Article

Rating Compiler Optimizations for Automatic Performance Tuning

Authors:

Rudolf EigenmannAuthors Info & Claims

SC '04: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM/IEEE conference on Supercomputing

Page 14

https://doi.org/10.1109/SC.2004.47

Published: 06 November 2004 Publication History

Abstract

To achieve maximum performance gains through compiler optimization, most automatic performance tuning systems use a feed-back directed approach to rate the code versions generated under different optimization options and to search for the best one. They all face the problem that code versions are only comparable if they run under the same execution context. This paper proposes three accurate, fast and flexible rating approaches that address this problem. The three methods identify comparable execution contexts, model relationships between contexts, or force re-execution of the code under the same context, respectively. We apply these methods in an automatic offline tuning scenario. Our performance tuning system improves the program performance of a selection of SPEC CPU 2000 benchmarks by up to 178% (26% on average). Our techniques reduce program tuning time by up to 96% (80% on average), compared to the state-of-the-art tuning scenario that compares optimization techniques using whole-program execution.

References

[1]

{1} William Blume and Rudolf Eigenmann. Symbolic range propagation. In the 9th International Parallel Processing Symposium, pages 357-363, 1995.

Digital Library

[2]

{2} Kingsum Chow and Youfeng Wu. Feedback-directed selection and characterization of compiler optimizations. In Second Workshop on Feedback Directed Optimizations, Israel, November 1999.

[3]

{3} Keith D. Cooper, Devika Subramanian, and Linda Torczon. Adaptive optimizing compilers for the 21st century. The Journal of Supercomputing, 23(1):7-22, 2002.

Digital Library

[4]

{4} Pedro C. Diniz and Martin C. Rinard. Dynamic feedback: An effective technique for adaptive computing. In SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pages 71-84, 1997.

Digital Library

[5]

{5} Free Software Foundation, http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.3.3/gcc/. GCC online documentation, 2003.

[6]

{6} Elana D. Granston and Anne Holler. Automatic recommendation of compiler options. In 4th Workshop on Feedback-Directed and Dynamic Optimization (FDDO-4). December 2001.

[7]

{7} Brian Grant, Matthai Philipose, Markus Mock, Craig Chambers, and Susan J. Eggers. An evaluation of staged run-time optimizations in dyc. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 1999 conference on Programming language design and implementation, pages 293-304. ACM Press, 1999.

Digital Library

[8]

{8} Toru Kisuki, Peter M. W. Knijnenburg, Michael F. P. O'Boyle, Francois Bodin, and Harry A. G. Wijshoff. A feasibility study in iterative compilation. In ISHPC, pages 121-132, 1999.

Digital Library

[9]

{9} Peter Lee and Mark Leone. Optimizing ML with run-time code generation. In SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pages 137-148, 1996.

Digital Library

[10]

{10} Markus Mock, Craig Chambers, and Susan J. Eggers. Calpa: a tool for automating selective dynamic compilation. In International Symposium on Microarchitecture, pages 291-302, 2000.

Digital Library

[11]

{11} Zhelong Pan and Rudolf Eigenmann. Compiler optimization orchestration for peak performance. Technical Report TR-ECE-04-01, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, 2004.

[12]

{12} Mark Stephenson, Saman Amarasinghe, Martin Martin, and Una-May O'Reilly. Meta optimization: improving compiler heuristics with machine learning. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 2003 conference on Programming language design and implementation, pages 77-90. ACM Press, 2003.

Digital Library

[13]

{13} Spyridon Triantafyllis, Manish Vachharajani, Neil Vachharajani, and David I. August. Compiler optimization-space exploration. In Proceedings of the international symposium on Code generation and optimization, pages 204-215, 2003.

Digital Library

[14]

{14} Michael Voss and Rudolf Eigenmann. ADAPT: Automated de-coupled adaptive program transformation. In International Conference on Parallel Processing, pages 163-170, 2000.

Digital Library

[15]

{15} Michael J. Voss and Rudolf Eigemann. High-level adaptive program optimization with ADAPT. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 36(7):93-102, 2001.

Digital Library

[16]

{16} R. Clint Whaley and Jack J. Dongarra. Automatically tuned linear algebra software. Technical Report UT-CS-97-366, 1997.

Digital Library

[17]

{17} Kamen Yotov, Xiaoming Li, Gang Ren, Michael Cibulskis, Gerald DeJong, Maria Garzaran, David Padua, Keshav Pingali, Paul Stodghill, and Peng Wu. A comparison of empirical and model-driven optimization. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 2003 conference on Programming language design and implementation, pages 63-76. ACM Press, 2003.

