Back to school: how professional software developers develop and test software in an educational context
Authors: 
Jan Lönnberg, 
Lauri MalmiAuthors Info & Claims
Pages 47 - 56
Abstract
In this paper, we describe the research part of a collaboration between a large telecommunications company and Aalto University built around a programming course arranged by Aalto University for the company's software developers. This research involved examining several of the software developers' understandings of matters related to software development and quality in both a learning and a professional development context. The study uses qualitative analysis of questionnaires and interviews to produce descriptions of how the developers understood the software development process and testing and the information sources and needs they had when debugging.
References
[1]
M. Ahmadzadeh, D. Elliman, and C. Higgins. An analysis of patterns of debugging among novice computer science students. In ITiCSE '05: Proceedings of the 10th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, pages 84--88, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press. ISBN 1-59593-024-8.
[2]
K. Ala-Mutka and H.-M. Järvinen. Assessment process for programming assignments. Advanced Learning Technologies, 2004. Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on, pages 181--185, 30 Aug.-1 Sept. 2004.
[3]
Y. Ben-David Kolikant. Students' alternative standards for correctness. In The Proceedings of the First International Computing Education Research Workshop, pages 37--46, 2005.
[4]
J. Bennedsen and M. E. Caspersen. Revealing the programming process. In Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, SIGCSE '05, pages 186--190, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM. ISBN 1-58113-997-7.
[5]
A. Berglund. Phenomenography as a way to research learning in computing. Bulletin of Applied Computing and Information Technology, 4(1), July 2006.
[6]
A. Berglund, I. Box, A. Eckerdal, R. Lister, and A. Pears. Learning educational research methods through collaborative research: the PhICER initiative. In Simon and M. Hamilton, editors, Proc. Tenth Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE 2008), volume 78 of Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology, pages 35--42, Wollongong, NSW, Australia, 2008. Australian Computer Society.
[7]
S. Booth. Learning to program: A phenomenographic perspective. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, doctoral dissertation, University of Gothenburg, Sweden, 1992.
[8]
J. Corbin and A. Strauss. Basics of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, third edition, 2008.
[9]
S. H. Edwards. Improving student performance by evaluating how well students test their own programs. Journal on Educational Resources in Computing, 3(3): 1--24, 2003.
[10]
M. Eisenstadt. My hairiest bug war stories. Communications of the ACM, 40(4):30--37, 1997. ISSN 0001-0782.
[11]
S. Fitzgerald, G. Lewandowski, R. McCauley, L. Murphy, B. Simon, L. Thomas, and C. Zander. Debugging: Finding, fixing and flailing, a multi-institutional study of novice debuggers. Computer Science Education, 18(2):93--116, June 2008.
[12]
A. Hiisilä. Kurssinhallintajärjestelmä ohjelmoinnin perusopetuksen avuksi (Course management system for basic courses in programming). Master's thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, May 2005. URL http://goblin.tkk.fi/goblin/diplomityo.pdf. In Finnish, abstract in English.
[13]
J. Lave and E. Wenger. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, 1991.
[14]
J. Lönnberg and A. Berglund. Students' understandings of concurrent programming. In R. Lister and Simon, editors, Proceedings of the Seventh Baltic Sea Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli Calling 2007), volume 88 of Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology, pages 77--86, Koli, Finland, 2008. Australian Computer Society.
[15]
J. Lönnberg, A. Berglund, and L. Malmi. How students develop concurrent programs. In M. Hamilton and T. Clear, editors, Proceedings of the Eleventh Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE2009), volume 95 of Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology, pages 129--138, Wellington, New Zealand, 2009. Australian Computer Society.
[16]
J. Lönnberg, M. Ben-Ari, and L. Malmi. Visualising concurrent programs with dynamic dependence graphs. In 6th IEEE International Workshop on Visualizing Software for Understanding and Analysis (VISSOFT 2011), Williamsburg, VA, USA, Sept. 2011. IEEE.
[17]
J. Lönnberg, L. Malmi, and M. Ben-Ari. Evaluating a visualisation of the execution of a concurrent program. In Proceedings of the 11th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli Calling 2011), pages 39--48, Koli, Finland, Nov. 2011. ACM.
[18]
F. Marton and S. Booth. Learning and Awareness. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997.
[19]
R. McCauley, S. Fitzgerald, G. Lewandowski, L. Murphy, B. Simon, L. Thomas, and C. Zander. Debugging: A review of the literature from an educational perspective. Computer Science Education, 18(2):67--92, 2008.
[20]
L. Murphy, G. Lewandowski, R. McCauley, B. Simon, L. Thomas, and C. Zander. Debugging: the good, the bad, and the quirky -- a qualitative analysis of novices' strategies. In Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, SIGCSE '08, pages 163--167, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. ISBN 978-1-59593-799-5.
[21]
A. Pears. Conveying conceptions of quality through instruction. In Seventh International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC), pages 7--14, Oporto, Portugal, Oct. 2010. IEEE.
[22]
W. W. Royce. Managing the development of large software systems. In Proceedings of IEEE WESCON, pages 1--9. IEEE, Aug. 1970.
[23]
J. Sheard, Simon, M. Hamilton, and J. Lönnberg. Analysis of research into the teaching and learning of programming. In ICER '09: Proceedings of the fifth International Computing Education Research Workshop, pages 93--104, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. ISBN 978-1-60558-615-1.
[24]
J. Sorva. The Same But Different --- Students' Understandings of Primitive and Object Variables. In A. Pears and L. Malmi, editors, The 8th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, Koli Calling '08, pages 5--15. Uppsala University, 2008.
[25]
I. Stamouli and M. Huggard. Object oriented programming and program correctness: the students' perspective. In ICER '06: Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Computing education research, pages 109--118, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press. ISBN 1-59593-494-4.
[26]
I. Vessey. Expertise in debugging computer programs: An analysis of the content of verbal protocols. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, (16): 621--637, 1986.
Index Terms
- Back to school: how professional software developers develop and test software in an educational context
Recommendations
Teaching a global software development course: student experiences using onsite exercise simulation
ICSE '16: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering CompanionOver the past decade, major advancements in software development have occurred in the global context. Global software development (GSD) is an effective strategy, and many higher educational institutions have been offering GSD courses. These courses are ...
Teachers' Experiences of using PRIMM to Teach Programming in School
SIGCSE '19: Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationPRIMM is an approach to teaching programming at K-12 that facilitates the structure of lessons in a purposeful way. PRIMM stands for Predict-Run-Investigate-Modify-Make, and draws on recent research in programming education. In particular the PRIMM ...
Test-driven design for introductory OO programming
SIGCSE '09: Proceedings of the 40th ACM technical symposium on Computer science educationTest-Driven Design (TDD) has been shown to increase the productivity of programming teams and improve the quality of the code they produce. However, most of the introductory curricula provide no introduction to test design, no support for defining the ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
November 2012
187 pages
Copyright © 2012 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Sponsors
- Univ. Eastern Finland: University of Eastern Finland
- Tampere University of Technology
- Univ. Turku: University of Turku
- Aalto University
In-Cooperation
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 15 November 2012
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Conference
Koli Calling '12
Sponsor:
- Univ. Eastern Finland
- Univ. Turku
Koli Calling '12: 12th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research
November 15 - 18, 2012
Koli, Finland
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 80 of 182 submissions, 44%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 148Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)4
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 01 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in