research-article

Titan: a toolset that connects software architecture with quality analysis

Authors:

Lu Xiao,

Yuanfang Cai,

Rick KazmanAuthors Info & Claims

FSE 2014: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering

Pages 763 - 766

https://doi.org/10.1145/2635868.2661677

Published: 11 November 2014 Publication History

Get Access

Abstract

In this tool demo, we will illustrate our tool---Titan---that supports a new architecture model: design rule spaces (DRSpaces). We will show how Titan can capture both architecture and evolutionary structure and help to bridge the gap between architecture and defect prediction. We will demo how to use our toolset to capture hundreds of buggy files into just a few architecturally related groups, and to reveal architecture issues that contribute to the error-proneness and change-proneness of these groups. Our tool has been used to analyze dozens of large-scale industrial projects, and has demonstrated its ability to provide valuable direction on which parts of the architecture are problematic, and on why, when, and how to refactor. The video demo of Titan can be found at https://art.cs.drexel.edu/~lx52/titan.mp4

References

[1]

C. Y. Baldwin and K. B. Clark. Design Rules, Vol. 1: The Power of Modularity. MIT Press, 2000.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[2]

M. Gethers and D. Poshyvanyk. Using relational topic models to capture coupling amoung classes in object-oriented software systems. In Proc. 26th ICSM, pages 1–10, Sept. 2010.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[3]

N. Nagappan and T. Ball. Use of relative code churn measures to predict system defect density. In Proc. 27th ICSE, pages 284–292, May 2005.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[4]

N. Nagappan, T. Ball, and A. Zeller. Mining metrics to predict component failures. pages 452–461, 2006.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[5]

T. J. Ostrand, E. J. Weyuker, and R. M. Bell. Predicting the location and number of faults in large software systems. TSE, 31(4):340–355, 2005.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[6]

N. Sangal, E. Jordan, V. Sinha, and D. Jackson. Using dependency models to manage complex software architecture. In Proc. 20th OOPSLA, pages 167–176, Oct. 2005.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[7]

R. Schwanke, L. Xiao, and Y. Cai. Measuring architecture quality by structure plus history analysis. In Proc. 35rd ICSE, pages 891–900, May 2013.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[8]

V. Tzerpos and R. C. Holt. ACDC: An algorithm for comprehension-driven clustering. In Proc. 7th WCRE, pages 258–267, Nov. 2000.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[9]

S. Wong and Y. Cai. Improving the efficiency of dependency analysis in logical models. In Proc. 24th ASE, pages 173–184, Nov. 2009.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[10]

S. Wong, Y. Cai, M. Kim, and M. Dalton. Detecting software modularity violations. In Proc. 33rd ICSE, pages 411–420, May 2011.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[11]

S. Wong, Y. Cai, G. Valetto, G. Simeonov, and K. Sethi. Design rule hierarchies and parallelism in software development tasks. In Proc. 24th ASE, pages 197–208, Nov. 2009.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[12]

L. Xiao, Y. Cai, and R. Kazman. Design rule spaces: A new form of architecture insight. In Proc. 36rd ICSE, pages 967–977.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Fang HCai YKazman RLefever J(2023)Identifying Anti-Patterns in Distributed Systems With Heterogeneous Dependencies2023 IEEE 20th International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C)10.1109/ICSA-C57050.2023.00035(116-120)Online publication date: Mar-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSA-C57050.2023.00035
Yapici HSözer H(2023)Coevolution Index: A Metric for Tracking Evolutionary Coupling2023 IEEE 47th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)10.1109/COMPSAC57700.2023.00244(1582-1587)Online publication date: Jun-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC57700.2023.00244
Parker GKim SMaruf ACerny TFrajtak KTisnovsky PTaibi D(2023)Visualizing Anti-Patterns in Microservices at Runtime: A Systematic Mapping StudyIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.323616511(4434-4442)Online publication date: 2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3236165
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Titan: a toolset that connects software architecture with quality analysis
1. Software and its engineering
  1. Software creation and management
    1. Designing software

Recommendations

Experiences applying automated architecture analysis tool suites
ASE '18: Proceedings of the 33rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering

In this paper, we report our experiences of applying three complementary automated software architecture analysis techniques, supported by a tool suite, called DV8, to 8 industrial projects within a large company. DV8 includes two state-of-the-art ...
Understanding the architecture of software systems
WPC '96: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Program Comprehension (WPC '96)

The first activity performed by maintenance programmers when approaching the task of understanding a system is often trying to discover its high level structure, that is identifying its subsystems and their relations: in few words, the software ...
Quantifying software architecture quality report on the first international workshop on software architecture metrics

Architects of complex software systems face the challenge of how best to assess the achievement of quality attributes and other key drivers, how to reveal issues and risks early, and how to make decisions about architecture improvement. Software ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

FSE 2014: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering

November 2014

856 pages

ISBN:9781450330565

DOI:10.1145/2635868

General Chair:
Shing-Chi Cheung
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, China
,
Program Chairs:
Alessandro Orso
Georgia Institute of Technology, USA
,
Margaret-Anne Storey
University of Victoria, Canada

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 November 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

SIGSOFT/FSE'14

Sponsor:

SIGSOFT

SIGSOFT/FSE'14: 22nd ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering

November 16 - 21, 2014

Hong Kong, China

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 17 of 128 submissions, 13%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

44
Total Citations
View Citations
529
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)7
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

Reflects downloads up to 20 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Fang HCai YKazman RLefever J(2023)Identifying Anti-Patterns in Distributed Systems With Heterogeneous Dependencies2023 IEEE 20th International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C)10.1109/ICSA-C57050.2023.00035(116-120)Online publication date: Mar-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSA-C57050.2023.00035
Yapici HSözer H(2023)Coevolution Index: A Metric for Tracking Evolutionary Coupling2023 IEEE 47th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)10.1109/COMPSAC57700.2023.00244(1582-1587)Online publication date: Jun-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC57700.2023.00244
Parker GKim SMaruf ACerny TFrajtak KTisnovsky PTaibi D(2023)Visualizing Anti-Patterns in Microservices at Runtime: A Systematic Mapping StudyIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.323616511(4434-4442)Online publication date: 2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3236165
Cai YKazman R(2023)Software design analysis and technical debt management based on design rule theoryInformation and Software Technology10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107322164(107322)Online publication date: Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107322
Cui DLi XLiu FWang SDai JWang LLi Q(2022)Towards Demystifying the Impact of Dependency Structures on Bug Locations in Deep Learning LibrariesProceedings of the 16th ACM / IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement10.1145/3544902.3546246(249-260)Online publication date: 19-Sep-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544902.3546246
Abid CGaaloul KKessentini MAlizadeh V(2022)What Refactoring Topics Do Developers Discuss? A Large Scale Empirical Study Using Stack OverflowIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2021.314003610(56362-56374)Online publication date: 2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3140036
Laser MMinh Le DGarcia JMedvidovic N(2021)Architectural Archipelagos: Technical Debt in Long-Lived Software Research Platforms2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt)10.1109/TechDebt52882.2021.00019(94-98)Online publication date: May-2021
https://doi.org/10.1109/TechDebt52882.2021.00019
Garcia JMirakhorli MXiao LZhao YMujhid IPham KOkutan AMalek SKazman RCai YMedvidovic N(2021)Constructing a Shared Infrastructure for Software Architecture Analysis and Maintenance2021 IEEE 18th International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA)10.1109/ICSA51549.2021.00022(150-161)Online publication date: Mar-2021
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSA51549.2021.00022
Cai YKazman RRothermel GBae D(2020)Software development data for architecture analysisProceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice10.1145/3377813.3381357(231-232)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3377813.3381357
Zhao YXiao LWang XSun LChen BLiu YBondi AAmaral JKoziolek ATrubiani CIosup A(2020)How Are Performance Issues Caused and Resolved?-An Empirical Study from a Design PerspectiveProceedings of the ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering10.1145/3358960.3379130(181-192)Online publication date: 20-Apr-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3358960.3379130
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Experiences applying automated architecture analysis tool suites

Understanding the architecture of software systems

Quantifying software architecture quality report on the first international workshop on software architecture metrics