research-article

SparkBench: a comprehensive benchmarking suite for in memory data analytic platform Spark

Authors:

Valentina SalapuraAuthors Info & Claims

CF '15: Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers

Article No.: 53, Pages 1 - 8

https://doi.org/10.1145/2742854.2747283

Published: 06 May 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Spark has been increasingly adopted by industries in recent years for big data analysis by providing a fault tolerant, scalable and easy-to-use in memory abstraction. Moreover, the community has been actively developing a rich ecosystem around Spark, making it even more attractive. However, there is not yet a Spark specify benchmark existing in the literature to guide the development and cluster deployment of Spark to better fit resource demands of user applications. In this paper, we present SparkBench, a Spark specific benchmarking suite, which includes a comprehensive set of applications. SparkBench covers four main categories of applications, including machine learning, graph computation, SQL query and streaming applications. We also characterize the resource consumption, data flow and timing information of each application and evaluate the performance impact of a key configuration parameter to guide the design and optimization of Spark data analytic platform.

References

[1]

TPC-DS. http://www.tpc.org/tpcds/, 2014.

[2]

TPC-H. http://www.tpc.org/tpch/, 2014.

[3]

AMPLab. Big Data Benchmark. https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/benchmark/, 2013.

[4]

Apache. Spark. http://spark.apache.org/.

[5]

Apache. GridMix. http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/r1.2.1/gridmix.html, 2013.

[6]

Apache. PigMix. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/PIG/PigMix, 2013.

[7]

T. G. Armstrong, V. Ponnekanti, D. Borthakur, and M. Callaghan. Linkbench: A database benchmark based on the facebook social graph. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGMOD, pages 1185--1196.

Digital Library

[8]

C. Avery. Giraph: Large-scale graph processing infrastructure on hadoop. Proceedings of the Hadoop Summit. Santa Clara, 2011.

[9]

B. F. Cooper, A. Silberstein, E. Tam, R. Ramakrishnan, and R. Sears. Benchmarking cloud serving systems with ycsb. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SOCC, pages 143--154, 2010.

Digital Library

[10]

J. Dean and S. Ghemawat. Mapreduce: Simplified data processing on large clusters. Commun. ACM, 51(1): 107--113, Jan. 2008.

Digital Library

[11]

FaceBook. Social Network Graph. http://snap.stanford.edu/data/egonets-Facebook.html.

[12]

M. Ferdman, A. Adileh, O. Kocberber, S. Volos, M. Alisafaee, D. Jevdjic, C. Kaynak, A. D. Popescu, A. Ailamaki, and B. Falsafi. Clearing the clouds: A study of emerging scale-out workloads on modern hardware. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM ASPLOS, pages 37--48, New York, NY, USA, 2012.

Digital Library

[13]

A. Ghazal, T. Rabl, M. Hu, F. Raab, M. Poess, A. Crolotte, and H.-A. Jacobsen. Bigbench: Towards an industry standard benchmark for big data analytics. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGMOD, pages 1197--1208, 2013.

Digital Library

[14]

Y. Hu, Y. Koren, and C. Volinsky. Collaborative filtering for implicit feedback datasets. In Proceedings of the Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pages 263--272. IEEE, 2008.

Digital Library

[15]

S. Huang, J. Huang, J. Dai, T. Xie, and B. Huang. The hibench benchmark suite: Characterization of the mapreduce-based data analysis. In 26th IEEE ICDEW, pages 41--51, March 2010.

[16]

IBM. Big Data and Analytics Hub. http://www.ibmbigdatahub.com/infographic/four-vs-big-data.

[17]

IBM. SoftLayer. http://www.softlayer.com/.

[18]

G. James, D. Witten, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. An introduction to statistical learning. Springer, 2013.

[19]

M. N. Kolountzakis, G. L. Miller, R. Peng, and C. E. Tsourakakis. Efficient triangle counting in large graphs via degree-based vertex partitioning. Internet Mathematics, 8(1--2): 161--185, 2012.

[20]

Y. Koren. Factorization meets the neighborhood: A multifaceted collaborative filtering model. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD, pages 426--434, 2008.

Digital Library

[21]

M. Li, J. Tan, Y. Wang, L. Zhang, and V. Salapura. SparkBench: A Comprehensive Spark Benchmarking Suite. https://bitbucket.org/lm0926/sparkbench.

[22]

S. Neumann. Spark vs. Hadoop MapReduce. https://www.xplenty.com/blog/2014/11/apache-spark-vs-hadoop-mapreduce/.

[23]

C. Nyberg, M. Shah, and N. Govindaraju. Sort Benchmark. http://sortbenchmark.org/, 2014.

[24]

L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical Report 1999-66, Stanford InfoLab, November 1999.

[25]

A. Pavlo, E. Paulson, A. Rasin, D. J. Abadi, D. J. DeWitt, S. Madden, and M. Stonebraker. A comparison of approaches to large-scale data analysis. In Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGMOD, pages 165--178, New York, NY, USA.

Digital Library

[26]

Twitter. Twitter4j: a Java Library for the Twitter API. http://twitter4j.org.

[27]

L. Wang, J. Zhan, C. Luo, Y. Zhu, Q. Yang, Y. He, W. Gao, Z. Jia, Y. Shi, S. Zhang, C. Zheng, G. Lu, K. Zhan, X. Li, and B. Qiu. BigDataBench. http://prof.ict.ac.cn/BigDataBench/, 2014.

[28]

L. Wang, J. Zhan, C. Luo, Y. Zhu, Q. Yang, Y. He, W. Gao, Z. Jia, Y. Shi, S. Zhang, C. Zheng, G. Lu, K. Zhan, X. Li, and B. Qiu. Bigdatabench: A big data benchmark suite from internet services. In IEEE 20th HPCA, pages 488--499, Feb 2014.

[29]

Wikipedia. Data Dumps. http://dumps.wikimedia.org/enwiki/.

[30]

A. Woodie. Spark Smashes MapReduce in Big Data Benchmark. http://www.datanami.com/2014/10/10/spark-smashes-mapreduce-big-data-benchmark/.

[31]

W. Xiong, Z. Yu, Z. Bei, J. Zhao, F. Zhang, Y. Zou, X. Bai, Y. Li, and C. Xu. A characterization of big data benchmarks. In IEEE International Conference on Big Data, pages 118--125, Oct 2013.

[32]

M. Zaharia, M. Chowdhury, T. Das, A. Dave, J. Ma, M. McCauley, M. J. Franklin, S. Shenker, and I. Stoica. Resilient distributed datasets: A fault-tolerant abstraction for in-memory cluster computing. In Proceedings of the 9th USENIX NSDI, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2012.

Digital Library

Cited By

Siachamis GChristodoulou GPsarakis KFragkoulis Mvan Deursen AKatsifodimos A(2024)Evaluating Stream Processing AutoscalersProceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Distributed and Event-based Systems10.1145/3629104.3666036(110-122)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3629104.3666036
Song WEo JUm TJeon MChun B(2024)Blaze: Holistic Caching for Iterative Data ProcessingProceedings of the Nineteenth European Conference on Computer Systems10.1145/3627703.3629558(370-386)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3627703.3629558
Siachamis GPsarakis KFragkoulis Mvan Deursen ACarbone PKatsifodimos A(2024)CheckMate: Evaluating Checkpointing Protocols for Streaming Dataflows2024 IEEE 40th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE60146.2024.00309(4030-4043)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE60146.2024.00309
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

SparkBench: a comprehensive benchmarking suite for in memory data analytic platform Spark

Recommendations

BigBench: towards an industry standard benchmark for big data analytics
SIGMOD '13: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data

There is a tremendous interest in big data by academia, industry and a large user base. Several commercial and open source providers unleashed a variety of products to support big data storage and processing. As these products mature, there is a need to ...
SparkBench: a spark benchmarking suite characterizing large-scale in-memory data analytics

Spark has been increasingly employed by industries for big data analytics recently, due to its resilience, scalability and efficient in-memory distributed programming model. Meanwhile, the rapid growing community is also actively incubating a rich ...
Making sense of performance in in-memory computing frameworks for scientific data analysis: A case study of the spark system
Abstract
Over the last five years, Apache Spark has become a major software platform for in-memory data analysis. Acknowledging its widespread use, we present a comprehensive study of system characteristics of Spark targeting scientific data ...
Highlights
- We develop a benchmark, ArrayBench, for benchmarking scientific data analytics that process gene expression matrices using Spark and SciDB.

