUPI to Improve Complex Activity RecognitionSensor- and Video-Based Activity and Behavior Computing10.1007/978-981-19-0361-8_3(39-55)Online publication date: 4-May-2022
    • (2021)Introducing VTT-ConIot: A Realistic Dataset for Activity Recognition of Construction Workers Using IMU DevicesSustainability10.3390/su1401022014:1(220)Online publication date: 26-Dec-2021
    • (2021)Summary of the Third Nurse Care Activity Recognition Challenge - Can We Do from the Field Data?Adjunct Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers10.1145/3460418.3479391(428-433)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2021
    • (2021)Analysis of Feature Importances for Automatic Generation of Care RecordsAdjunct Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers10.1145/3460418.3479354(316-321)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2021
    • (2021)NEAT Activity Detection using Smartwatch at Low Sampling Frequency2021 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced & Trusted Computing, Scalable Computing & Communications, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/IOP/SCI)10.1109/SWC50871.2021.00014(25-32)Online publication date: Oct-2021
    • (2020)A Framework of Combining Short-Term Spatial/Frequency Feature Extraction and Long-Term IndRNN for Activity RecognitionSensors10.3390/s2023698420:23(6984)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2020
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media