Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1148109.1148119acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesspaaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Exponential separation of quantum and classical online space complexity

Published: 30 July 2006 Publication History

Abstract

The main objective of quantum computation is to exploit the natural parallelism of quantum mechanics to solve problems using less computational resources than classical computers. Although quantum algorithms realizing an exponential time speed-up over the best known classical algorithms exist, no quantum algorithm is known performing computation using less space resources than classical algorithms. In this paper, we study, for the first time explicitly, spacebounded quantum algorithms for computational problems where the input is given not as a whole, but bit by bit. We show that there exist such problems that a quantum computer can solve using exponentiallyless work space than a classical computer. More precisely, we introduce a very natural and simple model of a space-bounded quantum online machine and prove an exponential separation of classical and quantum online space complexity, in the bounded-error setting and for a total language. The language we consider is inspired bya communication problem that Buhrman, Cleve and Wigderson used to show an almost quadratic separation of quantum and classical bounded-error communication complexity. We prove that, in the framework of online space complexity, the separation becomes exponential.

References

[1]
S. Aaronson and A. Ambainis. Quantum search of spatial regions. Theory of Computing, 1:47--79, 2005.
[2]
F. Ablayev. Lower bounds for one-way probabilistic communication complexityan d their application to space complexity. Theoretical Computer Science, 157:139--159, 1996.
[3]
D. Aharonov, A. Kitaev, and N. Nisan. Quantum circuits with mixed states. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 20--30, 1998.
[4]
J. L. Balcázar, J. Diaz, and J. Gabarró. Structural Complexity I. Springer-Verlag, 1995.
[5]
Z. Bar-Yossef, T. S. Jayram, and I. Kerenidis. Exponential separation of quantum and classical one-waycomm unication complexity. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 128--137, 2004.
[6]
R. Beals, H. Buhrman, R. Cleve, M. Mosca, and R. de Wolf. Quantum lower bounds byp olynomials. Journal of the ACM, 48(4):778--797, 2001.
[7]
A. Borodin, S. Cook, and N. Pippenger. Parallel computation for well-endowed rings and space-bounded probabilistic machines. Information andContr ol, 58:113--136, 1983.
[8]
M. Boyer, G. Brassard, P. Høyer, and A. Tapp. Tight bounds on quantum searching. Fortschritte der Physik, 46(4-5):493--505, 1998.
[9]
H. Buhrman, R. Cleve, and A. Wigderson. Quantum vs. classical communication and computation. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 63--68, 1998.
[10]
H. Buhrman. Quantum computing and communication complexity. Bulletin of the EATCS, 70:131--141, 2000.
[11]
L. Grover. A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 212--219, 1996.
[12]
P. Høyer and R. de Wolf. Improved quantum communication complexity bounds for disjointness and equality. In Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium of Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, pages 299--310, 2002.
[13]
B. Kalyanasundaram and G. Schnitger. The probabilistic communication complexityof set intersection. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, 5(4):545--557, 1992.
[14]
H. Klauck. Quantum communication complexity. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Boolean Functions and Applications at the 27th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages andPr ogramming, pages 241--252, 2000.
[15]
E. Kushilevitz and N. Nisan. Communication Complexity. Cambridge UniversityPress, 1997.
[16]
F. Le Gall. Quantum weaklyn ondeterministic communication complexity. In Proceedings of the 31st International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science, to appear, 2006. Preprint version: Los Alamos e-print archive, quant-ph/0511025.
[17]
S. Muthukrishnan. Data Streams: Algorithms and Applications. Now Publishers, 2005.
[18]
M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge UniversityPress, 2000.
[19]
A. Razborov. On the distributional complexity of disjointness. Theoretical Computer Science, 106:385--390, 1992.
[20]
A. Razborov. Quantum communication complexityof symmetric predicates. Izvestiya Mathematics, 67(1):145--159, 2003.
[21]
J. Watrous. Space-bounded quantum complexity. Journal of Computer andSystem Sciences, 59:281--326, 1999.
[22]
J. Watrous. On the complexity of simulating space-bounded quantum computations. Computational Complexity, 12:48--84, 2003.
[23]
R. de Wolf. Quantum communication and complexity. Theoretical Computer Science, 287(1):337--352, 2002.
[24]
R. de Wolf. Nondeterministic quantum query and communication complexity. SIAM Journal on Computing, 32(3):681--699, 2003.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Accelerating Quantum Algorithms with PrecomputationQuantum10.22331/q-2024-02-22-12648(1264)Online publication date: 22-Feb-2024
  • (2023)Deterministic Construction of QFAs Based on the Quantum Fingerprinting TechniqueLobachevskii Journal of Mathematics10.1134/S199508022302021X44:2(713-723)Online publication date: 22-May-2023
  • (2023)Quantum Versus Classical Online Streaming Algorithms with Logarithmic Size of MemoryLobachevskii Journal of Mathematics10.1134/S199508022302020844:2(687-698)Online publication date: 22-May-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Exponential separation of quantum and classical online space complexity

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SPAA '06: Proceedings of the eighteenth annual ACM symposium on Parallelism in algorithms and architectures
    July 2006
    344 pages
    ISBN:1595934529
    DOI:10.1145/1148109
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 30 July 2006

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. communication complexity
    2. online
    3. quantum computation
    4. space complexity
    5. streaming algorithms

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    SPAA06
    SPAA06: 18th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures 2006
    July 30 - August 2, 2006
    Massachusetts, Cambridge, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 447 of 1,461 submissions, 31%

    Upcoming Conference

    SPAA '25
    37th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures
    July 28 - August 1, 2025
    Portland , OR , USA

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Accelerating Quantum Algorithms with PrecomputationQuantum10.22331/q-2024-02-22-12648(1264)Online publication date: 22-Feb-2024
    • (2023)Deterministic Construction of QFAs Based on the Quantum Fingerprinting TechniqueLobachevskii Journal of Mathematics10.1134/S199508022302021X44:2(713-723)Online publication date: 22-May-2023
    • (2023)Quantum Versus Classical Online Streaming Algorithms with Logarithmic Size of MemoryLobachevskii Journal of Mathematics10.1134/S199508022302020844:2(687-698)Online publication date: 22-May-2023
    • (2022)The Quantum and Classical Streaming Complexity of Quantum and Classical Max-Cut2022 IEEE 63rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)10.1109/FOCS54457.2022.00054(498-506)Online publication date: Oct-2022
    • (2022)A Quantum Advantage for a Natural Streaming Problem2021 IEEE 62nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)10.1109/FOCS52979.2021.00091(897-908)Online publication date: Feb-2022
    • (2022)Quantum Vs Classical Computing: a Comparative Analysis2022 Seventh International Conference on Fog and Mobile Edge Computing (FMEC)10.1109/FMEC57183.2022.10062753(1-8)Online publication date: 12-Dec-2022
    • (2022)Two-Way and One-Way Quantum and Classical Automata with Advice for Online Minimization ProblemsTheoretical Computer Science10.1016/j.tcs.2022.02.026Online publication date: Feb-2022
    • (2022)Exponential separation between quantum and classical ordered binary decision diagrams, reordering method and hierarchiesNatural Computing10.1007/s11047-022-09904-322:4(723-736)Online publication date: 26-Jul-2022
    • (2020)Two-Way Quantum and Classical Automata with Advice for Online Minimization ProblemsFormal Methods. FM 2019 International Workshops10.1007/978-3-030-54997-8_27(428-442)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2020
    • (2019)Improved constructions of quantum automataTheoretical Computer Science10.1016/j.tcs.2009.01.027410:20(1916-1922)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2019
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media