Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2557028acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Pinch-drag-flick vs. spatial input: rethinking zoom & pan on mobile displays

Published: 26 April 2014 Publication History

Abstract

The multi-touch-based pinch to zoom, drag and flick to pan metaphor has gained wide popularity on mobile displays, where it is the paradigm of choice for navigating 2D documents. But is finger-based navigation really the gold standard' In this paper, we present a comprehensive user study with 40 participants, in which we systematically compared the Pinch-Drag-Flick approach with a technique that relies on spatial manipulation, such as lifting a display up/down to zoom. While we solely considered known techniques, we put considerable effort in implementing both input strategies on popular consumer hardware (iPhone, iPad). Our results show that spatial manipulation can significantly outperform traditional Pinch-Drag-Flick. Given the carefully optimized prototypes, we are confident to have found strong arguments that future generations of mobile devices could rely much more on spatial interaction principles.

Supplementary Material

suppl.mov (pn0425-file3.mp4)
Supplemental video

References

[1]
Bier, E.A., Stone, M.C., Pier, K., Buxton, B., and DeRose, T.D. Toolglass and Magic Lenses: The SeeThrough Interface. In Proc. SIGGRAPH 1993, ACM (1993), 445--446.
[2]
Boring, S., Ledo, D., Chen, X., Marquardt, N., Tang, A., and Greenberg, S. The fat thumb: using the thumb's contact size for single-handed mobile interaction. In Proc. MobileHCI 2012, ACM (2012), 207--208.
[3]
Burstyn, J., Banerjee, A., and Vertegaal, R. FlexView: An evaluation of depth navigation on deformable mobile devices. In Proc. TEI 2013, ACM (2013), 193--200.
[4]
Chae, M. and Kim, J. Do size and structure matter to mobile users' An empirical study of the effects of screen size, information structure, and task complexity on user activities with standard web phones. Behaviour and Information Technology 23, 3 (2004), 165--181.
[5]
Cutmore, T., Hine, T., Maberly, K., Langford, N., and Hawgood, G. Cognitive and gender factors influencing navigation in a virtual environment. Int. Journal of Human Computer Studies 53, 2 (2000), 223--249.
[6]
Dabbs, J., Chang, E., Strong, R., and Milun, R. Spatial ability, navigation strategy, and geographic knowledge among men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior 19, 2 (1998), 89--98.
[7]
Fitzmaurice, G.W., Zhai, S., and Chignell, M. Virtual reality for palmtop computers. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 11, 3 (1993), 197--218.
[8]
Furnas, G.W. and Bederson, B.B. Space-Scale Diagrams: Understanding Multiscale Interfaces, In Proc. CHI 1995, ACM (1995), 234--241.
[9]
Gutwin, C. and Fedak, C. Interacting with big interfaces on small screens: a comparison of fisheye, zoom, and panning techniques. In Proc. Graphics Interface 2004, Canad. H.-C. Comm. Society (2004), 145--152.
[10]
Hansen, T.R., Eriksson, E., and Lykke-Olesen, A. Mixed interaction space - Expanding the interaction space with mobile devices. In Proc. HCI 2006. Springer London (2006), 365--380.
[11]
Jones, B., Sodhi, R., Forsyth, D., Bailey, B., and Maciocci, G. Around device interaction for multiscale navigation. In Proc. MobileHCI 2012. ACM (2012), 83--92.
[12]
Jones, M., Marsden, G., Mohd-Nasir, N., Boone, K., Buchanan, G. Improving web interaction on small displays. Computer Networks 31, 16 (1999), 1129--1137.
[13]
Joshi, N., Kar, A., and Cohen, M. Looking at you: fused gyro and face tracking for viewing large imagery on mobile devices. In Proc. CHI, ACM (2012), 2211--2220.
[14]
Jul, S. and Furnas, G.W. Critical zones in desert fog: aids to multiscale navigation. In Proc. UIST 1998, ACM (1998), 97--106.
[15]
Kaufmann, B. and Ahlström, D. Studying spatial memory and map navigation performance on projector phones with peephole interaction. In Proc. CHI 2013. ACM (2013), 3173--3176.
[16]
Malacria, S., Lecolinet, E., and Guiard, Y. Clutch-free panning and integrated pan-zoom control on touchsensitive surfaces: the cyclostar approach. In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM (2010), 2615--2624.
[17]
Norman, D. The Design of Everyday Things. Basic Books, 2002.
[18]
Oh, J. and Hua, H. User Evaluations on Form Factors of Tangible Magic Lenses. In Proc. ISMAR 2006, ACM (2006), 23--32.
[19]
Pahud. M., Hinckley, K., Iqbal, S., Sellen, A., and Buxton, B. Toward compound navigation tasks on mobiles via spatial manipulation. In Proc. Mobile HCI 2013. ACM (2013), 113--122.
[20]
Rädle, R., Jetter, H.-C., Butscher, S., and Reiterer, H. The effect of egocentric body movements on users' navigation performance and spatial memory in zoomable user interfaces. In Proc. ITS 2013. ACM (2013), 23--32.
[21]
Reeves, B., Lang, A., Kim, E.Y., and Tatar, D. The effects of screen size and message content on attention and arousal. Media Psychology 1, 1 (1999), 49--67.
[22]
Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., and Preece, J. Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. John Wiley & Sons, 1st edition, 2002.
[23]
Spelmezan, D., Appert, C., Chapuis, O., and Pietriga, E. Side Pressure for Bidirectional Navigation on Small Devices. In Proc. MobileHCI, ACM (2013), 113--122.
[24]
Spindler, M., Martsch, M., Dachselt, R. Going Beyond the Surface: Studying Multi-Layer Interaction Above the Tabletop. In Proc. CHI, ACM (2012), 1277--1286.
[25]
Spindler, M., Stellmach, S., and Dachselt, R. Advanced Magic Lens Interaction above the Tabletop. In Proc. ITS 2009, ACM (2009), 77--84.
[26]
Treisman, A., Gelade, G. A Feature Integration Theory of Attention. Cogn. Psychology 12, 1 (1980), 97--136.
[27]
Tsang, M., Fitzmaurice, G., Kurtenbach, G., Khan, A., and Buxton, B. Boom Chameleon: Simultaneous Capture of 3D Viewpoint, Voice and Gesture Annotations on a Spatially-aware Display. In Proc. UIST 2002, ACM (2002), 111--120.
[28]
Ullmer, B., Ishii, H., and Jacob, R. Token + constraint systems for tangible interaction with digital information. ACM Trans. C. - H. Interaction 12, 1 (2005), 81--118.
[29]
Wigdor, D., Forlines, C., Baudisch, P., Barnwell, J., and Shen, C. Lucid touch: a see-through mobile device. In Proc. UIST 2007, ACM (2007), 269--278.
[30]
Yee, K. Peephole Displays: Pen Interaction on Spatially Aware Handheld Computers. In Proc. CHI 2003, ACM (2003), 1--8.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Pinch-drag-flick vs. spatial input: rethinking zoom & pan on mobile displays

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2014
    4206 pages
    ISBN:9781450324731
    DOI:10.1145/2556288
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 26 April 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. mobile displays
    2. multi-touch input
    3. spatial input
    4. spatially aware displays
    5. user study

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CHI '14
    Sponsor:
    CHI '14: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2014
    Ontario, Toronto, Canada

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 465 of 2,043 submissions, 23%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI '25
    CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)38
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
    Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)PalmSpaceInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103219184:COnline publication date: 1-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Förderlicher Entwurf cyber-physischer ProduktionssystemeHandbuch Industrie 4.010.1007/978-3-662-58528-3_132(189-223)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
    • (2023)Exploring Interactions with Printed Data Visualizations in Augmented RealityIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2022.320938629:1(418-428)Online publication date: 27-Jan-2023
    • (2023)Leveraging Motion Tracking for Intuitive Interactions in a Tablet-Based 3D Scene Annotation System2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR)10.1109/ISMAR59233.2023.00071(563-572)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
    • (2022)Understanding and Creating Spatial Interactions with Distant Displays Enabled by Unmodified Off-The-Shelf SmartphonesMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti61000946:10(94)Online publication date: 19-Oct-2022
    • (2022)Small screen-big information challenge for older adults: a study on visual momentum and gesture navigationBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2022.204238542:6(744-757)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2022
    • (2022)Förderlicher Entwurf cyber-physischer ProduktionssystemeHandbuch Industrie 4.010.1007/978-3-662-45537-1_132-1(1-36)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2022
    • (2021)MARVIS: Combining Mobile Devices and Augmented Reality for Visual Data AnalysisProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411764.3445593(1-17)Online publication date: 6-May-2021
    • (2021)Embodied gesture interaction for immersive mapsCartography and Geographic Information Science10.1080/15230406.2021.192949248:5(417-431)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2021
    • (2021)AR Peephole InterfacePervasive and Mobile Computing10.1016/j.pmcj.2021.10148978:COnline publication date: 1-Dec-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media