Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2557008acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Opportunities for odor: experiences with smell and implications for technology

Published: 26 April 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Technologies for capturing and generating smell are emerging, and our ability to engineer such technologies and use them in HCI is rapidly developing. Our understanding of how these technologies match the experiences with smell that people have or want to have is surprisingly limited. We therefore investigated the experience of smell and the emotions that accompany it. We collected stories from 439 participants who described personally memorable smell experiences in an online questionnaire. Based on the stories we developed 10 categories of smell experience. We explored the implications of the categories for smell-enhanced technology design by (a) probing participants to envision technologies that match their smell story and (b) having HCI researchers brainstorm technologies using the categories as design stimuli. We discuss how our findings can benefit research on personal memories, momentary and first time experiences, and wellbeing.

Supplementary Material

ZIP File (pn0320-file4.zip)

References

[1]
Alaoui-Ismaïli, O., Robin, O., Rada, H., Dittmar, A., Vernet-Maury, E. Basic Emotions Evoked by Odorants: Comparison Between Autonomic Responses and Self-Evaluation. Physiology & Beh. 62, 4 (1997), 713--720.
[2]
Bakalar, N. Sensory science: Partners in flavour. Nature 486, 7403 (2012), S4--S5.
[3]
Baumeister, R.F., Newman, L.S. How Stories Make Sense of Personal Experiences: Motives that Shape Autobiographical Narratives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20, 6 (1994), 676--690.
[4]
Bodnar, A., Corbett, R., Nekrasovski, D. AROMA: ambient awareness through olfaction in a messaging application. Proc. ICMI, (2004), 183--190.
[5]
Brewster, S., McGookin, D., Miller, C. Olfoto: designing a smell-based interaction. Proc. CHI (2006), 653--662.
[6]
Bruner, J. Life as narrative. Social Research: An International Quarterly 71, 3 (2004), 691--710.
[7]
Chrea, C., Grandjean, D., Delplanque, S., Cayeux, I., Le Calvé, B., Aymard, L., Velazco, MI., Sander, D., Scherer, KR. Mapping the Semantic Space for the Subjective Experience of Emotional Responses to Odors. Chem. Senses 34, 1 (2009), 49--62.
[8]
Ehrlichman, H., Bastone, L. The use of odour in the study of emotion. In S. Van and G.H. Dodd, (Eds.), Fragrance: The psychology and biology of perfume. Elsevier, (1992), 143--159.
[9]
Emsenhuber, B. Scent Marketing: Making Olfactory Advertising Pervasive. In J. Müller, F. Alt and D. Michelis (Eds.), Pervasive Advertising. Springer, (2011), 343--360.
[10]
Erickson, T. Design as storytelling. Interactions 3, 4 (1996), 30--35.
[11]
1Faste, H., Rachmel, N., Essary, R., Sheehan, E. Brainstorm, Chainstorm, Cheatstorm, Tweetstorm: new ideation strategies for distributed HCI design. Proc. CHI (2013), 1343--1352.
[12]
Fleiss, J.L., Levin, B., Paik, M.C. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. John Wiley & Sons, (2013).
[13]
Ghinea, G., Ademoye, O. The sweet smell of success: Enhancing multimedia applications with olfaction. TOMCCAP 8, 1 (2012), 2.
[14]
Hassenzahl, M. Experience Design: Technology for All the Right Reasons. Syn. Lect. on HCI 3, 1 (2010), 1--95.
[15]
Herz, R.S., Engen, T. Odor memory: review and analysis. Psy. Bulletin & Review. 3, 3 (1996), 300--313.
[16]
Jonsson, F., Verhagen, H. Senses working overtime: on sensuous experiences and public computer game play. Proc. ACE (2011), 56:1--56:8.
[17]
Kaye, J. "Jofish." Making Scents: aromatic output for HCI. Interactions 11, 1 (2004), 48--61.
[18]
Kazakos, K., Howard, S., Vetere, F. Revisiting the relationship between reunion and technology-mediated separation in periodically transitioning families. Proc. CSCW (2013), 1157--1168.
[19]
Loumakis, F., Stumpf, S., Grayson, D. This image smells good: effects of image information scent in search engine results pages. CIKM (2011), 475--484.
[20]
Mason, W., Suri, S. Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods 44, 1 (2012), 1--23.
[21]
2Massimi, M., Moncur, W., Odom, W., Banks, R., Kirk, D. Memento mori: technology design for the end of life. Proc. CHI EA (2012), 2759--2762.
[22]
2Matsukura, H., Yoneda, T., Ishida, H. Smelling Screen: Development and Evaluation of an Olfactory Display System for Presenting a Virtual Odor Source. IEEE TVCG 19, 4 (2013), 606--615.
[23]
Petitmengin, C. Describing one's subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 5, 3--4 (2006), 229--269.
[24]
Ranasinghe, N., Karunanayaka, K., Cheok, A.D., Fernando, O.N.N., Nii, H., Gopalakrishnakone, P. Digital taste and smell communication. Proc. BodyNets, (2011), 78--84.
[25]
Saldana, J. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. SAGE (2012).
[26]
Scherer, K.R. Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking. Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research 92, (2001), 120.
[27]
Scherer, K.R. What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Social Science Inf. 44, 4 (2005), 695--729.
[28]
Seligman, M.E.P., Csikszentmihalyi, M. Positive psychology: An intro. Am. Psy. 55, 1(2000), 5--14.
[29]
Seo, H.-S., Guarneros, M., Hudson, R., et al. Attitudes toward Olfaction: A Cross-regional Study. Chem. Senses 36, 2 (2011), 177--187.
[30]
Suddendorf, T., Corballis, M.C. The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans? Beh. & Brain Sciences 30, 3 (2007), 299--313.
[31]
3Tuch, A.N., Trusell, R., Hornbæk, K. Analyzing users' narratives to understand experience with interactive products. Proc. CHI (2013), 2079--2088.
[32]
3Wallace, J., Wright, P.C., McCarthy, J., Green, D.P., Thomas, J., Olivier, P. A design-led inquiry into personhood in dementia. Proc. CHI (2013), 2617--2626.
[33]
3Willander, J., Larsson, M. Smell your way back to childhood: Autobiographical odor memory. Psy. Bulletin & Review 13, 2 (2006), 240--244.
[34]
Wright, P., McCarthy, J. Experience-Centered Design: Designers, Users, and Communities in Dialogue. Syn. Lect. on HCI 3, 1 (2010), 1--123.
[35]
Wyszynski, B., Yamanaka, T., Nakamoto, T. Recording and reproducing citrus flavors using odor recorder. Sensors&Actuators B: Chemical 106, 1(2005), 388--393.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Scent Box: Prototyping and Instructions for Olfactory Enhancement of VR-ExperiencesImmersive Learning Research Network10.1007/978-3-031-80475-5_2(18-33)Online publication date: 20-Feb-2025
  • (2024)Mul-O: Encouraging Olfactory Innovation in Various Scenarios Through a Task-Oriented Development PlatformProceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3654777.3676387(1-17)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Designing Smart Home Technology For Passive Co-Presence Over DistanceProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661508(3389-3406)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Opportunities for odor: experiences with smell and implications for technology

