Article

Free access

Comparison of models: ex post facto validation/acceptance?

Authors:

David A. Diener,

Heston R. Hicks,

Lawrence L. LongAuthors Info & Claims

WSC '92: Proceedings of the 24th conference on Winter simulation

Pages 1095 - 1103

https://doi.org/10.1145/167293.167850

Published: 01 December 1992 Publication History

PDF eReader

References

[1]

Balci, Osman. 1989. "How to Assess the Acceptability and Credibility of Simulation Results," Proceedings of the 1989 Winter Simulation Conference: 62-71.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[2]

Banks, Jerry and John S. Carson, II. 1984. Discrete- Event System Simulation, Prentice-Hall.

Google Scholar

[3]

Clark, Capt Gregg A. 1987. The Theater Simulation of Airbase Resources and Logistics Composite Models: A Comparison. MS Thesis, AFIT/GLM/LSM/87S- 15. School of Systems and Logistics, Air Force Institute of Technology (AU), Wright-Patterson AFB OH.

Google Scholar

[4]

Diener, David A. 1989. Forecasting Air Base Operability bz a Hostile Environment: Estimating Metamodels From Large-Scale Simulations. PhD Dissertation. Purdue University, West Lafayette IN.

Google Scholar

[5]

Fossett, Christine A. and others. 1991. "An Assessment Procedure for Simulation Models: A Case Study," Operations Research, 39:710-723.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[6]

General Accounting Office. 1979. Guidelines for Model Evaluations, PAD-79-17.

Google Scholar

[7]

1987. DOD Simulations: ImprovedAssessment Procedures Would Increase the Credibility of Results, GAO/PEMD-88-3.

Google Scholar

[8]

Hicks, Heston R. and Lawrence L. Long. 1992. A Comparison of the Tlzeater Simulation of Airbase Resources and the All Mobile Tactical Air Force models. MS Thesis, AFIT/GLM/LSM/92S-XX. School of Systems and Logistics, Air Force Institute of Technology (AU), Wright-Patterson AFB OH.

Google Scholar

[9]

Law, Averill and W. David Kelton. 1991. Simulation Modeling and Analysis, McGraw-Hill.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[10]

Leonhardt, Capt David P. 1991. A Comparison of the All Mobile Tactical Air Force and the Logistics Composite Simulation Models. MS Thesis, AFIT/GLM/LSM/91S-42. School of Systems and Logistics, Air Force Institute of Technology (AU), Wright-Patterson AFB OH.

Google Scholar

[11]

McLean, Robert a. and Virgil L. Anderson. 1984. Applied Factorial and Fractional Designs, Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Google Scholar

[12]

Noble, Capt David R. 1986. Comparison of the TSAR Model to the L COM Model. MS Thesis, AFIT/GLM/LSM/86S-54. School of Systems and Logistics, Air Force Institute of Technology (AU), Wright-Patterson AFB OH.

Google Scholar

[13]

Orlando Technology, Inc. 1989. "ABO Model Comparisons- CBAM/TSAR".

Google Scholar

[14]

Williams, Marion L. and James Sikora. 1991. "SIMVAL Minisymposium - A Report," Phalanx- The Bulletin of Military Operations Research, 24:1-6.

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Robinson SBrooks R(2009)Independent Verification and Validation of an Industrial Simulation ModelSIMULATION10.1177/003754970934158286:7(405-416)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2009
https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549709341582
Wright SBauer K(1997)Covalidation of dissimilarly structured modelsProceedings of the 29th conference on Winter simulation10.1145/268437.268497(311-318)Online publication date: 1-Dec-1997
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/268437.268497

Index Terms

Comparison of models: ex post facto validation/acceptance?
1. Applied computing
  1. Computers in other domains
    1. Military
2. Computing methodologies
  1. Modeling and simulation
    1. Model development and analysis
      1. Model verification and validation
    2. Simulation evaluation

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

WSC '92: Proceedings of the 24th conference on Winter simulation

December 1992

1410 pages

ISBN:0780307984

DOI:10.1145/167293

Chairman:
Robert C. Crain
Wolverine Software Corporation, Annandale, VA

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 December 1992

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Article

Conference

WSC90

Sponsor:

IIE
IEEE-SMCS
ASA
ACM
ORSA
SCS
TIMS
SIGSIM
IEEE-CS
NIST

WSC90: 1990 Winter Simulation Conference

December 13 - 16, 1992

Virginia, Arlington, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 3,413 of 5,075 submissions, 67%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
419
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)20
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Robinson SBrooks R(2009)Independent Verification and Validation of an Industrial Simulation ModelSIMULATION10.1177/003754970934158286:7(405-416)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2009
https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549709341582
Wright SBauer K(1997)Covalidation of dissimilarly structured modelsProceedings of the 29th conference on Winter simulation10.1145/268437.268497(311-318)Online publication date: 1-Dec-1997
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/268437.268497

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Technischer Vergleich von Aufbereitungsverfahren für Gärreste in der Biogastechnik / Technical Comparison of Treatment Processes for Fermentation Residues in Biogas Technology

Numerics of Photonic and Plasmonic Nanostructures with Advanced Material Models

Comparison of Single Bubble and Bubble Swarm Behavior in Narrow Gaps Inside Flat Sheet Membrane Modules / Vergleich des Einzelblasen- und Blasenschwarmverhaltens in engen Kanälen innerhalb von Flachmembranmodulen