Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1134271.1134276acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Group and topic discovery from relations and text

Published: 21 August 2005 Publication History

Abstract

We present a probabilistic generative model of entity relationships and textual attributes that simultaneously discovers groups among the entities and topics among the corresponding text. Block-models of relationship data have been studied in social network analysis for some time. Here we simultaneously cluster in several modalities at once, incorporating the words associated with certain relationships. Significantly, joint inference allows the discovery of groups to be guided by the emerging topics, and vice-versa. We present experimental results on two large data sets: sixteen years of bills put before the U.S. Senate, comprising their corresponding text and voting records, and 43 years of similar data from the United Nations. We show that in comparison with traditional, separate latent-variable models for words or Blockstructures for votes, the Group-Topic model's joint inference improves both the groups and topics discovered.

References

[1]
D. Beeferman and A. Berger. Agglomerative clustering of a search engine query log. In SIGKDD, 2000.
[2]
R. Bekkerman, R. E. Yaniv, and A. McCallum. Multi-way distributional clustering via pairwise interactions. In ICML, 2005.
[3]
I. Bhattacharya and L. Getoor. Deduplication and group detection using links. In LinkKDD, 2004.
[4]
D. Blei, A. Ng, and M. Jordan. Latent Dirichlet allocation. JMLR, 3:993--1022, 2003.
[5]
K. Carley. A theory of group stability. American Sociological Review, 56(3):331--354, 1991.
[6]
K. Carley. A comparison of artificial and human organizations. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 56:175--191, 1996.
[7]
G. Cox and K. Poole. On measuring the partisanship in roll-call voting: The U.S. House of Represenatatives, 1887--1999. American Journal of Political Science, 46(1):477--489, 2002.
[8]
W. W. Denham, C. K. McDaniel, and J. R. Atkins. Aranda and Alyawarra kinship: A quantitative argument for a double helix model. American Ethnologist, 6(1):1--24, 1979.
[9]
I. S. Dhillon, S. Mallela, and D. S. Modha. Information-theoretic co-clustering. In SIGKDD, 2003.
[10]
D. Fenn, O. Suleman, J. Efstathiou, and N. Johnson. How does Europe make its mind up? Connections, cliques, and compatibility between countries in the Eurovision song contest. arXiv:physics/0505071, 2005.
[11]
S. Hix, A. Noury, and G. Roland. Power to the parties: Cohesion and competition in the European Parliament, 1979--2001. British Journal of Political Science, 35(2):209--234, 2005.
[12]
A. Jakulin and W. Buntine. Analyzing the US Senate in 2003: Similarities, networks, clusters and blocs, 2004.
[13]
C. Kemp, T. L. Griffiths, and J. Tenenbaum. Discovering latent classes in relational data. Technical report, MIT CSAIL, 2004.
[14]
D. Krackhardt and K. M. Carley. A PCANS model of structure in organization. In Int. Sym. on Command and Control Research and Technology, June 1998.
[15]
J. Kubica, A. Moore, J. Schneider, and Y. Yang. Stochastic link and group detection. In AAAI, 2002.
[16]
A. McCallum, A. Corrada-Emanuel, and X. Wang. Topic and role discovery in social networks. In IJCAI, 2005.
[17]
K. Nowicki and T. A. Snijders. Estimation and prediction for stochastic blockstructures. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96(455), 2001.
[18]
A. Pajala, A. Jakulin, and W. Buntine. Parliamentary group and individual voting behavior in Finnish Parliamentin year 2003: A group cohesion and voting similarity analysis, 2004.
[19]
M. Sparrow. The application of network analysis to criminal intelligence: an assessment of prospects. Social Networks, 13:251--274, 1991.
[20]
E. Voeten. Documenting votes in the UN General Assembly. http://home.gwu.edu/~voeten/UNVoting.htm_Toc82404232.
[21]
S. Wasserman and K. Faust. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, 1994.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A review on network representation learning with multi-granularity perspectiveIntelligent Data Analysis10.3233/IDA-22732828:1(3-32)Online publication date: 3-Feb-2024
  • (2022)Economists in the 2008 financial crisis: Slow to see, fast to actJournal of Financial Stability10.1016/j.jfs.2022.10098660(100986)Online publication date: Jun-2022
  • (2021)How Is Twitter Talking About COVID-19?Advances in Data Science and Information Engineering10.1007/978-3-030-71704-9_7(111-121)Online publication date: 30-Oct-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
LinkKDD '05: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Link discovery
August 2005
101 pages
ISBN:1595932151
DOI:10.1145/1134271
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 August 2005

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. graphical models
  2. relational learning
  3. text modeling

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

KDD05

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 26 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A review on network representation learning with multi-granularity perspectiveIntelligent Data Analysis10.3233/IDA-22732828:1(3-32)Online publication date: 3-Feb-2024
  • (2022)Economists in the 2008 financial crisis: Slow to see, fast to actJournal of Financial Stability10.1016/j.jfs.2022.10098660(100986)Online publication date: Jun-2022
  • (2021)How Is Twitter Talking About COVID-19?Advances in Data Science and Information Engineering10.1007/978-3-030-71704-9_7(111-121)Online publication date: 30-Oct-2021
  • (2019)User group based emotion detection and topic discovery over short textWorld Wide Web10.1007/s11280-019-00760-3Online publication date: 12-Dec-2019
  • (2019)A survey of event analysis and mining from social multimediaMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-019-7567-7Online publication date: 24-Apr-2019
  • (2018)An Empirical Study on Sentiments in Twitter Communities2018 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW)10.1109/ICDMW.2018.00167(1166-1172)Online publication date: Nov-2018
  • (2018)Combining Link and Content for Community DetectionEncyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_214(301-312)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2018
  • (2017)Text and Data Mining of Social Media in Science and Technology Publicity2017 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET)10.23919/PICMET.2017.8125345(1-7)Online publication date: Jul-2017
  • (2017)Relation Topic Model Based on LinksComputer Science and Application10.12677/CSA.2017.7302907:03(232-239)Online publication date: 2017
  • (2017)People Opinion Topic ModelProceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion10.1145/3041021.3051159(1353-1359)Online publication date: 3-Apr-2017
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media