Digital Library

Cited By

Ashouri AKillian WCavazos JPalermo GSilvano C(2018)A Survey on Compiler Autotuning using Machine LearningACM Computing Surveys10.1145/319797851:5(1-42)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3197978
Cammarota RNicolau AVeidenbaum AKejariwal ADonato DMadhugiri M(2013)On the determination of inlining vectors for program optimizationProceedings of the 22nd international conference on Compiler Construction10.1007/978-3-642-37051-9_9(164-183)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2013
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-642-37051-9_9
Suprapto Wardoyo R(2013)Algorithms of the combination of compiler optimization options for automatic performance tuningProceedings of the 2013 international conference on Information and Communication Technology10.1007/978-3-642-36818-9_10(91-100)Online publication date: 25-Mar-2013
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-642-36818-9_10
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Tuning compiler optimizations for simultaneous multithreading
MICRO 30: Proceedings of the 30th annual ACM/IEEE international symposium on Microarchitecture

Compiler optimizations are often driven by specific assumptions about the underlying architecture and implementation of the target machine. For example, when targeting shared-memory multiprocessors, parallel programs are compiled to minimize sharing, in ...
Tuning Compiler Optimizations for Simultaneous Multithreading
Special issue on the 30th annual ACM/IEEE international symposium on microarchitecture, part II

Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT) is a processor architectural technique that promises to significantly improve the utilization and performance of modern wide-issue superscalar processors. An SM T processor is capable of issuing multiple instructions ...
Fast, automatic, procedure-level performance tuning
PACT '06: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Parallel architectures and compilation techniques

This paper presents an automated performance tuning solution, which partitions a program into a number of tuning sections and finds the best combination of compiler options for each section. Our solution builds on prior work on feedback-driven ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

SC '04: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM/IEEE conference on Supercomputing

November 2004

724 pages

ISBN:0769521533

General Chair:
Jeff Huskamp

Sponsors

SIGARCH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Architecture
IEEE-CS: Computer Society

Publisher

IEEE Computer Society

United States

Publication History

Published: 06 November 2004

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Article

Conference

SC '04

Sponsor:

SIGARCH
IEEE-CS

SC '04: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis

November 6 - 12, 2004

Acceptance Rates

SC '04 Paper Acceptance Rate 60 of 200 submissions, 30%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,516 of 6,373 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

9
Total Citations
View Citations
23
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)3
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

Reflects downloads up to 22 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Ashouri AKillian WCavazos JPalermo GSilvano C(2018)A Survey on Compiler Autotuning using Machine LearningACM Computing Surveys10.1145/319797851:5(1-42)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3197978
Cammarota RNicolau AVeidenbaum AKejariwal ADonato DMadhugiri M(2013)On the determination of inlining vectors for program optimizationProceedings of the 22nd international conference on Compiler Construction10.1007/978-3-642-37051-9_9(164-183)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2013
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-642-37051-9_9
Suprapto Wardoyo R(2013)Algorithms of the combination of compiler optimization options for automatic performance tuningProceedings of the 2013 international conference on Information and Communication Technology10.1007/978-3-642-36818-9_10(91-100)Online publication date: 25-Mar-2013
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-642-36818-9_10
Chen YFang SHuang YEeckhout LFursin GTemam OWu C(2012)Deconstructing iterative optimizationACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization10.1145/2355585.23555949:3(1-30)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2012
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2355585.2355594
Fursin GTemam O(2010)Collective optimizationACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization10.1145/1880043.18800477:4(1-29)Online publication date: 30-Dec-2010
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1880043.1880047
Pan ZEigenmann R(2008)PEAK—a fast and effective performance tuning system via compiler optimization orchestrationACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems10.1145/1353445.135345130:3(1-43)Online publication date: 21-May-2008
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1353445.1353451
Johnson TEigenmann RVijaykumar TYelick KMellor-Crummey J(2007)Speculative thread decomposition through empirical optimizationProceedings of the 12th ACM SIGPLAN symposium on Principles and practice of parallel programming10.1145/1229428.1229474(205-214)Online publication date: 14-Mar-2007
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1229428.1229474
Pan ZEigenmann RAltman ESkadron KZorn B(2006)Fast, automatic, procedure-level performance tuningProceedings of the 15th international conference on Parallel architectures and compilation techniques10.1145/1152154.1152182(173-181)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2006
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1152154.1152182
Pan ZEigenmann R(2006)Fast and Effective Orchestration of Compiler Optimizations for Automatic Performance TuningProceedings of the International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization10.1109/CGO.2006.38(319-332)Online publication date: 26-Mar-2006
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/CGO.2006.38

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents