Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1402958.1402996acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free access

Ispy: detecting ip prefix hijacking on my own

Published: 17 August 2008 Publication History

Abstract

IP prefix hijacking remains a major threat to the security of the Internet routing system due to a lack of authoritative prefix ownership information. Despite many efforts in designing IP prefix hijack detection schemes, no existing design can satisfy all the critical requirements of a truly effective system: real-time, accurate, light-weight, easily and incrementally deployable, as well as robust in victim notification. In this paper, we present a novel approach that fulfills all these goals by monitoring network reachability from key external transit networks to one's own network through lightweight prefix-owner-based active probing. Using the prefix-owner's view of reachability, our detection system, iSPY, can differentiate between IP prefix hijacking and network failures based on the observation that hijacking is likely to result in topologically more diverse polluted networks and unreachability. Through detailed simulations of Internet routing, 25-day deployment in 88 ASes (108 prefixes), and experiments with hijacking events of our own prefix from multiple locations, we demonstrate that iSPY is accurate with false negative ratio below 0.45% and false positive ratio below 0.17%. Furthermore, iSPY is truly real-time; it can detect hijacking events within a few minutes.

References

[1]
RIPE RIS. http://www.ripe.net/ris/.
[2]
University of Oregon Route Views Archive Project. http://www.routeviews.org.
[3]
B. Augustin, X. Cuvellier, B. Orgogozo, F. Viger, T. Friedman, M. Latapy, C. Magnien, and R. Teixeira. Avoiding traceroute anomalies with paris traceroute. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM IMC, 2006.
[4]
H. Ballani, P. Francis, and X. Zhang. A Study of Prefix Hijacking and Interception in the Internet. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, August 2007.
[5]
P. Boothe, J. Hiebert, and R. Bush. How Prevalent is Prefix Hijacking on the Internet. NANOG36 Talk, February 2006.
[6]
R. Bush, J. Hiebert, O. Maennel, M. Roughan, and S. Uhlig. Testing the reachability of new address space. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM INM, 2007.
[7]
D.-F. Chang, R. Govindan, and J. Heidemann. Exploring the Ability of Locating BGP Missing Routes from Multiple Looking Glasses. In Proc. ACM Workshop on Netw. Troubleshooting, 2004.
[8]
H. Chang, R. Govindan, S. Jamin, S. Shenker, and W. Willinger. Towards capturing representative AS-level Internet topologies. Computer Networks, 44 (6):737--755, April 2004.
[9]
A. Feldmann, O. Maennel, Z. M. Mao, A. Berger, and B. Maggs. Locating Internet Routing Instabilities. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, 2004.
[10]
L. Gao. On Inferring Autonomous System Relationships in the Internet. In Proc. IEEE Global Internet Symposium, 2000.
[11]
Y. He, G. Siganos, M. Faloutsos, and S. V. Krishnamurthy. A systematic framework for unearthing the missing links: Measurements and Impact. In Proc. NSDI, 2007.
[12]
X. Hu and Z. M. Mao. Accurate Real-time Identification of IP Prefix Hijacking. In Proc. IEEE Security and Privacy, 2007.
[13]
Y.-C. Hu, A. Perrig, and M. Sirbu. SPV: A Secure Path Vector Scheme for Securing BGP. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, 2004.
[14]
B. Huffaker. Caida as ranking project. July, 2006, http://ww.caida.org/analysis/topology/rank_as/.
[15]
J. Karlin, J. Karlin, S. Forrest, and J. Rexford. Pretty Good BGP: Improving BGP by Cautiously Adopting Routes. In Proc. ICNP, 2006.
[16]
E. Katz-Bassett, H. V. Madhyastha, J. P. John, A. Krishnamurthy, D. Wetherall, and T. Anderson. Studying Blackholes in the Internet with Hubble. In Proc. NSDI, 2008.
[17]
S. Kent, C. Lynn, and K. Seo. Secure Border Gateway Protocol (Secure-BGP). IEEE J. Selected Areas in Communications, 18 (4):582--592, April 2000.
[18]
M. Lad, D. Massey, D. Pei, Y. Wu, B. Zhang, and L. Zhang. PHAS: A Prefix Hijack Alert System. In Proc. USENIX Security Symposium, 2006.
[19]
M. Lad, R. Oliveira, B. Zhang, and L. Zhang. Understanding resiliency of Internet topology against prefix hijack attacks. In Proc. DSN, 2007.
[20]
H. V. Madhyastha, T. Anderson, A. Krishnamurthy, N. Spring, and A. Venkataramani. iPlane: An information plane for distributed services. In Proc. OSDI, Nov. 2006.
[21]
Z. M. Mao, J. Rexford, J. Wang, and R. Katz. Towards an accurate AS-level traceroute tool. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, 2003.
[22]
J. Ng. Extensions to BGP to Support Secure Origin BGP (soBGP). IETF Draft: draft-ng-sobgp-bgp-extensions-01.txt, November 2002.
[23]
R. Oliveira, D. Pei, W. Willinger, B. Zhang, and L. Zhang. In search of the elusive ground truth: The Internet's AS-level connectivity structure. In Proc. ACM SIGMETRICS, 2008.
[24]
R. Oliveira, B. Zhang, D. Pei, R. Izhak-Ratzin, and L. Zhang. Quantifying path exploration in the Internet. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM IMC, 2006.
[25]
J. Qiu, L. Gao, S. Ranjan, and A. Nucci. Detecting Bogus BGP Route Information: Going Beyond Prefix Hijacking. In Proc. SECURECOMM, 2007.
[26]
A. Ramachandran and N. Feamster. Understanding the network-level behavior of spammers. In Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM, 2006.
[27]
C. A. Shue, A. Kalafut, and M. Gupta. The web is smaller than it seems. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM IMC, 2007.
[28]
N. Spring, R. Mahajan, D. Wetherall, and T. Anderson. Measuring ISP topologies with Rocketfuel. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., 12(1):2--16, 2004.
[29]
L. Subramanian, V. Roth, I. Stoica, S. Shenker, and R. H. Katz. Listen and Whisper: Security Mechanisms for BGP. In Proc. NSDI, 2004.
[30]
R. Teixeira and J. Rexford. A measurement framework for pin-pointing routing changes. In Proc. ACM Workshop on Netw. Troubleshooting, 2004.
[31]
D. Wendlandt, I. Avramopoulos, D. Andersen, and J. Rexford. Don't Secure Routing Protocols, Secure Data Delivery. In Proc. ACM HotNets, 2006.
[32]
J. Wu, Y. Zhang, Z. M. Mao, and K. Shin. Internet Routing Resilience to Failures: Analysis and Implications. In Proc. ACM CoNEXT, 2007.
[33]
W. Xu and J. Rexford. MIRO: multi-path interdomain routing. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, 2006.
[34]
M. Zhang, C. Zhang, V. Pai, L. Peterson, and R. Wang. PlanetSeer: Internet Path Failure Monitoring and Characterization in Wide-Area Services. In Proc. OSDI, Dec. 2004.
[35]
Y. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Z. M. Mao, Y. C. Hu, and B. Maggs. On the impact of route monitor selection. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM IMC, 2007.
[36]
Z. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Y. C. Hu, and Z. M. Mao. Practical Defenses Against BGP Prefix Hijacking. In Proc. ACM CoNEXT, 2007.
[37]
C. Zheng, L. Ji, D. Pei, J. Wang, and P. Francis. A Light-Weight Distributed Scheme for Detecting IP Prefix Hijacks in Realtime. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, 2007.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Modeling the BGP Prefix Hijack via Pollution and Recovery ProcessesBig Data and Social Computing10.1007/978-981-97-5803-6_15(253-265)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
  • (2023)Be Careful of Your Neighbors: Injected Sub-Prefix Hijacking Invisible to Public MonitorsICC 2023 - IEEE International Conference on Communications10.1109/ICC45041.2023.10278923(3774-3780)Online publication date: 28-May-2023
  • (2022)Zeph & Iris map the internetACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review10.1145/3523230.352323252:1(2-9)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGCOMM '08: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2008 conference on Data communication
August 2008
452 pages
ISBN:9781605581750
DOI:10.1145/1402958
  • cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
    ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review  Volume 38, Issue 4
    October 2008
    436 pages
    ISSN:0146-4833
    DOI:10.1145/1402946
    Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 17 August 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. bgp
  2. detection
  3. hijacking
  4. routing

