Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1109/ROMAN.2018.8525604guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
research-article

“How was Your Stay?”: Exploring the Use of Robots for Gathering Customer Feedback in the Hospitality Industry

Published: 27 August 2018 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents four exploratory studies of the potential use of robots for gathering customer feedback in the hospitality industry. To account for the viewpoints of both hotels and guests, we administered need finding interviews at five hotels and an online survey concerning hotel guest experiences with 60 participants. We then conducted the two deployment studies based on deploying software prototypes for Savioke Relay robots we designed to collect customer feedback: (i) a hotel deployment study (three hotels over three months) to explore the feasibility of robot use for gathering customer feedback as well as issues such deployment might pose and (ii) a hotel kitchen deployment study (at Savioke headquarters over three weeks) to explore the role of different robot behaviors (mobility and social attributes) in gathering feedback and understand the customers' thought process in the context that they experience a service. We found that hotels want to collect customer feedback in real-time to disseminate positive feedback immediately and to respond to unhappy customers while they are still on-site. Guests want to inform the hotel staff about their experiences without compromising their convenience and privacy. We also found that the robot users, e.g. hotel staff, use their domain knowledge to increase the response rate to customer feedback surveys at the hotels. Finally, environmental factors, such as robot's location in the building influenced customer response rates more than altering the behaviors of the robot collecting the feedback.

References

[1]
J Weed, “Checking in after checkout,” The New York Times, May 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/28/business/hotels-work-harder-to-collect-customer-responses.html.
[2]
W Burgard, A. B Cremers, D Fox, D. Hähnel, G Lakemeyer, D Schulz, W Steiner, and S Thrun, “Experiences with an interactive museum tour-guide robot,” Artificial intelligence, vol. 114, no. 1-2, pp. 3–55, 1999.
[3]
R Gockley, A Bruce, J. Forlizzi, M. Michalowski, A. Mundell, S. Rosenthal, B. Sellner, R. Simmons, K. Snipes, A. C. Schultz, et al., “Designing robots for long-term social interaction,” in Proc. of IROS, 2005, pp. 1338–1343.
[4]
T Kanda, D. F Glas, M Shiomi, H Ishiguro, and N Hagita, “Who will be the customer?: A social robot that anticipates people's behavior from their trajectories,” in Proc. of UBICOMP, 2008, pp. 380–389.
[5]
C Shi, M Shiomi, C Smith, T Kanda, and H Ishiguro, “A model of distributional handing interaction for a mobile robot.” in Proc. of RSS, 2013, pp. 24–28.
[6]
L Moshkina, S Trickett, and J. G Trafton, “Social engagement in public places: a tale of one robot,” in Proc. of HRI, 2014, pp. 382–389.
[7]
A. M Rosenthal-von der Pütten, N. C Krämer, L Hoffmann, S Sobieraj, and S. C Eimler, “An experimental study on emotional reactions towards a robot,” International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 17–34, 2013.
[8]
B Mutlu and J Forlizzi, “Robots in organizations: the role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human-robot interaction,” in Proc. of HRI, 2008, pp. 287–294.
[9]
C Pantofaru and L Takayama, “Need finding: A tool for directing robotics research and development,” in RSS Workshop on Perspectives and Contributions to robotics from the human sciences, 2011.
[10]
C Pantofaru, L Takayama, T Foote, and B Soto, “Exploring the role of robots in home organization,” in Proc. of HRI, 2012, pp. 327–334.
[11]
D. E Karreman, E. M van Dijk, and V Evers, “Using the visitor experiences for mapping the possibilities of implementing a robotic guide in outdoor sites,” in Proc. of RO-MAN, 2012, pp. 1059–1065.
[12]
M Joosse, M Lohse, and V Evers, “How a guide robot should behave at an airport insights based on observing passengers,” CTIT Technical Report Series, no. TR-CTIT-15–01, 2015.
[13]
S Azenkot, C Feng, and M Cakmak, “Enabling building service robots to guide blind people a participatory design approach,” in Proc. of HRI, 2016, pp. 3–10.
[14]
D Bohus, C. W Saw, and E Horvitz, “Directions robot: in-the-wild experiences and lessons learned,” in Proc. of AAMAS, 2014, pp. 637–644.
[15]
D Karreman, G Ludden, and V Evers, “Visiting cultural heritage with a tour guide robot: a user evaluation study in-the-wild,” in Proc. of ICSR, 2015, pp. 317–326.
[16]
M.J.-Y. Chung, A. Pronobis, M. Cakmak, D. Fox, and R. P. Rao, “Au-tonomous question answering with mobile robots in human-populated environments,” in Proc. of IROS, 2016, pp. 823–830.
[17]
D Hebesberger, C Dondrup, T Koertner, C Gisinger, and J Pripfl, “Lessons learned from the deployment of a long-term autonomous robot as companion in physical therapy for older adults with dementia: A mixed methods study,” in Proc. of HRI, 2016, pp. 27–34.
[18]
M. K Lee, J Forlizzi, P. E Rybski, F Crabbe, W Chung, J Finkle, E Glaser, and S Kiesler, “The snackbot: documenting the design of a robot for long-term human-robot interaction,” in Proc. of HRI, 2009, pp. 7–14.
[19]
N Doering, S Poeschl, H.-M Gross, A Bley, C Martin, and H.-J Boehme, “User-centered design and evaluation of a mobile shopping robot,” International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 203–225, 2015.
[20]
R Pinillos, S Marcos, R Feliz, E Zalama, and J. Gómez-García-Bermejo, “Long-term assessment of a service robot in a hotel environment,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 79, pp. 40–57, 2016.
[21]
M Tonkin, J Vitale, S Herse, M.-A Williams, W Judge, and X Wang, “Design methodology for the ux of hri: A field study of a commercial social robot at an airport,” in Proc. of HRI. ACM, 2018, pp. 407–415.
[22]
M. J.-Y. Chung and M. Cakmak, “Exploring the use of robots for gathering customer feedback in the hospitality industry,” in HRI Workshop on Social Robots in the Wild, 2018.
[23]
T. J Levesque and G. H McDougall, “Service problems and recovery strategies: an experiment,” Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 20–37, 2000.
[24]
M Dixon, K Freeman, and N Toman, “Stop trying to delight your customers,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 88, no. 7/8, pp. 116–122, 2010.
[25]
M Heerink, B Krose, V Evers, and B Wielinga, “Measuring acceptance of an assistive social robot: a suggested toolkit,” in Proc. of RO-MAN, 2009, pp. 528–533.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)First Impressions Are Essential: Testing Attraction Strategies for Robot-Human Interaction in the Higher Education DomainProceedings of the 2023 7th International Conference on Software and e-Business10.1145/3641067.3641070(57-63)Online publication date: 21-Dec-2023
  • (2020)Learning to Engage with Interactive SystemsACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/340887610:1(1-29)Online publication date: 20-Oct-2020

Index Terms

  1. “How was Your Stay?”: Exploring the Use of Robots for Gathering Customer Feedback in the Hospitality Industry
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Guide Proceedings
    2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)
    Aug 2018
    1195 pages

    Publisher

    IEEE Press

    Publication History

    Published: 27 August 2018

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)First Impressions Are Essential: Testing Attraction Strategies for Robot-Human Interaction in the Higher Education DomainProceedings of the 2023 7th International Conference on Software and e-Business10.1145/3641067.3641070(57-63)Online publication date: 21-Dec-2023
    • (2020)Learning to Engage with Interactive SystemsACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/340887610:1(1-29)Online publication date: 20-Oct-2020

    View Options

    View options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media