research-article

Peer instruction in computing: the role of reading quizzes

Authors:

Daniel Zingaro,

Cynthia Bailey Lee,

Leo PorterAuthors Info & Claims

SIGCSE '13: Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education

Pages 47 - 52

https://doi.org/10.1145/2445196.2445216

Published: 06 March 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Peer Instruction has recently gained interest in computing as an effective active learning pedagogy. The general focus of PI research has been on the in-class portion of PI: multiple choice questions and group discussion. Here, our focus is the reading quizzes completed by students for purposes of class preparation. These quizzes contain content questions but also ask for difficulties or confusion with course material. Consistent with expectations, we demonstrate that providing correct responses to quiz questions positively correlates with other course assessments. Somewhat counter-intuitively, we find that identifying confusions, noting problematic sections, or asking questions about the reading are also correlated with lab grades.

References

[1]

I. D. Beatty, W. J. Gerace, W. J. Leonard, and R. J. Dufresne. Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching. American Journal of Physics, 74:31--39, 2006.

[2]

J. Carter. Introduction to Computer Science Using C. McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 2008.

[3]

C. H. Crouch and E. Mazur. Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69:970--977, 2001.

[4]

C. H. Crouch, J. Watkins, A. P. Fagen, and E. Mazur. Peer instruction: Engaging students one-on-one, all at once. In E. F. Redish and P. J. Cooney, editors, Research-Based Reform of University Physics. American Association of Physics Teachers, 2007.

[5]

Q. Cutts, S. Esper, M. Fecho, S. R. Foster, and B. Simon. The abstraction transition taxonomy: Developing desired learning outcomes through the lens of situated cognition. In ICER '12: Proceedings of the Eighth international Workshop on Computing Education Research, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM.

Digital Library

[6]

Q. Cutts, G. Kennedy, C. Mitchell, and S. Draper. Maximising dialogue in lectures using group response systems. 7th IASTED international conference on computers and advanced technology in education. www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/ quintin/papers/cate2004.pdf (accessed August 19, 2011)., 2004.

[7]

K. A. Ericsson, R. T. Krampe, and C. Tesch-Roemer. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3):363--406, 1993.

[8]

S. Esper, B. Simon, and Q. Cutts. Exploratory homeworks: An active learning tool for textbook reading. In ICER '12: Proceedings of the Eighth international Workshop on Computing Education Research, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM.

Digital Library

[9]

J. K. Knight and W. B. Wood. Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biology Education, 4:298--310, 2005.

[10]

N. Lasry. Clickers or flashcards: Is there really a difference? The Physics Teacher, 46:242--244, 2008.

[11]

N. Lasry, E. Mazur, and J. Watkins. Peer instruction: From Harvard to the two-year college. American Journal of Physics, 76:1066--1069, 2008.

[12]

E. Mazur. ICER 2011 keynote address, 2011.

[13]

R. P. Pargas and D. M. Shah. Things are clicking in computer science courses. In SIGCSE '06: Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, pages 474--478, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.

Digital Library

[14]

L. Porter, C. Bailey-Lee, B. Simon, and D. Zingaro. Peer instruction: Do students really learn from peer discussion in computing? In ICER '11: Proceedings of the Seventh international Workshop on Computing Education Research, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.

Digital Library

[15]

B. Simon and Q. Cutts. CS principles pilot at University of California, San Diego. ACM Inroads, 3(2):61--63, June 2012.

Digital Library

[16]

B. Simon, M. Kohanfars, J. Lee, K. Tamayo, and Q. Cutts. Experience report: Peer instruction in introductory computing. In SIGCSE '10: Proceedings of the 41st SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, pages 341--345, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.

Digital Library

[17]

M. K. Smith, W. B. Wood, W. K. Adams, C. Wieman, J. K. Knight, N. Guild, and T. T. Su. Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science, 323:122--124, 2009.

[18]

D. Zingaro. Experience report: Peer instruction in remedial computer science. In Ed-Media 2010: Proceedings of the 22nd World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, pages 5030--5035. AACE, 2010.

[19]

D. Zingaro. Pi-cs resource page. www.danielzingaro.com/pics.php, 2012.

Cited By

Gomes da Costa Junior MAmélia Amorim Carvalho A(2022)Reactions of Computer Science Students to Peer Instruction Activities in Class2022 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE)10.1109/TALE54877.2022.00112(661-664)Online publication date: Dec-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE54877.2022.00112
Shah KLee PBarretto DLiao SSchulte CBecker BDivitini MBarendsen E(2021)A Qualitative Study on How Students Interact with Quizzes and Estimate Confidence on Their AnswersProceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3430665.3456377(32-38)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3430665.3456377
Da Costa MCarvalho A(2021)Applying Peer Instruction to Computer Science Students Using Non-native Language: A Study with Undergraduate Students2021 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology & Education (TALE)10.1109/TALE52509.2021.9678789(854-858)Online publication date: 5-Dec-2021
https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE52509.2021.9678789
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Peer instruction in computing: the role of reading quizzes
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Computing education
      1. Computing education programs
        Computer science education
        Information science education

Recommendations

Peer instruction: do students really learn from peer discussion in computing?
ICER '11: Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Computing education research

Peer Instruction (PI) is an instructional approach that engages students in constructing their own understanding of concepts. Students individually respond to a question, discuss with peers, and respond to the same question again. In general, the peer ...
Peer instruction: a link to the exam
ITiCSE '14: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Innovation & technology in computer science education

In computer science, the active learning pedagogical practice of Peer Instruction (PI) has been shown to improve final exam performance, reduce student failure rates, and improve student retention. PI consists of two major parts: group discussion and ...
Peer instruction contributes to self-efficacy in CS1
SIGCSE '14: Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education

Recent work in computing suggests that Peer Instruction (PI) is a valuable interactive learning pedagogy: it lowers fail rates, increases retention, and is enjoyed by students and instructors alike. While these findings are promising, they are somewhat ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

SIGCSE '13: Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education

March 2013

818 pages

ISBN:9781450318686

DOI:10.1145/2445196

Conference Chairs:
Tracy Camp
Colorado School of Mines
,
Paul Tymann
Rochester Institute of Technology
,
Program Chairs:
J. D. Dougherty
Haverford College
,
Kris Nagel
Georgia Gwinnett College

Copyright © 2013 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 March 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

SIGCSE '13

Sponsor:

SIGCSE

SIGCSE '13: The 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

March 6 - 9, 2013

Colorado, Denver, USA

Acceptance Rates

SIGCSE '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 111 of 293 submissions, 38%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

Upcoming Conference

SIGCSE Virtual 2024

Sponsor:
sigcse

1st ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference

December 5 - 8, 2024

Virtual Event , NC , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

21
Total Citations
View Citations
324
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)10
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

Reflects downloads up to 14 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Gomes da Costa Junior MAmélia Amorim Carvalho A(2022)Reactions of Computer Science Students to Peer Instruction Activities in Class2022 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE)10.1109/TALE54877.2022.00112(661-664)Online publication date: Dec-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE54877.2022.00112
Shah KLee PBarretto DLiao SSchulte CBecker BDivitini MBarendsen E(2021)A Qualitative Study on How Students Interact with Quizzes and Estimate Confidence on Their AnswersProceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3430665.3456377(32-38)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3430665.3456377
Da Costa MCarvalho A(2021)Applying Peer Instruction to Computer Science Students Using Non-native Language: A Study with Undergraduate Students2021 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology & Education (TALE)10.1109/TALE52509.2021.9678789(854-858)Online publication date: 5-Dec-2021
https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE52509.2021.9678789
Salguero AMcAuley JSimon BPorter LRobins AMoskal AKo AMcCauley RRobins AKo A(2020)A Longitudinal Evaluation of a Best Practices CS1Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research10.1145/3372782.3406274(182-193)Online publication date: 10-Aug-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3372782.3406274
Sturzinger EHawthorne DBabbitt TGoda BZilora SGrispos GBogaard D(2019)Hacking the Non-Technical BrainProceedings of the 20th Annual SIG Conference on Information Technology Education10.1145/3349266.3351411(112-117)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3349266.3351411
Porter LSimon B(2019)A Case Study of Peer InstructionThe Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research10.1017/9781108654555.031(861-874)Online publication date: 15-Feb-2019
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108654555.031
(2019)The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research10.1017/9781108654555Online publication date: 15-Feb-2019
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108654555
Gholami AZhang L(2018)Student Behaviour in Unsupervised Online QuizzesProceedings of the 23rd Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education10.1145/3209635.3209650(1-6)Online publication date: 4-May-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3209635.3209650
Taylor CSpacco JBunde DPetersen ALiao SPorter LPolycarpou IRead JAndreou PArmoni M(2018)A multi-institution exploration of peer instruction in practiceProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education10.1145/3197091.3197144(308-313)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3197091.3197144
Porter LBouvier DCutts QGrissom SLee CMcCartney RZingaro DSimon B(2016)A multi-institutional study of peer instruction in introductory computingACM Inroads10.1145/29381427:2(76-81)Online publication date: 16-May-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2938142
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents