Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2660114.2660126acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Modeling Image Appeal Based on Crowd Preferences for Automated Person-Centric Collage Creation

Published: 07 November 2014 Publication History

Abstract

This paper attempts to model IA in personal photo collections through a user-centric perspective. To understand how users deemed an image as being more/less appealing, an extensive crowdsourcing experiment was conducted with 350 workers and five different albums. The significant variance in selection probabilities for the most and least appealing images indicated that images were not selected randomly, and there were underlying factors that influenced some images to be selected more often than others. We then employed nine low level image attributes to model the image selection process, and trained SVRs which could adequately predict image selections for the album-specific conditions. However, a generic SVR failed to model the selection patterns as adequately as the album-specific SVRs suggesting that context greatly influences the categorization of what is more and less appealing. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach is promising. However, more attributes (related to image semantics) are needed to accurately model image selection characteristics.

References

[1]
Microworkers. https://microworkers.com/, 2014.
[2]
S. Bakhshi, D. A. Shamma, and E. Gilbert. Faces engage us: Photos with faces attract more likes and comments on instagram. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '14, pages 965--974, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM.
[3]
M. S. Bernstein, J. Brandt, R. C. Miller, and D. R. Karger. Crowds in two seconds: Enabling realtime crowd-powered interfaces. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST '11, pages 33--42, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.
[4]
C.-C. Chang and C.-J. Lin. Libsvm: a library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 27(2):1--27, 2004.
[5]
A. C. Gallagher and T. Chen. Clothing cosegmentation for recognizing people. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1--8, 2008.
[6]
S. Gilani, R. Subramanian, H. Hua, S. Winkler, and S.-C. Yen. Impact of image appeal on visual attention during photo triaging. In IEEE Int'l Conference Image Processing, pages 231--235, 2013.
[7]
D. Hasler and S. E. Susstrunk. Measuring colorfulness in natural images. In Proc. SPIE, pages 87--95, 2003.
[8]
T. Hossfeld, C. Keimel, M. Hirth, B. Gardlo, J. Habigt, K. Diepold, and P. Tran-Gia. Best practices for qoe crowdtesting: Qoe assessment with crowdsourcing. Multimedia, IEEE Transactions on, 16(2):541--558, Feb 2014.
[9]
A. Kornai. Mathematical Linguistics. Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing. Springer, 2008.
[10]
P. Obrador. Region based image appeal metric for consumer photos. In IEEE Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing, pages 696--701, 2008.
[11]
P. Obrador and N. Moroney. Low level features for image appeal measurement. pages 1--12, 2009.
[12]
D. Parikh and K. Grauman. Relative attributes. In Int'l Conference on Computer Vision, pages 503--510, 2011.
[13]
J. A. Redi, T. Hossfeld, P. Korshunov, F. Mazza, I. Povoa, and C. Keimel. Crowdsourcing-based multimedia subjective evaluations: A case study on image recognizability and aesthetic appeal. In Proceedings of the 2Nd ACM International Workshop on Crowdsourcing for Multimedia, CrowdMM '13, pages 29--34, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM.
[14]
S. Rudinac, M. Larson, and A. Hanjalic. Learning crowdsourced user preferences for visual summarization of image collections. Multimedia, IEEE Transactions on, 15(6):1231--1243, Oct 2013.
[15]
A. E. Savakis, S. P. Etz, and A. C. P. Loui. Evaluation of image appeal in consumer photography. In Proc. SPIE, volume 3959, pages 111--120, 2000.
[16]
P. Sinha, S. Mehrotra, and R. Jain. Summarization of personal photologs using multidimensional content and context. In ACM International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval, pages 4:1--4:8, 2011.
[17]
P. Viola and M. J. Jones. Robust real-time face detection. Int'l Journal of Computer Vision, 57(2):137--154, 2004.
[18]
V. Vonikakis, R. Subramanian, and S. Winkler. How do users make a people-centric slideshow? In ACM Int'l Workshop on Crowdsourcing for Multimedia, pages 13--14, 2013.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The State of Pilot Study Reporting in Crowdsourcing: A Reflection on Best Practices and GuidelinesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36410238:CSCW1(1-45)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2023)Towards Effective Crowd-Assisted Similarity Retrieval of Large Cursive Chinese Calligraphic Character ImagesProceedings of the 2023 4th International Conference on Computing, Networks and Internet of Things10.1145/3603781.3603853(403-409)Online publication date: 26-May-2023
  • (2022)User Interface Evaluation of Design Alternatives of the Emotion-Libras—An Emotional Self-Report Instrument for Sign Language UsersInteracting with Computers10.1093/iwc/iwac01835:2(142-152)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CrowdMM '14: Proceedings of the 2014 International ACM Workshop on Crowdsourcing for Multimedia
November 2014
84 pages
ISBN:9781450331289
DOI:10.1145/2660114
  • General Chairs:
  • Judith Redi,
  • Mathias Lux
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 November 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. collage synthesis
  2. crowdsourcing
  3. image appeal
  4. modeling

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

MM '14
Sponsor:
MM '14: 2014 ACM Multimedia Conference
November 7, 2014
Florida, Orlando, USA

Acceptance Rates

CrowdMM '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 8 of 26 submissions, 31%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 16 of 42 submissions, 38%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 22 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The State of Pilot Study Reporting in Crowdsourcing: A Reflection on Best Practices and GuidelinesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36410238:CSCW1(1-45)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2023)Towards Effective Crowd-Assisted Similarity Retrieval of Large Cursive Chinese Calligraphic Character ImagesProceedings of the 2023 4th International Conference on Computing, Networks and Internet of Things10.1145/3603781.3603853(403-409)Online publication date: 26-May-2023
  • (2022)User Interface Evaluation of Design Alternatives of the Emotion-Libras—An Emotional Self-Report Instrument for Sign Language UsersInteracting with Computers10.1093/iwc/iwac01835:2(142-152)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2022
  • (2020)Effective and efficient crowd-assisted similarity retrieval of medical images in resource-constraint Mobile telemedicine systemsMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-020-08755-3Online publication date: 31-Mar-2020
  • (2017)A Probabilistic Approach to People-Centric Photo Selection and SequencingIEEE Transactions on Multimedia10.1109/TMM.2017.269985919:11(2609-2624)Online publication date: Nov-2017
  • (2016)Subtle consumer-photo quality evaluation2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)10.1109/ICIP.2016.7533066(3778-3782)Online publication date: Sep-2016
  • (2016)Shaping datasets: Optimal data selection for specific target distributions across dimensions2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)10.1109/ICIP.2016.7533061(3753-3757)Online publication date: Sep-2016

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media