Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article

The concept of 'IT artifact' has outlived its usefulness and should be retired now

Published: 01 January 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Vastly inconsistent definitions of the term "the IT artifact" in leading journals and conferences demonstrate why it no longer means anything in particular and should be retired from the active IS lexicon. Examples from the literature show why artifact-cousins, such as the IS artifact, sociotechnical artifact, social artifact, and ensemble artifact should be used with great care, if not retired as well. Any void created by these retirements could be filled through the following approaches: i relabeling with simple terms that are immediately understandable; ii adopting guidelines for making sense of the whole X-artifact family; and iii sidestepping the IT artifact and focusing directly on IT-enabled work systems in organizations.

References

[1]
<author>Ackoff, R.</author>1981 Creating the Corporate Future. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
[2]
<author>Agarwal, R.</author> &<author>Lucas Jr, H.C.</author>2005 The information systems identity crisis: Focusing on high-visibility and high-impact research. MIS Quarterly, Volume 29 Issue 3, pp.381-398.
[3]
<author>Alter, S.</author>2003 Sidestepping the IT artifact, scrapping the IS silo, and laying claim to "systems in organizations". Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Volume 12, pp.494-526.
[4]
<author>Alter, S.</author>2013 Work system theory: overview of core concepts, extensions, and challenges for the future. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Volume 14 Issue 2, pp.72-121.
[5]
<author>Benbasat, I.</author> &<author>Zmud, R.W.</author>2003 The identity crisis within the IS discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline's core properties. MIS Quarterly, Volume 27 Issue 2, pp.183-194.
[6]
<author>Brynjolfsson, E.</author> &<author>McAfee, A.</author>2011 Race Against the Machine: How the Digital Revolution is Accelerating Innovation, Driving Productivity, and Irreversibly Transforming Employment and the Economy. Digital Frontier Press, Lexington, MA.
[7]
<author>Brynjolfsson, E.</author> &<author>McAfee, A.</author>2014 The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. WW Norton & Company, New York City.
[8]
<author>Callon, M.</author>1986 Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of Saint Brieuc Bay. In: Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, Law, J. ed., pp. pp.196-233. Routledge, London.
[9]
<author>Carroll, L.</author>1917 Through the Looking Glass: And What Alice Found There. Rand, McNally, Chicago. first published in 1872
[10]
<author>Churchman, C.W.</author>1979 The Design of Inquiring Systems: Basic Concepts of Systems and Organizations. Basic Books, New York.
[11]
<author>Davenport, T.H.</author> &<author>Harris, J.G.</author>2005 Automated decision making comes of age. MIT Sloan Management Review, Volume 46 Issue 4, pp.83-89.
[12]
<author>Denning, P.</author>, <author>Comer, D.</author>, <author>Giles, D.</author>, <author>Mulder, M.</author>, <author>Tucker, A.</author><author>Turner, A.J.</author>, et al. 1989 Computing as a discipline: Final report of the task force on the core of computer science. Communications of the ACM, January, pp.9-23.
[13]
<author>De Souza, C.</author>, <author>Froehlich, J.</author> &<author>Dourish, P.</author>2005 Seeking the source: software source code as a social and technical artifact. In Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work, pp.197-206. ACM.
[14]
<author>Engeström, Y.</author>1990 Learning, Working, and Imagining: Twelve Studies in Activity Theory. Orienta-Konsultit Oy, Helsinki.
[15]
<author>Feldman, M.S.</author> &<author>Pentland, B.T.</author>2003 Re-theorizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, Volume 48, pp.94-118.
[16]
<author>Feldman, M.</author> &<author>Orlikowski, W.</author>2011 Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, Volume 22 Issue 5, pp.1240-1253.
[17]
<author>Floyd, C.</author>, <author>Zullighoven, H.</author>, <author>Budde, R.</author> &<author>Keil-Slavik, R.</author>1992 Software Development and Reality Construction. Springer, Berlin.
[18]
<author>Goldkuhl, G.</author>2013 The IT artefact: An ensemble of the social and the technical?-A rejoinder. Systems, Signs & Actions, Volume 7 Issue 1, pp.90-99.
[19]
<author>Gregor, S.</author> &<author>Hevner, A.R.</author>2011 Introduction to the special issue on design science. Information Systems and E-Business Management, Volume 9, pp.1-9.
[20]
<author>Guarino, N.</author>, <author>Bottazzi, E.</author>, <author>Ferrario, R.</author> &<author>Sartor, G.</author>2012 Open ontology-driven sociotechnical systems: Transparency as a key for business resiliency. In: Information Systems: Crossroads for Organization, Management, Accounting and Engineering pp. pp.535-542. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
[21]
<author>Hevner, A.</author>, <author>March, S.T.</author>, <author>Park, J.</author> &<author>Ram, S.</author>2004 Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, Volume 28 Issue 1, pp.75-105.
[22]
<author>Hirschheim, R.</author>, <author>Klein, H.K.</author> &<author>Lyytinen, K.</author>1996 Exploring the intellectual structures of information systems development: a social action theoretic analysis. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, Volume 6 Issue 1, pp.1-64.
[23]
<author>Houston, R.</author> &<author>Jackson, M.H.</author>2003 Technology and context within research on international development programs: positioning an integrationist perspective. Communication Theory, Volume 13 Issue 1, pp.57-77.
[24]
ICIS 2013 Website2013 IT Artifact, viewed on Jan. 15, 2014 at "http://icis2013.aisnet.org/index.php/tracks/104-it-artifact"
[25]
<author>Joerges, B.</author>1996 Large technical systems and the discourse of complexity. Ingelstam. L. 1996, Complex Technical Systems, <bookSeriesTitle>Swedish Council for Planning and Coordination of Research</bookSeriesTitle>, Affärs Litteratur, Stockholm, pp.55-72.
[26]
<author>Kaptelinin, V.</author> &<author>Nardi, B.E.</author>2006 Acting With Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge.
[27]
<author>Lee, A.S.</author>, <author>Manoj, A.T.</author> &<author>Baskerville, R.L.</author>2013 Going back to basics in design: from the IT artifact to the IS artifact AMCIS 2013.
[28]
<author>Lins, F.</author>, <author>Damasceno, J.</author>, <author>Souza, A.</author>, <author>Silva, B.</author>, <author>Aragão, D.</author>, <author>Medeiros, R.</author>, et al. 2012 Towards automation of SOA-based business processes. International Journal of Computer Science, Engineering and Applications Volume 2 Issue 2, pp.1-17.
[29]
<author>March, S.</author> &<author>Smith, G.</author>1995 Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems, Volume 15, pp.251-266.
[30]
<author>Markus, M.L.</author>1984 Systems in Organizations: Bugs & Features. Pitman, Boston, MA.
[31]
<author>Markus, M.L.</author> &<author>Silver, M.S.</author>2008 A foundation for the study of IT effects: a new look at DeSanctis and Poole's concepts of structural features and spirit. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Volume 9 Issue 10, pp.609-632.
[32]
<author>Matook, S.</author> &<author>Brown, S.A.</author>2008 Conceptualizing the IT artifact for MIS research. In 24th International Conference on Information Systems ICIS 2008 Vol. 14, No. Paper 102, pp. pp.1-11. Association for Information Systems.
[33]
<author>Miller, K.W.</author>2013 A secret sociotechnical system. IT Professional, Volume 15 Issue 4, pp.0057-59.
[34]
<author>Motahari Nezhad, H.R.</author>, <author>Benatallah, B.</author>, <author>Casati, F.</author> &<author>Saint-Paul, R.</author>2011 From business processes to process spaces. Internet Computing, IEEE, Volume 15 Issue 1, pp.22-30.
[35]
<author>Orlikowski, W.J.</author>1992 The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, Volume 3 Issue 3, pp.398-427.
[36]
<author>Orlikowski, W.J.</author> &<author>Iacono, C.S.</author>2001 Research commentary: Desperately seeking the" IT" in IT research-a call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research, Volume 12 Issue 2, pp.121-134.
[37]
<author>Orlikowski, W.J.</author> &<author>Scott, S.V.</author>2008 Sociomateriality: challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, Volume 2 Issue 1, pp.433-474.
[38]
<author>Overbye, D.</author>2014 Over the side with old scientific tenets, New York Times, Jan. 14, 2014.
[39]
<author>Pathak, J.</author>2013 Extensible business reporting language XBRL: a note on need to study XBRL as a social artifact. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems IGI. forthcoming
[40]
<author>Pinch, T.J.</author> &<author>Bijker, W.E.</author>1987 The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of. The Social Constructions of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, pp.17.
[41]
<author>Rose, J.</author>, <author>Jones, M.R.</author> &<author>Truex, D.</author>2005 Socio-theoretic accounts of IS: the problem of agency. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, Volume 17 Issue 1, pp.133-152.
[42]
<author>Sarker, S.</author>, <author>Chatterjee, S.</author> &<author>Xiao, X.</author>2013 How "sociotechnical" is our IS research? an assessment and possible ways forward. In The 34th International Conference on Information Systems. ICIS 2013.
[43]
<author>Sein, M.K.</author>, <author>Henfridsson, O.</author>, <author>Purao, S.</author>, <author>Rossi, M.</author> &<author>Lindgren, R.</author>2011 Action design research. MIS Quarterly, Volume 35 Issue 1, pp.37-56.
[44]
<author>Silver, M.</author> &<author>Markus, L.</author>2013 Conceptualizing the SocioTechnical ST artifact. Systems, Signs & Actions, Volume 7 Issue 1, pp.82-89.
[45]
<author>Skyttner, L.</author>2005 General Systems Theory: Problems, Perspectives, Practice. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore.
[46]
<author>Taylor, J.</author> &<author>Raden, N.</author>2007 Smart enough systems: How to deliver competitive advantage by automating hidden decisions. Pearson Education.
[47]
<author>Winograd, T.</author> &<author>Flores, K.E.</author>1986 Understanding Computers and Cognition. Ablex, Norwood, NJ.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Leveraging Digital Technologies in Logistics 4.0: Insights on Affordances from Intralogistics ProcessesInformation Systems Frontiers10.1007/s10796-023-10394-626:2(755-774)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2024
  • (2022)The Role of Machine Learning in Creating and Capturing ValueInternational Journal of Software Science and Computational Intelligence10.4018/IJSSCI.31222914:1(1-19)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2022
  • (2022)Nature and purpose of visual artifacts in design science researchInformation Systems and e-Business Management10.1007/s10257-022-00559-220:3(515-550)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Information Systems Journal
Information Systems Journal  Volume 25, Issue 1
January 2015
63 pages
ISSN:1350-1917
EISSN:1365-2575
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 January 2015