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2014
    4206 pages
    ISBN:9781450324731
    DOI:10.1145/2556288
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 26 April 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. crowdsourcing
    2. design brainstorming
    3. designing for smell.
    4. narratives
    5. odor
    6. olfaction
    7. smell
    8. smell experiences
    9. smell stories
    10. smell-enhanced technology
    11. user experience

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CHI '14
    Sponsor:
    CHI '14: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2014
    Ontario, Toronto, Canada

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 465 of 2,043 submissions, 23%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI 2025
    ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)173
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2025)Scent Box: Prototyping and Instructions for Olfactory Enhancement of VR-ExperiencesImmersive Learning Research Network10.1007/978-3-031-80475-5_2(18-33)Online publication date: 20-Feb-2025
    • (2024)Mul-O: Encouraging Olfactory Innovation in Various Scenarios Through a Task-Oriented Development PlatformProceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3654777.3676387(1-17)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Designing Smart Home Technology For Passive Co-Presence Over DistanceProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661508(3389-3406)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Olfactory Puppetry: Merging Olfaction and Puppetry to Explore the Future of Olfactory Social RobotsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660733(2435-2449)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Smell Above All: Envisioning Smell-Centred Future WorldsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660699(2530-2544)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)AromaBlendz: An Olfactory System for Crafting Personalized ScentsExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3648670(1-5)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Representing scentsInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103357192:COnline publication date: 1-Dec-2024
    • (2024)MORE THAN ONE MILAN: Urban Interactive Experience: An Olfactory Map ProjectHuman-Computer Interaction10.1007/978-3-031-60441-6_2(15-29)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
    • (2023)“Sweet: I did it”! Measuring the sense of agency in gustatory interfacesFrontiers in Computer Science10.3389/fcomp.2023.11282295Online publication date: 12-May-2023
    • (2023)Expanding the Senses: Considering the Use of Active Smell Delivery for Human-Robot InteractionsProceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction10.1145/3623809.3623971(479-481)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media