M. Arenas, A. Bertails, E. Prud'hommeaux, and J. F. Sequeda. A direct mapping of relational data to RDF. W3C Recommendation 27 September 2012, http://www.w3.org/TR/rdb-direct-mapping/.

Google Scholar

[8]

M. Arenas, S. Conca, and J. Pérez. Counting beyond a yottabyte, or how SPARQL 1.1 property paths will prevent adoption of the standard. In WWW, pages 629--638, 2012.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[9]

T. Berners-Lee. Principles of design. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Principles.html.

Google Scholar

[10]

T. Berners-Lee, R. Fielding, and L. Masinter. Uniform resource identifier (URI): Generic syntax. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt, 2005.

Google Scholar

[11]

C. Buil-Aranda, M. Arenas, and O. Corcho. Semantics and optimization of the SPARQL 1.1 federation extension. In ESWC, 2011.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[12]

C. Buil-Aranda, M. Arenas, O. Corcho, and A. Polleres. Federating queries in SPARQL 1.1: Syntax, semantics and evaluation. Submitted for journal publication.

Google Scholar

[13]

S. Das, S. Sundara, and R. Cyganiak. R2rml: Rdb to RDF mapping language. W3C Recommendation 27 September 2012, http://www.w3.org/TR/r2rml/.

Google Scholar

[14]

V. Fionda, C. Gutierrez, and G. Pirró. Semantic navigation on the web of data: specification of routes, web fragments and actions. In WWW, pages 281--290, 2012.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[15]

T. Furche, B. Linse, F. Bry, D. Plexousakis, and G. Gottlob. RDF querying: Language constructs and evaluation methods compared. In Reasoning Web, pages 1--52, 2006.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[16]

M. R. Garey and D. S. Johnson. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H. Freeman, 1979.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[17]

B. Glimm and C. Ogbuji. SPARQL 1.1 entailment regimes. W3C Working Draft 05 January 2012, http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-entailment/.

Google Scholar

[18]

S. Harris and A. Seaborne. SPARQL 1.1 query language. W3C working draft. http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/, July 2012.

Google Scholar

[19]

A. Harth, K. Hose, M. Karnstedt, A. Polleres, K.-U. Sattler, and J. Umbrich. Data summaries for on-demand queries over linked data. In WWW, pages 411--420, 2010.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[20]

A. Harth and S. Speiser. On completeness classes for query evaluation on linked data. In AAAI, pages 613--619, 2012.

Google Scholar

[21]

O. Hartig. Provenance information in the web of data. In LDOW, 2009.

Google Scholar

[22]

O. Hartig. Querying trust in RDF data with tSPARQL. In ESWC, pages 5--20, 2009.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[23]

O. Hartig. SPARQL for a web of linked data: Semantics and computability. In ESWC, pages 8--23, 2012.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[24]

O. Hartig, C. Bizer, and J. C. Freytag. Executing SPARQL queries over the web of linked data. In ISWC, pages 293--309, 2009.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[25]

O. Hartig and J.-C. Freytag. Foundations of traversal based query execution over linked data. In HT, pages 43--52, 2012.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[26]

P. Hayes. RDF semantics, W3C recommendation, February 2004.

Google Scholar

[27]

T. Heath and C. Bizer. Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2011.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[28]

P. Hitzler, M. Krtzsch, B. Parsia, P. F. Patel-Schneider, and S. Rudolph. OWL 2Web ontology language primer. W3C Recommendation 27 October 2009, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-primer/.

Google Scholar

[29]

K. Kochut and M. Janik. SPARQLeR: Extended sparql for semantic association discovery. In ESWC, pages 145--159, 2007.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[30]

I. Kollia, B. Glimm, and I. Horrocks. SPARQL query answering over OWL ontologies. In ESWC, 2011.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[31]

G. Ladwig and T. Tran. Linked data query processing strategies. In ISWC, 2010.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[32]

A. Letelier, J. Pérez, R. Pichler, and S. Skritek. Static analysis and optimization of semantic web queries. In PODS, pages 89--100, 2012.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[33]

K. Losemann and W. Martens. The complexity of evaluating path expressions in SPARQL. In PODS, pages 101--112, 2012.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[34]

A. Mallea, M. Arenas, A. Hogan, and A. Polleres. On blank nodes. In ISWC, pages 421--437, 2011.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[35]

A. O. Mendelzon and T. Milo. Formal models ofWeb queries. Inf. Syst., 23(8):615--637, 1998.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[36]

D. P. Miranker, R. K. Depena, H. Jung, J. F. Sequeda, and C. Reyna. Diamond: A SPARQL query engine, for linked data based on the rete match. In Workshop on Artificial Intelligence meets the Web of Data, 2012.

Google Scholar

[37]

M. Olson and U. Ogbuji. The Versa specification. http://uche.ogbuji.net/tech/rdf/versa/etc/versa-1.0.xml.

Google Scholar

[38]

P. F. Patel-Schneider, P. Hayes, and I. Horrocks. OWL Web ontology language semantics and abstract syntax. W3C Recommendation 10 February 2004, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/.

Google Scholar

[39]

J. Pérez, M. Arenas, and C. Gutierrez. Semantics and complexity of SPARQL. In ISWC, pages 30--43, 2006.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[40]

J. Pérez, M. Arenas, and C. Gutierrez. Semantics of SPARQL. Technical report, Universidad de Chile, 2006. Dept. Computer Science, Universidad de Chile, TR/DCC-2006-17.

Google Scholar

[41]

J. Pérez, M. Arenas, and C. Gutierrez. Semantics and complexity of SPARQL. ACM Trans. Database Syst., 34(3), 2009.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[42]

J. Párez, M. Arenas, and C. Gutierrez. nSPARQL: A navigational language for RDF. J. Web Sem., 8(4):255--270, 2010.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[43]

E. Prud'hommeaux and C. Buil-Aranda. SPARQL 1.1 federated query. W3C Working Draft 17 November 2011, http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-federated-query/.

Google Scholar

[44]

E. Prud'hommeaux and A. Seaborne. SPARQL query language for RDF. W3C Recommendation 15 January 2008, http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/.

Google Scholar

[45]

M. Schmidt, M. Meier, and G. Lausen. Foundations of SPARQL query optimization. In ICDT, pages 4--33, 2010.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[46]

J. F. Sequeda, M. Arenas, and D. P.Miranker. On directly mapping relational databases to RDF and owl. In WWW, 2012.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[47]

J. F. Sequeda and D. P. Miranker. Ultrawrap: Sparql execution on relational data. Technical Report TR-12-10, University of Texas at Austin, Department of Computer Sciences, 2012.

Google Scholar

[48]

J. Umbrich, M. Karnstedt, A. Hogan, and J. X. Parreira. Hybrid SPARQL queries: fresh vs. fast results. In ISWC, 2012.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[49]

M. Y. Vardi. The complexity of relational query languages (extended abstract). In STOC, pages 137--146, 1982.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[50]

V. Vianu. Database techniques for the world-wide web: A survey. SIGMOD Record, 27:59--74, 1998.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Affeldt TMennicke SBalke W(2020)Preference-driven Control over Incompleteness of Knowledge Graph Query AnswersProceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Web Science10.1145/3394231.3397911(212-220)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3394231.3397911
Mennicke SKalo JNagel DKroll HBalke W(2019)Fast Dual Simulation Processing of Graph Database Queries2019 IEEE 35th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE.2019.00030(244-255)Online publication date: Apr-2019
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.2019.00030
Zhang XMeng CZou L(2018)Expressivity issues in SPARQL: monotonicity and two-versus three-valued semanticsScience China Information Sciences10.1007/s11432-017-9344-561:12Online publication date: 6-Jun-2018
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-017-9344-5
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Querying Semantic Data on the Web?

Recommendations

Querying semantic web data with SPARQL
PODS '11: Proceedings of the thirtieth ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems

The Semantic Web is the initiative of the W3C to make information on the Web readable not only by humans but also by machines. RDF is the data model for Semantic Web data, and SPARQL is the standard query language for this data model. In the last ten ...
Querying the Semantic Web: A Formal Approach
ISWC '02: Proceedings of the First International Semantic Web Conference on The Semantic Web

Ontologies are set to play a key role in the Semantic Web, and several web ontology languages, like DAML+OIL, are based on DLs. These not only provide a clear semantics to the ontology languages, but allows them to exploit DL systems in order to provide ...
Querying the Semantic Web: An Efficient Approach Using Relational Databases

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

ACM SIGMOD Record Volume 41, Issue 4

December 2012

62 pages

ISSN:0163-5808

DOI:10.1145/2430456

Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 17 January 2013

Published in SIGMOD Volume 41, Issue 4

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Column

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

12
Total Citations
View Citations
524
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)4
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 22 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Affeldt TMennicke SBalke W(2020)Preference-driven Control over Incompleteness of Knowledge Graph Query AnswersProceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Web Science10.1145/3394231.3397911(212-220)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3394231.3397911
Mennicke SKalo JNagel DKroll HBalke W(2019)Fast Dual Simulation Processing of Graph Database Queries2019 IEEE 35th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE.2019.00030(244-255)Online publication date: Apr-2019
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.2019.00030
Zhang XMeng CZou L(2018)Expressivity issues in SPARQL: monotonicity and two-versus three-valued semanticsScience China Information Sciences10.1007/s11432-017-9344-561:12Online publication date: 6-Jun-2018
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-017-9344-5
Reutter JRomero MVardi M(2017)Regular Queries on Graph DatabasesTheory of Computing Systems10.1007/s00224-016-9676-261:1(31-83)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s00224-016-9676-2
Hartig OLetter IPérez J(2017)A Formal Framework for Comparing Linked Data FragmentsThe Semantic Web – ISWC 201710.1007/978-3-319-68288-4_22(364-382)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-319-68288-4_22
Hannula MKontinen JLink S(2016)On the finite and general implication problems of independence atoms and keysJournal of Computer and System Sciences10.1016/j.jcss.2016.02.00782:5(856-877)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.jcss.2016.02.007
Papadakis IStefanidakis MMylonas PNiggemeyer BKazanas S(2016)Top-K Shortest Paths in Large Typed RDF Datasets ChallengeSemantic Web Challenges10.1007/978-3-319-46565-4_15(191-199)Online publication date: 9-Oct-2016
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46565-4_15
Umbrich JHogan APolleres ADecker S(2014)Link traversal querying for a diverse Web of DataSemantic Web10.3233/SW-1401646:6(585-624)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2014
https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-140164
Hannula MKontinen JLink SLi JWang XGarofalakis MSoboroff ISuel TWang M(2014)On Independence Atoms and KeysProceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/2661829.2662058(1229-1238)Online publication date: 3-Nov-2014
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2661829.2662058
Giannakis KAndronikos T(2014)Querying Linked Data and Büchi AutomataProceedings of the 2014 9th International Workshop on Semantic and Social Media Adaptation and Personalization10.1109/SMAP.2014.15(110-114)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2014
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/SMAP.2014.15
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Querying semantic web data with SPARQL

Querying the Semantic Web: A Formal Approach

Querying the Semantic Web: An Efficient Approach Using Relational Databases