Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article

Designing and evaluating kalas: A social navigation system for food recipes

Published: 01 September 2005 Publication History

Abstract

The idea of social navigation is to aid users to navigate information spaces through making the collective, aggregated, or individual actions of others visible and useful as a basis for making decisions on where to go next and what to choose. These social markers should also help in turning the navigation experience into a social and pleasurable one rather than the tedious, boring, frustrating, and sometimes even scary experience of a lonely traveler. To evaluate whether it is possible to design for social navigation, we built the food recipe system Kalas. It includes several different forms of aggregated trails of user actions and means of communication between users: recommender system functionality (recommendations computed from others' choices), real-time broadcasting of concurrent user activity in the interface, possibilities to comment and vote on recipes, the number of downloads per recipe, and chatting facilities. Recipe author was also included in the recipe description.Kalas was tried with 302 users during six months, and 73 of the users answered a final questionnaire. The overall impression was that users liked and acted on aggregated trails and navigated differently because of them. 18% of the selected recipes came from the list of recommended recipes. About half of the 73 users understood that recommendations were computed from their own and others actions, while the rest had not reflected upon it or had erroneous beliefs. Interestingly, both groups selected a large proportion of their recipes from the recommendations.Unfortunately, there were not enough users to populate the space at every occasion, and thus both chatting and following other users moving in the space was for the most part not possible, but when possible, users move to the space where most other users could be found. Of the other social textures, users themselves claimed to be most influenced by other users' comments attached to the recipes and less by recipe author or number of downloads. Users are more positive to the possibility of expressing themselves in terms of comments and voting than seeing the comments and votes of others.It was noted that users did not pick more recommended recipes towards the end of the study period when the accuracy of recommendations should have been higher. More or less from the start, they picked recommended recipes and went on doing so throughout the whole period.

References

[1]
Breese, J. S., Heckerman, D., and Kadie, C. 1998. Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. 43--52.
[2]
Calderón-Banavides, M. L., González-Caro, C. N., Pérez-Alcázar, J. de J., Garcia-Diaz, J. C., and Delgado, J. 2004. A comparison of several predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering on multi-valued ratings. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. 1033--1039.
[3]
Cosley, D., Lam, S. K., Albert, I., Konstan, J., and Riedl, J. 2003. Is Seeing Believing? How Recommender Systems Influence Users' Opinions. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Fort Lauderdale, FL. 585--592.
[4]
Cosley, S. Lawrence, and D. M. Pennock. 2002. REFEREE: An open framework for practical testing of recommender systems using researchindex. In the 28th International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB'02) Hong Kong.
[5]
Dieberger, A. 1997. Supporting social navigation on the World-Wide Web. Intl. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 46, 6, 805--826.
[6]
Dieberger, A., Dourish, P., Höök, K., Resnick, P., and Wexelblat, A. 2000. Social navigation: techniques for building more usable systems. Interactions (Nov.-Dec.), ACM.
[7]
Dieberger, A. and Lönnqvist, P. 2000. Visualizing interaction history on a collaborative Web server. Hypertext 2000. 220--221.
[8]
Dourish, P. and Chalmers, M. 1994. Running out of space: Models of information navigation. In Proceedings of Human Computer Interaction (HCI'94).
[9]
Erickson, T. 1996. The World Wide Web as social hypertext. Comm. ACM 39, 1, 15--17.
[10]
Erickson, T. 2004. Designing online collaborative environments: Social visualizations as shared resources. In Proceedings of the 9th International Working Conference on the Language-Action Perspective on Communication Modeling (LAP'04). M. Aakhus and M. Lind, Eds. Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.
[11]
Erickson, T., Smith, D. N., Kellogg, A. W., Laff, M., Richards, J. T., John T., and Bradner, E. 1999. Socially translucent systems: Social proxies, persistent conversation, and the design of “babble”. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Pittsburgh, PA. 72--79.
[12]
Girgensohn, A. and Lee, A. 2002. Making Web sites be places for social interaction. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'02). 136--145.
[13]
Herlocker, J., Konstan, J., and Riedl, J. 2000. Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 2--6.
[14]
Hill, W. C., Hollan, J. D., Wroblewski, D., and McCandless, T. 1992. Edit wear and read wear. In Proceedings the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Monterey, CA. 3--9.
[15]
Höök, K., Munro, A., and Benyon, D., Eds. 2002. Designing Information Spaces: The Social Navigation Approach. Springer Verlag.
[16]
Konstan, J. A., Miller, B. N., Maltz, D., Herlocker, J. L., Gordon, L. R., and Riedl, J. 1997. GroupLens: Applying collaborative filtering to usenet news. Comm. ACM 40, 3, 77--87.
[17]
Maglio, P. and Barrett, R. 1999. WebPlaces: Adding people to the web. In the 8th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW8). Toronto, Canada.
[18]
Munro, A. 1999. Fringe Benefits: An ethnographic study of social navigation at the Edinburgh festival. Deliverable 2.1.1 from the PERSONA Project, available from SICS, Stockholm, Sweden.
[19]
Munro, A., Höök, K., and Benyon, D., Eds. 1999. Social Navigation in Information Space. Springer Verlag.
[20]
Shardanand, U. and Maes, P. 1995. Social information filtering: Algorithms for automating “word of mouth”. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'95). Denver, CO. 210--217.
[21]
Streeter, L. A., Vitello, D., and Wonsiewicz, S. A. 1985. How to tell people where to go: Comparing navigational aids. Intl. J. Man-Machine Stud. 22, 549--562.
[22]
Svensson M., Höök, K., Laaksolahti, J., and Waern A. 2001. Social navigation of food recipes. In Proceedings of of the Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'01). Seattle, WA. 341--348.
[23]
Timpka, T. and Hallberg N. 1996. Talking at work---professional advice-seeking at primary healthcare centers. Scand. J. Prim Health Care 14, 130--135.
[24]
Wexelblat, A. 2002. Results from the Footprints project. In Designing Information Spaces: The Social Navigation Approach, K. Höök, A. Munro, and D. Benyon, Eds. Springer Verlag.
[25]
Wexelblat, A. and Maes, P. 1999. Footprints: History--rich tools for information foraging. In Proceeding of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'99). Pittsburgh, PA. 270--277.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Applying “Designerly Framing” to Understand Assisted Feeding as Social Aesthetic Bodily ExperiencesACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/358374212:2(1-23)Online publication date: 14-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Facilitating Mindful Eating with a Voice AssistantProceedings of the 5th International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces10.1145/3571884.3604311(1-6)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2023
  • (2023)Human-Behavior-Based Personalized Meal Recommendation and Menu Planning Social SystemIEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems10.1109/TCSS.2022.321350610:4(2099-2110)Online publication date: Aug-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 12, Issue 3
September 2005
106 pages
ISSN:1073-0516
EISSN:1557-7325
DOI:10.1145/1096737
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 September 2005
Published in TOCHI Volume 12, Issue 3

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Social navigation
  2. collaborative filtering
  3. design
  4. evaluation
  5. experiments

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 25 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Applying “Designerly Framing” to Understand Assisted Feeding as Social Aesthetic Bodily ExperiencesACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/358374212:2(1-23)Online publication date: 14-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Facilitating Mindful Eating with a Voice AssistantProceedings of the 5th International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces10.1145/3571884.3604311(1-6)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2023
  • (2023)Human-Behavior-Based Personalized Meal Recommendation and Menu Planning Social SystemIEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems10.1109/TCSS.2022.321350610:4(2099-2110)Online publication date: Aug-2023
  • (2023)Machine Learning Model for Predicting the Cuisine Category from a Dish Ingredients2023 International Conference on Smart Computing and Application (ICSCA)10.1109/ICSCA57840.2023.10087436(1-6)Online publication date: 5-Feb-2023
  • (2023)The role of technology use in food practices during the COVID-19 pandemicInternational Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science10.1016/j.ijgfs.2023.10068731(100687)Online publication date: Mar-2023
  • (2023)Multimodal Recipe Recommendation System Using Deep Learning and Rule-Based ApproachSN Computer Science10.1007/s42979-023-01870-64:4Online publication date: 26-May-2023
  • (2022)Allergen-Free Food Dataset and Comparative Analysis of Recommendation Algorithms2022 International Conference on Recent Trends in Microelectronics, Automation, Computing and Communications Systems (ICMACC)10.1109/ICMACC54824.2022.10093402(1-6)Online publication date: 28-Dec-2022
  • (2022)Food Affection Determination Through Biosignal Based Affective Computing2022 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Computer Science and Data Engineering (CSDE)10.1109/CSDE56538.2022.10089292(1-5)Online publication date: 18-Dec-2022
  • (2022)Improved Alternative Average Support Value for Automatic Ingredient Substitute Recommendation in Cooking RecipesIntelligent Systems10.1007/978-3-031-21689-3_27(373-387)Online publication date: 19-Nov-2022
  • (2021)Ingredient Substitute Recommendation Based on Collaborative Filtering and Recipe Context for Automatic Allergy-Safe Recipe GenerationProceedings of the Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web10.1145/3470482.3479622(97-104)Online publication date: 5-Nov-2021
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media