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

SIGCOMM '08
Sponsor:
SIGCOMM '08: ACM SIGCOMM 2008 Conference
August 17 - 22, 2008
WA, Seattle, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 462 of 3,389 submissions, 14%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)131
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)27
Reflects downloads up to 25 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Modeling the BGP Prefix Hijack via Pollution and Recovery ProcessesBig Data and Social Computing10.1007/978-981-97-5803-6_15(253-265)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
  • (2023)Be Careful of Your Neighbors: Injected Sub-Prefix Hijacking Invisible to Public MonitorsICC 2023 - IEEE International Conference on Communications10.1109/ICC45041.2023.10278923(3774-3780)Online publication date: 28-May-2023
  • (2022)Zeph & Iris map the internetACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review10.1145/3523230.352323252:1(2-9)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2022
  • (2022)A multi-view framework for BGP anomaly detection via graph attention networkComputer Networks10.1016/j.comnet.2022.109129214(109129)Online publication date: Sep-2022
  • (2022)Understanding the impact of outsourcing mitigation against BGP prefix hijackingComputer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking10.1016/j.comnet.2021.108650202:COnline publication date: 15-Jan-2022
  • (2021)Estimating the Impact of BGP Prefix Hijacking2021 IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking)10.23919/IFIPNetworking52078.2021.9472813(1-10)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2021
  • (2021)Securing internet applications from routing attacksCommunications of the ACM10.1145/342977564:6(86-96)Online publication date: 24-May-2021
  • (2021)ROAchain: Securing Route Origin Authorization With Blockchain for Inter-Domain RoutingIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management10.1109/TNSM.2020.301555718:2(1690-1705)Online publication date: Jun-2021
  • (2021)ISP Self-Operated BGP Anomaly Detection Based on Weakly Supervised Learning2021 IEEE 29th International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP)10.1109/ICNP52444.2021.9651957(1-11)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2021
  • (2021)A BGP Hijacking Detection Method based on Multi-dimensional Historical Data Analysis2021 International Conference on Computer Communication and Artificial Intelligence (CCAI)10.1109/CCAI50917.2021.9447530(141-145)Online publication date: 7-May-2021
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media