Author Tags

  1. IS artifact
  2. IT artifact
  3. ensemble artifact
  4. rigour and relevance
  5. social artifact
  6. sociotechnical artifact
  7. technical artifact

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 03 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Leveraging Digital Technologies in Logistics 4.0: Insights on Affordances from Intralogistics ProcessesInformation Systems Frontiers10.1007/s10796-023-10394-626:2(755-774)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2024
  • (2022)The Role of Machine Learning in Creating and Capturing ValueInternational Journal of Software Science and Computational Intelligence10.4018/IJSSCI.31222914:1(1-19)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2022
  • (2022)Nature and purpose of visual artifacts in design science researchInformation Systems and e-Business Management10.1007/s10257-022-00559-220:3(515-550)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2022
  • (2020)The Philosopher's CornerACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems10.1145/3433148.343315551:4(123-138)Online publication date: 2-Nov-2020
  • (2019)The sociotechnical axis of cohesion for the IS disciplineMIS Quarterly10.25300/MISQ/2019/1374743:3(695-720)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2019
  • (2018)Desperately Seeking the Information in Information Systems ResearchACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems10.1145/3242734.324273649:3(10-18)Online publication date: 25-Jul-2018
  • (2018)EditorialInformation Systems Journal10.1111/isj.1205025:1(1-4)Online publication date: 12-Dec-2018
  • (2018)Design for social media engagementThe Journal of Strategic Information Systems10.1016/j.jsis.2015.04.00224:2(128-145)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2018
  • (2016)EditorialACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems10.1145/3025099.302510147:4(10-22)Online publication date: 13-Dec-2016

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media