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CF '15: Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers

May 2015

413 pages

ISBN:9781450333580

DOI:10.1145/2742854

General Chairs:
Claudia Di Napoli
Istituto di Calcolo e Reti ad Alte Prestazioni, CNR, ITALY
,
Valentina Salapura
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
,
Program Chairs:
Hubertus Franke
IBM T.J.Watson Research Center
,
Rui Hou
Institute for Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PRC

Copyright © 2015 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGMICRO: ACM Special Interest Group on Microarchitectural Research and Processing

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 May 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

CF'15

Sponsor:

SIGMICRO

CF'15: Computing Frontiers Conference

May 18 - 21, 2015

Ischia, Italy

Acceptance Rates

CF '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 33 of 96 submissions, 34%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 273 of 785 submissions, 35%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

116
Total Citations
View Citations
2,428
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)77
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)13

Reflects downloads up to 29 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Siachamis GChristodoulou GPsarakis KFragkoulis Mvan Deursen AKatsifodimos A(2024)Evaluating Stream Processing AutoscalersProceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Distributed and Event-based Systems10.1145/3629104.3666036(110-122)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3629104.3666036
Song WEo JUm TJeon MChun B(2024)Blaze: Holistic Caching for Iterative Data ProcessingProceedings of the Nineteenth European Conference on Computer Systems10.1145/3627703.3629558(370-386)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3627703.3629558
Siachamis GPsarakis KFragkoulis Mvan Deursen ACarbone PKatsifodimos A(2024)CheckMate: Evaluating Checkpointing Protocols for Streaming Dataflows2024 IEEE 40th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE60146.2024.00309(4030-4043)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE60146.2024.00309
Henning SHasselbring W(2024)Benchmarking scalability of stream processing frameworks deployed as microservices in the cloudJournal of Systems and Software10.1016/j.jss.2023.111879208:COnline publication date: 1-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.jss.2023.111879
Ji MZhou MZou HTang MQian ZWang X(2023)SAC: Dynamic Caching upon Sketch for In-Memory Big Data Analytics2023 9th International Conference on Big Data Computing and Communications (BigCom)10.1109/BIGCOM61073.2023.00032(180-187)Online publication date: 4-Aug-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/BIGCOM61073.2023.00032
Wang MZhen JMa YHuang XZhang H(2023)SPOAHA: Spark Program Optimizer Based on Artificial Hummingbird AlgorithmKnowledge Science, Engineering and Management10.1007/978-3-031-40289-0_26(317-331)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40289-0_26
Symeonides MTrihinas DPallis GDikaiakos M(2023)SparkEdgeEmu: An Emulation Framework for Edge-Enabled Apache Spark DeploymentsEuro-Par 2023: Parallel Processing10.1007/978-3-031-39698-4_11(154-168)Online publication date: 24-Aug-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39698-4_11
Kocharyan AEkane BTeabe BTran GAstsatryan HHagimont D(2022)A Remote Memory Sharing System for Virtualized Computing InfrastructuresIEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing10.1109/TCC.2020.301808910:3(1532-1542)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/TCC.2020.3018089
Lattuada MBarbierato EGianniti EArdagna D(2022)Optimal Resource Allocation of Cloud-Based Spark ApplicationsIEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing10.1109/TCC.2020.298568210:2(1301-1316)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/TCC.2020.2985682
Yu YZhang CWang WZhang JLetaief K(2022)Towards Dependency-Aware Cache Management for Data Analytics ApplicationsIEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing10.1109/TCC.2019.294501510:1(706-723)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/TCC.2019.2945015
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents