research-article

Mulsemedia: State of the Art, Perspectives, and Challenges

Authors:

Gheorghita Ghinea,

Christian Timmerer,

Stephen R. GulliverAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM), Volume 11, Issue 1s

Article No.: 17, Pages 1 - 23

https://doi.org/10.1145/2617994

Published: 01 October 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Mulsemedia—multiple sensorial media—captures a wide variety of research efforts and applications. This article presents a historic perspective on mulsemedia work and reviews current developments in the area. These take place across the traditional multimedia spectrum—from virtual reality applications to computer games—as well as efforts in the arts, gastronomy, and therapy, to mention a few. We also describe standardization efforts, via the MPEG-V standard, and identify future developments and exciting challenges the community needs to overcome.

Supplementary Material

a17-ghinea-apndx.pdf (ghinea.zip)

Supplemental movie, appendix, image and software files for, Mulsemedia: State of the Art, Perspectives, and Challenges

Download
40.60 KB

References

[1]

E. Aarts and B. de Ruyter. 2009. New research perspectives on ambient intelligence. J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ. 1, 1, 5--14.

Digital Library

[2]

O. Ademoye and G. Ghinea. 2009. Synchronization of olfaction-enhanced multimedia. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 11, 3, 561--565.

Digital Library

[3]

J. R. Anderson. 2004. Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications 6th Ed. Worth Publishers.

[4]

J. G. Apostolopoulos, P. A. Chou, B. Culbertson, T. Kalker, M. D. Trott, and S. Wee. 2012. The road to immersive communication. Proc. IEEE 100, 4, 974--990.

[5]

S. Ayabe--Kanamura, I. Schicker, M. Laska, R. Hudson, H. Distel, T. Koboyakawa, and S. Saito. 1998. A Japanese-German cross-cultural study. Chem. Sens., 23, 1, 31--38.

[6]

A. Bodnar, R. Corbett, and D. Nekrasovski. 2004. AROMA: Ambient awareness through olfaction in a messaging application: Does olfactory notification make ‘scents’&quest; In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI'04). 183--190.

Digital Library

[7]

S. Boyd-Davis, G. Davies, R. Haddad, and M. Lai. 2006. Smell Me: Engaging with an interactive olfactory game. In Proceedings 25th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 25--40.

[8]

S. A. Brewster, D. K. Mcgookin, and C. A. Miller. 2006. Olfoto: Designing a smell-based interaction. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 653--662.

Digital Library

[9]

D. Campbell, E. Jones, and M. Glavin. 2009. Audio quality assessment techniques—A review, and recent developments. Signal Process., 89, 8, 1489--1500.

Digital Library

[10]

C.-C. Carbon and M. Jakesch. 2013. A model for haptic aesthetic processing and its implications for design. Proc. IEEE. 101, 9, 2123--2133.

[11]

J. P. Cater. 1992. The nose have it&excl; Letters to the editor. Presence 1, 4, 493--494.

[12]

A. Chang and C. O'Sullivan. 2005. Audio-haptic feedback in mobile phones. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA'05). ACM, New York, NY, 2005, 1264--1267.

Digital Library

[13]

A. D. Craig. 2003. Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Curr. Opinion Neurobiol. 13, 4, 500--505.

[14]

A. R. Damasio. 1989. Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: A systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition 33, 1--2, 25--62.

[15]

B. de Ruyter and E. Aarts. 2004. Ambient intelligence: Visualizing the future. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI'04). ACM Press, New York, NY, 203--208.

Digital Library

[16]

P. Dimaggio. 1997. Culture and cognition. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 23, 263--287.

[17]

H. Q. Dinh, N. Walker, L. F. Hodges, C. Song, and A. Kobayashi. 1999. Evaluating the importance of multi-sensory input on memory and the sense of presence in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium. 222--228.

Digital Library

[18]

C. Fadel and C. Lemke. 2008. Multimodal learning through media: What the research says. CISCO Systems Report.

[19]

G. Ghinea and O. Ademoye. 2010a. Perceived synchronization of olfactory multimedia. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet.-Part A 40, 4, 657--663.

Digital Library

[20]

G. Ghinea and O. Ademoye. 2010b. A user perspective of olfaction-enhanced mulsemedia. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems (MEDES'10). 277--280.

Digital Library

[21]

G. Ghinea and O. Ademoye. 2011. Olfaction-enhanced multimedia: Perspectives and challenges. Multimedia Tools Appl. 55, 3, 601--626.

Digital Library

[22]

G. Ghinea and O. Ademoye. 2012. The sweet smell of success: Enhancing multimedia applications with olfaction. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 8, 1, 2.

Digital Library

[23]

E. B. Goldstein. 2013. Sensation and Perception. Cengage Learning.

[24]

R. Gray, C. Spence, C. Ho, and H. Z. Tan. 2013. Efficient multimodal cuing of spatial attention Proc. IEEE 101, 9, 2113--2121.

[25]

M. Grega, L. Janowski, M. Leszczuk, P. Romaniak, and Z. Papir. 2008. Quality of experience evaluation for multimedia services - Szacowanie postrzeganej jako sci uslug (QoE) komunikacji multimedialnej. Przegla d Telekomunika- cyjny 81, 4, 142--153.

[26]

S. Gumtau. 2011. Affordances of touch in multisensory embodied interface design. Ph.D., Dissertation University of Portsmouth, U.K.

[27]

D. Hands. 2004. A basic multimedia quality model. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 6, 6, 806--816.

Digital Library

[28]

M. L. Heilig. 1962. Sensorama simulator. United States Patent 3,050,870. Filed January 10, 1961, Patented August 28, 1962.

[29]

P. Hinterseer and E. Steinbach. 2006. A psychophysically motivated compression approach for 3D haptic data. In Proceedings of the 14th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. 35--41.

Digital Library

[30]

C. Ho and C. Spence. 2005. Olfactory facilitation of dual-task performance. Neurosci. Lett. 389, 1, 35--40.

[31]

T. Hoß feld, D. Hock, P. Tran-Gia, K. Tutschku, and M. Fiedler. 2008. Testing the IQX hypothesis for exponential interdependency between QoS and QoE of voice codecs iLBC and G.711. In Proceedings of the 18th ITC Specialist Seminar on Quality of Experience.

[32]

Y. Ishibashi, T. Kanbara, and S. Tasaka. 2004. Inter-stream synchronization between haptic media and voice in collaborative virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia. ACM, New York, NY, 604--611.

Digital Library

[33]

L. Itti, C. Koch, and E. Niebur. 1998. A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 20, 11, 1254-9.

Digital Library

[34]

ITU. 2008a. Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications. ITU-T Rec. P.910.

[35]

ITU. 2008b. Subjective audiovisual quality assessment methods for multimedia applications. ITU-T Rec. P.911.

[36]

R. Jain. 2003. Experiential computing. Commun. ACM 46, 7, 48--55.

Digital Library

[37]

N. Jayant, J. Johnston, and R. Safranek. 1993. Signal compression based on models of human perception. Proc. IEEE 81, 10, 1385--1422.

[38]

L. Jones, C. A. Bowers, D. Washburn, A. Cortes, and R. V. Satya. 2004. The effect of olfaction on immersion into virtual environments. In Human Performance, Situation Awareness and Automation: Issues and Considerations for the 21st Century. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 282--285.

[39]

K. Kahol, P. Tripathi, T. Mcdaniel, L. Bratton, and S. Panchanathan. 2006. Modeling context in haptic perception, rendering, and visualization. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 2, 3, 219--240.

Digital Library

[40]

J. Kammerl, I. Vittorias, V. Nitsch, B. Faerber, E. Steinbach, and S. Hirche. 2010. Perception-based data reduction for haptic force-feedback signals using adaptive deadbands. Presence, Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 19, 5, 450--462.

Digital Library

[41]

D. Kahneman. 2003. A perspective on judgement and choice. Am. Psychol. 58, 9, 697--720.

[42]

J. N. Kaye. 2001. Symbolic olfactory display. Master's Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MA. http://www.media.mit.edu/&sim;jofish/thesis/.

[43]

H. Kim, H.-J. Kwon, and K.-S. Hong. 2010. Location awareness-based intelligent multi-agent technology. Multimedia Syst. 16, (4--5), 275--292.

[44]

R. L. Klatzky, D. Pawluk, and A. Peer. 2013. Haptic perception of material properties and implications for applications. Proc. IEEE 101, 9, 2081--2092.

[45]

P. Le Callet, S. Möller, and A. Perkis. (Eds). 2013. Qualinet white paper on definitions of quality of experience. White paper, European Network on Quality of Experience in Multimedia Systems and Services (COST Action IC 1003). Lausanne, Switzerland, Version 1.2.

[46]

W. Lin. 2006. Computational models for just-noticeable difference. In Digital Video Image Quality and Perceptual Coding, H. R. Wu and K. R. Rao, (Eds.), CRC Press, Chapter 9.

[47]

W. Lin and C.-C. Jay Kuo. 2011. Perceptual visual quality metrics: A survey. J. Visual Commun. Image Represent. 22, 4, 297--312.

Digital Library

[48]

K. Liu and S. R. Gulliver. 2013. Semiotics in building space for working and living. In Intelligent Building: Design, Management and Operation, D. Clements-Croome, (Ed.), ICE Publishing.

[49]

Z. Lu, W. Lin, X. Yang, E. Ong, and S. Yao. 2005. Modeling visual attention's modulatory aftereffects on visual sensitivity and quality evaluation. IEEE Trans. Image Process., 14, 11, 1928--1942.

Digital Library

[50]

Y.-F. Ma, X.-S. Hua, L. Lu, and H.-J. Zhang. 2005. A generic framework of user attention model and its application in video summarization. IEEE Trans. Multimedia. 7, 5, 907--919.

Digital Library

[51]

R. E. Mayer. 2003. Elements of a science of e-learning. J. Edu. Comput. Res. 29, 3, 297--313.

[52]

B. S. Manjunath, P. Salembier, and T. Sikora. 2002. Introduction to MPEG-7: Multimedia Content Description Interface. John Wiley 8. Sons Inc.

Digital Library

[53]

R. Marois and J. Ivanoff. 2005. Capacity limits of information processing in the brain. Trends Cognitive Sci., 9, 6, 296--305.

[54]

T. Metzinger. 1995. Faster than thought: Holism, homogeneity and temporal coding. In Conscious Experience T. Metzinger (Ed.), Imprint Academic, 425--461.

[55]

A. Mochizuki, T. Amada, S. Sawa, T. Takeda, S. Motoyashiki, K. Kohyama, M. Imura, and K. Chihara. 2004. Fragra: A visual-olfactory VR game. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH (SIGGRAPH'04). ACM Press, New York, NY, 123.

Digital Library

[56]

S. Möller, W.-Y. Chan, N. Côté, T. H. Falk, A. Raake, and M. Wältermann. 2011. Speech quality estimation: Models and trends. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 28, 6, 18--28.

[57]

G. Morrot, F. Brochet, and D. Dubourdieu. 2001. The color of odors. Brain Lang. 79, 2, 309--320.

[58]

M. Narwaria and W. Lin. 2012. SVD-based quality metric for image and video using machine learning. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. Part B 42, 2, 347--364.

Digital Library

[59]

M. Narwaria, W. Lin, I. Mcloughlin, S. Emmanue, and L. T. Chia. 2012. Nonintrusive quality assessment of noise suppressed speech with mel-filtered energies and support vector regression. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 20, 4, 1217--1232.

Digital Library

[60]

T. Nakamoto, S. Otaguro, M. Kinoshita, M. Nagahama, K. Ohinishi, and T. Ishida. 2008. Cooking up an interactive olfactory game display. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 28, 1, 75--78.

Digital Library

[61]

H.-C. Nothdurft. 2000. Salience from feature contrast: Additivity across dimensions. Vis. Res. 40, 10--12, 1183--1201.

[62]

M. A. Otaduy, C. Garre, and M. C. Lin. 2013. Representations and algorithms for force-feedback display. Proc. IEEE 101, 9, 2068--2080.

[63]

F. Pereira. 2005. A triple user characterization model for video adaptation and quality of experience evaluation. In Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing. 1--4.

[64]

S. Pyo, S. Joo, B. Choi, M. Kim, and J. Kim. 2008. A metadata schema design on representation of sensory effect information for sensible media and its service framework using UPnP. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT'08). 1129--1134.

[65]

B. Rainer, M. Waltl, E. Cheng, M. Shujau, C. Timmerer, S. Davis, I. Burnett, C. Ritz, and H. Hellwagner. 2012. Investigating the impact of sensory effects on the quality of experience and emotional response in Web videos. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX'12). IEEE, 278--283.

[66]

E. Reinhard, A. A. Efros, J. Kautz, and H.-P. Seidel. 2013. On visual realism of synthesized imagery. Proc. IEEE 101, 9, 1998--2007.

[67]

A. Revonsuo. 1999. Binding and the phenomenal unity of consciousness. Consciou. Cognition 8, 2, 173--185.

[68]

G. Richard, S. Sundaram, and S. Narayanan. 2013. An overview on perceptually motivated audio indexing and classification. Proc. IEEE 101, 9, 1939--1954.

[69]

L. A. Rowe and R. Jain. 2005. ACM SIGMM retreat report on future directions in multimedia research. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 1, 1, 3--13.

Digital Library

[70]

J. S. Rubinstein, D. E. Meyer, and J. E. Evans. 2001. Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. J. Exp. Psychol. Human Percep. Perform. 27, 4, 763.

[71]

N. Sarter. 2013. Multimodal support for interruption management: Models, empirical findings, and design recommendations. Proc. IEEE 101, 9, 2105--2112.

[72]

P. H. Schiller. 1986. The central visual system. Vision Res. 26, 9, 1351--1386.

[73]

C. Seungmoon and K. J. Kuchenbecker. 2013. Vibrotactile display: Perception, technology, and applications. Proc. IEEE 101, 9, 2093--2104.

[74]

J. R. Smythies. 1994a. The Walls of Plato's cave. Avebury.

[75]

J. R. Smythies. 1994b. Requiem for the identity theory. Inquiry 37, 311--329.

[76]

R. K. Stamper. 1973. Information in Business and Administrative Systems. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Digital Library

[77]

E. Steinbach, S. Hirche, M. Ernst, F. Brandi, R. Chaudhari, J. Kammerl, and I. Vittorias. 2012. Haptic communications. Proc. IEEE 100, 4, 937--956.

[78]

C. B. Suk, J. S. Hyun, and L. H. Yong. 2009. Sensory effect metadata for SMMD media service. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services. IEEE Computer Society, 649--654.

Digital Library

[79]

ISO. 2011. ISO/IEC 23005-3 FDIS Information technology—Media context and control—Part 3: Sensory information. ISO.

[80]

C. Timmerer, M. Waltl, B. Rainer, and H. Hellwagner. 2012. Assessing the quality of sensory experience for multimedia presentations. Signal Process. Image Commun. 27, 8, 909--916.

Digital Library

[81]

R. Tortell, D. P. Luigi, A. Dozois, S. Bouchard, J. F. Morie, and D. Ilan. 2007. The effects of scent and game play experience on memory of a virtual environment. VirtualReality 11, 1, 61--68.

Digital Library

[82]

A. Vetro and C. Timmerer. 2005. Digital item adaptation: Overview of standardization and research activities. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 7, 3, 418--426.

Digital Library

[83]

M. Waltl, C. Timmerer, B. Rainer, and H. Hellwagner. 2012. Sensory effect dataset and test setups. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX'12). IEEE, 115--120.

[84]

M. Waltl, B. Rainer, C. Timmerer, and H. Hellwagner. 2013. An end-to-end tool chain for sensory experience based on MPEG-V Signal Process. Image Commun. 28, 2, 136--150.

Digital Library

[85]

A. Williams, S. Langron, and A. Noble. 1984. Influence of appearance on the assessment of aroma in Bordeaux wines by trained assessors. J. Institute Brew. 90, 250--253.

[86]

H. R. Wu, A. Reibman, W. Lin, F. Pereira, and S. S. Hemami. 2013. Perceptual visual signal compression and transmission. Proc. IEEE 101, 9, 2025--2043.

[87]

X. Yang, W. Lin, Z. Lu, E. Ong, and S. Yao. 2005. Just noticeable distortion model and its applications in video coding. Signal Process. Image Commun. 20, 7, 662--680.

[88]

A. L. Yarbus. 1967. Eye movements during perception of complex objects. In Eye Movements and Vision. Springer, 171--211.

[89]

A. Yazdani, E. Kroupi, J. Vesin, and T. Ebrahimi. 2012. Electroencephalogram alterations during perception of pleasant and unpleasant odors. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX'12). IEEE, 272--277.

[90]

K. Yoon, B. Choi, E.-S. Lee, and T.-B. Lim. 2010. 4-D Broadcasting with MPEG-V. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP). 257--262.

[91]

J. You, U. Reiter, M. M. Hannuksela, M. Gabbouj, and A. Perkis. 2010. Perceptual-based quality assessment for audio-visual services: A survey. Signal Process. Image Commun. 25, 7, 482--501.

Digital Library

[92]

J. You, G. Liu, L. Sun, and H. Li. 2007. A multiple visual models based perceptive analysis framework for multilevel video summarization. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 17, 3, 273--285.

Digital Library

[93]

W. A. Yost and D. W. Nielsen. 1985. Fundamentals of Hearing. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

[94]

L. M. Zhang and W. Lin. 2013. Selective Visual Attention: Computational Models and Applications. John Wiley & Sons.

Digital Library

Cited By

Ivanov MMoreno MMuchaluat-Saade D(2024)Automatic Preparation of Sensory EffectsProceedings of the 15th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference10.1145/3625468.3647615(100-108)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3625468.3647615
Chen SHan BLiu Y(2024)Immersive Computing: What to Expect in a Decade?IEEE Internet Computing10.1109/MIC.2024.338880828:3(46-54)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/MIC.2024.3388808
Debabhuti NPrasetyawan DNakamoto T(2024)Droplet formation analysis for multi-component olfactory display using inkjet devices2024 IEEE International Symposium on Olfaction and Electronic Nose (ISOEN)10.1109/ISOEN61239.2024.10556128(1-3)Online publication date: 12-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ISOEN61239.2024.10556128
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Mulsemedia: State of the Art, Perspectives, and Challenges
1. Computing methodologies
  1. Artificial intelligence
    1. Philosophical/theoretical foundations of artificial intelligence
      1. Cognitive science
2. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. HCI design and evaluation methods

Recommendations

Is Multimedia Multisensorial? - A Review of Mulsemedia Systems

Mulsemedia—multiple sensorial media—makes possible the inclusion of layered sensory stimulation and interaction through multiple sensory channels. The recent upsurge in technology and wearables provides mulsemedia researchers a vehicle for potentially ...
Mulsemedia DIY: A Survey of Devices and a Tutorial for Building Your Own Mulsemedia Environment

Multisensory experiences have been increasingly applied in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). In recent years, it is commonplace to notice the development of haptic, olfactory, and even gustatory displays to create more immersive experiences. Companies ...
User Quality of Experience of Mulsemedia Applications
Special Issue on Multiple Sensorial (MulSeMedia) Multimodal Media : Advances and Applications

User Quality of Experience (QoE) is of fundamental importance in multimedia applications and has been extensively studied for decades. However, user QoE in the context of the emerging multiple-sensorial media (mulsemedia) services, which involve ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications

ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications Volume 11, Issue 1s

Special Issue on Multiple Sensorial (MulSeMedia) Multimodal Media : Advances and Applications

September 2014

260 pages

ISSN:1551-6857

EISSN:1551-6865

DOI:10.1145/2675060

Editors:
Ralf Steinmetz
Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany
,
Gheorghita Ghinea,
Christian Timmerer,
Weisi Lin,
Stephen Gulliver,
Zheng-Jun Zha
Institute of Intelligent Machines, Chinese Academy of Sciences
,
Lei Zhang
Bing Multimedia Search, Microsoft Corporation
,
Max Mühlhäuser
Department of Computer Science, Technische Universität Darmstadt
,
Alan F. Smeaton
Insight Centre for Data Analytics, Dublin City University

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2014 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 October 2014

Accepted: 01 April 2014

Revised: 01 March 2014

Received: 01 December 2013

Published in TOMM Volume 11, Issue 1s

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

119
Total Citations
View Citations
1,223
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)88
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11

Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Ivanov MMoreno MMuchaluat-Saade D(2024)Automatic Preparation of Sensory EffectsProceedings of the 15th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference10.1145/3625468.3647615(100-108)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3625468.3647615
Chen SHan BLiu Y(2024)Immersive Computing: What to Expect in a Decade?IEEE Internet Computing10.1109/MIC.2024.338880828:3(46-54)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/MIC.2024.3388808
Debabhuti NPrasetyawan DNakamoto T(2024)Droplet formation analysis for multi-component olfactory display using inkjet devices2024 IEEE International Symposium on Olfaction and Electronic Nose (ISOEN)10.1109/ISOEN61239.2024.10556128(1-3)Online publication date: 12-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ISOEN61239.2024.10556128
Muntean CTal IBogusevschi DBratu MBi TMuntean G(2024)Mulseplayer: A Multi-Sensorial Media Content Delivery Solution to Enhance End-User Quality of Experience2024 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB)10.1109/BMSB62888.2024.10608351(1-6)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/BMSB62888.2024.10608351
Murugan Mda Silveira ASubashini PGhinea GSantos C(2024)Technology-Enhanced Mulsemedia Learning (TEML) Through Design for Learners with Dyslexia for Enhancing the Quality of Experience (QoE)Envisioning the Future of Education Through Design10.1007/978-981-97-0076-9_10(221-243)Online publication date: 11-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0076-9_10
Debloos JJost CArchambault D(2024)Programming Learning Difficulties: How Can Naive Users Create Human-Machine Interaction Scenarios?Computers Helping People with Special Needs10.1007/978-3-031-62849-8_30(241-248)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-62849-8_30
Vieira RMuchaluat-Saade DCesar P(2024)Exploring Artificial Intelligence for Advancing Performance Processes and Events in Io3MTMultiMedia Modeling10.1007/978-3-031-53302-0_17(234-248)Online publication date: 29-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53302-0_17
Frisson CWanderley M(2023)Challenges and Opportunities of Force Feedback in MusicArts10.3390/arts1204014712:4(147)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
https://doi.org/10.3390/arts12040147
Abreu RMattos DSantos JGuinea GMuchaluat-Saade DZimmermann RShirmohammadi SGriwodz CHefeeda MWang M(2023)Semi-automatic mulsemedia authoring analysis from the user's perspectiveProceedings of the 14th Conference on ACM Multimedia Systems10.1145/3587819.3590979(249-256)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3587819.3590979
Jost CDebloos JLe Pévédic BUzan G(2023)ICAMUS: Evaluation Criteria of an Interactive Multisensory Authoring ToolProceedings of the 2023 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences10.1145/3573381.3596472(174-179)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3573381.3596472
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents